Abergavenny man hit by 7/7 bomb calls for public inquiry
Mr Biddle has described the long-lasting trauma of the day and criticised the Government's handling of the aftermath.
Talking to GB News, he said: "The Dan Biddle that I was at 8.52 on July 7 died at 8.52 on the 7th of July and I've had to reinvent myself and everything that I was trying to do.
"I've had to start afresh, and I've been incredibly lucky that my wife Gem is an amazing support and gets me through so much of it."
Mr Biddle, a former Pride of Gwent winner, has also criticised the Government's decision not to hold a public inquiry.
He said: "After 7/7, me and a lot of other people were calling for a public inquiry.
"We constantly have that shut down.
"And I think the reason I don't think London is any safer is because we didn't have the public inquiry."
Dan Biddle was named a Pride of Gwent winner in 2018 He has compared the lack of a 7/7 inquiry with other major incidents.
He said: "If you jump forward a few years, the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes had a public inquiry.
"The Manchester attack had a public inquiry.
"Grenfell had a public inquiry.
"All were absolutely wonderful and deserved it.
"7/7 was the first attack of its kind in this country.
"It was the biggest loss of life in a terrorist attack.
"It was a first suicide attack, and there were clear failings, yet no public inquiry."
Mr Biddle has also challenged the Government's narrative about the attack.
He said: "I think they're naïve given the arrogance of Tony Blair to think that you can go to war in a Middle Eastern country and it not have any repercussions on home soil.
"I think the fact that when Blair was interviewed, he turned around and said that there is no link between al-Qaeda and the 7/7 attacks, yet when Khan made his suicide video, he openly states that that is the reason."
Dan Biddle with his wife Gemma
Mr Biddle has now written a book about his experience, Back From the Dead: The Untold Story of the 7/7 Bombings.
He said: "I wanted to write a book to hopefully for somebody that's struggling to read that and go, yeah, there is a way through with the right support and the right people, I can potentially come through the other side of it."
He has also reflected on the personal choices that put him on the train that morning.
He said: "There's countless times where, if I'd have made a different decision, then I wouldn't have been on that train at that time.
"If I'd have got up on time, if I'd missed my stop.
"There's so many things that I can think back on and think if I knew, I'd have done this, if I never done that, but it serves no purpose now, because what's happened has happened."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
5 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Ministers face fresh challenge to welfare reforms in Wednesday votes
The Department for Work and Pensions will try to steer the Universal Credit Bill through its final Commons stages, including clause-by-clause scrutiny, on Wednesday. The Bill, if agreed to, would roll out two different rates of benefit for claimants who cannot currently work. It would also freeze the limited capability for work and work-related activity (LCW and LCWRA) elements of the benefit until 2030. The PA news agency understands that a 'substantial number' of Labour rebels have agreed to vote to gut the Bill of these reforms, if they can trigger a division. When MPs debated the reforms last week, Government frontbenchers rolled back on their plan to reform the separate personal independence payment (Pip) benefit, vowing to revisit any proposed changes only after a review by social security minister Sir Stephen Timms. 'The Government for all the goodwill of pulling clause five on Pip, they've lost it over being so stubborn and obstinate over clauses two and three,' Labour MP for York Central Rachael Maskell said. Clause two of the Bill includes a framework for two rates of LCWRA, with claimants who are eligible for the benefit before April 2026 able to claim a higher rate than later applicants. Claimants who are terminally ill or who have severe symptoms of an illness which 'constantly' apply would also be eligible for the higher rate, regardless of when they become eligible. Ms Maskell has proposed a change to the reforms, so that someone who has slipped out of and then back into the LCWRA eligibility criteria either side of April 2026 would still be able to claim the higher rate. Approving this change would be like 'gathering up the crumbs rather than getting the full course meal', she said. Asked what the Government should do to tackle welfare costs, Ms Maskell told the PA news agency: 'We've got to put the early interventions in to take people off this path of ill health. 'We've got quite a sick society at the moment for all the reasons that we know, a broken NHS, you know, social care not being where it should be, and of course long-term Covid. 'All of that is having its impact, and the endemic mental health challenges that people are facing. 'But to then have the confidence that your programme is so good that it's going to get loads of these people into work and employers are going to have to fulfil their obligations in the future hopefully after the Charlie Mayfield report (the Keep Britain Working review) will make those recommendations – all of that, great, as far as it goes. 'But what we can't do is leave those people that can't work in poverty, because they would love to work and earn money, but they can't, so we have to pay for it. 'And therefore the people who've got the good fortune of earning money, whether it's through income or assets, they're the people that are going to have to support a wider society.' Labour MP for Poole Neil Duncan-Jordan proposed gutting the Bill through a series of draft amendments, to strike clause two and cancel the freeze in clause three. He and Ms Maskell were two of 49 MPs who unsuccessfully tried to block the Bill at second reading, when it cleared its first Commons hurdle by 335 votes to 260, majority 75. Amid fears the Bill had been rushed through Parliament, and referring to the Liberal reformer William Beveridge who published a post-war blueprint for the welfare state in 1942, Mr Duncan-Jordan asked: 'Beveridge didn't design the welfare state on the back of a postage stamp, did he?' Beyond changes to parts of the benefit specifically for people who cannot currently work, the Bill would demand an above-inflation rise to the universal credit standard allowance each year until 2030.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Macron tells parliament immigration is a challenge that France and UK ‘must fix together'
French President Emmanuel Macron stated that immigration is a "burden for our two countries" during his state visit to the UK. Addressing parliament on Tuesday, 8 July 2025, he called for France and the UK to focus on fixing immigration. Macron highlighted a shared responsibility to address irregular migration with humanity, solidarity, and firmness. He added that an upcoming summit aims for enhanced cooperation and tangible results to resolve the issue. Watch the video in full above.
Leader Live
36 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Ministers face fresh challenge to welfare reforms in Wednesday votes
The Department for Work and Pensions will try to steer the Universal Credit Bill through its final Commons stages, including clause-by-clause scrutiny, on Wednesday. The Bill, if agreed to, would roll out two different rates of benefit for claimants who cannot currently work. It would also freeze the limited capability for work and work-related activity (LCW and LCWRA) elements of the benefit until 2030. The PA news agency understands that a 'substantial number' of Labour rebels have agreed to vote to gut the Bill of these reforms, if they can trigger a division. When MPs debated the reforms last week, Government frontbenchers rolled back on their plan to reform the separate personal independence payment (Pip) benefit, vowing to revisit any proposed changes only after a review by social security minister Sir Stephen Timms. 'The Government for all the goodwill of pulling clause five on Pip, they've lost it over being so stubborn and obstinate over clauses two and three,' Labour MP for York Central Rachael Maskell said. Clause two of the Bill includes a framework for two rates of LCWRA, with claimants who are eligible for the benefit before April 2026 able to claim a higher rate than later applicants. Claimants who are terminally ill or who have severe symptoms of an illness which 'constantly' apply would also be eligible for the higher rate, regardless of when they become eligible. Ms Maskell has proposed a change to the reforms, so that someone who has slipped out of and then back into the LCWRA eligibility criteria either side of April 2026 would still be able to claim the higher rate. Approving this change would be like 'gathering up the crumbs rather than getting the full course meal', she said. Asked what the Government should do to tackle welfare costs, Ms Maskell told the PA news agency: 'We've got to put the early interventions in to take people off this path of ill health. 'We've got quite a sick society at the moment for all the reasons that we know, a broken NHS, you know, social care not being where it should be, and of course long-term Covid. 'All of that is having its impact, and the endemic mental health challenges that people are facing. 'But to then have the confidence that your programme is so good that it's going to get loads of these people into work and employers are going to have to fulfil their obligations in the future hopefully after the Charlie Mayfield report (the Keep Britain Working review) will make those recommendations – all of that, great, as far as it goes. 'But what we can't do is leave those people that can't work in poverty, because they would love to work and earn money, but they can't, so we have to pay for it. 'And therefore the people who've got the good fortune of earning money, whether it's through income or assets, they're the people that are going to have to support a wider society.' Labour MP for Poole Neil Duncan-Jordan proposed gutting the Bill through a series of draft amendments, to strike clause two and cancel the freeze in clause three. He and Ms Maskell were two of 49 MPs who unsuccessfully tried to block the Bill at second reading, when it cleared its first Commons hurdle by 335 votes to 260, majority 75. Amid fears the Bill had been rushed through Parliament, and referring to the Liberal reformer William Beveridge who published a post-war blueprint for the welfare state in 1942, Mr Duncan-Jordan asked: 'Beveridge didn't design the welfare state on the back of a postage stamp, did he?' Beyond changes to parts of the benefit specifically for people who cannot currently work, the Bill would demand an above-inflation rise to the universal credit standard allowance each year until 2030.
