Has Russia Moved Strategic Aviation Nearer to Alaska? What We Know
Ukraine said it hit 41 of Russia's expensive, hard-to-replace warplanes on June 1 in a meticulously timed operation across three different time zones using drones smuggled over the border.
Ukrainian outlet Defence Express reported on Thursday that Russia had relocated one of its Tu-160 strategic bombers to the Anadyr airfield in Russia's far eastern Chukotka region, citing satellite imagery captured by the European Space Agency's Sentinel satellites on June 4.
Satellite imagery provided to Newsweek by Planet Labs, captured of Anadyr on May 26 - prior to the audacious Ukrainian strikes - showed three aircraft lined up on the main apron. The image, while low quality, does not indicate the presence of the distinctively shaped Tu-160s, analysts said.
A separate image from June 3 showed four aircraft on the main apron of the base, but none of the aircraft - including the one that appeared since May 26 - appear to be the world's heaviest operational bomber, experts told Newsweek.
It is fairly standard practice for militaries to move aircraft around and may not indicate anything more than a "sensible approach to looking after your aircraft," said Frank Ledwidge, a senior lecturer in Law and War Studies at Portsmouth University in the U.K. and a former British military intelligence officer.
Under the New START Treaty limiting nuclear weapons, strategic bombers have to be kept out in the open, Ledwidge added.
Russia will likely move around its aircraft more following the success of the Ukrainian strikes, retired Air Marshal Greg Bagwell, a former senior commander in the U.K.'s Royal Air Force, told Newsweek.
Kyiv said after the strikes, it had targeted at least one of Moscow's scarce A-50 airborne early warning and control aircraft and several long-range, nuclear-capable bombers across four air bases thousands of miles apart. Russia reported drone assaults on five bases, including strikes on a long-range aviation hub in the country's far east that Kyiv did not publicly acknowledge.
One Ukrainian official said 13 aircraft had been destroyed. Satellite imagery from the Siberian air base of Belaya and Olenya, an Arctic base in Murmansk-just two of the targeted bases-showed several destroyed Tu-95 and Tu-22 bombers. Ukraine said it had also attacked the Ivanovo airbase northeast of Moscow and Dyagilevo in the Ryazan region.
The Belaya airfield sits just shy of 3,000 miles from Ukraine.
At least six Russian Tu-95MS and four Tu-22M3 aircraft appear to have been destroyed, Justin Bronk, a senior research fellow for airpower at the U.K.-based Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said in recent days.
While unlikely to hack away at how many aerial assaults Russia can mount on Ukraine, the simultaneous strikes known as Operation Spiderweb caused roughly $7 billion in damage, according to Kyiv, and exposed how vulnerable airfields and their aircraft now are to drone strikes while landing an embarrassing slap on the Kremlin.
U.S. President Donald Trump said earlier this week that Russian President Vladimir Putin had "very strongly" insisted he would retaliate for the strikes.
The main base in Russian territory where the operation was masterminded was "directly next to" an FSB regional headquarters, Ukraine's President, Volodymyr Zelensky, said as he praised the "brilliant" operation. Russia's FSB domestic security agency is the main descendant of the Soviet-era KGB.
Russia used a Tu-160 in intensive overnight missile and drone strikes across Ukraine, Kyiv's air force said on Friday.
Moscow fired more than 400 attack drones, six ballistic missiles, 38 cruise missiles and one anti-radar air-to-surface missile at the war-torn country overnight, according to the air force.
Ukraine's military separately said on Friday it had hit Dyagilevo in fresh strikes and the Engels long-range aviation hub in the Saratov region.
Newsweek has reached out to the Russian Defense Ministry for comment via email.
Related Articles
G7 Invite for Modi Signals India's Growing Weight for Democratic AllianceRussia Offers Political Asylum to Elon Musk Over Trump FeudRussia Reacts to Trump's 'Young Children Fighting' CommentUS Demands 'End' to Military Cooperation Between North Korea and Russia
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
20 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Elon Musk Spent Millions to Get Back in Donald Trump's Good Graces
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Elon Musk made donations totaling $15 million to three super PACs supporting Donald Trump and the Republicans after his very public falling out with the president, but all before he announced his plans for the new "America Party." Newsweek reached out to the White House and Musk via X, SpaceX, and Tesla for comment by email outside of normal business hours on Saturday morning. Why It Matters Musk and Trump formed a fast and mutually beneficial friendship in the runup to the 2024 presidential election, with Musk bankrolling Trump's campaign to the tune of at least $250 million and helping him secure victory against then-Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee. Trump then positioned Musk as the point person for the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), giving him free rein to look into the federal government to cut back on "waste, fraud, and abuse" and bring down spending across all departments. However, their relationship took a turn as pressure mounted against Musk, with Tesla suffering significantly due to his role in the Trump administration, and ultimately Musk left his post to return to the private sector. Musk, who called himself Trump's "first buddy," also publicly criticized the administration-backed "One Big Beautiful Bill," which aims to extend tax cuts, increase immigration enforcement, and end consumer incentives for electric vehicles. Trump and Musk then started to taking shots at each other—through the press and via their respective social media platforms—culminating in a very public falling out in June. Musk accused Trump of withholding the release of the Epstein files because he was allegedly named in them, and Trump threatened to cut Musk's contracts with the federal government. Tesla CEO Elon Musk speaks is seen in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. Tesla CEO Elon Musk speaks is seen in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, To Know Following their public feud, which occurred in the first week of June, Musk appeared to try and make amends with the president by donating $5 million to each of three super PACs related to Trump and the Republicans. The Daily Mail first noted the donations in a report on Friday, but Newsweek verified through Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings that Musk donated $5 million each to MAGA Inc., the Senate Leadership Fund, and the House Leadership Fund. All three donations were made on June 27, which is about a week before he then declared he would create his own political party—the America Party. Musk's last donations were made to the AMERICA PAC, which included a roughly $27 million donation on June 30, according to the filings. He has also donated to the reelection campaign for Republican Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Barry Moore of Alabama, although those were only a few thousand dollars each. This was also around the time that Musk heavily criticized the "One Big Beautiful Bill," which he said was "political suicide" to pass and warned it would add trillions to the national debt. Musk decided to create the America Party after holding a poll on X on July 4, in which he asked users: "Should we create the America Party?" as a way of creating "independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system." The poll received 1.25 million votes, with 65.4 percent saying "Yes," which Musk greeted with enthusiasm, writing: "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waster & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy." As a foreign-born U.S. citizen, Musk cannot run for president, but he could bankroll other candidates, which he could do with a third party. He wrote in a separate X post that if he did make a new party, he would focus on capturing two or three Senate seats and eight to 10 seats in the House of Representatives in order to have impact on legislation. Trump criticized Musk's decision to start a third party, writing on Truth Social at the time, in part: "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks. He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States - The System seems not designed for them. The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS." What People Are Saying President Donald Trump in his last Truth Social post to mention Elon Musk, which was on July 24, wrote: "Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so! I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before! The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us. We are setting records every day, and I want to keep it that way!" Elon Musk in his last X post to mention Donald Trump, which was on July 8, wrote: "How can people be expected to have faith in Trump if he won't release the Epstein files?" What Happens Next? It remains unclear if Trump and Musk have had any direct communication following their war-of-words in June. This article includes reporting by The Associated Press.
UPI
20 minutes ago
- UPI
India responds to U.S. penalty over Russia oil
Aug. 2 (UPI) -- Indian officials confirmed Saturday the country is not altering policy and will continue buying oil from Russia, despite threats of a financial "penalty" from U.S. President Donald Trump. India's government has not given any directive to the country's oil refiners to stop or reduce the amount of Russian crude oil, the New York Times reported, citing two senior Indian officials. Trump earlier this week said he would impose a financial "penalty" on the South Asian country if it did not cut back on its reliance on Russian oil. The sanction would be in addition to a 25% American tariff on Indian goods. The president did not elaborate on the extent of the additional financial "penalty." "Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country, " Trump said in a Truth Social post. "Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE." Trump on Friday said it was his understanding "that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens." Indian officials told the New York Times the country has "not given any direction to oil companies" to change direction. Publicly, Indian officials said they are considering options without confirming or denying the Times report. "We have taken note of the sanctions, and we are looking into it," Ministry of External Affairs of India spokesman Shri Randhir Jaiswal said during a news conference Friday in New Delhi. "On the other question about proposed oil sale, I would say that I have no comments to offer in this particular matter. As far as sourcing our energy requirements is concerned, you are well aware of our broad approach, meaning our overall approach and stance. We take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time. As for the specifics of your particular question, I am not aware of it. I don't have details of these specifics." Jaiswal also attempted to avoid further escalating the situation. "I would also like to underline this particular point that this is a sensitive and complex case and therefore, I would urge all to be mindful that media reports based on speculation and misinformation are not helpful at all," he told reporters. "In so far as the reports claiming that there has been certain developments etc., such reports are incorrect. Please wait for an update from us, this is a sensitive matter, and we urge all sides to stay away from misinformation."
CNBC
20 minutes ago
- CNBC
How this week's avalanche of news from Washington to Wall Street kept investors guessing
It was a dizzying week on Wall Street. The S & P 500 closed this past Monday at a record high and then went on a four-session losing streak. Friday was particularly unsettling as terrible jobs data slammed the market and triggered President Donald Trump . Trump started the day by slamming Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for not cutting interest rates on Wednesday. He accused the Fed of cutting rates at the end of last year to help elect Kamala Harris. Later in the day , the president used similar reasoning when firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which puts out the employment report. Trump accused BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, a Biden appointee, of negatively manipulating the numbers during his presidency and inflating them before Election Day to help Harris. Also on Friday afternoon, Fed Governor Adriana Kugler resigned . The Biden appointee didn't give a reason. As if all that were not enough, just before his self-imposed Aug. 1 deadline, Trump set new "reciprocal" tariff rates to go into effect on Aug. 7. The president also on Friday ordered two nuclear submarines "to be positioned in the appropriate regions" after a warning to the U.S. from Russian official Dmitry Medvedev. On Monday, Medvedev said that "each new ultimatum" about the Ukraine conflict is a "threat and a step towards war" between Russia and the U.S. .SPX .IXIC 5D mountain S & P 500 and Nasdaq performance this week It was no wonder the S & P 500 lost more than 1.5% on Friday, in a session even further pressured by a drop in tech stocks following Amazon 's post-earnings stock decline of more than 8%. For the week, the broad market index lost nearly 1%, ending a two-week win streak. The tech-heavy Nasdaq was the big loser Friday, dropping more than 2.2% on the session and more than 2% for the week. It, too, snapped two straight weekly gains. As bad as the calendar page turn to August was on Friday, the S & P 500 and the Nasdaq wrapped July on Thursday with gains of 2.2% and 3.7%, respectively. The S & P 500 completed a three-month winning streak, while the Nasdaq extended its monthly run to four straight. It was certainly a busy week, jam-packed with macroeconomic updates, trade negotiations, a Fed rate decision — and, of course, an earnings onslaught, with four of the Magnificent Seven reporting. Trump trade The week started out with the U.S. on Sunday striking a trade deal with the European Union. South Korea slipped in under the wire before the president's Friday deadline. Both trade partners are now subject to a 15% tariff on exports to the U.S., down from the respective 30% and 25% rates in place prior to the agreements. The deal with the EU will also see the trading bloc purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy, while investing an additional $600 billion into the U.S. The deal with South Korea included an agreement for $350 billion in U.S. investments. Negotiations with China remain ongoing, with the tariff deadline being pushed to Aug. 12. Mexico was granted a 90-day extension of current 25% rates following a discussion with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Canada, however, was slapped with a 35% tariff rate . As for the trade partners that have yet to strike a deal, new rates were announced last Thursday evening and are set to take effect this coming Thursday. Weak jobs Just hours after the new tariff rates were announced, the Friday jobs report was released. The July nonfarm payroll growth of 73,000 positions fell way short of the 100,000 additions economists had expected. Worse yet, the June and May readings were both revised significantly lower for a combined 258,000 less jobs than originally reported for those two months. All of that, besides setting Trump off, put a September rate cut back on the table, according to the CME FedWatch tool. The market odds of a cut flipped from about 38% on Thursday to nearly 83% on Friday. Shortly after the weak jobs report, Jim Cramer said that while he has been a big backer of Powell, this number says: "You didn't need to wait" to cut rates. Warmer inflation The day after the Fed held rates steady, the central bank's preferred measure of inflation — the personal consumption expenditure (PCE) price index — was released Thursday morning. Both the headline PCE reading, as well as the core rate excluding food and energy prices, came in one-tenth hotter than expected on a year over year basis, seemingly supportive of the Fed's decision to leave rates unchanged. However, the negative jobs data clouds the picture a bit and will force the Fed to weigh the importance of both parts of its dual mandate — maintaining price stability, around their target 2% inflation rate, and fostering maximum employment. The former currently requires more restrictive or higher rates, given that inflation remains above target, while the latter points to less restrictive or lower rates, because central bankers don't want to see any material increases in joblessness. Economic growth Part of the rationale for holding rates steady came from a strong advance second quarter reading on the economy, which was released Wednesday morning just hours before the Fed's July meeting wrapped up. The seasonally adjusted annual GDP growth rate of 3% was much better than the 2.3% advance that was expected. While the economy managed to chug along during the April to June period, despite all the fear and uncertainty caused by trade disputes, it's already August. The GDP is a backwards looking data set. That's why more weight is put on the monthly updates noted above, relating to inflation and the labor market — and of course, the most real-time source of data we can get, earnings. Club earnings So, with that, let's take a look at how earnings went this week for the Club. We heard from Starbucks on Tuesday evening, Meta Platforms and Microsoft on Wednesday evening, Bristol Myers Squibb on Thursday morning, Amazon and Apple on Thursday evening, and Linde on Friday morning. Starbucks : Though the coffee giant reported mixed quarterly results, we heard enough positives to confirm that CEO Brian Niccol's turnaround remains firmly on track. Meta Platforms : The social media powerhouse delivered an absolute blow out quarter, with the only thing better than the results being the guidance. Bristol Myers : The drugmaker delivered a solid quarterly beat and outlook raise. However, with the Cobenfy narrative — at the core of our investment thesis— going from being pretty straightforward to a show-me story, investors aren't giving the company the benefit of the doubt. We trimmed our price target following the release. There are also the added questions marks around Trump push this week for lower prescription prices from Bristol and 16 other major drugmakers, including Club name Eli Lilly, which reports earnings next week. The threat of sector-specific pharma tariffs remains in play. Amazon : Overall the tech giant reported a solid quarter. However, shares sold off as investors took issue with Amazon Web Services (AWS) failing to deliver the same type of cloud revenue upside as rivals Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud. Operating income guidance for the current quarter was also a bit lower than expected, though that has historically proven conservative. Ultimately, we think the concerns are overblown and think the pullback represents a buying opportunity . Apple : The iPhone maker reported a very respectable quarter. However, when taking into account the price action of the stock this year alongside the reaction to the results, it's clear that investors are not ready to give management much credit until they deliver more clarity about the company's AI strategy. It was encouraging to hear CEO Tim Cook say he's open to M & A to help with that. Linde : The industrial gas stalwart delivered solid quarterly results in a difficult operating environment, demonstrating the company's resiliency no matter the backdrop. Moreover, management raised the low end of its full-year earnings guidance, despite noting that the high end of the range already assumes an economic contraction. It's another important week of corporate earnings ahead, with about a quarter of S & P 500 companies set to report. Six companies in the Club portfolio are on the docket: Coterra Energy , DuPont , Eaton , Disney , Eli Lilly , and Texas Roadhouse . Week in trades It was also a busy week of trades for the portfolio. Kicking off the week, we added to our positions in Cisco Systems and Honeywell . That was followed up by a small trim of Eaton as the stock hit new high. On Tuesday, we locked in a nice profit on Eli Lilly following disappointing news from Novo Nordisk , its main competitor in the GLP-1 market. We also trimmed our position in Wells Fargo as shares finally recovered from their post-earnings decline. On Wednesday, we added to our position in Dover and called out that we would also be adding to our stakes in Starbucks and Palo Alto Networks , we were not restricted. We'll be keeping a close eye on both in the week to come for an opportunity to step in. Palo Alto finished the week down nearly 15% on a four-session losing streak after reports of talks and its confirmation of a $25 billion deal to buy CyberArk were not well received by investors. We, however, feel that bundling CybarArk's identity security platform will accelerate Palo Alto's platformization strategy. Rounding out the week , on Thursday, we cut our position in Abbott , in line with prior commentary in which we highlighted our concerns about the company's exposure to China. We took the raised capital and redeployed it in Capital One Financial as the move we were seeing in the stock didn't reflect the fundamentals we saw when it reported second quarter earnings. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
