
Power distribution privatisation: The why comes first, the how comes later
Things came full circle when some state governments started revisiting the pros and cons of Private vs Govt. ownership of Power Distribution Companies (DISCOMs). In 1993, UP government privatised electricity distribution in Greater Noida. Like Jamshedpur, Greater Noida too was more like a greenfield venture, where the city itself was built from scratch – and so was power distribution infrastructure. By contrast, privatisation of existing state-owned utilities with the prime objective of
turnaround
started later in 1999, when Odisha government attempted privatisation of power distribution. However, it yielded mixed results, was aborted midway and then reattempted successfully in 2020, after incorporating the learnings from Delhi privatisation of 2002. Delhi government privatised power distribution with the objective of turning around a lackadaisical Delhi Vidyut Board by using the Private Sector Partner as the
agent of distribution reforms
.
Even today, the private sector's footprint forms a miniscule portion of India's overall power distribution landscape, whereby a vast majority of India's states continue to be serviced by government owned Utilities (70+). Why is that so, even when Delhi privatisation has strongly demonstrated how across 3 DISCOMs operated by 2 different private players (Reliance Infra and Tata), the
Aggregate Technical & Commercial Loss
(AT&CL) has been consistently and uniformly brought down from 45 per cent-60 per cent to ~6 per cent in a couple of decades?
What went right in case of Delhi?
First and foremost, Delhi's AT&C Loss reduced sharply because that was precisely the bid parameter defined by the Delhi govt – AT&CL Reduction in first five years – so no wonder that the winning bidders delivered successfully on the criterion they had bid for. While both Delhi (2002) and Odisha (1999) had put up for divestment exactly 51 per cent equity in their DISCOMs, Odisha government had made the price (valuation) for that stake as its bid parameter. Later, in the second privatisation initiative in 2020, Odisha government defined bid parameter as a combination of AT&CL Reduction Target, price for 51 per cent equity and certain other criteria.
This difference in approach between Delhi privatisation vis-à-vis Odisha-1999 vis-à-vis Odisha-2020 privatisation holds the key to what makes privatisation successful or not – The 'why' comes first, the 'how' follows why. Since in case of Delhi, the purpose (WHY) behind privatisation was distribution reforms (as reflected by AT&C Loss Reduction), all aspects of the privatisation process reflected that theme. In case of over-achievement of loss reduction target by the privatised DISCOM, monetary gains of such over-achievement were shared with and retained by the DISCOM (in part or in full depending on the varied ranges of performance) as an additional incentive. Similarly, there was additional incentive for collecting past arrears. All of that added up.
Yet, this operational turnaround (AT&C Loss Reduction) has not automatically resulted in financial turnaround.
Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission
(DERC) has been reluctant to raise tariff, and has disallowed significant expenditure when passing tariff orders. Between FY 2009-10 and FY 2021-22, DERC, on average, disallowed 15 per cent-18 per cent of the ARR projected by the DISCOMs (Chitnis, Nair and Singh, CSEP). This leads to a vicious cycle of litigation. Both private players have about a
dozen each
of tariff order disputes still sub judice.
Now let us look at privatisation efforts by the Central government - UTs of Daman Diu Dadra and Nagar Haveli (DD-DNH) in 2022, and Chandigarh in 2025. Chandigarh is the first and only case where 100 per cent shares of DISCOM have been divested up front to a private player (it was 51 per cent equity in all other cases, with a provision to extend from 51 per cent to 74 per cent in case of DD-DNH based on milestone achievements that are yet to unfold). The reserve price was based on net fixed assets, and the winning bidder (CESC), outbidding six others, ended up paying a whopping five times that amount! And then comes the twist in the tale. The bid was floated in the market on 10th November 2020, and the private player could take over the government-owned DISCOM only by 1st February 2025 - after a delay of 4 years – all because of litigation by staff of erstwhile utility protesting against privatisation.
The question staring states like UP who have recently initiated DISCOM privatisation process is: why do they want to privatize (no, it cannot be 'all of the above')? The why should then determine how to go about it – the bidding process, the labour unions, the works. The how (e.g., bid parameter, bidder eligibility, opening balance sheet, post takeover treatment of various financial and operational aspects, etc.) will follow once there is absolute clarity on why.
(Shalabh Srivastava is Visiting Senior Fellow at the Centre for Social and Economic Progress (CSEP). Views are personal.)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
Discoms in AP spend nearly ₹3,500 cr on short-term power procurement from exchanges
High-volume power purchases from exchanges by the distribution companies (DISCOMs) are placing a significant financial burden on consumers. In the last fiscal year, the DISCOMs spent nearly ₹3,500 crore on short-term power procurement from exchanges — exceeding limits set by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (APERC). Despite a surplus in installed power capacity, utilities are frequently shutting down state-run generation plants citing maintenance or technical issues — while resorting to costly exchange purchases. These short-term buys have escalated the sector's debts due to astronomical prices. Instead of making use of its own generation plants, the power utilities are often resorting to power purchases citing sudden demand increase or technical glitches in the operation of the plants. According to the affidavit filed with APERC, the power utilities disclosed that they purchased 5282 million units from the open market during 2024-25 financial year. This caused a massive burden as the procurement cost is around 6.78 per unit. The power utilities spent close to ₹3,580 crore exclusively for the purchase of power. The discoms have already collected ₹2787 crore from the power consumers on the pretext of FPPCA charges during the last fiscal and raised a request for collection of another ₹870 crore. In fact, the discoms revealed that they have purchased 8617 million units of power through short-term purchase during 2022-23. Surprisingly, APERC put a cap at 3675 million units for short-term purchases during 2022-23. However, the power utilities purchased 8617 million units at a cost of 9.62 per unit. The discoms spent close to ₹6670 crore for the purchases in a single fiscal year. Subsequently, the discoms simply transferred ₹6000 crore burden to the commoners in the name of FPPCA charges. The situation further deteriorated during 2023-24 when the discoms purchased a whopping 11,753 million units from the exchanges. "They have spent close to 8972 crore for power purchases from exchanges causing massive burden on the commoners," said CPM leader Ch Baburao. In fact, APERC allowed the discoms to purchase only 1551 million units. However, the power utilities purchase almost 10,000 million units over and above the cap fixed by the APERC. The discoms transferred nearly 9,412 crore burden to the commoners due to the short-term purchases. "The forecasted grid demand varies due to weather conditions and the forecasted generation vary due to outages of thermal generation or variation in renewable energy generation. In order to balance the load-generation on real time basis, the APDISCOMs overdraw/under draw from the grid. Also when there is shortfall in declared availability vis a vis the grid demand, DISCOMs are procuring shortfall from power markets, exchanges/e-bidding portal in order to ensure 24X7 power for all. A quantum of 5282.96 MU @ 6.79 per Unit was procured under short term/market. A quantum of 9 64.88 MU was sold through short term at a cost of 4.45 per unit," explained SPDCL Chief General Manager (CGM) V Sobha. CPDCL CGM K Venkata Krishna said that the availability of thermal stations decreased by 2056.56 MU(8.00 per cent) when compared to approved availability. Accordingly, the energy despatch from APGENCO thermal stations is also decreased by 1,490.75 MU than the approved quantum. He said that a quantum of 5282.96 MU @ 6.79 per Unit was procured under short term/market," said CGM.


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Discoms in AP spend nearly Rs 3,500 crore on short-term power procurement from exchanges
Vijayawada: High-volume power purchases from exchanges by the distribution companies (DISCOMs) are placing a significant financial burden on consumers. In the last fiscal year, the DISCOMs spent nearly 3,500 crore on short-term power procurement from exchanges — exceeding limits set by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (APERC). Despite a surplus in installed power capacity, utilities are frequently shutting down state-run generation plants citing maintenance or technical issues — while resorting to costly exchange purchases. These short-term buys have escalated the sector's debts due to astronomical prices. Instead of making use of its own generation plants, the power utilities are often resorting to power purchases citing sudden demand increase or technical glitches in the operation of the plants. According to the affidavit filed with APERC, the power utilities disclosed that they purchased 5282 million units from the open market during 2024-25 financial year. This caused a massive burden as the procurement cost is around 6.78 per unit. The power utilities spent close to 3,580 crore exclusively for the purchase of power. The discoms have already collected 2787 crore from the power consumers on the pretext of FPPCA charges during the last fiscal and raised a request for collection of another 870 crore. In fact, the discoms revealed that they have purchased 8617 million units of power through short-term purchase during 2022-23. Surprisingly, APERC put a cap at 3675 million units for short-term purchases during 2022-23. However, the power utilities purchased 8617 million units at a cost of 9.62 per unit. The discoms spent close to 6670 crore for the purchases in a single fiscal year. Subsequently, the discoms simply transferred 6000 crore burden to the commoners in the name of FPPCA charges. The situation further deteriorated during 2023-24 when the discoms purchased a whopping 11,753 million units from the exchanges. "They have spent close to 8972 crore for power purchases from exchanges causing massive burden on the commoners," said CPM leader Ch Baburao. In fact, APERC allowed the discoms to purchase only 1551 million units. However, the power utilities purchase almost 10,000 million units over and above the cap fixed by the APERC. The discoms transferred nearly 9,412 crore burden to the commoners due to the short-term purchases. "The forecasted grid demand varies due to weather conditions and the forecasted generation vary due to outages of thermal generation or variation in renewable energy generation. In order to balance the load-generation on real time basis, the APDISCOMs overdraw/under draw from the grid. Also when there is shortfall in declared availability vis a vis the grid demand, DISCOMs are procuring shortfall from power markets, exchanges/e-bidding portal in order to ensure 24X7 power for all. A quantum of 5282.96 MU @ 6.79 per Unit was procured under short term/market. A quantum of 9 64.88 MU was sold through short term at a cost of 4.45 per unit," explained SPDCL Chief General Manager (CGM) V Sobha. CPDCL CGM K Venkata Krishna said that the availability of thermal stations decreased by 2056.56 MU(8.00 %) when compared to approved availability. Accordingly, the energy despatch from APGENCO thermal stations is also decreased by 1,490.75 MU than the approved quantum. He said that a quantum of 5282.96 MU @ 6.79 per Unit was procured under short term/market," said CGM.


Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
UP CM Adityanath flags power issues; warns against tripping, overbilling
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Friday emphasised that the state's power infrastructure is no longer merely a technical or administrative matter, but a reflection of public trust and a key indicator of government responsiveness. UP CM Adityanath flags power issues; warns against tripping, overbilling During a high-level review meeting with officials of the Power Department, Adityanath warned against tripping, overbilling, and unwarranted power cuts. "Every form of negligence must be addressed immediately. The power system is not just about transformers and wires, it's about public trust," the chief minister said, directing urgent reforms and improvements. In June 2025, Uttar Pradesh met a record peak power demand of 31,486 MW and supplied 16,930 million units, the government said in a statement. Despite soaring temperatures and humidity, uninterrupted power was reportedly provided—24 hours in urban areas, 21.5 hours in tehsils, and 18 hours in rural regions. Adityanath ordered comprehensive technical audits of all power feeders, instructing officials to identify weak points and fix them without delay. He stressed the need to enhance transformer capacity wherever overloading is occurring and underscored the importance of resolving consumer complaints in a timely and effective manner. "There is no shortage of resources. A record-breaking budget has been allocated to strengthen power generation, transmission, and distribution," he said. Accountability must be ensured at every level, he added, following a review with the Managing Directors of all DISCOMs. Highlighting issues in billing, Adityanath said inflated or incorrect electricity bills are unacceptable. "Every consumer must receive a clear, accurate bill on time. Errors in billing erode public trust and tarnish the department's credibility," he stated. Officials informed him that over 31 lakh consumers have been connected to smart meters, and implementation is progressing rapidly at the block level. The chief minister also directed a phased reduction of technical and commercial losses and called on each DISCOM to prepare a focused strategy to address them. He urged the speedy modernisation of transmission and distribution infrastructure. On the power generation front, officials reported that Uttar Pradesh's current installed capacity stands at 11,595 MW across thermal, hydro, renewable, and centrally supported projects. With upcoming units like Ghatampur and Meja, capacity is expected to rise to 16,000 MW in two years. Renewable energy is also set to cross the 100 MW mark. Adityanath directed continuous monitoring and timely completion of these projects. Focusing on agriculture, Adityanath called for faster separation of agricultural feeders and directed that all farm tubewells be transitioned to solar power under the PM KUSUM Yojana. This, he said, would provide long-term relief to farmers and reduce dependency on conventional power. Concluding the meeting, Adityanath reminded officials, "It is our responsibility to ensure electricity is delivered to every citizen transparently, promptly, and without discrimination." This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.