
Support for UK electoral reform is at a record high. Here's why
This change is backed by a majority of supporters of all parties and by those with low levels of trust and confidence in government.
The figure represents a staggering increase of 33% since 2011, when less than a third of people wanted to change the system.
READ MORE: Here's what we learned from John Curtice's new polling report
A report – compiled by Professor John Curtice, Alex Scholes and Aisha Chabdu and entitled Britain's Democracy: A Health Check – shows how just 36% of people are now happy with the first past the post voting system staying as it is.
The authors concluded voters seemed to feel the choice between Labour and the Tories at the General Election was 'a choice between Tweedledum and Tweedledee'.
For the first time, more than half of people (53%) say they would prefer a coalition running the UK than a one-party government (41%).
It comes after the Labour Party managed to secure a huge majority of MPs in the Commons last July despite winning just over a third of the vote.
Willie Sullivan, senior director of campaigns for the Electoral Reform Society, said the General Election in 2024 was the 'most disproportional ever' and clearly showed people are now voting in a multi-party way.
He said: 'Public support to change the electoral system has hit a record 60%, according to the latest British Social Attitudes survey, showing a clear majority want to ditch Westminster's distorting First Past the Post system.
'This surge in support comes after last year's General Election was the most disproportional ever, meaning the current Parliament least represents how the whole country voted of any in history.
'The General Election and this year's local elections also showed that people are clearly voting in a multi-party way, and we now need a proportional voting system that accurately represents how they are voting with the MPs they get at Westminster.
'Having a fair and accurate voting system is a crucial step to restoring trust in politics, which the latest BSA results also alarmingly found has slumped to a record low.'
The below graph shows how people's attitudes towards the voting system have changed, with a dramatic shift forming over the past five years.
(Image: British Social Attitudes Survey) Despite Labour clinching this landslide victory, the survey suggests there has only been a slight decline since 2023 in Labour supporters' backing for electoral reform, with 55% still in favour of change.
The survey also showed just 12% trust governments to put the interests of the nation above those of their own party 'just about always or most of the time' – which is a record low.
Only 19% think the system of governing Britain needs little or no improvement.
In its conclusion, the report says the survey has 'left some significant questions hanging over the continued health of Britain's traditional system of democracy' with the authors suggesting many voters felt the choice between Labour and the Tories was like 'a choice between Tweedledum and Tweedledee'.
It said: 'What the election does appear to have done is to provide an opportunity for some voters to express their discontent by voting for parties that posed an unprecedentedly strong challenge to the country's traditional, limited panoply of political parties.
'Those with low levels of trust and confidence were markedly more likely to vote for Reform or the Greens, thereby helping to push the share of the vote won by the Conservatives and Labour combined to a record low.
'For many, the choice between the two parties of government looked too much like a choice between Tweedledum and Tweedledee.'
READ MORE: Corbyn-led party would attract 10 per cent of vote, poll says
The traditional demographic division between middle and working-class voters that had long provided the foundation of support for the Conservatives and Labour respectively showed 'no signs of re-emerging', the report said, with voters age and educational background mattering much more.
The authors warned that while the debate on electoral reform is important, people should not jump to conclusions that changing the voting system would restore faith in government.
'We should be wary of anticipating that changing the electoral system would prove sufficient to restore voters' faith in how they are being governed,' the report said.
'Ultimately, they are looking for more effective government than they feel they have enjoyed in recent years, not least in respect of the economy and public services. The key question ultimately facing Britain's democracy is whether it can deliver.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Labour vows small-boat arrivals 'will get one shot at asylum' as Yvette Cooper doubles down on controversial migrants return deal
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is planning to double down on Labour 's controversial migrants return deal by banning repeat offenders from claiming asylum. Home Office sources said that any boat migrant who has been returned to France and then made a crossing again would not be able to apply for asylum. Their identities would also be stored on a biometric database. A source said: 'At about £3,000 a crossing it would be a total waste of money for them to try again.' Ms Cooper has refused to say how many of the thousands arriving in Britain by dinghy will actually be removed under the 'one in, one out' scheme. Human-rights campaigners have said they will support court challenges brought by small-boat arrivals, while the EU says it is assessing whether the scheme complies with the 'spirit and the letter of the law'. Ms Cooper is also facing calls to extend the biometric testing into an effective revival of Sir Tony Blair 's abandoned ID card plans, to stop migrants working illegally. In May, the Home Office's immigration white paper promised to roll out 'digital identity for all overseas citizens' to improve border management and 'enforcement against illegal working and misuse'. But there are increasing signs that ID cards could now be introduced for all citizens – not just migrants. However on the day the deal was agreed, more dinghies full of migrants were seen attempting to cross the Channel Last month, Downing Street was said to be looking 'very closely' at a so-called 'BritCard' that could be used to check on an individual's right to live and work in this country. And yesterday, Labour MPs told the Mail on Sunday that on the back of the 'one in, one out' deal with France, now was the time to revive a modern version of those plans. Bury North MP James Firth said: 'There is considerable merit in revisiting digital ID now, given how far technology and public confidence in digitisation have come since this was last considered in our politics. 'From online banking to NHS apps, people are increasingly comfortable with secure digital services.' He added: 'In light of the new returns deal with France and efforts to strengthen the integrity of our asylum system, a carefully-designed digital ID could help protect access to public services, prevent abuse, and ensure faster, fairer support for those who need it.' East Thanet MP Polly Billington said: 'Digital ID cards are completely normal in most countries and go a long way to prevent migrants without legal status from accessing public services or working in the illicit economy, where they undercut the wages of legal workers.' Ms Billington added: 'That's why I'm supporting this call from Labour MPs for the government to make this pragmatic change, so that we can secure our borders and disincentivise people from making these dangerous journeys across the Channel.' Last night, Labour peer Maurice Glasman – founder of the 'Blue Labour' movement – also gave the idea his backing. Only last week, Sir Alex Younger – former chief of MI6 – said he backed the creation of a British ID card. He told BBC Newsnight: 'It's absolutely obvious to me that people should have a digital identity. 'And in that context, the grey labour force won't exist and we've removed a pull factor.' And John Vine, former chief inspector of borders and immigration, said the decision by the Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition government to abandon ID card plans drawn up under the Blair government 'in hindsight, was a big mistake'.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
The new UK tribes: are you a rooted patriot or Waterstones dad?
B ritain is a 'shattered nation' and seven in ten voters believe it is on the 'wrong track', according to a new think tank report which offers a stark assessment of the country's mood. While geographic identities like 'red wall' and 'blue wall' were used to explain the post-Brexit political landscape, the research by More in Common suggests cultural values have become a bigger dividing line than geography. Since the pandemic, British people have increasingly split along their views on multiculturalism, free speech and whether Britain should reform key institutions or 'burn the system down'. While they remain trusting of their neighbours, 87 per cent have little or no trust in politicians. Some 36 per cent say the Covid pandemic was exaggerated to control people. The report, based on polling of 20,000 people and dozens of focus groups around the country, alongside consultations with top Labour and Tory aides, suggests we remain deeply divided on how to fix Britain's problems.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
‘Stop the excuses' and recognise state of Palestine, SNP tells UK government
The SNP also called on the UK Government to stop the sale of arms to Israel, saying that failure by the Government to 'use the power it has' to end the conflict in Gaza would make it 'totally complicit' in what it called a 'slaughter'. SNP Middle East spokesman Brendan O'Hara MP said that if the UK Government 'could muster just a shred of conviction and courage they would have the power to act'. He went on: 'After witnessing another week of slaughter, the Labour Party could, and should, begin this new week by taking two concrete steps,' he said. 'They should start this new week by finally stopping all arms sales to Israel and finally recognising the state of Palestine. 'President Macron was crystal clear that he is preparing to join other European nations in recognising the state of Palestine and that he is pressing the UK to join this 'political momentum' towards a ceasefire and a permanent peace. 'Keir Starmer should stop the excuses and join him in recognising the state of Palestine without any more damaging delays. 'That would send the clearest of signals that we are prepared to protect and guarantee the right of the Palestinian people to their own homeland – and that all diplomatic levers will be used to prevent any plan that effectively proposes ethnic cleansing in Gaza. Earlier this week French President Emmanuel Macron said recognising Palestine was 'the only path to peace' (Leon Neal/PA) 'It is also blindingly obvious that anyone claiming to support a two-state solution must back immediate recognition of Palestine, otherwise their words ring hollow. 'If after this week Westminster stays sitting on its hands and fails to use the power it has to act, then they will be totally complicit in giving the (Benjamin) Netanyahu government impunity to commit week upon week of slaughter, even deadlier than the one Palestinians have just suffered.' The party pointed out that 144 members of the UN, including Ireland, Spain and Norway, have already moved to recognise Palestine. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said earlier this week that the UK Government remained 'completely committed' to recognition, but refused to set a time frame for it, saying it was a 'moving, live situation'. A FCDO spokesperson said: 'From day one we have taken decisive action – suspending relevant export licences, suspending trade negotiations, restarting UNRWA funding, sanctioning Israeli Ministers, providing aid to hundreds of thousands of civilians, and using our position on the UN Security Council to demand the end of this war and the full resumption of aid into Gaza. 'We continue working with international partners to end Palestinian suffering, free the hostages and secure lasting Middle East peace.'