AVY Q1 Earnings Call: Tariff Uncertainty Clouds Steady Organic Growth and Margin Performance
Is now the time to buy AVY? Find out in our full research report (it's free).
Revenue: $2.15 billion vs analyst estimates of $2.16 billion (flat year on year, in line)
Adjusted EPS: $2.30 vs analyst estimates of $2.31 (in line)
Adjusted EBITDA: $352.4 million vs analyst estimates of $353.4 million (16.4% margin, in line)
Adjusted EPS guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $2.40 at the midpoint, below analyst estimates of $2.58
Operating Margin: 11.9%, in line with the same quarter last year
Free Cash Flow was -$59.9 million, down from $64.1 million in the same quarter last year
Organic Revenue rose 2.3% year on year, in line with the same quarter last year
Market Capitalization: $13.46 billion
Avery Dennison's first quarter performance was shaped by consistent demand in its core Materials and Solutions Groups, with management citing high-value product categories and sequential margin expansion as key drivers. CEO Deon Stander highlighted strong organic growth in high-value segments such as graphics, reflective solutions, and industrial tapes, as well as a rebound in North American label volumes after prior-year destocking. The Solutions Group benefited from continued momentum in retail shelf-edge solutions and food labeling, offsetting softness in certain apparel-related categories.
Looking ahead, Avery Dennison's forward guidance reflects caution amid increased macroeconomic and trade-related uncertainty. Management pointed to evolving tariffs, particularly those affecting Chinese apparel exports, as a primary reason for restricting visibility to quarterly guidance. CFO Gregory Lovins explained that tariff impacts and potential shifts in global sourcing strategies could pressure apparel demand and margins, prompting the company to activate scenario planning and cost containment measures. Stander noted, 'It is more difficult to predict and forecast full-year results,' as the company balances investment in growth areas with proactive risk management.
Avery Dennison's management attributed the quarter's steady results to targeted growth in high-value product lines, operational efficiency, and resilience in core markets. They also addressed evolving challenges in global trade policy and related impacts on customer demand, especially in apparel and logistics.
High-value category momentum: Management highlighted strong organic growth in high-value categories, including graphics, reflective solutions, and industrial tapes, which now represent over a third of Materials Group sales. These segments saw high single-digit growth, offsetting weaker base business performance.
Sequential recovery in North America: Label volume in North America improved from the prior year, aided by normalization of customer inventories and working capital. This helped stabilize Materials Group results despite softer demand in Europe and flat trends in China.
Solutions Group project execution: The Solutions Group delivered top-line and margin expansion, driven by the successful rollout of shelf-edge solutions (VESCOM) at CVS Health and ongoing pilots with major grocery retailers like Kroger. Apparel-related growth was mixed: core apparel rose mid-single digits, but certain personalized and sports categories faced declines due to program timing.
RFID and intelligent label outlook: Management emphasized continued progress in enterprise-wide intelligent labels, particularly in apparel and food, while logistics applications experienced expected declines. While new food pilots and compliance-driven retail programs are advancing, management does not anticipate another large-scale logistics rollout in 2025.
Tariff and macroeconomic headwinds: Leadership acknowledged elevated uncertainty from recent tariff changes, particularly affecting apparel labels for garments exported from China to the U.S. While direct cost impacts are considered manageable, the indirect effect on discretionary demand is less predictable, leading to a more cautious approach for the remainder of the year.
Avery Dennison's management expects near-term results to hinge on trade policy developments, apparel market demand, and the company's ability to grow high-value categories while managing costs.
Tariff-driven apparel uncertainty: Management believes that ongoing U.S.-China tariff changes could continue to disrupt apparel label demand, with apparel sales expected to decline mid-single digits in the near term. The team is working with customers to facilitate supply chain shifts and is implementing pricing surcharges to offset direct input cost inflation.
Expansion in high-value categories: The company sees growth potential in intelligent labels, food labeling, and shelf-edge solutions, especially as adoption expands in grocery and general retail. Management is investing in these areas to diversify revenue streams and reduce exposure to cyclical end markets.
Proactive cost management: In response to macroeconomic uncertainty, management has activated scenario-based planning, including temporary cost controls and identification of structural actions if demand deteriorates. This approach is designed to protect margins and sustain free cash flow, even in a lower-volume environment.
Ghansham Panjabi (Baird): Asked whether recent tariff announcements prompted pre-buying or order shifts in apparel. Management clarified that no significant pull-forward occurred, but early Q2 apparel demand is trending lower as brands re-evaluate sourcing and pricing strategies under new tariffs.
John McNulty (BMO Capital Markets): Inquired about the rise in working capital and the company's approach to mitigating low single-digit tariff impacts. CFO Gregory Lovins explained the increase was due to higher incentive and rebate payments, and tariff headwinds will be addressed through pricing surcharges and sourcing adjustments.
Jeffrey Zekauskas (JPMorgan): Questioned if the decline in apparel demand is mainly a China event and rationale for accelerating share buybacks amid limited visibility. Management attributed the apparel softness to China tariffs and justified buybacks based on valuation, noting the recent uncertainty emerged after the repurchases.
George Staphos (Bank of America): Probed Avery Dennison's capacity to support customer supply chain shifts out of China and the outlook for intelligent label growth. Management said its global network can accommodate moderate shifts, but overall industry capacity remains a constraint; intelligent label programs remain on track except for apparel-related volatility.
Mike Roxland (Truist Securities): Sought details on competitive dynamics in intelligent labels for logistics and mitigation strategies for share erosion. CEO Deon Stander outlined innovation, process efficiency, and customer support as key levers to maintain majority share and support future logistics rollouts.
In the coming quarters, the StockStory team will monitor (1) the pace at which apparel brands adapt sourcing and pricing strategies in response to tariffs, (2) the execution and scaling of intelligent label pilots in food and retail, and (3) signs of margin resilience as cost control measures are deployed. The timing and impact of potential large-scale logistics customer rollouts and further macroeconomic developments will also be critical factors to track.
Avery Dennison currently trades at a forward P/E ratio of 16.7×. Should you double down or take your chips? See for yourself in our free research report.
The market surged in 2024 and reached record highs after Donald Trump's presidential victory in November, but questions about new economic policies are adding much uncertainty for 2025.
While the crowd speculates what might happen next, we're homing in on the companies that can succeed regardless of the political or macroeconomic environment. Put yourself in the driver's seat and build a durable portfolio by checking out our Top 6 Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 176% over the last five years.
Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Exlservice (+354% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Labcorp Holdings Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Lags
Labcorp Holdings (NYSE:LH) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$3.53b (up 9.5% from 2Q 2024). Net income: US$237.9m (up 16% from 2Q 2024). Profit margin: 6.7% (up from 6.4% in 2Q 2024). The increase in margin was driven by higher revenue. EPS: US$2.85 (up from US$2.44 in 2Q 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Labcorp Holdings Revenues Beat Expectations, EPS Falls Short Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 1.2%. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates by 12%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 4.5% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 6.3% growth forecast for the Healthcare industry in the US. Performance of the American Healthcare industry. The company's shares are up 8.7% from a week ago. Risk Analysis You should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Labcorp Holdings. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Integer Holdings' (NYSE:ITGR) earnings growth rate lags the 11% CAGR delivered to shareholders
While Integer Holdings Corporation (NYSE:ITGR) shareholders are probably generally happy, the stock hasn't had particularly good run recently, with the share price falling 12% in the last quarter. But at least the stock is up over the last five years. Unfortunately its return of 65% is below the market return of 100%. While the stock has fallen 3.5% this week, it's worth focusing on the longer term and seeing if the stocks historical returns have been driven by the underlying fundamentals. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. During five years of share price growth, Integer Holdings achieved compound earnings per share (EPS) growth of 1.4% per year. This EPS growth is slower than the share price growth of 11% per year, over the same period. This suggests that market participants hold the company in higher regard, these days. That's not necessarily surprising considering the five-year track record of earnings growth. This optimism is visible in its fairly high P/E ratio of 45.37. The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image). It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on Integer Holdings' earnings, revenue and cash flow. A Different Perspective While the broader market gained around 19% in the last year, Integer Holdings shareholders lost 7.1%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 11%, each year, over five years. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Integer Holdings (1 doesn't sit too well with us) that you should be aware of. Of course Integer Holdings may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
China Calls for Global AI Rules as U.S. Escalates Tech Fight – What Investors Should Watch
China is proposing to lead the creation of a new international body to shape the future of artificial intelligence. Speaking at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai, Premier Li Qiang called for a World AI Cooperation Organization, aiming to make AI development more inclusive and to prevent it from being dominated by a handful of nations or companies. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The proposal comes as the global AI race accelerates. Premier Li cited the need for shared governance to address the risks tied to AI, from job losses to security concerns. Former Google (GOOG) chief executive Eric Schmidt backed the idea of global collaboration, saying the U.S. and China should work together to maintain stability and ensure human control over powerful AI systems. Tensions Rise as China Courts Allies and the U.S. Doubles Down However, turning that vision into a working framework will not be easy, as the U.S. is taking a different path. Just days before the conference, President Donald Trump signed new executive orders to ease regulations and boost energy access for AI infrastructure, including data centers. These moves are designed to strengthen companies like OpenAI and Google while reinforcing America's lead in advanced AI. In the meantime, geopolitical friction remains high. U.S. restrictions on Nvidia Corporation (NVDA) chips continue to limit China's access to high-end semiconductors. Premier Li acknowledged these supply chain issues and reaffirmed China's goal to reduce its reliance on foreign technology. That includes support for homegrown companies like DeepSeek, which has gained attention for scaling up open-sourced models and AI agents. China's strategy also includes outreach to the Global South, including partnerships with Brazil and African nations. However, international trust remains a hurdle. Western companies and governments are hesitant to align with a governance model led by Beijing, especially regarding concerns around data access, intellectual property, and dual-use technologies. Takeaway for Investors For investors, the gap between cooperation and competition is clear. Chinese firms are racing to set their own benchmarks, while U.S. players double down on domestic infrastructure and AI regulation. The idea of a global AI framework may gain traction diplomatically, but market dynamics suggest a more fragmented path forward. Whether this initiative reshapes AI development or becomes another diplomatic flashpoint will depend on how governments and companies balance access, risk, and control in the months ahead. Using TipRanks' Comparison Tool, we've analyzed several leading AI stocks that could be influenced by geopolitical tensions, shifting regulations, and broader market dynamics.