Government's £445m for railways in Wales branded ‘peanuts' by Tories
The investment in Welsh rail announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday will be spent on new stations and upgraded railway lines, and delivered through both direct funding and additional money for the Welsh Government.
However, Ms Davies branded the sum 'paltry' and said the Government was 'short-changing' Wales.
The Conservative frontbencher asked Wales Secretary Jo Stevens: 'Does the minister prefer peanuts, cashew nuts, or simply scraps for Wales?
'The fabled two Labour governments in lockstep is simply a myth for voters.
'Changing rail classifications and short-changing Welsh communities is a true reality.
'Is the minister concerned by today's reported peanuts, because when did she become aware of just over £400 million, the paltry settlement to come to Wales?
'How will it be split to Welsh Government? How does she think it compares to our Government's £740 million on rail alone?'
Responding, Ms Stevens said: 'Her party was in government for 14 years when Wales got 1% of the rail enhancement budget, when it has 11% of the whole UK network.
'Her party are responsible for the historic underfunding of the Welsh rail and we'll hear from the Chancellor this afternoon about what this Government is going to do about it.'
Liz Saville-Roberts, Plaid Cymru's leader in Westminster, also accused the Government of reclassifying the Oxford- Cambridge line as an England and Wales project, rather than England only.
She said: 'The Secretary of State for Wales joined Plaid Cymru in condemning the Conservatives for denying Wales £4.6 billion in rail funding.
'Now she's in government, she's waxing lyrical about 10% of that, and content with moving the goalpost to deny Wales a further £300 million by recently classifying the Oxford-Cambridge line as benefiting Wales. I don't know how they make this up.
'Does she oppose this new injustice? Or was she ignored? Or is it her mission to see Wales short-changed?'
Ms Stevens reiterated her previous response to this accusation that the Government had only been correcting a publishing error and that the Oxford-Cambridge line was always considered an England and Wales development.
She said: 'I listened very carefully to the question, and I'm sure she would not wish to unintentionally mislead the House.
'This was an error on the Oxford-Cambridge line. This was an error by the Conservative government in the 2021 spending review.
'And as she knows, heavy rail infrastructure is reserved, not devolved. Like every heavy rail project in England, Barnet consequentials do not apply.
'The UK Government fund from which East West Rail is being funded is also directing funding projects in Wales, like the redevelopment of Wales's busiest station, Cardiff central, improvements to level crossings in north Wales and upgrading the South Wales Relief Link.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Bank of England could cut base rate if jobs market continues to slow
The Bank of England could make cuts to interest rates if the jobs market slows down, Andrew Bailey has said. Businesses are 'adjusting employment' as a result of Chancellor Rachel Reeves' decision to raise national insurance contributions (NICs) for employers, the governor of the Bank also told The Times. Companies are 'also having pay rises that are possibly less than they would have been if the NICs change hadn't happened', Mr Bailey said. In an interview with the newspaper, the governor said the British economy was growing behind its potential. This could open up 'slack' to bring down inflation, he said, meaning prices on goods would rise less swiftly compared with earnings in future. Mr Bailey said he believes the base rate set by the Bank of England would be lowered in future, after it was held in June. The current Bank rate of 4.25%, which has a bearing on all lending in the UK – including mortgages – will be reviewed again on August 7 by the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee. 'I really do believe the path is downward,' Mr Bailey told The Times. He added: 'But we continue to use the words 'gradual and careful' because… some people say to me 'why are you cutting when inflation's above target?'' The governor's indication that lower lending rates and reduced inflation could be around the corner comes as the Government is facing pressure to improve living standards. Ms Reeves' tax and spend plans are also being constrained by the current borrowing costs, as well as downgraded growth forecasts. The Chancellor's fiscal headroom has been in part eroded by U-turns on the winter fuel payment and welfare reforms, as well as global shocks to the British economy. Some in the Labour Party, including former leader Lord Neil Kinnock and Wales's First Minister Baroness Eluned Morgan, are calling for a wealth tax to help bolster the public finances. On Sunday, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said such a tax had not been 'directly' discussed when ministers held an away day at the end of last week. But speaking to Sky News' Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme, she would not rule out tax rises at the autumn budget, only saying tax decisions would be made based on 'fairness'.
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ellen DeGeneres supports Rosie O'Donnell after Trump threatens to revoke her citizenship
Ellen DeGeneres showed public support for Rosie O'Donnell, whose US citizenship President Donald Trump threatened to revoke, just three months after Rosie accused Ellen of never saying 'anything political in her life.' It all began Saturday when the 79-year-old Republican politician vowed on Truth Social: 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her citizenship. 'She is a threat to humanity, and should remain in the wonderful country of Ireland, if they want her. God bless America!' On Sunday, the 67-year-old canceled comedian - who boasts 293.1M social media followers - shared Donald's post and gave a shout-out to the 63-year-old comedian: 'Good for you @rosie.' Ironically, the lesbian funnywomen have never shared more in common - being former TV titans who both left the States for the UK following Trump's re-election last November. 'I've never really known Ellen to say anything political in her life, so I was surprised to read that she left because of President Trump. Like, that shocked me, actually,' Rosie (born Roseann) marveled to Us Weekly last April. 'I've been a political person my whole life, not better or worse, it's just a different way to be in the world. I was very clear about the reason why I was leaving.' O'Donnell continued: 'It's not like we're tenaciously opposed to each other. We're just very different people. We have had some stuff in the past that we never resolved. And not in any way as, as partners or lovers or anything like that, just as friends and comedians, but I wish her the best. I seriously do.' The Long Island native's 'past' comment was referring to when DeGeneres told the late Larry King that she didn't know Rosie and was not her friend, which deeply upset her because they were close in the nineties. 'Ellen wrote [in a text], "I'm really sorry and I don't remember that,"' Rosie recalled to THR in 2023. 'It would never occur to me to say "I don't know her" about somebody whose babies I held when they were born. It wouldn't be in my lexicon of choices to ever say. When she was in a perplexing situation and people were saying things about her, I said, "Let me stand next to you and say that I'm Lebanese, too." When it was a downward media time for me, she didn't do anything.' The 34-time Emmy winner is reportedly 'never coming back' to the States after moving to a farmhouse in Cotswolds, England where she and her wife Portia DeGeneres are raising chickens and goats. Last Thursday, Ellen and the 52-year-old retired actress enjoyed seeing the 'amazing' Billie Eilish at The O2 Arena in London, and they'll celebrate their 17th wedding anniversary on August 16. DeGeneres notoriously got 'kicked out of show business for being mean' after her former self-titled daytime talk show ended following 19 seasons after being hit with racism, workplace bullying, and sexual harassment claims in 2022. It all began Saturday when the 79-year-old Republican politician vowed on Truth Social: 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her citizenship. She is a threat to humanity, and should remain in the wonderful country of Ireland, if they want her. God bless America!' On Sunday, the 67-year-old canceled comedian - who boasts 293.1M social media followers - shared Donald's post and gave a shout-out to the 63-year-old comedian: 'Good for you @rosie' DeGeneres is reportedly 'never coming back' to the States after moving to a farmhouse in Cotswolds, England where she and her wife Portia DeGeneres are raising chickens and goats (pictured June 13) Last Thursday, the 34-time Emmy winner and the 52-year-old retired actress enjoyed seeing the 'amazing' Billie Eilish at The O2 Arena in London, and they'll celebrate their 17th wedding anniversary on August 16 Ellen notoriously got 'kicked out of show business for being mean' after her former self-titled daytime talk show ended following 19 seasons after being hit with racism, workplace bullying, and sexual harassment claims in 2022 Meanwhile, Rosie and her child Dakota 'Clay' O'Donnell (R, pictured last Tuesday) are getting acclimated to Dublin and she's 'in the process' of getting Irish citizenship The New Orleans-born funnywoman now keeps busy running her age-positive skincare company, Kind Science By Ellen, as well as her lifestyle brand, ED Ellen DeGeneres. Meanwhile, O'Donnell and her child Dakota 'Clay' O'Donnell are getting acclimated to Dublin and she's 'in the process' of getting Irish citizenship. The 12-time Emmy winner - whose grandparents hailed from the country - adopted the non-binary 12-year-old during her two-year marriage to late ex-wife #2 Michelle Rounds, which ended in 2015.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
You can hardly blame the union for pushing at a door ministers unbolted: DANIEL HANNAN
When in opposition, Labour made a series of contradictory promises. The party would pay public sector workers more and make it easier for unions to call strikes. Yet it would also make sure that there was enough economic growth to cover these rises. Now it is discovering how incompatible those promises are. Ministers are furious with junior doctors – now called resident doctors – for calling more strikes only a year after getting a huge pay rise. Yet, at the same time, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is scrapping the minimum turnout that a trade union needs before launching legal strike action – a threshold that the doctors barely cleared in their recent ballot. Under the current rules, a strike requires the approval of 50 per cent of eligible union members. The BMA strike got 55 per cent which, as the Health Secretary Wes Streeting points out, is hardly a massive mandate. Yet his Government is lifting the requirement altogether. You can hardly blame the union for pushing at a door that ministers are theatrically unbolting. We are in for strikes of the most disruptive kind. The Corbynite clique that runs the BMA is being bellicose, convinced that the way to bring pressure on ministers is to make life as uncomfortable as possible for the general public. Its members are starting with five days of strikes at the end of this month, and it has told them not to give hospitals advance notice, so as to maximise the disruption to managers. 'You do NOT have a legal responsibility to disclose whether you are striking,' says Ross Nieuwoudt, co-leader of the BMA's resident doctors' committee, on X. At the same time, the union has recommended that its consultants charge £4,000 if they are asked to come in to cover for the striking juniors. As doctors used to say, this will hurt. It makes me feel almost sorry for Streeting. His first decision was to give junior doctors a massive pay bump: 28.9 per cent in phases, the last tranche of which comes into their bank accounts next month. The doctors' union, the BMA, trousered the money and, for a brief while, the doctors called off their industrial action. Now, a year later, they are back for more. Like the Vikings paid off by Ethelred the Unready, it turned out that they had withdrawn only briefly, their longships laden with silver, before deciding that the old deal was not good enough, and demanding another 29 per cent. Until now, public opinion has tended to favour the striking doctors. This is not because they have a better case than other workers – we almost all ended up getting a real-terms pay cut because of the lockdown – but because we grew up with a high opinion of medical professionals. People often quote Nigel Lawson's observation that the NHS is the closest thing the English have to a religion. But what Margaret Thatcher's Chancellor went on to say next was perhaps the more relevant insight. 'For a bunch of laymen, who called themselves the Government, to presume to tell the priesthood that they must change their ways in any respect whatsoever was clearly intolerable. And faced with a dispute between their priests and ministers, the public would have no hesitation in taking the part of the priesthood.' So it has proved – until now. A poll in The Guardian over the weekend showed that public support for the strikes had fallen from 52 per cent last year to 26 per cent now. Perhaps it reflects a growing sense that, however much the NHS budget increases, things don't seem to improve. We have more doctors and nurses on higher salaries, but it is harder than ever to see a GP. There is often a perception lag in politics and, until recently, Britain's unimpressive health outcomes were attributed to an imagined lack of funding. In fact, our health spending has been above-average for a wealthy country since the massive budget increases of the Blair/Brown years. Our lower survival rates and poorer outcomes are almost entirely a result of our insistence, unique in the world, on maintaining a wholly state-run healthcare system. Which brings us to the irony of these strikes. BMA members fanatically defend the Marxist principle on which the NHS is run: production according to ability, distribution according to need. Yet they don't like the application of the same principle to their own salaries. How do ministers suppose other trade unions will respond to their changes? Every government worker will want the kind of deal given to the doctors; and, thanks to Rayner's legislation, they can now easily call a strike to get it. Meanwhile, the country is borrowing £150billion a year just to meet its existing obligations. It turns out that being in government involves making, rather than just talking about, tough choices. Who knew?
