logo
Former Democratic state House candidate among nine indicted for alleged vote harvesting in South Texas

Former Democratic state House candidate among nine indicted for alleged vote harvesting in South Texas

Yahoo3 days ago
A South Texas grand jury this week reportedly indicted nine people, including the former chair of the Bexar County Democratic Party and a former Texas House candidate, for alleged vote harvesting in a sprawling investigation led by Attorney General Ken Paxton that has targeted Latino Democrats in the state.
Among the indicted were Manuel Medina, who once led Bexar County Democrats and served as a legislative aide, as well as Cecilia Castellano, who lost a bid last year to represent a district that includes Frio County in the Legislature's lower chamber, according to KSAT, which first reported the development Wednesday.
The indictments add to six previous ones revealed by Paxton in May and are the latest escalation in a probe that last year resulted in search warrants that led Texas authorities to seize Castellano's phone and raid Medina's home.
At the time, Latino leaders in Texas condemned the moves while Democratic state lawmakers asked the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate the state for potential violations of federal law and civil and voting rights amid a flurry of what Republican state leaders described as efforts to secure the state's elections.
On Thursday, neither Paxton's office nor 81st Judicial District Attorney Audrey Gossett Louis returned requests for comment. KSAT attributed the information in its report to Louis.
Castellano turned herself into authorities on Wednesday upon learning of two charges of vote harvesting leveled against her, her lawyer Don Flanary said. He professed his client's innocence and questioned the government's allegations in using a charge whose constitutionality is unsettled in courts.
In September, a federal judge ruled that certain prohibitions of voter outreach efforts in the Texas law were unconstitutionally vague and restricted free speech. But the New Orleans 5th Circuit appeals court overturned the decision when Paxton's office appealed it.
'Cecilia is innocent. She didn't do anything illegal and I don't think they are going to be able to prove it,' Flanary said by telephone, dismissing the prosecutions as 'plainly' politically motivated. 'The problem is it's very chilling for people.'
He added: 'It's highly inappropriate, in my opinion, to be filing these charges now when the 5th Circuit is going to rule about whether the activity is even a crime. … These people aren't charged with voter fraud. These people aren't charged with the traditional ways that it's illegal to get votes or do voter fraud.'
Medina did not immediately return a call Thursday. Neither did his lawyer.
The others charged include the former mayors of Pearsall and Dilley and other local elected officials from those cities and Frio County, according to KSAT. Some of them were the targets of search warrants executed by Paxton's office in May, according to the San Antonio news station.
Many were distraught by the allegations, Gabriel Rosales, League of United Latin American Citizens' Texas director, said in a brief interview.
LULAC last year raised alarms about the raids in August in which authorities also targeted the homes of elderly volunteers with guns drawn in early morning hours, the group and targets said.
'It's very disappointing that they would want to continue to go on with this witchhunt,' Rosales said. 'They're literally in tears.'
The extent of the allegations is not clear. The Tribune could not get copies of the indictments on Thursday. Frio County District Clerk Ofilia M. Trevino said they were not yet available online.
Search warrants obtained by the Tribune last year following the raids showed that authorities were investigating allegations that a longtime Frio County political operator had illegally harvested votes for multiple local races in recent years.
Vote harvesting, or the collection of ballots, is a term used by many Republicans to refer to the process of designating someone else to return a completed voter's ballot to election officials. The practice is permissible under federal law but numerous states have passed legislation to restrict it, including not letting the ballot collector be compensated or placing a limit on the number of ballots a person can collect, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
The charges leveled by Paxton's office this spring were under a 2021 state law that made it a third-degree felony for a person to knowingly provide or offer 'vote harvesting services' — or the collection of ballots — in exchange for compensation, unless the person is employed as a caregiver for a voter who is eligible to vote by mail.
That includes Texans who are 65 or older on Election Day or who are unable to vote in person due to illness or be away from their county throughout the entire election. Under the law, organizers of voter outreach groups and volunteers could spend up to 10 years in prison and be fined up to $10,000 for offering these services.
'The people of Texas deserve fair and honest elections, not backroom deals and political insiders rigging the system,' Paxton said in a May statement. 'Elected officials who think they can cheat to stay in power will be held accountable. No one is above the law.'
Disclosure: National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
🎆 During our Independence Day Sale, save $30 on your TribFest ticket.* Tribune members, students and educators save even more! Act fast — Offer ends at midnight Friday, July 4.
*Discount does not apply to Executive or VIP tickets
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump's Travel Ban And Visa Restrictions Could Affect Hospitals And Public Health
How Trump's Travel Ban And Visa Restrictions Could Affect Hospitals And Public Health

Forbes

time22 minutes ago

  • Forbes

How Trump's Travel Ban And Visa Restrictions Could Affect Hospitals And Public Health

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 26: A man bearing an upside down American flag watches as protesters gather ... More outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the court issued an immigration ruling June 26, 2018 in Washington, DC. The court issued a 5-4 ruling upholding the Trump administration's policy imposing limits on travel from several primarily Muslim nations. (Photo by) Several hospitals throughout the country are currently without some international medical graduates (IMG) because of President Trump's travel band and visa restrictions. According to the travel ban, citizens from 12 foreign countries are barred from entering the United States, and citizens from seven other countries will also face restrictions, making it difficult for many doctors who have completed medical education in foreign countries to train in America. In addition, on May 27th, the Trump administration restricted certain visas like J-1 visas from being issued which allow foreign medical students to work and train in the United States. The pause on interviews for J-1 visas has since been lifted, but some IMGs have reported to the Associated Press that U.S. embassies have been slow to open interview slots, and some have not opened any. This comes at a critical time, since July 1st marked the first calendar day of medical residencies or training programs throughout the U.S. On July 1st, newly graduated medical students start medical training in their prospective fields such as internal medicine, emergency medicine and surgery; to name a few. Although it remains unclear exactly how many IMGs have had their residency start date delayed due to the travel ban or visa restrictions, nearly 7,000 foreign born IMGs matched or filled into U.S. programs in 2025. This represents nearly 17% of the entire incoming workforce of medical residents in 2025, according to the National Resident Matching Program. Without IMGs joining the medical workforce in America, the physician shortage will be exacerbated for the next decade. In fact, the U.S. will face a physician shortage of 86,000 doctors by 2036, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges. Less physicians means longer wait times in emergency rooms, delayed diagnoses and significant strain on safety-net hospitals. IMGs make up a critical component of the healthcare workforce, and without them, patient care is directly compromised. IMGs also choose residencies and take jobs in places where U.S. medical trainees tend not to go, according to National Resident Matching Program President Donna Lamb, as reported by the Associated Press. As an example, IMGs make up 40% of residents in internal medicine, a primary care field with a focus on preventing chronic conditions like diabetes, cancer and heart disease. In addition, IMGs play a critical role in serving underserved areas throughout America, providing primary care, cancer screening and emergency care to some of the U.S.'s most vulnerable population. According to a 2021 study published in Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, more than 64% of IMGs surveyed practiced in medically underserved areas and more than 45% practiced in rural areas. These foreign-grad doctors form the backbone of healthcare in rural America, and without them, the health of the 66 million Americans that are served by rural hospitals could be in jeopardy. Finally, Trump's travel ban could have a chilling effect on future foreign medical applicants to the U.S. Prospective physicians may be deterred from considering medical training programs in America given the challenges and hurdles present in securing visas. Not only will this amplify the physician shortage in the U.S., it will decrease the amount of culturally competent physicians that serve an increasingly diverse population in America. President Trump's travel ban, which has been enacted in the name of national security and public safety, could have serious consequences for public health and medical education. One thing remains certain- IMGs form a vital part of the healthcare workforce in the United States.

Suspect in multiple Daytona stabbings shot dead after charging law enforcement, Volusia sheriff says
Suspect in multiple Daytona stabbings shot dead after charging law enforcement, Volusia sheriff says

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Suspect in multiple Daytona stabbings shot dead after charging law enforcement, Volusia sheriff says

A suspect in multiple stabbings in Daytona Beach was shot dead by responding police and deputies on Saturday night, according to a press release from the Volusia County Sheriff's Office. Law enforcement were responding to the stabbing report around 9:30 p.m. in the 1400 block of Derbyshire Road, found two people with stab wounds outside a home and learned the suspect was inside the residence, the release said. They also learned another person could be in the house. 'Deputies and police formed a team to enter the house and rescue any additional victims,' the release stated. 'As the team moved through the house, the suspect suddenly charged out of a bedroom door, screaming with a large knife raised above his head.' Police and deputies opened fire and the suspect was shot multiple times. He was pronounced dead on the scene. Responding agencies including the sheriff's office as well as Daytona Beach, Ormond Beach and Holly Hill police departments. No injuries were reported among law enforcement. The two stabbing victims, a 16-year-old boy and 39-year-old man, were transported to an area hospital where they were listed in stable condition, the release stated. The Florida Department of Law Enforcement is investigating the shooting. Deputies involved were placed on administrative leave. It's the second shooting by Central Florida law enforcement over the weekend after Orange County deputies shot and injured a suspect who was fleeing them on foot and had a gun, according to law enforcement.

Gamblers will have to pay taxes on their losses thanks to provision in Trump's spending bill
Gamblers will have to pay taxes on their losses thanks to provision in Trump's spending bill

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gamblers will have to pay taxes on their losses thanks to provision in Trump's spending bill

The Trump administration's signature spending package contains a little-known provision which could radically upend the gambling industry. Previously, gamblers could deduct all their losses from their declared income, while still having to pay taxes on their winnings. As a result, bettors were only taxed if they walked away from the table with a net profit. But starting next year, under the new bill, which the president signed into law Friday, bettors can only deduct 90 percent of their losses from their declared income. This sets up the potential for people to pay income taxes even if they ultimately came out of their bets at a loss. Insiders warned the change could drive away professional and recreational gamers alike impacting tax revenue. 'Did anyone think this through?' Russell Fox, a Nevada-based accountant specializing in gambling, told The Washington Post. 'They thought: 'We'll bury this somewhere in the bill. No one will see it, and now we've got $1 billion of income to offset $1 billion of tax cuts.'' 'This is bad long-term for the casino industry,' he added. 'It's bad for gamblers. It's actually bad for the IRS, too. We need a less-complex tax system.' Rep. Dina Titus, a Democratic congresswoman who represents Nevada, said earlier this week she would seek a 'legislative fix' to the provision. 'This is just another attack on gaming and tourism and on districts like mine that rely on these industries,' she said in a statement to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 'This also punishes people who are trying to do the right thing by reporting gambling on their taxes, pushing them towards offshore outlets and the predictions market, which unlike legitimate gambling sources, do not invest in bricks and mortar, pay state taxes, hire union labor, or contribute to problem gaming efforts.' Professional gamblers have also warned about the impact of the provision. 'This new amendment to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would end professional gambling in the U.S. and hurt casual gamblers, too,' poker player Phil Galfond wrote on X on Tuesday. 'You could pay more in tax than you won. Contact your representative quickly.' Others suggested the provision could push gamblers away from casinos and traditional sports books to online prediction markets such as Kalshi, which in practice often function like gambling but are regulated and taxed differently. Sports betting is legal in 38 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico. The gaming industry brought in a record high of nearly $72 billion last year, according to the American Gaming Association.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store