Explained: How new rule tweak frees up stock brokers to invest beyond securities
In a welcome step for the broking industry, the government has amended Rule 8 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957 ( SCRR ), providing long-awaited clarity on what does not constitute 'business' for a stockbroker. The amendment addresses a long-standing industry concern around regulatory restrictions that limited brokers from investing their own surplus funds in non-securities businesses.Rule 8 of the SCRR lays down the eligibility conditions for a person to act as a stockbroker or a member of a recognised stock exchange . Under sub-rules (1)(f) and (3)(f), brokers are prohibited from engaging in any business other than that of securities, unless such business is carried out without any personal financial liability. This essentially prevented brokers from exposing themselves to financial risks unrelated to their core broking activities.Over time, the National Stock Exchange and the Bombay Stock Exchange issued circulars that significantly widened the interpretation of 'business' under Rule 8 of the SCRR. These circulars clarified that even passive investments in group companies (subsidiary or associate) engaged in non-securities businesses (such as NBFCs, real estate or insurance) would be treated as 'business' and would be in violation of Rule 8. This interpretation created a regulatory overhang that discouraged brokers from investing their own profits outside the securities space.In practice, brokers were restricted from investing their retained earnings or surplus capital into group ventures operating outside the securities domain, even where such investments posed no financial risk to the broker or its clients. This created a significant operational constraint. If a broker wished to invest in a non-securities business, it first had to route profits to its parent, typically via dividends or buybacks, incurring additional tax liabilities before the funds could be redeployed by the parent. This structure was inefficient and deterred brokers from pursuing legitimate investment opportunities that could enhance their business offerings and growth.Recognising these industry concerns, the Ministry of Finance released a consultation paper in September 2024 proposing a more nuanced interpretation of Rule 8. It clarified that the original intent of the restriction was to protect client interests and ensure the financial soundness of the brokers, not to place undue limitations on the use of their own capital. Since stockbrokers are already subject to stringent SEBI regulations aimed at safeguarding client funds, further restricting them from investing in group companies engaged in non-securities businesses under the guise of protecting client funds seemed excessive and unwarranted.This position has now been codified through an amendment to Rule 8. It now clarifies that a broker's investment activity will not be treated as 'business', unless it involves client funds, client securities or creates a financial obligation for the broker. This empowers brokers to freely invest their retained earnings and surplus capital in group companies or unrelated ventures, so long as client interests remain unaffected. Brokers can now participate in broader financial services ecosystems such as lending or insurance through subsidiaries, allowing them to diversify revenue streams and build integrated financial platforms.While this amendment to Rule 8 is now effective and offers much-needed regulatory clarity, it is worth noting that the circulars issued by NSE and BSE interpreting the earlier position have not yet been formally withdrawn. This could create some ambiguity for brokers on how the exchanges will align with the amended Rule 8, particularly given that the validity of the NSE circular had been challenged before the Bombay High Court. Until the exchanges formally update their stance, brokers may continue to face uncertainty in practice despite the regulatory intent to liberalise.(The authors Prashanth Ramdas is Partner and Shivaang Maheshwari is Associate at Khaitan & Co. The views expressed are personal.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Loan recovery practices of NBFCs must be fair, respectful: FM Sitharaman
New Delhi [India], July 10 (ANI): Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman emphasized that the loan recovery practices of Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) must be fair, respectful, and empathetic, and must strictly align with the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Fair Practices Code. Speaking at the NBFC Symposium 2025 held in New Delhi on Wednesday, the minister urged NBFCs to avoid harsh recovery measures, especially in cases involving small loan amounts, and reminded them of the importance of customer dignity. 'Recovery practices of NBFCs must be fair, empathetic and respectful, in strict accordance with the RBI's Fair Practices Code,' Sitharaman said. She noted that sometimes media reports highlight harsh recovery actions taken for very small loan amounts like Rs 500. 'Sensationalized reporting in the media, which they are right in reporting. I don't fault the media at all on this. Where harsh measures are taken for recovery of a 500 rupee. heartbreaking stories come out,' she said. The minister added, 'I know for you it's important and it's part of your duty, but it's not part of your duty to be heartless. You need to have better Fair Practices Code, aligning with RBI's Fair Practices Code. So the same message, the push for growth should not come at the expense of customer well-being.' She also raised an important issue regarding the role NBFCs can play in supporting the banking sector's priority sector lending goals. The minister pointed out that every year, a substantial amount of funds allocated for priority sector lending by banks remains unutilized. These unutilized funds are then transferred to institutions like NABARD and SIDBI. 'In the last few years, I have been closely monitoring how public priority sector lending activities of the banks are going on. Every year you have substantial amount left behind, which then gets refilled to NABARDs of the world and SIDBIs of the world,' Sitharaman said. She questioned the logic behind returning these funds to financial institutions when they could be disbursed to the people who need them on the ground. 'Collectively, if you put together all the public sector banks, they have a certain number of branches all over the country. NABARD has far less than that. What's the logic? Why should the priority sector lending money be coming back to the secretary? It should be in the ground with the people for whom it was meant,' she added. The minister proposed that NBFCs, which often operate at the last mile, could be co-opted by banks as partners to improve the priority sector lending performance. 'Is there a role that you can actively play through the NBFCs? You and the NBFCs together. Because they are there at the last mile. Can the priority sector lending performance of the banks be improved if you co-opt the NBFCs as your partners in this?' she said. Sitharaman also invited the Reserve Bank of India to offer guidance on how this partnership could be achieved without disrupting prudential norms. She pointed out that the delay in disbursement, when funds return to NABARD or SIDBI and then are re-issued, causes a loss of six to eight months. 'Why should the customer at the end of the day, for whom the government is making this apportionment through the budget, not receive it that year itself?' she questioned. She concluded by stating that the presence of NBFCs should be more effectively used by public sector banks to ensure timely and targeted credit delivery to the intended beneficiaries. (ANI)
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Mukesh Ambani's Reliance-owned Alok Industries to declare Q1 results 2025 on THIS date
Mukesh Ambani's Reliance-owned Alok Industries announced on Thursday that the company will be declaring its financial results for the quarter ending on June 30, 2025 on Thursday, July 17. Alok Industries share price fell over 2.87 per cent in Thursday's trading session to ₹ 21.35 apiece on NSE. The stock has ascended over 3 per cent in a month and 9.90 per cent in six months In 2020, Reliance Industries, in partnership with JM Financial Asset Reconstruction, acquired Alok Industries via an auction under the insolvency and bankruptcy code, organized by lenders aiming to recover dues. By the end of the March quarter, RIL owned 40 per cent of the company, while JM Financial ARC held a 34.99 per cent stake. In an exchange filing, the company said that the board of directors will meet on Thursday, July 17 to consider and approve June quarter results for FY26. ' We wish to inform you that pursuant to Regulation 29 and other applicable provisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company is scheduled to be held on Thursday, July 17, 2025 inter-alia, to consider and approve the Standalone and Consolidated Unaudited Financial Results of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2025,' the company said in the filing. Founded in 1986 and based in Mumbai, Alok Industries is a fully integrated textile manufacturer with a significant footprint in both cotton and polyester segments. In the cotton segment, the company's operations span the entire value chain—from spinning and weaving to processing, producing finished fabrics, bedsheets, towels, and garments. Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Education loan book growth to halve amid US visa curbs
Mumbai: Crisil has forecast that growth in the education loan book of non-banking finance companies (NBFCs) will slow to half of last year's pace due to tightening immigration policies in the United States that are discouraging Indian students from pursuing higher education abroad. 'Policy uncertainties in the US, combined with measures including reduced visa appointments and the proposed elimination of Optional Practical Training norms have culled newer loan originations. This has led to around 30% decline in total disbursements to that geography last fiscal,' said Malvika Bhotika, Director at Crisil Ratings. According to the ratings agency, education loans had been the fastest-growing asset class for NBFCs in recent years, with assets under management (AUM) rising by over 50% annually. However, Crisil expects this growth to moderate to around 25% in the current fiscal, down from 48% last year and 77% the year before. The AUM is projected to reach ₹80,000 crore by March 2026, up from ₹64,000 crore in FY25. The slowdown has been attributed to a sharp decline in loan disbursements to the US — traditionally the largest destination for Indian students — as the country reduces visa appointments and considers scrapping the Optional Practical Training (OPT) programme for international students. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5-year-old girl needs her second heart surgery! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo Disbursements to Canada, the second-largest market, also declined due to stricter student visa rules, including higher financial requirements and a cap on permits. As a result, overall education loan disbursements rose just 8% in FY25, a sharp fall from the 50% growth seen in FY24. To counter the US-led slowdown, NBFCs are now diversifying into alternative geographies such as the UK, Germany, Ireland and other smaller nations. Disbursements to these destinations have doubled, with their combined share in total education loan disbursals rising from 25% in FY24 to nearly 50% in FY25. However, this diversification is unlikely to fully offset the drop in US-bound disbursals. The US still accounted for 50% of total education loan portfolios as of March 2025, down from 53% a year earlier, and this share is expected to decline further in the coming years. NBFCs are also exploring new product adjacencies including domestic student loans, school funding, and loans for skill development and coaching. While these segments involve lower ticket sizes and are unlikely to materially impact AUM, they may offer portfolio stability during global disruptions. Asset quality in the sector remains strong for now, with gross non-performing assets (NPAs) at 0.1% as of March 31, 2025. Even after adjusting for the principal moratorium — which covers around 85% of the loan book — gross NPAs stood at ~0.7%. 'Despite the global developments, NBFCs have maintained healthy asset quality so far,' said Sonica Gupta, Associate Director at Crisil Ratings. 'However, high growth in the past few years and estimated ~15% of the portfolio coming out of contractual moratorium this fiscal pose some asset quality risks.' The report emphasizes that NBFCs' ability to scale newer segments while maintaining quality, and to adapt to changing student preferences and international policies, will be critical for sustaining growth in the education loan segment. The analysis is based on NBFCs rated by Crisil, which represent over 90% of the industry's total AUM. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
