logo
The record-breaking week in the stock market that could have gone very badly

The record-breaking week in the stock market that could have gone very badly

CNBC18 hours ago

It was another exciting week on Wall Street as the S & P 500 and Nasdaq each closed Friday at new record highs. Incredible as that was, this week could have easily gone another way. Last Saturday, the world learned that the U.S. had entered the Israel-Iran conflict, dropping several massive bunker busters on Fordo, Iran's underground nuclear facility buried under a mountain, and bombing two other sites, Isfahan and Natanz. While fear of further escalation and a prolonged war involving the U.S. was palpable last weekend, the market on Monday shrugged, betting on the notion that the conflict would not result in systemic risk or slow the U.S. economy and hamper corporate earnings much, if at all. As risky as any military action is given the potential to spiral out of control, they tend not to impact the market for long, unless signs appear that it will start impacting growth and inflation. That has not yet happened. We did see energy prices surge in the week before last Saturday's bombings, but they quickly came back down. West Texas Intermediate crude plunged on Monday and Tuesday. While rising modestly in each subsequent session, WTI plunged more than 11% for the week, breaking a three-week winning streak. The stock market took its cues from oil trading, which allowed for the S & P 500 and Nasdaq records and weekly gains of nearly 3.5% and more than 4%, respectively. Monday is the last day of June and Wall Street's second quarter. For the week ... S & P 500 week to date (WTD) up 3.44%; first positive week in three Month to date (MTD) up 4.42%; on pace for its second positive month in a row Quarter to date (QTD) up 10%; on pace for its best quarter since first quarter 2024 Nasdaq WTD up 4.25% MTD up 6%; on pace for its third positive month in a row QTD up 17.2%; best quarter since second quarter 2020 Energy represents a major input cost, often one of the largest, for just about every business in the world, so a sustained increase in energy prices would crunch profit margins or force price hikes in order to preserve them. At the same time, it represents a large unavoidable cost for consumers, whether they're trying to air condition their homes in the summer, heat their homes in the winter, or fill up their cars. Given these high priority needs, elevated energy costs end up cutting into discretionary budgets – meaning activities such as eating out or shopping would get cut back. The quick pairing back of those energy price increases this past week, however, means that analysts don't need to downwardly revise estimates for growth, inflation, or consumer spending – at least not yet. The full impact of President Donald Trump 's tariffs is still unclear, though they will almost certainly lead to higher prices for consumers. While the de-escalation of tensions in the Mideast, and subsequent pullback in energy prices, were certainly the most important factors supporting this week's market action, interest rate expectations were also in focus. Though several voting members of the Federal Reserve's policymaking committee, including Fed Chairman Jerome Powell , threw cold water on comments from Fed Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman that they were on board with a July rate cut, investors have nonetheless started to price in a higher likelihood that we see three Fed rate cuts by year-end, up from the odds of just two cuts only a week ago. That's according to the CME FedWatch Tool . Another important update that could influence interest rate decisions came Friday, with the release of the May personal income and spending report. Within that report, we find the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, the Fed's preferred measure of inflation. While headline PCE was in line with expectations, up 0.1% month over month and up 2.3% annually, the core rate was a bit hotter than expected, rising 0.2% month over month and 2.7% versus the year-ago period, both one-tenth of a percentage point above expectations. The warmer core reading, which excludes food and energy, is something to watch and cuts against the case for a July rate cut. Digging into the portfolio, we hosted our June Monthly Meeting this week, providing a rundown of all 30 holdings. Jim Cramer highlighted six rallying stocks that members may want to consider booking profits in, and five others that look like buys. We also answered key member questions and touched on all 10 names in our Bullpen, including Cisco Systems, which was added on Monday . The Bullpen is our watch list of stocks that could, under the right circumstances, join the Charitable Trust. During the June meeting, Jim was itching to buy Cisco and Boeing but decided to wait. Sticking with portfolio updates, Nvidia hit new all-time highs this past week as sentiment around artificial intelligence and data center demand continued to improve. Analysts at Loop Capital slapped a $250-per-share price target on the stock, highlighting the hyperscaler purchase intentions over the next few years, the compute intensity of reasoning models, and increased inference demand resulting from AI agent adoption. Already regaining the title of the most valuable U.S. public company at more than $3.8 trillion, Nvidia at $250 represents roughly 60% upside to Friday $157 close and a market cap of more than $6 trillion. Needless to say, Nvidia was our top performer for the week up more than 9.5%. Data center plays — Eaton, GE Vernova, and Broadcom are also expected to benefit from the AI strong demand. On Tuesday, analysts at Morgan Stanley raised their price target on GE Vernova, while analysts at HSBC upgraded Broadcom to a buy from a hold rating. Broadcom, Eaton , and GE Vernova were our next best stocks for the week. Goldman Sachs rounded out the week's top five as financial stocks got some incrementally positive news this week when the Fed, on Wednesday, proposed lowering capital requirements for large U.S banks that were implemented in the years following the 2008 financial crisis. The move would allow banks, including Club holdings Goldman and Wells Fargo , to lend more freely while making it easier for them to buy more U.S. government bonds. Amazon continues to be in the news as investors work to better understand the opportunity the company has in new areas like online grocery shopping, thanks to its massive logistics network and the implications of advancing it through generative AI, robotics and autonomous vehicles. In health care, shares of Eli Lilly advanced this week despite data released Monday on the company's experimental weight-loss drug, bimagrumab, which is designed to help patients preserve muscle mass. It failed to wow investors. Abbott Laboratories , meanwhile, got some positive news Tuesday when Health & Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that his department will encourage the use of wearable health devices. "My vision is every American is wearing a wearable within four years," RFK Jr. said at a House Energy and Commerce Committee meeting . The news may also bode well for devices like the Apple Watch, especially as more health-related sensors are built in. Speaking of Apple , we still believe it is an incredible company with the "greatest product in the world," as Jim put it , referring to the iPhone. However, we think the company would benefit from modifying its capital allocation plans , focusing less on the buyback and more on AI development, be it via internal R & D, paying up for top talent, or acquiring groundbreaking startups. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Spending Bill Moves Forward After Senate Vote
Trump's Spending Bill Moves Forward After Senate Vote

Forbes

time12 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Trump's Spending Bill Moves Forward After Senate Vote

The Senate voted to advance President Donald Trump's signature budget and spending bill to the floor late Saturday night, clearing a key hurdle as Republicans seek to meet Trump's requested July 4 deadline—despite some opposition within the GOP and from former Trump adviser Elon Musk. President Donald Trump asked Congress to pass his spending bill before July 4. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The Senate voted to advance the bill late Saturday night after a 51-49 vote, with two Republicans (Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.) joining Democrats opposing the move. The bill will now face more scrutiny with a floor debate and voting on amendments taking place before a final vote, though Trump immediately claimed victory after the procedural vote, calling it the vote a 'GREAT VICTORY' in a post on Truth Social. The amendment process, often called a 'vote-a-rama,' could last hours as Democrats are expected to delay the vote as long as possible, with a final vote not likely until Monday. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., also introduced another hurdle Saturday after announcing he would require a 'full reading' of all 940 pages of the bill from start to finish, a process that could take hours and was still ongoing at 10 a.m. EDT on Sunday morning. Senate Republicans released the latest version of the spending bill Friday, propping the measure up for a final vote that could be successful even if three GOP members vote against it. Republicans have sparred over provisions linked to Medicaid cuts, an increased debt ceiling and tax deductions in recent weeks, with Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruling against Medicaid provisions that sought to pull the federal healthcare program from undocumented migrants and gender-affirming care among other changes. Sen. Susan Collins, a moderate Republican from Maine who still voted to advance the bill, said she would file several amendments, telling reporters Saturday 'if the bill is not further changed, I would be leaning against the bill.' Musk, who had a recent falling out with Trump over the bill, weighed in on it again Saturday afternoon, calling it 'utterly insane and disgusting' and saying it 'will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts : We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here . What's In Trump's Spending Bill? Trump's mega bill proposes $4 trillion in tax cuts and calls for an extension on the cuts made by Trump during his first term. It carves out $46.5 billion for the construction of the president's border wall and over $15 billion for border security. Reductions to student loan repayment options are also included, as are new or more pricey fees for immigration services including work authorization applications. Americans will be able to deduct up to $25,000 in tip wages through 2028 under the bill, which also creates a $12,500 overtime deduction. Large cuts to Medicaid worth hundreds of billions of dollars were proposed in the House version of the bill as a way to offset the costs of the proposed tax cuts, but some of those efforts were blocked by the Senate parliamentarian this week. Conversely, child tax credits are slated to increase under the bill from $2,000 to $2,200 per child alongside inflation adjustments to the credit amount after 2025. While Democrats are poised to completely oppose the bill, some Republicans have taken issue with its provisions and may not be on board for the vote. Paul told NBC News on Friday he would reconsider opposing the bill if the debt ceiling hike was removed. Collins and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, had not explicitly said how they would vote prior to the Senate convening Saturday, though they have both actively opposed a provision in the bill that bars Medicaid funding from abortion providers like Planned Parenthood. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., told Fox News on Saturday he would vote against the initial motion to debate the 940-page bill, saying he would need more time to review the updated version published Friday night—though he ended up voting to advance. Tillis said in a statement Saturday he will not support the bill over its changes to Medicaid. Key Background One of the leading concerns around the spending bill is linked to its potential impact on the national debt. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said in a report this month the bill will increase the federal deficit by $2.8 trillion by 2034, noting economic growth that would come from the measure would be offset by a jump in interest payments over the next decade. Trump and Republican leadership have indicated their self-imposed July 4 deadline could be missed. The president, who threatened to pull Congress' July 4 recess if the bill is not passed by then, said Friday the deadline is 'not the end all.' House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Friday it is possible the deadline is missed, but noted, 'I don't even want to accept that as an option right now.' Trump's Tax Cuts Would Raise Deficit By $2.8 Trillion, New Estimate Suggests (Forbes)

Tariffs are meant to boost US manufacturing. Is America ready?
Tariffs are meant to boost US manufacturing. Is America ready?

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tariffs are meant to boost US manufacturing. Is America ready?

Winton Machine, an Atlanta-based manufacturer, is desperate to hire. So far, there are few takers. CEO and co-founder Lisa Winton has been searching for a salesperson since March. A mechanist job has been open even longer, with less than a dozen applications over the past year – none of whom had the skillset required for the job. Winton has done what she can to attract workers, like forming a relationship with local technical colleges, offering applicants flexible hours and rehiring retirees. Still, keeping her staffing up has been a challenge. The push for more domestic manufacturing through tariffs, Winton worries, will only make matters worse. 'If more factories move into an area, who are they competing with? They're competing with other factories," she said. "Whether it be machinists or maintenance or assembly, all of the different types of jobs that are available – they have to come from somewhere.' President Donald Trump has said his tariffs, which range from a 10% baseline tariff on trade partners to 50% on steel imports, will have jobs and factories 'come roaring back.' 'The end game is to have production here. Any country that wants to produce here doesn't pay a tariff. That's the ultimate solution,' Trump's top trade adviser, Peter Navarro, told ABC News in early April. It's not clear that America is prepared for that shift. Building new manufacturing facilities can take up to 10 years, depending on the industry, and experts say the country's infrastructure isn't primed to handle additional factories. Meanwhile, a manufacturing labor shortage could mean new factories have a hard time filling roles. 'If the Trump administration's vision is to bring manufacturing back to America en masse – not just in a few sectors, but en masse – that vision isn't realistic," said Nancy Qian, an economics professor at Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management. It's not clear how many businesses will shift production to the U.S. because of tariffs. Those that do reshore face a lengthy process. 'Most companies do not make a decision to onshore or to build a new factory or plant lightly,' said Erin McLaughlin, a senior economist at the Conference Board, a nonprofit business-research group. 'This is something for most companies that they strategize many years in advance.' First, companies must figure out where to build. The location needs to be close to transportation corridors, good water supplies and on a stable electric grid – something easier said than done with current U.S. infrastructure, which earned a C in its 2025 report card from the American Society of Civil Engineers, according to McLaughlin. Then, companies must purchase the land, obtain proper permits and inspections, design their factory, purchase equipment and select a construction team. Only then can they start construction. The process generally takes three to 10 years, depending on the industry, McLaughlin said. Certain projects can be done in less time, although the timeline can be challenged by growing competition for sites with access to a stable electric grid, according to Jeff Bischoff, chief sales officer at Lexington, Kentucky-based designer-builder Gray. 'Power generation is not keeping up right now with demand,' Bischoff said. 'All the utilities are doing their best to try to keep up and get ahead of that. But it's a several-year process.' Trump has acknowledged that infrastructure changes will be necessary, and believes it would take roughly two years to get his vision for manufacturing up and running. 'You've got to build a thing called a factory. You have to build your energy. You have to do a lot of things,' Trump said on April 7, adding that he would give businesses approvals for electric plants in 'record timing.' But McLaughlin believes a two-year turnaround for bolstering the U.S. manufacturing sector could be optimistic. Even if executive orders speed up federal approvals, she said, factories would likely still need to worry about state and local permits. More complications could arise if the Trump administration continues to crack down on immigration, with roughly 20% of manufacturing workers in the U.S. foreign-born, according to labor market analytics firm Lightcast. An even higher share – roughly 30% – are foreign-born in construction. "We don't want to be over reliant on one trading partner for certain things,' McLaughlin said. But 'I don't think the U.S. is prepped and primed for everything to be manufactured here.' Are tariffs worth the pain? Trump says the ultimate fruits of tariffs will be worth the pain. Experts disagree. Trump's push for more factories comes after a dramatic decline in manufacturing jobs. After accounting for roughly 22% of total nonfarm employment in 1979, manufacturing work makes up just 8% today. Even if tariffs were able to eliminate the entire U.S. trade deficit in manufacturing, that would still only bump that share up to about 10% of employment – still less than half of its share in the late 1970s, according to Robert Lawrence, a Harvard professor of international trade and investment and author of 'Behind the Curve: Can Manufacturing Still Provide Inclusive Growth?' 'Even in its most successful form, this is barely noticeable,' Lawrence said. Other experts warn that even that level of growth could exacerbate the hiring challenges manufacturers face today. Manufacturers have been struggling to fill jobs for years, including during a post-pandemic construction boom, when supply chain issues pushed more manufacturers to build facilities closer to home. The number of manufacturing establishments in the U.S. increased by more than 11% between the first quarter of 2019 and the second quarter of 2023, according to a 2024 report from Deloitte. Despite the growth, manufacturing jobs have remained essentially flat since 2019, discounting a pandemic-era dip. That's partially due to automation; factories today need fewer workers. But nearly half of manufacturers say attracting and retaining talent has been a major challenge, according to a first-quarter survey from the National Association of Manufacturers. Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows there were 381,000 manufacturing job openings as of April. By 2033, manufacturing could have 1.9 million unfilled jobs – roughly half of open positions – due to a skills and applicant gap, according to Deloitte. 'We absolutely do not have enough people ready to take these jobs,' said Rachel Sederberg, senior economist at Lightcast. 'That is going to be a very significant challenge if more and more manufacturing – or more and more of anything – comes back to the U.S.' One issue is that manufacturing workers are aging out of the workforce. Just over one-third of manufacturing employees in the U.S. are 55 or older and nearing retirement, according to a recent report from Lightcast, which is expected to make the shortage even more acute. And attracting new talent to backfill these positions hasn't been easy. As factories turn to more automation, manufacturers say they're having trouble finding talent with the right skillset to manage the more advanced technology. 'Not every manufacturing job today requires a degree, but every single manufacturing job today requires skills,' said Carolyn Lee, executive director of the Manufacturing Institute, a nonprofit focused on workforce development and education within the industry. Lee said obtaining those skills can take anywhere from a day or two for a forklift certification to up to four years of education and apprenticeship programs for maintenance technicians, one of the most in-demand manufacturing jobs today. There are some signs of renewed interest in trade jobs. Enrollment in public two-year institutions that focus on vocational programs was up 14% year-over-year in 2024, outpacing the 3% growth in public four-year schools, according to a May 12 Wells Fargo report. But Lightcast found there are still not enough students learning relevant skills to keep up with job demand. For instance, there were just 400 machinist program completions in Texas in 2023 compared to roughly 16,000 related job openings in the state. Research suggests manufacturing's reputation as dirty and dangerous has made the industry less appealing to younger Americans, especially amid a period of low unemployment. The Deloitte report says 'a different set of expectations' among millennial and Generation Z workers, many of whom were pushed to go to college instead of working in the trades, has made it difficult for manufacturers to attract and retain workers. 'The consensus among American manufacturers is this generation of Americans just don't want these jobs anymore," said Qian of Northwestern. Fear of lower wages may also be keeping workers away. Manufacturing work today can pay well, and some research finds it tends to pay better than other sectors that don't require college degrees. But as of 2018, the average hourly earnings for manufacturing employees fall short of average overall employee earnings, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. There's a reason so many American companies rely on factories abroad; operating in the U.S. tends to be more expensive. For one, labor costs are higher. Take the average annual machine operator salary, which is nearly $45,000 in the U.S. compared to $15,000 in China and less than $5,000 in Vietnam, according to the Reshoring Institute, a nonprofit that supports expanded U.S. manufacturing. And tariffs are expected to hike production costs for many domestic manufacturers, since companies will need to pay more for inputs shipped in from other countries. That could leave manufacturers increasingly turning toward automation to trim costs. 'If you need to pay anyone you employ as a factory worker an average of $36 an hour with benefits, then you are inclined to hire very few of them and instead buy automated equipment and robots,' said Farok Contractor, a professor at Rutgers' management and global business department. Winton of Winton Machine said she's already seeing an increased demand for automation from her company, which designs and produces factory automation for manufacturers in HVAC, aerospace, construction and other industries. Winton still expects to see jobs created if manufacturing gets a boost through tariffs. She just believes automation will allow fewer, high-quality positions as opposed to a large influx of manual labor. Already, manufacturing is relying on more college-educated workers; nearly 32% of civilian manufacturing workers had at least a bachelor's degree in 2023, up from 22% in 2006, according to a USA TODAY analysis of the Census Bureau's American Community Survey data. 'I need the people to build all the parts and pieces and the engineers to design and the software to build this factory automation,' Winton said. 'I think we have the people. Do we have the skillset? That's the question.' This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Is America ready for a manufacturing revival?

Go ahead: Start celebrating a big quarter for stocks
Go ahead: Start celebrating a big quarter for stocks

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Go ahead: Start celebrating a big quarter for stocks

Go ahead: Start celebrating a big quarter for stocks originally appeared on TheStreet. When 2025 opened, there was plenty of talk of a boffo year for stocks. Tax cuts were coming. Deregulation was coming. Maybe the Federal Reserve would cut interest rates more. So, there was talk the Standard & Poor's 500 would end the year possibly at 7,000 or higher, which would mean a 19% gain on the year. 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter💰💵 Yes, there might be some tariff increases, but no one — but no one — expected the panic that overtook markets when President Trump unveiled his tariff plans on April 3. The S&P 500 fell as much as 10.4% in the next two days. The president then dialed back the tariff increases, subject to getting trades negotiated by July lo and behold, the S&P took off. From an April 7 low, the index has roared back, rising nearly 28% and ending Friday at a record 6,173 after reaching an intraday high of 6,188. 7,000 may seem over-the-top, but . . . For the quarter so far (with one day to go), the S&P 500 is up 10%. It's up 4.4% in June and nearly 5% on the year. The year-to-date return is about the same at the Nasdaq Composite Index; the Nasdaq-100's gain is 7.2% on the year and 17% for the quarter. So, if the S&P 500 hits 10% gains per quarter for the rest of the year, the index would finish 2025 at, maybe, 8,200, a gain of some 40%.If you think that's doable, we can think of a bridge you might buy in Brooklyn. In short, we're being a tad silly. Nonetheless, the S&P 500 will end the quarter higher, with the technology sector up 21% and the industrial sector up 12%. Techs are led by Seagate Technology () , up more than 60%, Broadcom () , up 61%, and Jabil () ., up 56% Palantir () is up about 45%. Nvidia () , Microsoft () and Meta Platforms () are up 46%, 32% and 28%, respectively. The industrial sector has risen because of gains in a number of defense and related companies, including Boeing () , naval ship builder Huntington Ingalls () , L3Harris Technologies () and Howmet Aerospace () . The current environment is bullish and has momentum that won't last forever. In fact, there face risks a-plenty over the next six months, including: The Administration's July 9 deadline for finishing trade negotiations will probably come and go because there are so many deals to negotiate. China and the United States have agreed on terms for exporting rare earth metals to the United States. India and the United States are close to a deal. But the president stopped talks with Canada over a tax dispute. Terms on all agreements, however, will be examined carefully. And a mistake on tariffs can cause investors to panic as they did in start, first-quarter earnings were very good with tariffs talked about but having little actual effect. Yet. It depends on how all the negotiations end. And tax changes as big as the Trump Administration is proposing can cause absolutely unforeseen effects that probably won't be seen until later in the year. Still, second-quarter earnings look promising. They unofficially have a soft start on July 10, when Delta Air Lines () reports results. The parade kicks into higher fear on July 15 when JP Morgan Chase () and a host of big banks report on July 15. () sports the largest percentage of buy ratings: 97% of total ratings, with 3% holds. The Middle East is quiet for now. Israel and Iran are not shooting missiles at one another, and Iran has not blocked the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of the world's oil flows. The state of Iran's nuclear materials, however, is not clear. The fear is that the Trump tax bill will increase the U.S. deficit by trillions of dollars over the next few years, and bond yields will soar. (Senate Republicans were able to win a key procedural vote on Saturday.) The 10-year Treasury yield was at 4.87% on Jan. 13 and $4.285% on Friday. Meanwhile, it seems that the Fed will cut its key federal funds rate in September, despite President Trump's complaints that Fed boss Jerome Powell, whose terms ends in 2026, is too slow. The traders have expected two rate cuts all this year, with the first coming in September. Two measures to watch: One is the S&P 500 forward price-earnings ratio which was at 25 on Friday. The 10-year average is 18 to 19. Relative strength indexes are very high. as many as 55 S&P 500 stocks are Friday at RSIs, above 70, a signal they're overvalued. It fell back to 49 at the end of the day. Jabil Circuit, Western Digital () , Seagate Technology and financial giant Goldman Sachs () all had RSIs are 80 or higher. Bull markets, like we're having, can continue with high RSIs for a while — but not forever. More Tech Stocks:Amazon tries to make AI great again (or maybe for the first time) Google plans major AI shift after Meta's surprising $14 billion move Question of the Week: The S&P 500 Pits the Big Dogs Against the Little Dogs U.S. financial markets and most businesses will be closed on Friday for the July 4 holiday. Earnings are small in number and include only one S&P 500 component: Constellation Brands () . The shares have struggled all year as alcoholic beverage consumption generally has slumped. Beer stocks have been weak too. Trading volume will peak on Tuesday but will fall rapidly Wednesday and Thursday as Wall Street starts the long weekend ahead: Start celebrating a big quarter for stocks first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 29, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 29, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store