Trump sues Wall Street Journal and Murdoch over reporting on Epstein ties
The president denied writing the letter, calling the story 'false, malicious, and defamatory'.
Jeffrey Epstein in 2017 (New York State Sex Offender Registry via AP)
The letter was reportedly collected by disgraced British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell as part of a birthday album for Epstein years before he was first arrested in 2006 and subsequently had a falling-out with Mr Trump.
The letter bearing Mr Trump's name includes text framed by the outline of what appears to be a hand-drawn naked woman and ends with, 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret,' according to the newspaper.
The outlet described the contents of the letter but did not publish a photo showing it entirely or provide details on how it came to learn about it.
It comes after the US Justice Department asked a federal court to unseal grand jury transcripts in Epstein's case at the direction of Mr Trump amid a firestorm over the administration's handling of records related to the case.
Deputy attorney general Todd Blanche filed motions urging the court to unseal the Epstein transcripts as well as those in the case against Maxwell, who was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein.
Epstein killed himself in 2019 shortly after his arrest while awaiting trial.
The Justice Department's announcement that it would not be making public any more Epstein files enraged parts of Mr Trump's base, in part because members of his own administration had hyped the expected release and stoked conspiracies around the well-connected financier.
Activists put up a poster showing President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein near the US Embassy in London (AP/Thomas Krych)
The Justice Department said in the court filings that it will work with prosecutors in New York to make appropriate redactions of victim-related information and other personally identifying information before transcripts are released.
'Transparency in this process will not be at the expense of our obligation under the law to protect victims,' Mr Blanche wrote.
But despite the new push to release the grand jury transcripts, the administration has not announced plans to reverse course and release other evidence in its possession.
Attorney general Pam Bondi had hyped the release of additional materials after the initial Epstein files disclosure in February sparked outrage because it contained no new revelations.
A judge would have to approve the release of the grand jury transcripts, and it is likely to be a lengthy process to decide what can become public and to make redactions to protect sensitive witness and victim information.
The records would show testimony from witnesses and other evidence presented by the prosecution during the secret grand jury proceedings, when a panel decides whether there is enough evidence to bring an indictment, or a formal criminal charge.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Brit siblings, 11 and 13, who drowned in Spain holiday horror pictured
The two tragic British children who died while on a family holiday in Spain have been named and pictured. Siblings Ameiya, 13, and her 11-year-old brother, Ricardo Junior, from Erdington, tragically lost their lives at sea during a family holiday in Salou. The siblings, described by loved ones as "beautiful" and "bright", were given treatment following the "tragic incident at sea" but sadly did not survive. Kayla Jasvinder Del-Brocco, the aunt of the children, said her niece and nephew were carried away from the shore by fierce currents "They went out to swim together with their dad as they loved the beach," she said. "Mum said 'don't be long' and took her little one to the bathroom. "She came back out and couldn't see anyone. That's when the nightmare commenced." Kayla described Ameiya as "athletic, driven, motherly with her siblings, sarcastic and unique". Ricardo Junior was kind, loving and helpful," she said. "He wanted to be a YouTuber and would do anything for a few quid. He doted on his mum."
Scotsman
31 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why silence over Gaza, even in Scotland, risks complicity in war crimes
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The situation in Gaza has never been a distant conflict; it is a humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in real time, and it demands a political response that goes beyond words of concern. As the death toll rises, the calls for action from my constituents grow louder and more urgent. Every day, I receive messages not only expressing anguish over the suffering of Palestinians, who are being deliberately starved, displaced, and killed while trying to access food and water, but also demanding that their elected representatives act. They are not only grieving; they are writing letters and calling for accountability at every level of government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As a Muslim MSP, I feel the emotional toll of this crisis both personally and publicly. At Friday prayers, in mosques, at community events and constituency surgeries, I am approached with grief, frustration, and a deep sense of urgency. Many are deeply shaken by what they are witnessing and feel abandoned by institutions they once trusted to stand for justice. People want reassurance that their voices are not being drowned out by political hesitation. READ MORE: Why Palestinians in Gaza are protesting with photos of Israeli children killed by Hamas Scores of people carry sacks of flour through the ruins of northern Gaza. UN-backed food security experts have warned the 'worst-case scenario of famine' is playing out in the area (Picture: Bashar Taleb) | AFP via Getty Images Providing arms and diplomatic cover Some argue that Gaza should not be a focus for British politicians. However, decisions made in Westminster, regarding arms exports, foreign policy, and trade, have global implications. We provide arms and diplomatic cover; we are not a neutral party. People in Scotland understand this. They expect those in public office to act with transparency and a firm commitment to human rights. Silence, in this context, is not a neutral stance. It risks complicity in war crimes. The systematic brutality we are witnessing in Gaza and the West Bank is not collateral damage; it is the deliberate dismantling of a people's right to exist. Entire families are being wiped out in minutes. Hospitals, schools, and places of worship have been bombed. Journalists and aid workers are allegedly being targeted and some have been killed. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The horror unfolding at humanitarian aid points is especially shocking. Civilians, many of them children, have been killed while queuing for food and water. What should be safe zones for relief have become death traps. These are not isolated incidents. The ongoing violence fits a broader pattern that many human rights observers now warn may amount to ethnic cleansing, or even genocide under international law. Such actions cannot go unanswered. There must be accountability. British citizens have also been among the victims. Three UK aid workers were killed in an Israeli airstrike on a World Central Kitchen convoy in April 2024. More recently, Israeli tank fire struck the Holy Family Church in Gaza, killing civilians who were sheltering inside. People rush to join a queue at a charity kitchen in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip | AFP via Getty Images Condemning but enabling atrocities That is why I have consistently worked with MPs and fellow MSPs to amplify concerns about Gaza. I welcomed the UK Government's decision to suspend trade talks with Israel and to impose sanctions on the most extreme members of Prime Minister Netanyahu's government. These measures are steps in the right direction, but they are far from sufficient. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Last week, the UK joined 27 other countries in condemning Israel's 'inhumane killing' of civilians seeking aid. Yet, despite suspending some export licences in September 2024, the UK has continued to authorise military exports, including munitions, vehicle and aircraft parts, and maintains diplomatic support in international arenas. You cannot claim to condemn atrocities while enabling the means to carry them out. Here in Scotland, we must also question how our own institutions may be complicit. I recently met with members of Campaign Against Arms Trade Edinburgh, which raised serious concerns about public subsidies being directed through Scottish Enterprise to arms manufacturers, including companies whose components may be used in weapons linked to war crimes. While not all funding is directly tied to weapons, the ethical implications are undeniable. Taxpayer money should never support, even indirectly, actions that risk violating international law. Public funds must align with Scotland's commitment to peace, dignity, and justice. Yasmine, a 22-year-old Palestinian mother, holds her malnourished two-month-old daughter Teen as they wait for treatment at the Nasser hospital in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip | AFP via Getty Images Standing Together In that same spirit of accountability and solidarity, I've also been in conversation with Standing Together, a movement of Jewish and Palestinian citizens in Israel working jointly for peace and equality. In a deeply polarised and dangerous environment, these activists are showing extraordinary courage. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad They risk their personal safety to stand against settler violence, challenge discriminatory policies, and protest against the actions of the Israeli government. Their message is simple but powerful: that peace is only possible when it is built on mutual recognition and shared humanity. Supporting movements like Standing Together is not only a way to protest against violence and promote peace in the face of the horrific situation unfolding in the region, it is also essential to tackling antisemitism and Islamophobia. This is not about political allegiance. It is about basic human dignity; the right of every person, regardless of where they are born, to live free from fear, violence, and oppression. The scale of suffering in Gaza has moved far beyond the bounds of political debate. Calls for a ceasefire are no longer enough. There must be immediate international action to stop the violence, protect civilians, and hold those responsible to account. In light of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's recent announcement, I welcome the outlined pathway towards recognising the state of Palestine ahead of the United Nations' General Assembly in September. The suffering in Gaza remains relentless. Our priority must be protecting civilians, both hostages and the people of Gaza, who continue to bear the unbearable. On Gaza, and on every issue where human rights are under threat, I will continue to raise my voice. Whether it's in the Scottish Parliament, in community spaces, or in solidarity with international movements for justice, I will continue to use every platform to speak out against oppression and to stand up for those whose voices are being silenced.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump extends deadline for tariff deal with Mexico by another 90 days
Donald Trump has extended the deadline for a tariff deal with Mexico by another 90 days, fuelling speculation he could announce pauses for dozens of other countries that face punitive higher import duties from Friday. As the countdown continues to his deadline for a trade deal – already extended by four weeks from the original 90 days – the US president said he had made the decision to offer more time to Mexico because of the complexities of the trading relationship. He wrote on social media: 'We will be talking to Mexico over the next 90 Days with the goal of signing a Trade Deal somewhere within the 90 Day period of time, or longer.' A little more than two weeks ago Trump threatened the EU and Mexico with tariffs of 30% on most exports to the US, but last Sunday he concluded a deal with Brussels with a 15% baseline rate from 1 August. Writing on his Truth Social platform, Trump said: 'I have just concluded a telephone conversation with the President of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum, which was very successful in that, more and more, we are getting to know and understand each other. 'The complexities of a Deal with Mexico are somewhat different than other Nations because of both the problems, and assets, of the Border. 'We have agreed to extend, for a 90 Day period, the exact same Deal as we had for the last short period of time, namely, that Mexico will continue to pay a 25% Fentanyl Tariff, 25% Tariff on Cars, and 50% Tariff on Steel, Aluminum, and Copper.' He said Mexico had agreed to 'immediately terminate its Non Tariff Trade Barriers, of which there were many' although he did not specify which. Non-tariff barriers can range from complex paperwork to trading standards and food regulations. Dozens of other countries that have not signed a trade deal with the US are facing punitive tariffs from Friday including some of the world's poorest such as Lesotho, Bangladesh and Nepal, and the world's richest including Canada and Taiwan. Agreements have only been reached with eight of the 60 countries Trump said in April he would impose punitive 'reciprocal' tariffs on in retribution for what he described as years of looting, pillaging and scavenging of the US, announcing what he called 'liberation day'. China faces a separate deadline of 12 August, with an extension agreed in principle but yet to be approved by the White House. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The US Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, said on Thursday that a deal with Beijing was 'close', while Trump claimed last week that one with Australia was not far off. Other large trading partners still in Trump's crosshairs include Brazil, which has been threatened with a 50% tariff if it does not end what Trump contends is a 'witch-hunt' agains its former president, Jair Bolsonaro; and Canada, which is facing a 35% tariff tomorrow. Earlier this week the Canadian prime minister, Mark Carney, said it was possible a trade deal might not be concluded by 1 August, but on Thursday Trump linked its chances of a deal to its position on Palestine. He took to his social media platform just after midnight Washington time to say a deal could be scuppered. 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine,' he said on Truth Social. 'That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!'
