Sweet-toothed fans are racing to Iceland for retro snack inspired by iconic 2000s drink
choco lot Sweet-toothed fans are racing to Iceland for retro snack inspired by iconic 2000s drink
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
SHOPPERS are flocking to Iceland to get their hands on a snack inspired by an iconic 2000s drink.
Nesquik now comes in yogurt form, and they are bringing back some core memories for millennials.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Nesquik Chocoballs were spotted in Iceland
Credit: Facebook / Snack Reviews
The cereal treat is a split pot with a generous helping of sweet yogurt made from 83 percent milk and crunchy chocolate balls.
The four-pack of 107g Chocoballs pots is being sold exclusively at Iceland for £2.80.
There is also a deal on now where you can buy three packs for just £6.00 - saving yourself £2.40.
Or you can mix and match them with a choice between Muller Corners or Quality Street's Toffee Dessert.
One savvy shopper spotted the tasty treat in their local Iceland and shared a photo on Snack Reviews Facebook page.
"I need," one wrote, adding the eyes emoji.
"I want these for me, not the kids," another joked.
Nesquik was a huge hit in the 2000s and is known for its range of flavoured milk drink powders, particularly the iconic chocolate variety.
It has been a staple in many British households for decades, often associated with childhood memories and nostalgic comfort.
In addition to the classic powders, Nesquik in the UK has expanded its product range to include ready-to-drink bottles and cereal, further cementing its presence in the breakfast and snack categories.
Dunnes Stores fans set for frenzy as major new food section lands in supermarkets
This comes as Nesquik's creator Nestle revealed it hiked the cost of its chocolate and coffee for customers.
The Swiss company said it's raised its prices by 2.1% overall - but for some items the hikes are in the double digits.
It blamed surging costs of coffee beans and chocolate.
"Despite the significant level of the increases in many markets, the actions were implemented with limited customer disruption," Nestle said.
Nestle produces a range of products, including chocolates, sweets, cereals, drinks, ice cream and pet foods.
Among its popular brands are Aero, Milkybar, Smarties, Milo, Haagen Dazs, San Pellegrino, and Felix cat food.
The company said it had better-than-expected sales growth of 2.8% in the first three months of the year.
The higher prices accounted for much of the rise.
Nestle said it had seen demand drop significantly following the price increases but it is now bouncing back.
It also warned there could be further impacts on customers due to higher global tariffs.
Donald Trump recently launched a global trade war when he announced major tariffs on dozens of countries.
The move has raised fears of a global recession, sent stock markets tumbling and caused economic uncertainty for businesses trading internationally.
Mr Trump has called on American companies to produce their products in the US to avoid costly tariffs.
But for chocolate makers this is near impossible as the key ingredient, cocoa, can only be grown in tropical climates.
On top of this, the price of cocoa has soared in recent years.
Farmers in West Africa, where 70% of the world's cocoa is harvested, have been struggling with climate-related issues that have decimated their cocoa production.
It's estimated 400,000 tonnes less of cocoa has been produced over the last few years, hiking the price significantly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil little changed as OPEC+ output hikes counter Russia disruption concerns
Aug 5 (Reuters) - Oil prices were little changed on Tuesday as traders assessed rising supply by OPEC+ against worries of weaker demand and U.S. President Donald Trump's new threats on India over its Russian oil purchases. Brent crude futures dipped 1 cent to $68.75 a barrel by 0631 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was down 2 cents at $66.28. Both contracts fell by more than 1% in the previous session to settle at their lowest in a week. Both benchmarks have receded because extra capacity from OPEC+ is acting as a buffer for any shortfalls in Russian supplies, said Priyanka Sachdeva, a senior market analyst at Phillip Nova. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, together known as OPEC+, agreed on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September. It marks a full and early reversal of the group's largest tranche of output cuts, amounting to about 2.5 million bpd, or around 2.4% of global demand, though analysts caution the actual amount returning to the market will be less. The rising supplies come amid renewed concerns about demand, with some analysts expecting faltering economic growth in the second half of the year. JPMorgan analysts said on Tuesday the risk of a U.S. recession was high as labour demand has stalled. In addition, China's July Politburo meeting signalled no additional policy easing, with the focus shifting to structural rebalancing of the world's second-largest economy, the analysts wrote in a note. At the same time, investors are eyeing possible supply disruptions. U.S. President Donald Trump has said he could impose 100% secondary tariffs on Russian crude buyers such as India after announcing a 25% tariff on Indian imports in July. On Monday, Trump again threatened higher tariffs on Indian goods over the Russian oil purchases. New Delhi called his attack "unjustified" and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening the trade rift between the two countries. India is the biggest buyer of seaborne crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million bpd from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. Traders are also awaiting any developments on the latest U.S. tariffs on its trading partners, which analysts fear could slow economic growth and dampen fuel demand.
Time Out
34 minutes ago
- Time Out
The 10 best places to retire in the UK in 2025
After a long, hard lifetime of work, we all want a relaxing retirement. Some choose to settle down near family, others to escape gloomy British weather by fleeing the country – but if you're still shopping around for the perfect place to enjoy your golden years, we've got some info that might be helpful. Pension and asset management company Legal & General (L&G) has done some research into where the best places in the country to retire are based on six 'pillars': housing, health, social and community, financial, nature, and amenities. The firm evaluated how 632 areas stack up to each of those pillars, giving them an overall rating and thereby creating a national ranking. As you might expect, leafy suburbs in the south of England tended to score exceptionally well, with the seven of the top 10 best areas for retirees being in Surrey or Buckinghamshire. In fact, it isn't until 15th that Cheshire, the first place not in the south of England, makes an appearance. Scotland and Wales don't get a look into the top 20, despite both having more affordable housing. The best places to retire in the UK According to L&G's research, the best place to move to for retirees in Britain is Chesham and Amersham, a gorgeous Buckinghamshire authority with excellent transport links and loads of nature. It excelled in the 'health' category, where it got a very impressive 93/100 due to a high number of its 65+ population remaining in good health, and good access to GPs and hospitals. Overall, the towns got 74/100, topping the list, and you can find out more about why they're so good here. Next was Beaconsfield, also in Buckinghamshire and only a 15-minute drive from Chesham. It was a close second, even beating Chesham and Amersham when it came to availability of senior housing, and ended up just two points behind its neighbour at 72 overall. For third place it was over to Surrey for the market towns of Dorking and Horley, which received 71, just narrowly missing out on being first runner up. Here's the top 10 places to retire in the UK right now, according to L&G. Chesham and Amersham, Buckinghamshire: 74 Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire: 72 Dorking and Horley, Surrey: 71 Godalming and Ash, Surrey: 71 Mid Sussex, West Sussex: 70 Woking, Surrey: 70 Farnham and Bordon, Surrey: 70 Esher and Walton, Surrey: 69 Suffolk Coastal, Suffolk: 69 East Grinstead and Uckfield, Surrey: 68 The only London area to make the list was Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner, down in 14th place. If you want to see the full list, including how each place did in each individual category, you can have a look at it here. The best places to retire in Scotland If you'd prefer to stay north of the border, L&G recommends Mid Dunbartonshire, which scored 55. It has loads of social and community opportunities for older people, which helped it make its way to the top of the Scottish leaderboard. Here are the top five best places to retire in Scotland: Mid Dunbartonshire, East Dunbartonshire: 55 Stirling and Strathallan, Stirling: 52 East Renfrewshire: 51 West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, Aberdeenshire: 51 Na h-Eileanan an Iar, Na h-Eileanan Siar: 50 The best places to retire in Wales In Wales, Monmouthshire was named the best place to live as an older person. Thanks to its great amenities – access to shops and culture which are accessible to the elderly – Monmouthshire ended up with an overall rating of 53. In general, Wales' top scorers were the lowest of the three nations, but each of these places has something unique that makes it worth checking out if you're planning your retirement outside of England. Monmouthshire, Gwent: 53 Dwyfor Meirionnydd, Gwynedd: 49 Vale of Glamorgan, South Glamorgan: 48 Ynys Mon, Gwynedd: 48 Mid and South Pembrokeshire, Dyfed: 47
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump's Japan trade deal doesn't even help US car companies
President Donald Trump's latest trade deal with Japan serves to demonstrate how little administration officials actually understands what they are doing in the trade policy arena. Tariffs are bad policy - and Trump's tariffs are being implemented in the most chaotic manner possible. Trump's trade policy doesn't even give US car companies a leg up Proponents of tariffs love to claim that their policies will incentivize domestic production, but the reality is that they add additional burdens to domestic producers. The Japanese trade agreement spans many sectors, but this idea can be seen clearly in the automotive industry. American car manufacturers are charged tariffs of 25% on imported parts and 50% on imported aluminum and steel. The costs of tariffs on importing components and raw materials essential to vehicles only serve to drive up production costs for those companies doing what Trump wants, building in America. Opinion: Republicans accused Biden of trying to bribe voters. Now they're doing the same. These tariffs have already collectively cost domestic producers billions of dollars. Ford alone lost $800 million to tariffs in the second quarter and expects to lose $2 billion this year. Ford has rather admirably taken on a great portion of the costs of these tariffs themselves rather than raising prices, but because of that, tariff policies have resulted in Ford's first quarterly loss in two years. That isn't sustainable. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Not only are these tariffs costing domestic producers money, but they are also disadvantaging them against foreign competition. Japanese car companies face a tariff of just 15%, thereby further incentivizing the import of Japanese cars over domestic production. This rate is also notably lower than the 25% rate on vehicles coming from Mexico and Canada, both of which produce vehicles for American car companies. There's an even greater irony in that fact because Japanese manufacturers, such as Toyota, have announced expansions to their already existing U.S.-based manufacturing plants. It turns out that continuing production in Japan will be better. Tariffs are bad - but Trump's aren't even doing what he claims The backward effects that tariffs are having on domestic car production are a perfect example of how dysfunctional this administration's policy is on the issue. Even the tariffs that are put into effect don't achieve what they purport to. Opinion: I'll never have a car payment. Here's my secret. In the case of cars, they are doing the opposite, giving manufacturers from a foreign nation an artificial leg up over American ones. In this case, the disparity is a result of negotiated deals taking place at different times. Trump is rewarding Japan by coming around to make a deal before both Mexico and Canada. Another area of concern is the sudden and unexpected shock of tariffs, often with little advance notice to the impacted industries. Tariffs don't make sense, but they make even less sense when there is no phase in the window in which companies can change their manufacturing practices to avoid them. Nor can any company be faulted for not rapidly changing any of their practices, given the fact that Trump's tariff policies have changed by the week, or sometimes even by the day. The volatile nature of these policies has made it impossible for any affected parties to make reasonable decisions going forward. This administration's dysfunctional approach to tariffs has resulted in a headache for everyone involved. While everyone suffers, domestic producers end up getting the short end of the stick. None of this is good. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
