Here's if Lauren Sanchez's Ex-Husband ‘Knew' of Her Alleged Affair With Jeff Bezos & What He Thinks of the Amazon Founder Now
Sanchez and her ex-husband, talent agent Patrick Whitesell, filed for divorce in April 2019, months before news broke that Sanchez, a former Good Day L.A. co-host, and Bezos were dating. Sanchez and Whitesell reached a settlement and finalized their divorce in October 2019. According to TMZ, Sanchez and Whitesell divided their assets and properties according to a prenuptial agreement they both signed before their marriage. (Bezos, for his part, didn't sign a prenup before his marriage to his ex-wife, MacKenzie Scott, in 1993, which led to Scott receiving $38 million in Amazon stock in their divorce.)
More from StyleCaster
The Real Reason Eva Longoria Didn't Attend BFF Lauren Sanchez's Wedding to Jeff Bezos After Accusing Their Other Guest's Family of 'Spewing Hate'
The Real Reason Trump Didn't Attend Jeff Bezos & Lauren Sanchez's Wedding After the Amazon Founder's Complicated History With the President
As for why Sanchez and Whitesell divorced, a source told People in January 2019 that the former couple, who still lived in their same house for a short time following their split, had simply fallen out of love. 'Over the last two or three years, their marriage felt more like a business relationship,' the insider said. 'They both were doing their own thing.' The source added, 'She would be out and about a lot and he was never with her.'
Whitesell also seems to know Bezos. The same month news broke of Whitesell and Sanchez's divorce, the former couple were seen talking with Bezos at Amazon's Golden Globes afterparty. 'Jeff was in great spirits and having lots of fun. He had a crowd of people around him. Lauren was there but wasn't with Jeff all the time. Her husband was there, too,' the insider said.
The source also dispelled rumors that Sanchez cheated on Whitesell with Bezos, claiming that the two had been separated 'for a while' and that Whitesell knew of Bezos and Sanchez's relationship. 'Patrick and Lauren have been on and off for a while and have been separated. [Patrick] knew they were seeing each other,' the insider said.
Bezos, for his part, also denied that he cheated on his ex-wife, MacKenzie Scott, with Sanchez after The National Enquirer reported that he was 'whisking his mistress off to exotic destinations on his $65 million private jet.' A lawyer for Bezos told the tabloid at the time that it was 'widely known' Bezos and Scott had been 'long separated' by the time he started seeing Sanchez.
The National Enquirer, for its part, stood by its reporting and claimed that its investigation was what led Bezos to publicly announce his divorce from Scott. 'The National Enquirer has been doggedly investigating this story for four months and the extraordinary details and evidence uncovered by our team, and presented to Mr. Bezos' representatives for comment early this week, underscores the kind of investigative reporting that the publication has long been known for,' a spokesperson for the magazine told CNN.
Brad Stone, the author of Amazon Unbound: Jeff Bezos and the Invention of a Global Empire, also maintained that Bezos had cheated on Scott with Sanchez. In the book, Stone even included an alleged conversation between Bezos and an executive at Amazon, where he seemingly confirmed his romance with Sanchez.
'Just to set the record straight, I did have a relationship with this woman,' Bezos told executives, according to an excerpt of the book published by The New York Post. 'But the story is completely wrong and out of order. MacKenzie and I have had good, healthy adult conversations about it. She is fine. The kids are fine. The media is having a field day. All of this is very distracting, so thank you for being focused on the business.'
Stone also reported that dozens of Amazon employees were 'surprised and disappointed by Bezos' affair.' 'Their infallible and righteous leader was, after all, a flawed human,' he wrote.
Bezos and Scott married in 1993 and share four children: three sons and one daughter. Their names and birthdates haven't been publicly released except for their eldest son, Preston. The couple adopted their daughter from China. Sanchez, for her part, has three kids. She shares two with Whitesell: son Evan, born in 2006, and daughter Ella, born in 2008. She also has another son, Nikko Gonzalez, from her past relationship with former NFL player Tony Gonzalez.
Best of StyleCaster
The 26 Best Romantic Comedies to Watch if You Want to Know What Love Feels Like
These 'Bachelor' Secrets & Rules Prove What Happens Behind the Scenes Is So Much Juicier
BTS's 7 Members Were Discovered in the Most Unconventional Ways
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jurassic World Rebirth has everything a Jurassic film should
Stephen Spielberg's original Jurassic Park film (1993) instilled awe and trepidation in his characters and audience alike. As his protagonists wrestled with the unintended consequences and ethical dilemmas of reanimating extinct apex predators, viewers marvelled at the novel use of CGI. At a keystroke it seemed to consign the hand-crafted stop-motion wonders of dinosaur films past to the archive. Alongside pulse-pounding action set pieces delivered with trademark Spielberg panache, that first film flamboyantly inaugurated a new era in fantasy effects. And it solicited delight and wonder from its audience. On opening day in New York the dinosaurs' first appearance prompted a spontaneous ovation: I was there and clapped too. Thirty-two years, six Jurassic iterations and countless monstrous digital apparitions later, that initial wow factor is a distant memory. By Jurassic World: Rebirth (set nearly 35 years after the original film) dinosaurs are treated by their human prey as barely more than inconvenient obstacles. They're dangerous, of course, but certainly not wondrous. Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here. Palaeontologist Dr Henry Loomis's (Jonathan Bailey) delight in coming face-to-face with his objects of study is a pale echo of the giddy euphoria that overtook Sam Neill and Laura Dern's characters all those years ago. In fact, early in the film we're told that the public have since lost all interest in dinosaurs. Wildlife parks and museum displays are closing and the animals themselves have mostly died off outside their quarantined tropical habitat. As this has information has little bearing for the plot, it's hard not to sense some ironic commentary from screenwriter David Koepp (returning to the franchise for the first time since 1997) on the exhaustion of the Jurassic Park model. Always incipiently reflexive – as a blockbuster set in a theme park – by this stage in the game, the franchise machinery is inescapably visible. Almost as ironic is a plot line promoting the open-source sharing of intellectual property for the benefit of the whole world rather than exploitative corporations. I doubt NBCUniversal-Comcast would agree. The Jurassic Park format is among the most unforgivingly rigid of any current film franchise. Each instalment (bar to some extent the last, the convoluted 2022 Jurassic World: Dominion, whose characters and story the new release completely ignores) places humans in perilous proximity to genetically rejuvenated sauropods. And generally does so in a remote, photogenic tropical location with minimal contact with the outside world. (Will the franchise ever run out of uncharted Caribbean islands where demented bio-engineers have wreaked evolutionary havoc?) The human characters in this new film are the usual pick-and-mix of daredevil adventurers, amoral corporate types and idealistic palaeontologists. And there are the mandatory school-age children too – important to keep the interest of younger viewers. The real stars of course, are the primeval leviathans who grow larger and more fearsome – though not more interesting – with each new episode of the franchise. How this human-dino jeopardy comes about tends not to matter very much. Jurassic World: Rebirth produces one of the least interesting MacGuffins in movie history (meaning something that drives the plot and which the charcters care about but the audience does not). Blood drawn from each of the three largest dinosaur species in the aforesaid remote tropical island will produce a serum to cure human heart disease (dinosaur hearts are huge, you see, so … never mind). This feeble contrivance suffices for sneery Big Pharma suit Martin (Rupert Friend) to hire freebooters Zora (Scarlett Johansson) and Duncan (Mahershala Ali) for his expedition. Along the way they encounter a marooned family (dad, two teens, one winsome but plucky grade-schooler) who subsequently have their own largely self-contained adventures before reuniting for the big climax. Franchise filmmaking is generally an auteur-free zone. Welsh blockbuster specialist Gareth Edwards is no Spielberg (though he pays homage at several point, notably in a waterborne first act studded with Jaws references). But he handles the action with unremarkable competence. In truth, Jurassic World: Rebirth suggests that the intellectual property so expensively vested in the franchise would benefit from some genetic modification. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Barry Langford does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sean Combs Found Not Guilty of Sex Trafficking and Racketeering in Trial's Mixed Verdict
The jury in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial handed down a mixed verdict on Wednesday, acquitting the music mogul of the most serious charges against him while finding him guilty on lesser counts. Combs was found not guilty on two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and on one count of racketeering conspiracy. He was, however, found guilty on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. More from TVLine Martin Kove Addresses 2024 Cobra Kai Misconduct Allegation, After Biting Co-Star at June Fan Event The Sandman's Final Season Trailer Features Dream's Return to Hell, Warns 'All Good Stories Come to an End' ABC News Fires Terry Moran Over Social Media Post Criticizing Trump Administration Official Following Wednesday's verdict, Combs faces a maximum of 20 years in prison, with each prostitution transportation charge carrying up to 10 years behind bars. 'Mr. Combs has been given his life by this jury,' defense attorney Marc Agnifilo said after the jury's decision came down, per CNN. 'He treasures, I assure you, the opportunity that he has been given, and he will not run afoul of anything this court imposes on him.' Combs was initially indicted in September 2024 on three counts of sex trafficking, racketeering and transportation to engage in prostitution. His seven-week trial began on May 5, with the jury's verdict coming on the third day of deliberations. During the trial proceedings, multiple women — including Combs' ex-girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura — testified to Combs' alleged patterns of sexual assault, violence and threats of blackmail, including multi-day 'freak offs,' in which Combs would allegedly provide drugs and alcohol and coerce women into participating in sexual activity with others. 'He's going to fight this with all of his energy and all of his might, and the full confidence of his lawyers,' Agnifilo said at the time of Combs' indictment. 'And I expect a long battle with a good result for Mr. Combs.' A date for Combs' sentencing has not yet been set. Best of TVLine 'Missing' Shows, Found! Get the Latest on Ahsoka, Monarch, P-Valley, Sugar, Anansi Boys and 25+ Others Yellowjackets Mysteries: An Up-to-Date List of the Series' Biggest Questions (and Answers?) The Emmys' Most Memorable Moments: Laughter, Tears, Historical Wins, 'The Big One' and More
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South Park creators slam new streaming deal after season 27 premiere delayed
South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone have issued a fiery statement after Comedy Central announced the delay of the show's season 27 premiere. The network announced Wednesday morning that instead of a July 9 premiere date, fans will have to wait until July 23. But fans have already been eagerly awaiting the new season for more than two years, leaving some, including Parker and Stone, fuming. 'This merger is a s***show and it's f***ing up South Park,' the creators said in a joint statement posted to the show's official X account. 'We are at the studio working on new episodes and we hope the fans get to see them somehow.' The merger in question is that of David Ellison's Skydance and Paramount Global, which is set to close by July 6 — though that could be extended. But questions still remain around where the long-running animated series will be available for streaming. Last week, the show's $500 million exclusive streaming licensing deal with HBO Max expired. Paramount Global, the parent company of Comedy Central — where South Park has aired since its 1997 inception — has long said they want the show to live on their streaming service, Paramount+. However, the streaming rights to South Park have been shopped around to other companies, including Netflix and HBO Max parent Warner Bros. Discovery. — South Park (@SouthPark) July 2, 2025 In the meantime, South Park remains available to stream on Max in an extension agreement reached during negotiations. The show did not premiere on Paramount+ on July 1 as previously anticipated. However, South Park is expected to be available to stream on the platform by the time the new season debuts. Parker and Stone inked a deal with Paramount+ in 2021 for a reported $900 million to extend South Park through 2027 and renew the show on Comedy Central through season 30. At the time, they said: 'Comedy Central has been our home for 25 years and we're really happy that they've made a commitment to us for the next 75 years.' The drama surrounding season 27 comes months after the duo spoke about intentionally delaying it because of the 2024 presidential election. 'We've tried to do South Park through four or five presidential elections, and it is such a hard thing to do,' Stone told Vanity Fair in September 2024, adding: 'It's such a mind scramble, and it seems like it takes outsized importance.' While he acknowledged that the election is 'obviously f***ing important', Stone said: 'It kind of takes over everything and we just have less fun.'