Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad First Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS: RM0.024 (vs RM0.036 in 1Q 2024)
Net income: RM25.3m (down 34% from 1Q 2024).
Profit margin: 10% (down from 14% in 1Q 2024). The decrease in margin was driven by lower revenue.
EPS: RM0.024 (down from RM0.036 in 1Q 2024).
Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period
Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 16% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 2.6% growth forecast for the Basic Materials industry in Asia.
Performance of the market in Malaysia.
The company's shares are down 4.8% from a week ago.
You should always think about risks. Case in point, we've spotted 1 warning sign for Cahya Mata Sarawak Berhad you should be aware of.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
a few seconds ago
- Newsweek
Number of Home Sales Falling Through Hits Record Level
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. The number of pending home sales that fell through hit record-levels for the month of June in 2025, as surging inventory and economic uncertainty continues to plague sellers. According to analysis by real estate firm and brokerage Redfin, over 57,000 home-sale agreements across the U.S. were cancelled in June, equating to around 15 percent of houses that were under contract in the month. This is up from 14 percent a year ago, and marks the highest cancellation rate for any June on record. Why It Matters Redfin said in its analysis that record levels of home sales falling through serves as a reflection of persistent economic unease among buyers, as well as the issues of affordability, inflation and high mortgage rates that may be weighing on their minds. The increased fiscal risks associated with homeownership have also contributed to rising levels of inventory, reducing sellers' leverage and putting power over the housing market more firmly in the hands of prospective buyers. What To Know Real estate agents who spoke to Redfin said buyers are becoming reluctant to finalize purchases due to economic uncertainties, in particular high mortgage rates, the potential impacts of tariffs, inflation and the possibility of a recession in the near future. Others noted that surging levels of inventory have put power in the hands of buyers, leading many to cancel deals when another home within their price range is listed. According to June Housing Market Trends Report, the number of homes for sale in the U.S. rose nearly 30 percent year-over-year, marking the 20th consecutive month of increases. The latest market report from Zillow, and recent data from the St. Louis Fed, similarly showed that housing inventory has risen to post-Covid highs. Analysis from Redfin in May said that high levels of inventory, coupled with subdued demand, had led to a buyer surplus of nearly 500,000. It said that this marks the largest gap between buyers and sellers since 2013. A for sale sign is displayed outside of a home for sale on August 16, 2024 in Los Angeles, California. A for sale sign is displayed outside of a home for sale on August 16, 2024 in Los Angeles, California. Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images Despite buyers having greater choice, high prices, mortgage rates, and economic uncertainties have continued to sideline buyers and weigh on home sales in 2025. According to data released Wednesday by the National Association of Realtors, existing home sales fell by 2.7 percent in June to a nine-month low of 3.9 million. Median home prices also rose to $435,300, marking a record high for June and the 24th consecutive month of year-over-year increases. Prior to the release, President Trump on Tuesday blamed persistently weak home sales on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, and the central bank's reluctance to lower interest rates, which would likely contribute to mortgage rates declining. "People aren't able to buy a house because this guy is a numbskull," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "He keeps the rates too high." What People Are Saying Crystal Zschirnt, a Redfin Premier agent in Dallas, said: "Buyers have leverage. Some buyers are canceling deals because another home pops up in the same price range that they like better, or because they discover a flaw and get nervous it'll cost too much to fix. I've also heard of some buyers backing out because they're hoping home prices or mortgage rates are going to plummet soon, even though that's unlikely." Nancy Vanden Houten, Lead Economist at Oxford Economics, in comments shared with Newsweek on June's home sales data: "Existing home sales were weaker than expected in June, but we don't think the decline marks the start of a sustained downturn in sales. We look for sales to move sideways over the balance of 2025, before recovering in 2026 as rate cuts by the Federal Reserve get underway in earnest." "Increases in supply should temper home price growth and support sales. Median home prices rose to a record high in June, but the increase was at least partly due to seasonal quirks and we think price growth will trend lower in the second half of this year," she added. What Happens Next? According to Redfin's forecasts, home prices are expected to decline one percent by the end of the year compared to 2024. Despite hopes of mortgage rates soon dropping to six percent, which analysts believe could inject much-needed momentum into U.S. home sales, it anticipates these remaining effectively unchanged at around 6.8 percent.
Fast Company
a few seconds ago
- Fast Company
The gap between CEO and worker pay keeps increasing—and Trump's policies are making it grow faster
Ten years ago, just months after announcing his presidential campaign, Donald Trump called sky-high CEO pay 'disgraceful,' telling CBS's Face the Nation in 2015: 'You see these guys making enormous amounts of money, and it's a total and complete joke.' Since then, average CEO pay—and the gap between it and median worker pay—has grown even more. And as president, Trump's policies are making that inequality even worse. The average CEO-to-worker-pay ratio for S&P 500 Index companies in 2024 was 285 to 1, according to the AFL-CIO's annual Executive Paywatch report —an increase from 268 to 1 in 2023. In 2024, as Americans fretted about the rising costs of eggs and housing, and the way they felt the country's economy was leaving them behind, the average CEO of an S&P 500 company saw an average pay increase of $1.24 million. In 2024, the CEOs at those companies received $18.9 million in total compensation, up 7% from the year prior. The tax cuts in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' are set to increase CEO take-home pay even more. Each CEO is set to get about $500,000 back from those tax cuts; all together, the CEOs of the publicly traded companies in the AFL-CIO's Executive Paywatch database will see a combined $738 million in income tax savings. Meanwhile, that bill has severely cut funds for government services like Medicare health coverage, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, and school lunches. The AFL-CIO is a 70-year-old federation of more than 60 unions, representing 15 million-plus workers. It is highlighting CEO pay through this report to note how 'the system is obviously broken,' Fred Redmond, AFL-CIO secretary-treasurer, said in a press conference. 'Workers really have one concern in mind: They just want to share in the benefits and profits that they help to create every day. And the 285-to-1 ratio is not fair compensation to the workers.' Skyrocketing CEO pay isn't a recent issue; the gap between what a CEO takes home and what an average worker earns has been widening for years. Looking at the S&P Index specifically, the average CEO compensation package increased $6.5 million in the past decade alone, the report notes. In 1965, the pay ratio between CEOs and average workers was 20 to 1. The median annual wage for workers in the U.S. across all industries was just $49,500 in 2024. At that wage, a worker would need to have been working since 1740 to earn what the average S&P 500 CEO took home in 2024. Of course, CEO-to-worker-pay ratios also vary by individual company. In 2024, Starbucks's new CEO, Brian Niccol, received upwards of $95 million in total compensation. That puts Starbucks's CEO-to-median-worker-pay ratio at 6,666 to 1. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella earned $79 million in 2024, for a ratio of 408 to 1. Along with cutting taxes for high earners, the Trump administration is considering no longer requiring this information be publicly disclosed to investors. In 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a rule requiring CEO-to-worker-pay ratio disclosures (that requirement didn't go into effect until 2017). But Trump's SEC chair, Paul Atkins, has said that rules around executive compensation disclosure have grown 'increasingly complex and lengthy,' and is reportedly considering loosening disclosure requirements, including around executive perks like the personal use of corporate jets. The AFL-CIO is advocating for those disclosure requirements to remain as they are. 'In our view, sunlight is the best disinfectant to prevent CEO pay, waste, fraud, and abuse,' Redmond said, 'and we are urging visitors to the Executive Paywatch website to tell the SEC the importance of CEO pay disclosure.'
USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Truckers rejoice: Trump kills Obama plan to limit big-rig speed
Limiting truck and bus speeds to no more than 65 mph might have saved lives and fuel costs, but Trump administration says it would raise costs and stall traffic. The Trump administration is hitting the brakes on an Obama-era plan that would have created a de facto national speed limit as low as 60 mph for big rigs and buses traveling American highways. The proposal had been under discussion since 2016, and Trump officials on July 24 formally announced they're dropping the plan, which aimed to reduce the severity of crashes involving heavy vehicles. Obama-era regulators said limiting trucks and buses to no more than 65 mph would save between 63 and 214 lives annually, and save drivers more than $800 million in fuel and emissions costs. But federal regulators under Trump now say the proposal to install governors on all vehicles weighing more than 26,000 pounds would raise trucking costs and might actually make things worse by stalling traffic and putting more trucks on the road. Regulators said the proposal might have also slowed deliveries, hurt already-low driver pay and pushed more heavy truck traffic onto side streets instead of interstates. "Because drivers get paid by the mile, the more miles you can put in, well, the incentive is to not slow down," said Henry Albert, 62, an independent owner-operator based in Laredo, Texas. Albert said he understands why some safety advocates would support the speed restrictions, and said he personally limits his 2022 Freightliner Cascadia to 80 mph. He rarely drives that fast because higher speeds consume more diesel, he added. The exact speed limit being considered had not been decided but officials considered 60, 65 and 68 mph. Many states have interstate speed limits of 75, and some even allow 80 mph, although trucks are sometimes restricted to lower speeds. Federal regulators received more than 15,000 comments opposing the proposal, including objections from states that a national policy violated their right to set their own speed limits. Trump has ordered federal agencies to consider withdrawing or voiding what he considers to be onerous regulations, and the Department of Transportation cited his order in killing the governor plan. Regulators also noted the rule didn't consider the potential risk of increasing the speed differential between passenger vehicles and big rigs or the increased number of trucks that would have been needed to carry the same amount of cargo in a given period. They also said new technologies, like radar-assisted emergency alert and braking systems, have substantially improved safety since the proposal was first introduced. In a statement, the American Trucking Associations, which had supported a version of the regulation that would have restricted big-rig speeds to 65 mph, said it has long worked with regulators to find reasonable middle ground. "We believe USDOT can successfully balance deregulatory actions while enforcing sensible regulations that are on the books, in line with its safety mission," Dan Horvath, the ATA's chief operating officer said. There's a growing push by safety advocates to use technology like governors to limit driving speeds nationally; California Gov. Gavin Newsom last year vetoed a proposed state law that would have required new vehicles to alert drivers whenever they are speeding. Albert, who said he's seen few true accidents but many crashes, said he thinks better speed-limit enforcement would help improve safety for everyone on the road. "The speed limit sign isn't a starting point," he said, referencing the number of cars he sees zip past his rig at 100 mph. "It's the limit."
