U.S. State Department starts firing more than 1,350 workers in shake-up
The layoffs, which affect 1,107 civil service and 246 foreign service officers based in the United States, come at a time when Washington is grappling with multiple crises on the world stage: Russia's war in Ukraine, the almost two-year-long Gaza conflict, and the Middle East on edge due to high tension between Israel and Iran.
"The Department is streamlining domestic operations to focus on diplomatic priorities," an internal State Department notice that was sent to the workforce said. "Headcount reductions have been carefully tailored to affect non-core functions, duplicative or redundant offices, and offices where considerable efficiencies may be found," it added.
The total reduction in the workforce will be nearly 3,000, including the voluntary departures, according to the notice and a senior State Department official, out of the 18,000 employees based in the United States.
The move is the first step of a restructuring that Trump has sought to ensure U.S. foreign policy is aligned with his "America First" agenda. Former diplomats and critics say the firing of foreign service officers risks America's ability to counter the growing assertiveness from adversaries such as China and Russia.
"President Trump and Secretary of State (Marco) Rubio are once again making America less safe and less secure," Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine from Virginia said in a statement.
"This is one of the most ridiculous decisions that could possibly be made at a time when China is increasing its diplomatic footprint around the world and establishing an overseas network of military and transportation bases, Russia is continuing its years-long brutal assault of a sovereign country, and the Middle East is careening from crisis to crisis," Kaine said.
Dozens of State Department employees crowded the lobby of the agency's headquarters in Washington holding an impromptu "clap-out" for their colleagues who have been fired. Dozens of people were crying, as they carried their belongings in boxes and hugged and bid farewell to friends and fellow workers.
Outside, dozens of others were lined up continuing to clap and cheer for them with some holding banners that read, "Thank you America's diplomats.' Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen attended the demonstration.
Several offices were set up inside the building for employees who are being laid off to turn in their badges, laptops, telephones and other property owned by the agency.
The offices were marked by posters that read "Transition Day Out Processing." One counter was labeled an "Outprocessing service center" with small bottles of water placed next to a box of tissue. Inside one office, cardboard boxes were visible.
A five-page "separation checklist" that was sent to workers who were fired on Friday and seen by reporters tells the employees that they would lose access to the building and their emails at 5 p.m. Friday.
Many members of a State Department office overseeing the U.S. resettlement of Afghans who worked for the U.S. government during the 20-year war have also been terminated as part of the overhaul.
Trump in February ordered Rubio to revamp the Foreign Service to ensure that the Republican president's foreign policy is "faithfully" implemented. He has also repeatedly pledged to "clean out the deep state" by firing bureaucrats that he deems disloyal.
The shake-up is part of an unprecedented push by Trump to shrink the federal bureaucracy and cut what he says is wasteful spending of taxpayer money. His administration dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Aid, Washington's premier aid arm that distributed billions of dollars of assistance worldwide, and folded it under the State Department.
Rubio announced the plans for the State Department shake-up in April, saying the Department in its current form was "bloated, bureaucratic" and was not able to perform its mission "in this new era of great power competition."
He envisioned a structure that he said would give back the power to regional bureaus and embassies and get rid of programs and offices that do not align with America's core interests.
That vision would see the elimination of the role of top official for civilian security, democracy and human rights and the closure of some offices that monitored war crimes and conflicts around the world.
The reorganization had been expected to be largely concluded by July 1 but did not proceed as planned amid ongoing litigation, as the State Department waited for the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on the Trump administration's bid to halt a judicial order blocking mass job cuts.
On Tuesday, the court cleared the way for the Trump administration to pursue the job cuts and the sweeping downsizing of numerous agencies. Since then, the White House Counsel's Office and the Office of Personnel Management have been coordinating with federal agencies to ensure their plans comply with the law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
Pentagon No. 3 praises Japan defense report, but vows to make alliance more 'equitable'
The U.S. Department of Defense's No. 3 official has lauded Japan's latest defense white paper — though his praise was couched in language suggesting that the Pentagon will continue to push Tokyo to hike defense spending even further. The annual report, released Tuesday, says the international community has entered 'a new era of crisis,' with China representing Japan's 'greatest strategic challenge' and U.S. President Donald Trump's policies expected to 'significantly impact' the Indo-Pacific region. U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby on Tuesday labeled the report 'an important, clear-eyed strategic assessment from our close ally Japan.' Colby's endorsement, however, came with the stipulation that the U.S. would aim to focus on the shifting tide in the Indo-Pacific by seeking a more 'equitable' balance in its alliance with Japan. 'We at DOD stand ready to work closely with Tokyo to adjust to this new era and to follow President Trump's guidance to make our alliances stronger, more equitable, and thus sustainable,' Colby wrote on X. Trump has a long history of railing against the U.S.-Japan alliance, saying in recent months that the partnership is unfair and 'one-sided' — remarks that echoed views from his first term, when he demanded Tokyo cough up more cash or risk the removal of American troops. Colby has carried out these demands, initially saying during a March confirmation hearing that Japan 'should be spending at least 3%' of its gross domestic product on defense 'as soon as possible.' Last month, however, the Pentagon said it had set a 'global standard' for Japan and other U.S. allies to spend 5% of GDP on defense. Ostensibly pacifist Japan has in recent years undertaken a dramatic transformation of its security policy, including a five-year plan to ramp up defense spending to 2% of GDP by 2027. Japan's defense white paper alluded to concerns over potential policy shifts under Trump, saying that 'U.S. actions will significantly impact' the regional security environment 'and will require continued attention.' The Shandong, China's first domestically built aircraft carrier, sits anchored after arriving in Hong Kong on July 3. | AFP-JIJI China, meanwhile, lashed out at the attention it received in the report. 'The new version of the defense white paper holds a wrong perception of China, unreasonably interferes in China's internal affairs and hypes up the so-called China threat,' Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lin Jian told a news conference Tuesday. 'China expresses strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition to this, and has lodged solemn representations with Japan.' The white paper singles out China as 'the greatest strategic challenge' Tokyo has ever faced, pointing to the Chinese military's stepped-up 'throughout areas surrounding Japan.' It cites several recent incidents, including the China Coast Guard's deployment of a helicopter in Japan's territorial airspace around the Japanese-controlled, Chinese-claimed Senkakus in May. The white paper also notes a Chinese military aircraft's incursion into Japanese airspace last August and a Chinese aircraft carrier sailing close to Japan's territorial waters the following month — both firsts. Beijing has continued to chip away at precedent in recent months, dispatching both of its active aircraft carriers deep into the western Pacific last month and sending its warplanes near Japanese aircraft multiple times in recent weeks, moves that Tokyo said risked collisions. Following the latest close encounter — during which Chinese JH-7 fighter-bombers came within 30 meters of the Japanese YS-11EB electronic intelligence aircraft — Beijing blamed Tokyo, calling 'close-in reconnaissance and harassment' by the Japanese side 'the root cause' of the incidents. Defense Minister Gen Nakatani speaks during a news conference at the Defense Ministry in Tokyo on Tuesday. | JIJI Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani said Tuesday that the Air Self-Defense Force had acted appropriately in conducting 'regular surveillance activities,' calling the Chinese allegations that the ASDF aircraft's flights were to blame 'completely unfounded.' Lin disputed that China's larger military moves were problematic, repeating Beijing's line that it adheres to 'the path of peaceful development and pursues a defensive national defense policy.' 'Its national defense construction and military activities are legitimate and reasonable, and its military cooperation with other countries is in line with international law and international practice,' he said. Lin accused Tokyo of using the white paper — which also offers a detailed description of progress Japan has made in strengthening its own defenses — to justify its decision to loosen many of the postwar shackles on its military in recent years. Noting that this year marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, Lin urged Japan to 'deeply reflect' on its role in the war 'and stop looking for pretexts for its military expansion by exaggerating 'tensions in the surrounding areas.''
NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
Trump again slams Japan, claiming market remains closed
US President Donald Trump came out with another criticism of Japan's trade stance on Tuesday, claiming the country refuses to "open up." Speaking to reporters at an air force base outside Washington, Trump said: "I will veer from those deals on occasion when somebody is willing, like if Japan would open up their country, they don't do that and they just don't do that. And I don't either, I don't subscribe to it one way or another. But they won't do that. We might just stick with a letter." The president was referring to letters he has sent to foreign leaders informing them of new tariff rates. Trump has lately made a string of negative comments about Japan. He said on Sunday the country has lagged the European Union in opening its market. Trump has also said the US imports large volumes of Japanese cars, although Japan does not buy US vehicles. The president is threatening a 25-percent tariff on Japanese imports starting August 1 if the country does not take action.
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Senate Votes to Move Ahead with Trump's Request for $9 Billion in Spending Cuts
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans on Tuesday advanced President Donald Trump's request to cancel some $9 billion in previously approved spending, overcoming concerns from some lawmakers about what the rescissions could mean for impoverished people around the globe and for public radio and television stations in their home states. The Senate vote was 50-50, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie. A final vote in the Senate could occur as early as Wednesday. The bill would then return to the House for another vote before it would go to Trump's desk for his signature before a Friday deadline. Republicans winnowed down the president's request by taking out his proposed $400 million cut to a program known as PEPFAR. That change increased the prospects for the bill's passage. The politically popular program is credited with saving millions of lives since its creation under then-President George W. Bush to combat HIV/AIDS. The president is also looking to claw back money for foreign aid programs targeted by his Department of Government Efficiency and for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 'When you've got a $36 trillion debt, we have to do something to get spending under control,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. The White House tries to win over skeptics Republicans met with Russ Vought, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, during their weekly conference luncheon as the White House worked to address their concerns. He fielded about 20 questions from senators. The White House campaign to win over potential holdouts had some success. Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., tweeted that he would vote to support the measure after working with the administration to 'find Green New Deal money that could be reallocated to continue grants to tribal radio stations without interruption.' Some senators worried that the cuts to public media could decimate many of the 1,500 local radio and television stations around the country that rely on some federal funding to operate. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting distributes more than 70% of its funding to those stations. Maine Sen. Susan Collins, the Republican chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said she was particularly concerned about a lack of specifics from the White House. 'The rescissions package has a big problem — nobody really knows what program reductions are in it,' Collins said. 'That isn't because we haven't had time to review the bill. Instead, the problem is that OMB has never provided the details that would normally be part of this process.' Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said she didn't want the Senate to be going through numerous rounds of rescissions. 'We are lawmakers. We should be legislating,' Murkowski said. 'What we're getting now is a direction from the White House and being told: 'This is the priority and we want you to execute on it. We'll be back with you with another round.' I don't accept that.' Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Collins and Murkowski joined with Democrats in voting against the Senate taking up the measure. McConnell said he wanted to make clear he didn't have any problem with reducing spending, but agreed with Collins that lawmakers didn't have enough details from the White House. 'They would like a blank check is what they would like. And I don't think that's appropriate,' McConnell said. But the large majority of Republicans were supportive of Trump's request. 'This bill is a first step in a long but necessary fight to put our nation's fiscal house in order,' said Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo. Democrats warn of the consequences Democrats warned that it's absurd to expect them to work with Republicans on bipartisan spending measures if Republicans turn around a few months later and use their majority to cut the parts they don't like. 'It shreds the appropriations process,' said Sen. Angus King, an independent from Maine who caucuses with Democrats. 'The Appropriations Committee, and indeed this body, becomes a rubber stamp for whatever the administration wants.' Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said that tens of millions of Americans rely on local public radio and television stations for local news, weather alerts and educational programs. He warned that many could lose access to that information because of the rescissions. 'And these cuts couldn't come at a worse time,' Schumer said. 'The floods in Texas remind us that speedy alerts and up-to-the-minute forecasts can mean the difference between life and death.' Democrats also scoffed at the GOP's stated motivation for taking up the bill. The amount of savings pales compared to the $3.4 trillion in projected deficits over the next decade that Republicans put in motion in passing Trump's big tax and spending cut bill two weeks ago. 'Now, Republicans are pretending they are concerned about the debt,' said Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash. 'So concerned that they need to shut down local radio stations, so concerned they are going to cut off 'Sesame Street.' … The idea that that is about balancing the debt is laughable.' What's ahead in the Senate With Republicans providing enough votes to take up the bill, it sets up the potential for 10 hours of debate plus votes on scores of potentially thorny amendments in what is known as a vote-a-rama. The House has already shown its support for the president's request with a mostly party line 214-212 vote, but since the Senate is amending the bill, it will have to go back to the House for another vote. Republicans who vote against the measure also face the prospect of incurring Trump's wrath. He has issued a warning on his social media site directly aimed at individual Senate Republicans who may be considering voting against the rescissions package. He said it was important that all Republicans adhere to the bill and in particular defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 'Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement,' he said.
