
GP reveals exact number of drinks it takes for most people to feel hungover...and drunk
According to GP Dr Bhavini Sha, four standard glasses of wine, or two and a half pints of beer, is enough to make you feel dreadful the following day.
Although this amount is likely to land you with a roster of classic hangover symptoms, just half a medium glass can make you somewhat drunk, Dr Sha warned.
'One unit of alcohol [half a medium glass of wine] increases the heart rate, expands blood vessels, and gives a slight "buzz" which commonly makes people feel more sociable or talkative', she told The Mirror.
'But after four to six units [two to three medium glasses], alcohol begins to impact your nervous system, decreasing reaction time and affecting areas of the brain associated with decision making, resulting in poorer judgement and potentially more reckless behaviour.
'At around eight units most people will experience a hangover.'
The NHS recommends drinking no more than 14 units per week, spread over three or more days, which is the equivalent to roughly six and a half standard glasses of wine.
One unit equals 10ml of pure alcohol, which is the amount of booze the body can process in an hour.
'After eight units, your vision and sleep will be affected and you will have consumed more alcohol than your liver can process in one night, resulting in symptoms the following day,' Dr Sha warned.
Despite various products being marketed as hangover cures, Dr Sha explained that there is very little evidence that a person can speed up how quickly their body processes alcohol—meaning the damaging effects are almost guaranteed.
'After 12 units, you are at great risk of alcohol poisoning,' she added.
This can occur when alcohol is consumed quicker than the body can process it, resulting in confusion, vomiting, loss of conscious, breathing difficulties and even seizures.
Left untreated, this can progress and cause liver and heart failure, and even death.
This is usually caused by binge drinking, a term used to refer to when a lot of alcohol is consumed in one drinking session.
It comes as the latest ONS figures shows alcohol related deaths have soared to a record high in Britain, with more than 10,000 fatalities related to drinking in 2023.
The NHS states there is no 'safe' drinking level, with people who regularly drink more than 14 units a week at higher risk of cancer, stroke, heart disease, liver disease and brain damage.
The NHS recommends that adults drink no more than 14 units each week – that's 14 single shots of spirit, six pints of beer or a bottle and a half of wine
But, up to one in four adults in England report drinking over this level.
Earlier this year, scientists highlighted a simple test that can point to a 'hidden' drinking problem, amid a rise in alcohol-related deaths post-pandemic.
Medics have previously warned that many drinkers fail to recognise they have a problem because their body hasn't yet become reliant on alcohol, which causes telltale signs such as shakes.
However, there is a simple test that doctors use to spot a hidden, 'functioning' alcoholic.
Called the CAGE test, the tool involves asking the patient four key questions about their drinking habits.
The questions include the following:
Have you ever felt you needed to cut down your drinking? Have people annoyed you by criticizing your drinking? Have you ever felt guilty about drinking? Do you need to drink first thing in the morning to steady your nerves or lessen a hangover?
Experts say answering 'yes' to two or more of these questions means a patient could have a drinking problem.
Those concerned they may have a problem with alcohol should visit their GP, who can make an assessment and refer them to specialist clinics for counselling and help with withdrawal.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
15 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Hancock: Moving patients from hospitals to care homes was least-worst decision
Bereaved people whose loved ones died in care homes have urged truth and accountability from those appearing before the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, as its focus for the next month falls on the care sector. The inquiry has previously heard there were more than 43,000 deaths involving the virus in care homes across the UK between March 2020 and July 2022, and a civil servant was quoted earlier this week describing the toll as a 'generational slaughter within care homes'. Appearing before the inquiry on Wednesday, Mr Hancock acknowledged the discharge policy was an 'incredibly contentious issue', but he added: 'Nobody has yet provided me with an alternative that was available at the time that would have saved more lives.' When the pandemic hit in early 2020, hospital patients were rapidly discharged into care homes in a bid to free up beds and prevent the NHS from becoming overwhelmed. However, there was no policy in place requiring patients to be tested before admission, or for asymptomatic patients to isolate, until mid-April. This was despite growing awareness of the risks of people without Covid-19 symptoms being able to spread the virus. Mr Hancock, who resigned from government in 2021 after admitting breaking social distancing guidance by having an affair with a colleague, has given evidence to the inquiry multiple times. Returning for a full-day session to face questions specifically about the care sector, he said the hospital discharge policy had been a government decision but had been 'driven' by then-NHS chief executive Sir Simon Stevens, now Lord Stevens. Mr Hancock said: 'It was formally a government decision. It was signed off by the prime minister. It was really driven by Simon Stevens, the chief executive of the NHS, but it was widely discussed.' The inquiry heard Mr Hancock said in his witness statement that NHS England had 'insisted' on the policy, and while he did not take the decision himself, he took responsibility for it as then-health secretary. He said it was an 'incredibly contentious issue' but added that 'nobody has yet provided me with an alternative that was available at the time that would have saved more lives'. He said there were no good options, adding: 'It's the least-worst decision that could have been taken at the time.' Pressed further, he said he had both agreed with and defended the decision at the time. The High Court ruled in 2022 that Government policies on discharging hospital patients into care homes at the start of the pandemic were 'unlawful'. While the judges said it was necessary to discharge patients 'to preserve the capacity of the NHS', they found it was 'irrational' for the Government not to have advised that asymptomatic patients should isolate from existing residents for 14 days after admission. Asked about March 17, 2020 when NHS bosses were instructed to begin the discharge process, Mr Hancock said officials were 'pushing very hard' to get more PPE into care homes. He said not advising care homes to isolate returning residents without symptoms was a 'mistake', but it was in line with clinical guidance at the time. In 2023, appearing for a separate module of the inquiry, Mr Hancock admitted the so-called protective ring he said had been put around care homes early in the pandemic was not an unbroken one, and said he understood the strength of feeling people have on the issue. At a Downing Street press conference on May 15 2020, Mr Hancock said: 'Right from the start, we've tried to throw a protective ring around our care homes.' Mr Hancock told the inquiry: 'I would stress in that piece of rhetoric, what I said is that we had 'tried' – it was not possible to protect as much as I would have wanted.' He added: 'The protection, what at the time, was clearly not as much as we would have liked, but the alternatives were even worse. 'We were trying to put as much protection in place as possible. 'All I can do is take you back to the actual decisions and the resources that we had at that moment. He went on: 'We were trying to do everything that we possibly could, we were in bleak circumstances.' Counsel to the inquiry Jacqueline Carey KC highlighted anonymous evidence given to the inquiry, saying: 'One person in particular said he (Mr Hancock) blatantly lied about the situation with care homes, there was no blanket of protection. We were left to sail our own ships. He wasn't heartfelt. He had no understanding or appreciation of the challenges care homes face, pandemic or not, it felt like we were the sacrifice, a cull of older people who could no longer contribute to the society.' Mr Hancock said it was 'not helpful' for the inquiry to 'exchange brickbats', but went on: 'I've been through everything that we did as a Department, a big team effort, and we were all pulling as hard as we possibly could to save lives – that's what I meant by saying that we tried to throw a protective ring around. 'Of course, it wasn't perfect. It was impossible – it was an unprecedented pandemic, and the context was exceptionally difficult. 'What I care about is the substance of what we did, the protections that we put in place, and most importantly, what we can do in the future to ensure that the options available are better than they were last time.' Bereaved families have previously called this 'protective ring' phrase a 'sickening lie' and a 'joke'. Nicola Brook, a solicitor representing more than 7,000 families from Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK (CBFFJ), said Mr Hancock's claim that the discharge policy had been the least-worst decision available was 'an insult to the memory of each and every person who died'. She added: 'He knew at the time that many care homes did not have the ability to isolate the people who would be discharged from hospital and that Covid was airborne. 'It's frankly ridiculous and insulting that he says they tried to throw a protective ring around care homes when his department's policies caused Covid to spread like wildfire amongst society's most vulnerable loved ones. 'Mr Hancock claims the decision to discharge people into care homes was driven by Simon Stevens, the chief executive of the NHS, yet the inquiry is not calling him. We would call for this decision to be urgently reviewed.' The CBFFJ group had already written to inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett, to express their concern at some 'key decision-makers' not expected to be called in this module, including former prime minister Boris Johnson. Outlining the state of the adult social care sector at the outbreak of the pandemic, Mr Hancock said it 'was badly in need of, and remains badly in need of, reform', but rejected the suggestion of it being a 'Cinderella service to the NHS'. He said pandemic contingency plans, prepared by local authorities for adult social care, had been 'as good as useless' at the time, and described a 'hodge podge of accountability' between local councils and Government departments. He claimed the situation has 'got worse not better' for care homes in the event of another pandemic hitting, and suggested a series of recommendations, including having isolation facilities in care homes and ensuring a stockpile of personal protective equipment (PPE). Module six of the inquiry is focused on the effect the pandemic had on both the publicly and privately funded adult social care sector across the UK. Public hearings for the care sector module are expected to run until the end of July.


BBC News
15 minutes ago
- BBC News
Princess of Wales talks of 'life-changing' cancer treatment
The Princess of Wales has spoken candidly about the life-changing long-term challenges of recovering after chemotherapy, as she visited a hospital in said during treatment "you put on a sort of brave face" but afterwards it can also feel "really difficult".She told patients at the hospital about life after cancer treatment: "You're not able to function normally at home as you perhaps once used to."It was Catherine's first public engagement since pulling out of an appearance at Royal Ascot, when it was said she needed to find the right balance in her return to work. In January, Catherine announced she was in remission from cancer, which had been diagnosed last year. But her latest comments are a reminder how this is a gradual path to recovery. She said: "You put on a sort of brave face, stoicism through treatment, treatment's done - then it's like 'I can crack on, get back to normal'."But actually the phase afterwards is really difficult, you're not necessarily under the clinical team any longer, but you're not able to function normally at home as you perhaps once used to," said the princess."But it's life-changing for anyone, through first diagnosis or post treatment and things like that, it is life-changing experience both for the patient but also for the families as well. "And actually it sometimes goes unrecognised, you don't necessarily, particularly when it's the first time, appreciate how much impact it is going to have. "You have to find your new normal and that takes time... and it's a rollercoaster it's not one smooth plane, which you expect it to be. But the reality is it's not, you go through hard times," said had been much attention paid when the princess did not take part in an engagement at the Ascot royal sources say that her comments on Tuesday will send an important message of support for other former cancer patients who are facing challenges in their own journey of made the comments as she visited a "well-being garden" at Colchester, which helps to use nature to support patients in their recovery from has spoken of the healing power of the natural world and how it has been a source of strength for her during her return from illness. She has described nature as her "sanctuary".In May, the Royal Horticultural Society launched a "Catherine's rose", which was sold to raise funds for the Royal Marsden Cancer Charity, at a hospital where the princess had been are 50 of this variety of rose that have been donated to Colchester Hospital, with the princess helping to plant the roses during her well-being garden at the hospital is intended to provide a place to relax and recuperate for patients, recognising how nature can help people to feel better, both in their physical and mental health. Sign up here to get the latest royal stories and analysis every week with our Royal Watch newsletter. Those outside the UK can sign up here.


Cambrian News
20 minutes ago
- Cambrian News
Dental crisis in north Wales raised in Westminster
'Filling the Gaps' describes three distinct tiers of care which have developed, including those who have access to NHS care, those who want to access NHS care but are unable to do so and opt to go private, and those who are unable to access NHS care and are unable to afford private.