Ranges on Fort Benning aren't long enough for Army's new sniper rifle
The MK22 Precision Sniper Rifle is a multi-caliber bolt-action sniper rifle that was designed to replace the Army's M2010, M110 and M107 rifles, according to the Army's Program Executive Office Soldier, which is in charge of new weapon development.
The Army's current generation of sniper rifles have 'an effective range' of nearly 1,000 meters, but the new MK22 can reach targets between 1,500 to 1,800 meters away, said Shane Duncanson, Fort Benning range planner, in an Army release. As a result, he said, the sniper rifle 'requires a whole different range design.'
Will Brugge, a spokesperson for Fort Benning, said that the range upgrades will allow soldiers to use the MK22 to the fullest extent, which helps them train specific sniper skills like calculating ballistics, estimating distances and actually hitting targets.
'Firing at targets with the weapon system's maximum effective range requires snipers to be absolutely precise with their ballistic calculations to accommodate for atmospheric conditions, primarily wind speed and temperature. It also requires snipers to be absolute with their range estimation skills. Further engagements also challenge the sniper's ability to detect targets and apply target recognition skills,' Brugge said. 'Snipers who do this successfully gain experience and confidence in using the weapon system.'
The MK22 rifle can swap between three different barrels to use three types of ammunition: the typical 7.62mm, and two new calibers, .300 and .338 Norma Magnum rounds, which can be switched out depending on the type of mission.
With the shortest barrel, the rifle can use standard 7.62 rounds for targets as far as 1000 meters. Two longer barrels accommodate the .300NM's regular ball round and the .338NM's armor-piercing round for shots up to 1,500 meters, according to an Army fact sheet on the system.
An Army marksmanship instructor at one of the largest bases told Task & Purpose that some soldiers with the new MK22 have not yet received the .300NM and .338NM ammunition. Unlike 7.62 rounds, which the Army has used for decades in other weapons, both of the new sniper rounds have been developed specifically for the rifle. The Army signed a $157 million contract with Sig Sauer to produce .300NM and .338NM ammunition in June 2022. Sig Sauer told Task & Purpose that all of the ammunition ordered by the Army had been delivered.
The Army fielded the MK22 to special operations soldiers in 2021. According to PEO Soldier officials, the sniper rifles are still being distributed to conventional units that have sniper-trained soldiers assigned to them, such as infantry battalions. Officials declined to give additional details on what units have so far received the MK22 or which might soon.
The sniper rifle is also being adopted by the Marine Corps, which announced in November 2024 that it had been fielded to all of its infantry and reconnaissance units and training schools. The new rifles arrive amid a Marine Corps-wide overhaul of its marksmanship training, which includes building new ranges at major training centers.
Fort Benning's largest firing range, the Burroughs Range, was completed in 1976 and was originally designed for heavy sniper training with armored targets and a moving target rail system 800 meters from shooters.
To make room for the MK22, the range will now initially be upgraded for soldiers to practice with targets at distances between 800 and 1,100 meters. Further work will extend that distance to 1,200 meters away in the coming years.
However, as part of the range upgrades, the Army is removing a 225-meter berm and tracks, which will give soldiers an additional line of sight to distant targets and an area to install new trackless moving targets.
A Marine Corps reply-all email apocalypse has an incredible real-life ending
Army shuts down its sole active-duty information operations command
Army plans to close more than 20 base museums in major reduction
Former Green Beret nominated to top Pentagon position to oversee special ops
The Navy's new recruiting commercial puts the 'dirt wars' in the past
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
William Blair Upgrades CACI International (CACI) Stock to Outperform
CACI International Inc (NYSE:CACI) is one of the Top 10 Software and Technology Stocks to Buy Now. William Blair analyst Louie DiPalma upgraded the company's stock to 'Outperform' from 'Market Perform,' as reported by The Fly. The firm opines that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act features extensive drone funding. The firm's analysis reflects that CACI International Inc (NYSE:CACI) happens to be one of the industry's largest counter-drone system providers, describing this position as 'under-the-radar.' An IT technician in an open office with stacks of servers in the background. The firm opines that CACI International Inc (NYSE:CACI)'s shares provide valuation-focused investors an opportunity for drone exposure at a discount to peers. The company was awarded a 5-year task order valued at up to $66 million in order to continue helping the U.S. Navy's Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) and the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Carderock Division. CACI International Inc (NYSE:CACI) was also awarded a 5-year task order valued at up to $54 million to continue its support to the U.S. Army Product Manager Ground Sensors. The company is expected to provide current and future operational capability and efficiency across the life cycle of critical ground sensors, which include night vision, electro-optics, and thermal systems utilised by warfighters. CACI International Inc (NYSE:CACI) is engaged in providing expertise and technology to enterprise and mission customers in support of national security in the intelligence, defense, and federal civilian sectors. Frontier Capital Management, an investment management company, released its Q1 2025 investor letter. Here is what the fund said: 'The market volatility has created several opportunities to invest in companies at prices we find attractive, and thus we have initiated new positions in a variety of industries. Examples include CACI International Inc (NYSE:CACI) Amentum Holdings, Inc., Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc., and DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. CACI and Amentum both provide essential services to the Department of Defense and other governmental agencies. These companies recently saw a dramatic decline in their stock prices as investors became concerned that the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) would recommend cuts across all government areas. While pruning inefficient spending is likely, we believe that the mission critical nature of the projects on which CACI and Amentum work, together with the considerable cost the government would incur to bring this work in-house, are testaments to the value these companies provide. While some projects may be delayed, increased spending on defense and digital infrastructure should enable these companies to grow earnings during the next few years. Essential Properties owns and leases properties with a focus on regional and local mid-level markets. It is well capitalized and has a low percentage of leases rolling off over the next few years.' While we acknowledge the potential of CACI as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Cheap AI Stocks to Buy According to Analysts and 11 Unstoppable Growth Stocks to Invest in Now Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
4 days ago
- Miami Herald
As Drone Warfare Evolves, Pentagon Sees Its Own Vulnerabilities
WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon has been working to beef up drone defenses at overseas bases in the past 18 months, after three Army reservists were killed in an attack by an Iran-backed militia on an outpost in Jordan early last year. But in recent months, the U.S. military has seen a potentially broader vulnerability, as both Israel and Ukraine attacked adversaries with drones smuggled deep behind enemy lines. The audacious and creative use of drones by an Israeli intelligence agency to mount strikes from inside Iran, and Ukraine's so-called Operation Spider's Web, which knocked out Russian strategic bombers with drones launched from inside Russia, has made clear that the threat to the U.S. military is not just overseas, but also at home. American defense companies are pushing new technologies that they say can more effectively intercept drones. The companies are hoping that the billions of dollars the Pentagon is planning to invest in missile defense -- the so-called Golden Dome program -- will also be used to build up new drone defenses. Some new technologies aim not to shoot down drones one by one, but use what is known as directed energy, including high-powered microwaves, to take down large swarms of drones at once. The military has conducted at least two tests of the new microwave system, including one in the Middle East and one in the Pacific, setting the stage for a bigger Pentagon investment. The leaders of Epirus, the company that developed the microwave defense, have warned that the rise of new kinds drones means the U.S. military faces a 'guerrilla war of machines,' a style of fighting that is alien to the Pentagon's traditional way of thinking. Andy Lowery, chief executive of Epirus, said drone warfare between Russia and Ukraine had evolved with breathtaking speed. 'What we saw in Russia will play out here,' he said. 'Operation Spider's Web should be a real wake-up call to us, to the whole world, that this is very, very serious.' Ukraine, with U.S. help, has invested in drone technology and has developed new kinds of drones that can be used against ships, planes and tanks. American officials estimate that in recent months, Ukrainian drones have caused some 70% of Russian casualties. During Operation Spider's Web, Ukraine's intelligence agency smuggled drones across Russia to strike multiple air bases at once, destroying a large number of Russian strategic bombers. The attack highlighted how effective relatively cheap, concealable drones can be against traditional militaries. 'We're watching with our jaws dropped down on how fast the Ukrainians adapt to new technologies,' Lowery said. Russia has used its own drones and ones built by Iran to terrorize Ukrainian troops and the country's civilian population. Iranian drones have been used by Tehran-backed militias, not just in the attack in Jordan that killed the U.S. Army reservists, but in Syria, Iraq and Yemen. And Israel's use of drones smuggled into Iran in its initial attack on the country's nuclear program last month showed how quickly new technologies were spreading around the world. Shifting its strategy to counter drones, experts said, has challenged the Pentagon. 'This is a Sept. 11-style problem, and we are still operating in a Sept. 10 mindset,' said Christian Brose, chief strategy officer at Anduril, a defense company that makes equipment for the U.S. military to detect and destroy adversarial drones. 'On the day after a catastrophic attack, there is going to be a string of evidence that we should have seen this coming.' Pentagon officials insist they are taking the threat seriously and making investments to improve defenses. American commanders, especially in the Middle East, have taken steps over the past several years to build what the military calls a layered network of defenses, including jamming devices, missiles and other systems, to ward off hostile drone, rocket and missile attacks. Those efforts accelerated after the three Army reservists were killed in January 2024 at a remote logistics outpost in northeast Jordan called Tower 22. The drones were fired at the base by Iran-backed militias. Since then, the military has made 'considerable improvements across the board,' Adm. Charles B. Cooper II, President Donald Trump's nominee to be the next head of the Pentagon's Central Command, told senators last month. 'We really are leaps and bounds ahead of where we were before' the attack in Jordan, Cooper said. 'Having said that, I would never be satisfied that we have the maximum readiness.' But Brose and others said the threat is not just at overseas bases. In December 2023, surveillance drones flew over an Air Force base in Virginia where F-22 planes were stationed. 'Does anyone believe if a country wanted to try to do to us what the Ukrainians did to Russia that they wouldn't have a decent ability to be successful?' Brose asked. 'Do we think it's impossible that a willing adversary couldn't sneak nefarious drones into the country?' Lowery, the Epirus chief executive, noted that the Pentagon had spared counter-drone defenses from its across-the-board cuts announced earlier this year. In hearings on Capitol Hill last month, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was asked repeatedly by Republican and Democratic lawmakers about America's vulnerability to drone attacks. Hegseth said that 'cheaper, one-way commercially available drones with small explosives represent a new threat.' Hegseth said that he met with Gen. Dan Caine, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and top aides soon after the Ukrainian attacks to ensure that military forces based in the United States and overseas were adequately protected. The secretary recently approved the creation of a new organization, led by the Army, to address drone warfare and counter-drone measures, Gen. James Mingus, the Army's vice chief of staff, said at a conference in Washington last week. The organization is modeled after an agency the Pentagon formed two decades ago to counter roadside bombs that insurgents used against U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Army oversees drone defense for the military. But critics of the Army's past approaches have said its counter-drone defenses are built on older technology and are not adaptable enough, given how quickly the drone threat has evolved on the battlefield in Ukraine. New technologies can detect and identify incoming drones, then take them out more efficiently. Older technology, critics say, is poor at identifying drones, including which ones pose the most acute and immediate threat. Robust drone defense requires multiple ways to take out a drone, some defense experts said. Anduril, which has contracts with Special Operations Command and the Marine Corps, has a counter-drone system that combines methods for detecting a drone, including cameras and radar, with various ways to take it down, including shooting down the drone and jamming it. Supporters of those technologies say the innovations show that the government does not have to invent counter-drone systems, but simply adopt new technologies more quickly. Corporations making new anti-drone technologies have complained that government regulations hinder development. Lowery compared the emerging drone threat to a famous scene from Star Wars. 'We aren't thinking about the fact that an X-Wing pilot dropped a little bomb in the middle of the Death Star and blew the whole thing to smithereens,' Lowery said. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
Forbes
4 days ago
- Forbes
The U.S. Army's $170,000 Attack Drone Competes With $500 FPVs
The SwitchBlade 600 is the Army's choice for its LASSO project New budget documents show that the U.S. Army is making a little headway in its efforts to catch up with Ukraine and Russia acquiring small attack drones like the ubiquitous FPVs. But they also show there is still a very long way to go, and rather than abundant low-cost systems, the Army will be fielding a few expensive systems for the immediate future. Low Altitude Stalking And Strike Two years ago, back in July 2023, the U.S. Army announced a new Low Altitude Stalking and Strike Ordnance (LASSO) program. The new weapon was on an 'an urgent capability acquisition pathway to rapidly deliver this capability to the Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT).' The project was clearly inspired by Ukraine, where small FPV quadcopters were taking out Russian armor at long range, and would give the Army similar capability 'LASSO is a man-portable, tube launched, lethal payload munition, unmanned aerial system. It includes electrical optical /infrared sensor, precision flight control, and the ability to fly, track and engage non-line-of-sight targets and armored vehicles with precision lethal fires. LASSO currently consists of three modules: the launch tube, unmanned aerial system, and fire control station.' A U.S. marine with a tube-launched attack drone (note gas supply for the launcher) The big difference here is that LASSO would have an infrared sensor or thermal imager, These are still rare on FPVs because they typically add $200-$500 to the cost, so daytime FPVs generally lack them. And while in Ukraine FPVs are carried in a backpack and launched from a stand, the U.S. Army wanted a tube-launched version. This would be fired out by compressed air or other gas, then unfold its wings, making for a quicker and easier launch but at the cost of some cost and complexity. The LASSO requirement is for a 20-kilometer range and the ability to destroy armored vehicles including tanks, doing the same job as FPVs, There are a wide variety of FPVs in use in Ukraine, varying in size, payload and extras. Typically, they cost around $500. Ukrainian drone fundraiser Serhii Sternenko – who has supplied a staggering 200,000 FPVs to the military, and targeted by an assassin as a result -- – quotes $300 for a small 7-inch FPV and $460 for a 10-inch, On the other side, Russian maker Frobotics offers an entry-level model for $315 and heavy lift (20-pound warhead) for $756. Ukraine is building vast numbers of FPV attack drones These are made in vast numbers. Ukraine recently announced it had increased drone production to 200,000 per month or about 6,000 per day. In December 2023 AeroVironment announced that the Army had selected their SwitchBlade 600 for the LASSO requirement. The Switchblade 600, launched in 2020, is the big brother to the SwitchBlade 300 with longer range and a bigger warhead. The Switchblade 300 was used extensively in Iraq and Afghanistan against 'high-value targets' from about 2012. Budget documents showed Switchblade 300s cost $52,914 a shot , but there was no information on the exact pricing of the 600, until now., Follow the Money The U.S. Army's procurement budget for missiles for FY2026, released last month, gives a little more detail on LASSO and the rationale for it: 'Infantry Brigade Combat Teams (IBCTs) lack adequate proportional organic capabilities at echelon to apply immediate, point, long range, and direct fire effects to destroy tanks, light armored vehicles, hardened targets, defilade, and personnel targets, while producing minimal collateral damage in complex terrain in all environmental conditions.' LASSO will 'enable the Soldier to make multiple orbits within the IBCT typically assigned battlespace, to acquire and attack targets within and beyond current crew served and small arms fire' In other words, doing exactly what FPVs do in Ukraine. But how many would be acquired and for how much? The document shows the Army is buying 294 SwitchBlade 600 LASSO rounds at a cost of $170,000 each. In addition, the Army is also acquiring 54 ground control units; rather than the commercial controllers costing a few hundred dollars seen in the hands of Ukrainian FPV operators, these go for $69,204 each. This really goes to show what has been observed many times before: that producing high-specification gear in tiny quantities means you pay boutique prices. That tiny quantity will limit the number of operators trained, and they are not going to be firing a lot of live rounds in training. The Javelin missile costs more than SwitchBlade 600, has a much shorter range, and requires the ... More target to be within sight It is worth noting at $170k a shot only looks extravagant in the context of the hardware used by Russian and Ukraine. By military standards it is fairly normal. The same procurement budget shows the Army's latest batch of Javelin anti-tank missiles costing $221k apiece – and the reusable control unit needed to fire them is another $208k. And if that sounds pricey the Army's new hypersonic LRHW missile will cost a whopping $36 million a time. 'Expensive' is all a matter of what you are used to. FPVs For the Army In another budget though, we find that the Army is also getting something more like the FPVs used in Ukraine via a very different program. The Army's Aircraft budget for FY2026 includes money for 'FPV/PBAS' – 'PBAS' being 'Purpose Built Attritable System' which is the Army's new buzzword for expendable drones. The PBAS will carry a variety of 'lethal/non-lethal armaments and munitions.' As in Ukraine these may be fitted along with the battery immediately before launch. One PBAS system consists of 'First Person Viewer (FPV) goggles, controller, leader display, two 10" air vehicles and four 5" air vehicles' and costs $34,826. Depending on the other items, the drones are likely around $5k each. Making drones in the U.S. will always be more expensive because they cannot simple use low-cost Chinese components like the Ukrainians and Russians, and labor and other costs will inevitable be higher. $5k may be expensive by Ukrainian standards, but it will conform to U.S. military specifications, and the production run is small. Considering that only 1,057 systems are being ordered, the $5k price tag may be the best that can be expected. It does at least mean that this program is delivering more than 20 times as many attack drones as LASSO for less total cost. The PBAS requirement is being met by a variety of suppliers, likely including Neros, previously noted for supplying thousands of FPVs to Ukraine. Neros co-founder and CEO Soren Monroe-Anderson told me that in Ukraine he was told that any firm wishing to supply the market needed to be able to supply 5,000 FPVs a month or go home, and their business is based on large numbers of low-cost drones. Neros' Archer is a low-cost, U.S.-made attack drone currently being supplied to Ukraine This week Monroe-Anderson told Defence News that Neros is aiming to be able to produce 10,000 drones monthly by January, and that the longer-term vision a factory to produce one million drones per year with the U.S. Defense Department as its primary customer. The Real Battle These budget documents reveal the battle inside Army procurement between traditional legacy suppliers and high-cost established products against disruptive newcomers offering low-cost tech in vast numbers. To an outsider, the way forward might seem obvious. But the defense business has its own way of working. In Ukraine and Russia, FPVs were so vital that many soldiers started out buying drones with their own money until the military procurement process finally started supplying them. Another chink appeared this week with an Army call for solicitations, with the goal of acquiring thousands of drones rapidly at a cost of less than $2k a unit. They want more, faster, cheaper than LASSO. Maybe next year will see the Army putting its money behind small drones in a big way. But an entrenched bureaucracy is a tougher opponent to shift than a dug-in tank battalion.
