
Miliband says UK's way of life ‘under threat' amid extremes of heat and rainfall
From earlier spring events in nature to record warm periods in 2024, which have already been beaten again this year, Met Office experts say the UK's climate is 'notably different' from just a few decades ago.
The report details the climate in 2024, and over the longer term, highlighting how the UK has warmed at a rate of about 0.25C a decade and is now about 1.24C warmer than from 1961 to 1990.
For the first time, the report also found UK sea levels to be rising faster than the global average.
The Energy Secretary called the findings 'a stark warning' to take action on climate and nature.
'Our British way of life is under threat,' Mr Miliband told the PA news agency.
'Whether it is extreme heat, droughts, flooding, we can see it actually with our own eyes, that it's already happening, and we need to act.
'That's why the Government has a central mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower and tackle the climate crisis.'
On those who oppose Labour's green policies, he said: '(U)nless, we act on the cause of what is happening, the cause of what is changing our climate, then we will be betraying future generations.'
He spoke during a visit to a project restoring a rare alkaline fen at Hinksey Heights, Oxfordshire, with Environment Secretary Steve Reed, ahead of the report's release.
Conservationists told the ministers how the fen, which is part of a national effort to expand the country's best freshwater habitats, was helping to boost wetland biodiversity and sequester planet-heating carbon in the atmosphere.
Responding to the report, Mr Reed told PA it 'lays absolutely bare the damaging impact of climate change on people living in this country'.
But he said that through projects like the fen, 'we're tackling the problem of nature loss and also we're tackling the problem of climate change at the same time'.
One year in, Labour has been fiercely criticised over its approach to the environment, including concerns around planning reforms sidelining nature in pursuit of growth.
The Environment Secretary defended the Government's actions, pointing to boosting funding for sustainable farming and developing the nature restoration fund so that money from house builders goes towards more impactful landscape-scale projects.
'We'd become one of the most nature-depleted countries on earth,' he said. 'This Government is calling time on that decline.'
Elsewhere, the report said that the last three years have been in the top five warmest on record for the UK.
Last year was the fourth warmest in records dating back to 1884, while the year had the warmest May and warmest spring on record – already beaten by 2025's record hot spring.
But Mike Kendon, Met Office climate scientist and lead author of the report, said: 'It's the extremes of temperature and rainfall that is changing the most, and that's of profound concern, and that's going to continue in the future.'
The hottest summer days have warmed about twice as much as average summer days have in the past decade in some parts of the UK, according to new analysis in the report.
And as the UK's climate warms, it is also getting wetter, with extremes of rainfall, floods and storms in 2024, as in recent years.
England and Wales had the wettest winter from October 2023 to March 2024 on record in more than 250 years, as floods hit Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, the West Midlands and eastern Scotland.
But while red warnings were issued for storm Isha in January and storm Darragh in December, observations do not currently suggest the UK is becoming stormier or windier.
Overall, however, the country's weather is changing because of rising greenhouse gases pushing up global temperature, Mr Kendon said, with records being broken 'very frequently'.
'Every year that goes by is another upward step on the warming trajectory our climate is on,' he said.
'Observations show that our climate in the UK is now notably different to what it was just a few decades ago.'
The report also said tide gauge records since the 1900s show sea level rise around the UK is speeding up, with two-thirds of the rise of that time taking place in just the last three decades.
Dr Svetlana Jevrejeva, from the National Oceanography Centre, said the UK's coasts would start to see more events where rising sea levels combined with high tides would lead to coastal inundation, even without storms.
'This extra sea level rise contribution is leading to an increase in the frequency of extreme sea levels and an intensification of coastal hazards,' she said.
To highlight the impact of the UK's warming climate on wildlife, the report drew on Nature's Calendar, a volunteer-fed database of the natural signs of the changing seasons managed by the Woodland Trust.
Records for 2024 show that spring was earlier than average for 12 of the 13 spring events monitored, and the earliest in the data running back to 1999 for frogspawn appearing and blackbirds nesting.
The period of the year in which leaves were on trees from spring to autumn was also longer than average, mostly because of the earlier spring in 2024.
Chief executive of the Royal Meteorological Society, Professor Liz Bentley, said the report reinforced the 'clear and urgent signals of our changing climate'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
4 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Patrick Harvie slams Swinney over plans to meet with Trump
'We've all watched in recent months as the US President has sent troops to threaten their own citizens on the streets of Los Angeles, kidnapped innocent people under the guise of mass deportations and now they are constructing a concentration camp in Florida. 'This is a man who has a complete lack of respect for human rights and democracy in America, and whose climate denial threatens everyone around the world.' Patrick Harvie has slammed the government's decision to meet with Mr Trump. (Image: PA) Meanwhile, the First Minister has declined to address criticism over his decision to meet with Mr Trump, after previously stating the American president's state visit should be cancelled. In March, Mr Swinney said: 'If the US withdraws support from Ukraine, abandoning an ally and betraying democracy, the State Visit cannot go ahead. That is simply unimaginable." "If, despite what President Trump said, a state visit can help solidify US support for Ukraine; if the US maintains its support for Ukraine, then perhaps it can proceed. Right now, given shocking events, however, it is hard to believe the visit can happen." Asked if the First Minister accepted that his decision to meet with Mr Trump could be viewed as a 'u-turn' given his previous comments, a government spokesperson declined to answer, instead directing The Herald to a statement issued yesterday. The statement read: "The Scottish Government has been working collaboratively on arrangements with partners including Police Scotland on the visit of the President of the United States. 'There are plans for the First Minister to meet with the President when he is in Scotland. It is important that the opportunity to promote the interests of Scotland is taken during this visit." The Herald also asked if Mr Swinney believed Mr Trump's views on Ukraine had softened enough to warrant a state visit. However, the spokesperson declined to comment. John Swinney has agreed to meet with Donald Trump. (Image: Jane Barlow) Previously, Mr Swinney met with Mr Trump's son Eric at Bute House in March, and phoned the president last winter to congratulate him on his re-election. Mr Harvie added: 'The SNP's decision to meet with this convicted felon is a tragic one, and is out of step with Scotland's values. Appeasing political extremists like Trump won't save us from his misinformation and toxic rhetoric. "His Vice President has already attacked our parliament by lying to international media about a bill passed by Green MSP Gillian Mackay. Read more: Scots folk singer slams Aberdeen City Council over arts venue funding NHS board spent £269,000 in battle against rats, birds, insects, and rabbits 'A grim reality': Glasgow City Council spent £106m to house homeless last year 'If the Scottish Government won't make it clear to Trump, then I'm sure the people of Scotland on the streets protesting his every move will make it loud and clear. Donald Trump is not welcome here.' Mr Trump is expected to visit his golf courses in Aberdeenshire and Ayrshire for several days later this month. He will also meet with Sir Keir Starmer in Aberdeen ahead of an official state visit in September. Up to 5,000 police officers could be deployed on 12 hour shifts, and protests are expected to take place.


The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump encounters rare uproar from ardent rightwing allies over Jeffrey Epstein
Donald Trump managed something unusual last week. In his administration's claim that it did not have a list of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged clients, and that the convicted sex offender was not murdered, it succeeded in upsetting the rightwing influencers and commentators – and reportedly even Trump's deputy FBI director – people who typically champion his every move. 'This stinks. This just reeks,' was the verdict of Jesse Watters, the primetime Fox News host. He added: 'The feds spent decades investigating Epstein and have had total access to his property for years, they still cannot give us a straight answer? This is not anything new; the government has been keeping us in the dark for generations.' Watters was careful not to criticize the Trump administration directly, blaming 'the feds' as he described Pam Bondi, the attorney general, and Kash Patel, the director of the FBI, as 'great Americans'. There was also tumult within the Trump administration. Dan Bongino, the deputy FBI director and former rightwing podcast host, spent years pushing Epstein conspiracy theories, and was reportedly very upset with Bondi over how the Epstein files were handled. 'Bongino is out-of-control furious,' a source close to Bongino told NBC News. 'This destroyed his career. He's threatening to quit and torch Pam unless she's fired.' Axios reported that Bongino didn't show up to work on Friday, and the row prompted Trump himself to step in. Asked by reporters on Sunday if Bongino would remain in his position, Trump said: 'Oh I think so ... I spoke to him today. Dan Bongino, very good guy. I've known him a long time. I've done his show many, many times. He sounded terrific, actually.' But within the rightwing, Epstein-curious sphere, others had continued to wade in. 'Pam Blondi [sic] is covering up child sex crimes that took place under HER WATCH when she was Attorney General of Florida,' wrote Laura Loomer, the 32-year-old conspiracy theorist whose influence over Trump has come under scrutiny. Loomer accused Bondi of failing to pursue legal action against Epstein, despite lawsuits being filed against him in the Florida. 'She is afraid of that being discussed and brought to light. She needs to be fired. She has tainted the investigation,' Loomer concluded. Epstein died by suicide while in federal custody in August 2019, but his death was pounced on by rightwing conspiracy theorists, who believe he may have been killed before he could implicate famous associates. One of the most pervasive theories has been that Epstein kept a 'client list' of people who participated in illicit activities – typically the right has claimed that the list includes the names of prominent left-leaning politicians and celebrities. Bondi appeared to confirm the existence of such a list during an interview with Fox News in February. Bondi was asked: 'The DOJ [Department of Justice] may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients, will that really happen?' She responded: 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review.' That added fuel to conspiracy theorists' fire, but the blaze was doused last Monday, when the justice department said that Epstein did not keep a client list, and said no more files related to his sex-trafficking investigation would be made public. The White House claimed Bondi had been talking about the 'entirety of all of the paperwork and relation to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes', which satisfied few rightwing commentators, many of whom have built careers on propagating conspiracy theories. 'We were all told more was coming. That answers were out there and would be provided. Incredible how utterly mismanaged this Epstein mess has been. And it didn't have to be,' said Jack Posobiec, who promoted the baseless theory that high-level Democrats were running a child sex ring out of a Washington pizzeria. Posobiec was among a group of rightwing influencers who were given binders labeled 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1' during a visit to the White House in February – although many were disappointed that those documents contained little new information. The ire was also inspired by the justice department releasing an 11-hour video purportedly showing the exterior of Epstein's door, apparently in an effort to show no one entered his cell at the time he died. But a minute of the video was missing, which satisfied few on the right. 'There are some extremely bizarre things about the video of Epstein's cell that Pam Bondi's DOJ released as proof no one killed him. First, a full minute appears to be missing from the video and secondly, it does NOT appear to be the same cell as the photo released on Jan 5, 2020,' wrote Robby Starbuck, a rightwing influencer and Trump supporter. 'Anyone else find this extremely troubling?' Others were more direct. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion 'NO ONE IS BUYING THIS!! Next the DOJ will say 'Actually, Jeffrey Epstein never even existed.' This is over the top sickening,' Alex Jones, the rightwing commentator and conspiracy theorist, wrote on social media. The lackluster release also left others, outside of the far right, dissatisfied. Andrew Schulz, the host of the Flagrant podcast, who interviewed Trump in October and said he voted for him, included the Epstein saga as part of his reason for feeling let down by the president. 'When you feel like the status quo will do nothing and change nothing, you have way more of a longer leash for the outsiders' ideas than you do the status quo's ideas,' Schulz said, talking about Trump's appeal. 'And I think that was the idea with Trump, it was like: 'Maybe he will stop these wars.' No. 'Maybe we will see what's up with this Epstein shit.' No.' Trump, who once enjoyed a friendship with Epstein, said in the run-up to last year's election that he would declassify files related to Epstein, although he added: 'You don't want to affect people's lives if there's phoney stuff in there, because there's a lot of phoney stuff in that whole world.' At a cabinet meeting this week, however, Trump expressed surprise that people were 'still talking' about Epstein, suggesting that the president was, for once, out of touch with his Maga base. 'This guy's been talked about for years,' Trump said, describing Epstein as a 'creep'. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each. That failed to quell the anger, however, prompting Trump to write a lengthy Truth Social post over the weekend, pleading for calm from his supporters. 'What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?' They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening. We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein.' He added: 'One year ago our Country was DEAD, now it's the 'HOTTEST' Country anywhere in the World. Let's keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.' The replies to Trump's post, however, suggested his appeal had not worked. 'My wanting pedophiles to be punished for their crimes doesn't make me less of a patriot, but more,' one user wrote. 'I don't understand the reason for your current attitude and frankly I'm beyond the point of caring. I do care about justice, wether [sic] you approve or not.'

Leader Live
7 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Thousands being relocated to UK after personal data leak of Afghans
A dataset containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official. The breach resulted in the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024. The scheme is understood to have cost around £400 million so far, with a projected cost once completed of around £850 million. Millions more is expected to be paid in legal costs and compensation. Defence Secretary John Healey offered a 'sincere apology on behalf of the British government' for the data breach. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) only became aware of the breach over a year after the release, when excerpts of the dataset were anonymously posted onto a Facebook group in August 2023. Details on the dataset include the the names and contact details of the Arap applicants and names of their family members. Arap was responsible for relocating Afghan nationals who had worked for or with the UK Government and were therefore at risk of reprisals once the Taliban returned to power in Kabul in 2021. Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024. However an independent review, commissioned by the Government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'. Around 4,500 people – made up of 900 Arap applicants and approximately 3,600 family members have been brought to the UK or are in transit so far through the Afghanistan Response Route. A further estimated 600 people and their relatives are expected to be relocated before the scheme closes, with a total of around 6,900 people expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme. Projected costs of the scheme may include relocation costs, transitional accommodation, legal costs and local authority tariffs. It is understood that the unnamed official had emailed the dataset outside of a secure government system while attempting to verify information, believing the dataset to only have around 150 rows. However, there were more than 33,000 rows of information which were inadvertently sent. An unprecedented superinjunction was made at the High Court in September 2023 to reduce the risk of alerting the Taliban to the existence of the data, with the decision to apply for an order made by then-defence secretary Ben Wallace. The Information Commissioner's Office and Metropolitan Police were also informed. The superinjunction, lifted on Tuesday, is thought to be the longest lasting order of its kind and the first time the Government has sought such a restrictive measure against the media. At multiple hearings, lawyers for the MoD said in written submissions that there was a 'very real risk that people who would otherwise live will die' if the Taliban gained access to the data. However, a recent report by retired civil servant Paul Rimmer said: 'Given the data they already have access to as the de facto government, we believe it is unlikely the dataset would be the single, or definitive, piece of information enabling or prompting the Taliban to act.' Mr Rimmer further found that the Government possibly 'inadvertently added more value to the dataset' by seeking the unprecedented superinjunction and creating a bespoke resettlement scheme. Defence Secretary Mr Healey told MPs the superinjunction had left him feeling 'deeply uncomfortable to be constrained from reporting to this House' about the breach and the secret relocation scheme set up in its wake. Under plans set out last October, the Afghanistan Response Route was expected to allow up to 25,000 people – most of whom were ineligible for Arap but deemed to be at the highest risk from Taliban reprisals – to be relocated. One internal Government document from February this year said: 'This will mean relocating more Afghans to the UK than have been relocated under the Arap scheme, at a time when the UK's immigration and asylum system is under significant strain. This will extend the scheme for another five years at a cost of c. £7 billion.' This figure is understood to be a previous estimate of the cost of all Afghan relocations, with projected costs now between £5.5 billion and £6 billion. The resettlement schemes are closing, with the review suggesting that the Afghanistan Response Route may be 'disproportionate' to the impact of the Taliban obtaining the information. As of March 2025, around 36,000 people had been relocated to the UK under Arap and other resettlement schemes. Arap, which was launched in April 2021, is now closed to new applicants after immigration rule changes were laid in Parliament earlier this month. The Government had originally outlined plans to launch a compensation scheme for those affected by the breach, with an estimated cost of between £120 and £350 million, not including administration expenses. Hundreds of data protection legal challenges are also expected, with the court previously told that a Manchester-based law firm already had several hundred prospective clients. The breach can now be reported after a High Court judge lifted the superinjunction – which prohibited making any reference to the existence of the court proceedings and is thought to have been the longest and widest ranging of its kind – on Tuesday. In one of several rulings, judge Mr Justice Chamberlain noted the superinjunction 'imposed very wide-ranging restrictions', with information about the breach limited to selected officials. In a decision in November 2023, Mr Justice Chamberlain said while the superinjunction did not constrain what could be said in Parliament, 'MPs and peers cannot ask questions about something they do not know about'. The judge ruled in May 2024 that the order should be lifted, stating there was a 'significant possibility' the Taliban knew about the dataset, adding it was 'fundamentally objectionable' that decisions about thousands of people's lives and 'enormous sums of public money now being committed' were being taken in secret. However, judges at the Court of Appeal overturned this ruling the following month, finding that he had not properly considered the consequences of lifting the order and that the superinjunction should stay in place. Following the retired civil servant's review, the MoD agreed on July 4 that the order could be lifted. It is expected that the cost of seeking and maintaining the superinjunction will be several million pounds. Reading a summary of his judgment in court on Tuesday, Mr Justice Chamberlain noted that the grant of the superinjunction had 'given rise to serious free speech concerns'. He added: 'The superinjunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability which operate in a democracy. 'This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum'.'