
Networked trees' cosmic connection
The researchers also detected changes in the bioelectric responses of the stumps during the eclipse. Photo: Zenit Arti Audiovisive
Earth's cycles of light and dark profoundly affect billions of organisms. Events such as solar eclipses are known to bring about marked shifts in animals, but do they have the same effect on plants?
During a solar eclipse in a forest in Italy's Dolomites region, scientists seized the chance to explore that fascinating question.
The researchers were monitoring the bioelectric impulses of spruce trees, when a solar eclipse passed over. They left their sensors running to record the trees' response to the eclipse — and what they observed was astonishing.
The spruce trees not only responded to the solar eclipse — they actively anticipated it, by synchronising their bioelectric signals hours in advance.
This forest-wide phenomenon reveals a new layer of complexity in plant behaviour.
It adds to emerging evidence that plants actively take part in their ecosystems.
DO TREES RESPOND COLLECTIVELY?
The research was led by Prof Alessandro Chiolerio, of the Italian Institute of Technology, and Prof Monica Gagliano, of Australia's Southern Cross University, who is the lead author on this article. It also involved a team of international scientists.
A solar eclipse occurs when the Moon passes between the Sun and Earth, fully or partially blocking the Sun's light.
An eclipse can inspire awe and even social cohesion in humans. Other animals have been shown to gather and synchronise their movements during such an event.
But scientists know very little about how plants respond to solar eclipses. Some research suggests the rapid transitions from darkness to light during an eclipse can change plant behaviour. But this research focuses on the responses of individual plants.
The latest study set out to discover if trees respond to a solar eclipse together, as a living collective.
WHAT THE RESEARCH INVOLVED
Charged molecules travel through the cells of all living organisms, transmitting electrical signals as they go. Collectively, this electrical activity is known as the organism's "electrome".
The electrical activity is primarily driven by the movement of ions across cell membranes. It creates tiny currents that allow organisms, including humans, to co-ordinate their body and communicate.
The researchers wanted to investigate the electrical signals of spruce trees (Picea abies) during a partial solar eclipse on October 25, 2022. It took place in the Costa Bocche forest near Paneveggio in the Dolomites area, Italy.
The scientists set out to understand the trees' electrical activity during the hour-long eclipse. They used custom-built sensors and wired them to three trees. Two were healthy trees about 70 years old, one in full sun and one in full shade. The third was a healthy tree about 20 years old, in full shade.
Photo: Zenit Arti Audiovisive
They also attached the sensors to five tree stumps — the remnants of old trees, originally part of a pristine forest, but which were devastated by a storm several years earlier.
For each tree and stump, the researchers used five pairs of electrodes, placed in both the inner and outer layers of the tree, including on exposed roots, branches and trunks. The electrodes were connected to the sensors.
This set-up allowed the scientists to monitor the bioelectric activity from multiple trees and stumps across four sites during the solar eclipse. They examined both individual tree responses, and bioelectric signals between trees.
In particular, the scientists measured changes in the trees' "bioelectric potentials". This term refers to the differences in voltage across cell membranes.
WHAT DID THEY FIND?
The electrical activity of all three trees became significantly more synchronised around the eclipse — both before and during the one-hour event. These changes occur at a microscopic level, such as inside water and lymph molecules in the tree.
The two older trees in the study had a much more pronounced early response to the impending eclipse than the young tree. This suggests older trees may have developed mechanisms to anticipate and respond to such events, similar to their responses to seasonal changes.
Solar eclipses may seem rare from a human perspective, but they follow cycles that can occur well within the lifespan of long-lived trees. The scientists also detected bioelectric waves travelling between the trees. This suggests older trees may transmit their ecological knowledge to younger trees.
Such a dynamic is consistent with studies showing long-distance signalling between plants can help them co-ordinate various physiological functions in response to environmental changes.
The researchers also detected changes in the bioelectric responses of the stumps during the eclipse, albeit less pronounced than in the standing trees. This suggests the stumps were still alive.
The research team then used computer modelling, and advanced analytical methods including quantum field theory, to test the findings of the physical experiment.
The results reinforced the experimental results. That is, not only did the eclipse influence the bioelectric responses of individual trees, the activity was correlated. This suggests a cohesive, organism-like reaction at the forest scale.
UNDERSTANDING FOREST CONNECTIONS
These findings align with extensive prior research by others, highlighting the extent to which trees in forest ecosystems are connected.
These behaviours may ultimately influence the forest ecosystem's resilience, biodiversity and overall function, by helping it cope with rapid and unpredictable changes.
The findings also underscore the importance of protecting older forests, which serve as pillars of ecosystem resilience — potentially preserving and transmitting invaluable ecological knowledge.
This research is featured in a documentary, Il Codice del Bosco (The Forest Code), which premiered in Italy this week.
Monica Gagliano is a research associate professor in evolutionary biology, Southern Cross University. Prudence Gibson is a lecturer and researcher in plant humanities, UNSW Sydney.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
19-06-2025
- RNZ News
Elon Musk's SpaceX rockets keep blowing up at worst possible time
By Hadas Gold , CNN Another SpaceX Starship goes up in flames. Photo: NASASpaceflight Analysis: As Elon Musk returns his focus to his businesses, one of his most important companies just had another setback: a SpaceX Starship rocket exploded in an immense fireball on Wednesday during a routine ground test. The explosion marks the fourth failure in a row for SpaceX's Starship, all while Musk's other companies and his personal brand struggle to recover after his foray into politics. Starship is supposed to help reach NASA's goal of bringing American astronauts back to the moon by 2027: The US space agency is paying SpaceX up to about US$4 billion for the mission. Although SpaceX has said that the last three launches before Wednesday's explosions were successful in testing some elements, all ended in mid-flight failures. SpaceX has long made the case that failures during the testing and development phase are not the harbingers of disaster they may seem. The company embraces a design philosophy called "rapid iterative development" that emphasises building relatively low-cost prototypes and launching frequent test flights. SpaceX believes the approach allows the company to hash out rocket designs faster and at cheaper price points than relying on slower, more methodical engineering approaches that can guarantee a vehicle's success. But the very fiery Starship explosion comes as Musk has been trying to restore his reputation as he returned to focus on his businesses after a controversial stint in the Trump administration. After several months as a top White House adviser and leading the Department of government Efficiency, Musk is now taking a step back from full-time government work refocusing his time on his companies, including Tesla, which has struggled in part as a result of Musk's alliance with the Trump administration. Upon his return, Musk has sought to promote an image of safety and reliability at Tesla, which is aiming to launch its driverless robotaxis in Austin on Sunday - although the initial phase is expected to be limited to less than two dozen cars, and Musk has warned the date could shift. But before the launch, a group of Texas lawmakers have asked Tesla to delay the rollout of its robotaxi service until September, citing a new law on autonomous driving set to take effect. And Tesla's share price slipped this week, before recovering somewhat, following a report from Business Insider that the company plans to pause production on Cybertruck and Model Y lines for a week at its Austin factory for maintenance, the third such shutdown this year. And in Europe, where Tesla sales have been plunging, Chinese car maker BYD sold more pure battery electric vehicles over Tesla in Europe for the first time, according to a report from JATO , an automotive market research firm. Elon Musk Photo: AFP Musk also has his work cut out for him at his AI company, xAI. Bloomberg reported the company "is burning through US$1 billion a month" as the cost of building out its AI model "races ahead of the limited revenues." Musk brushed off the report. "Bloomberg is talking nonsense," he posted on X in response. They don't. Also, Bloomberg is talking nonsense. Musk also publicly disputed his own AI chatbot Grok, when it posted a fact check about politically motivated violence, noting that "Since 2016, data suggests right-wing political violence has been more frequent and deadly." That response lines up with most publicly available data. But Musk didn't agree. "Major fail, as this is objectively false. Grok is parroting legacy media. Working on it." he posted . Musk seems to be brushing off the setbacks, especially with SpaceX. He said last month that he hoped Starship would make its inaugural flight to Mars by the end of next year - a target that looks increasingly unlikely to be met. "Just a scratch," he posted after Starship's explosion before posting "RIP Ship 36" and memes. When a user asked Musk's chatbot Grok why Musk was posting memes, Grok responded "The timing suggests it's likely a humorous comment on the SpaceX Starship explosion that occurred on June 18, rather than targeting a specific person. Musk often uses memes to downplay such setbacks." Musk responded with a bullseye emoji. -CNN


Scoop
31-05-2025
- Scoop
Earth's Seasonal Rhythms Are Changing, Putting Species And Ecosystems At Risk
Seasonality shapes much of life on Earth. Most species, including humans, have synchronised their own rhythms with those of Earth's seasons. Plant growth cycles, the migration of billions of animals, and even aspects of human culture – from harvest rituals to Japanese cherry blossom viewings – are dictated by these dominant rhythms. However, climate change and many other human impacts are altering Earth's cycles. While humans can adapt their behaviour by shifting the timing of crop harvests or Indigenous fire-burning practices, species are less able to adapt through evolution or range shifts. Our new research highlights how the impacts of shifting seasons can cascade through ecosystems, with widespread repercussions that may be greater than previously thought. This puts species and ecosystems at risk the world over. We are still far from having a full picture of what changes in seasonality mean for the future of biodiversity. Almost every ecosystem on Earth has seasons From tropical forests to polar ice caps and abyssal depths, the annual journey of Earth around the Sun brings distinct seasons to all corners of the planet. These seasonal rhythms shape ecosystems everywhere, whether through monsoonal rains in equatorial regions or the predictable melt of snowpack in mountain ranges. But the seasonality of these processes is changing rapidly due to local human impacts. This includes dams in many rivers, which completely and abruptly disrupt their natural flow, and deforestation, which changes the timing of the onset of the rain season. These local influences are compounded by climate change, which is systematically modifying seasonal patterns in snow cover, temperature and rainfall around the world. From the earlier seasonal melting of glaciers and the snowpack to the disruption of monsoonal rain cycles, the effects of these changes are being felt widely. Many important ecological processes we rely on could be affected. A mismatch between plankton blooms and the life cycles of fish could affect the health of fisheries. Tourism dependent on seasonal migrations of large mammals could suffer. Even the regulation of the climate system itself is tightly controlled by seasonal processes. Changing seasonality threatens to destabilise key ecological processes and human society. Evolutionary adaptations to seasonal fluctuations The seasonal rhythms of ecosystems are obvious to any observer. The natural timing of annual flowers and deciduous trees – tuned to match seasonal variations in rainfall, temperature and solar radiation – transforms the colours of whole landscapes throughout the year. The arrival and departure of migratory birds, the life cycle of insects and amphibians, and the mating rituals of large mammals can completely change the soundscapes with the seasons. These examples illustrate how seasonality acts as a strong evolutionary force that has shaped the life cycles and behaviour of most species. But, in the face of unprecedented changes to Earth's natural rhythms, these adaptations can lead to complex negative impacts. For instance, snowshoe hares change coat colour between winter and summer to blend in with their surroundings and hide from predators. They are struggling to adapt to shifts in the timing of the first snow and snowmelt. The impact of changing seasonality on hare populations is linked with changes in predation rates. But predators themselves may also be out of sync with the new onset of seasons. Our research highlights that these kinds of complex interactions can propagate impacts through ecosystems, linking individual species' seasonal adaptations to broader food web dynamics, or even ecosystem functions such as carbon sequestration. Although biologists have studied seasonal processes for centuries, we know surprisingly little about how they mediate any ecological impacts of altered seasonality. Our findings show we are likely underestimating these impacts. The distinct mechanisms involved deserve further attention. Until we account for these complex processes, we risk overlooking important ecological and human consequences. The more we understand, the better prepared we are Understanding the extent to which impacts of altered seasonality can interact and propagate from individuals to whole ecosystems is a big challenge. It will require different types of research, complex mathematical modelling and the design of new experiments. But it is not easy to manipulate the seasons in an experiment. Scientists have come up with inventive ways of experimentally testing the effects of altered seasonality. This includes manually removing snow early in spring, manipulating rainfall patterns through irrigation and moving plants and animals to places with different seasonality. Some researchers have even recovered seeds from centuries-old collections to sprout them and look at how recent changes in climate have affected plant populations. These efforts will be of great value for forecasting impacts and designing effective management strategies beneficial for ecosystems and humans alike. Such efforts help to anticipate future shocks and prioritise interventions. For instance, understanding the mechanisms that allow native and non-native species to anticipate seasonal changes has proven useful for ' tricking ' non-native plants into sprouting only in the wrong season. This gives an advantage to native plants. Similarly, studies on the molecular mechanisms involved in the response to seasonality can help us determine whether certain species are likely to adapt to further changes in seasonal patterns. This research can also point out genes that could be targeted for improving the resilience and productivity of crops. Not only are we likely underestimating the ecological risks of shifting seasons, we tend to forget how much our everyday lives depend on them. As Earth's rhythms change, the risks multiply. But so does our opportunity to better understand, anticipate and adapt to these changes. Disclosure statement Daniel Hernández Carrasco receives funding from a Doctoral Scholarship by the University of Canterbury. Jonathan Tonkin receives funding from a Rutherford Discovery Fellowship administered by the Royal Society Te Apārangi and the Centres of Research Excellence Bioprotection Aotearoa and Te Pūnaha Matatini.


Otago Daily Times
24-05-2025
- Otago Daily Times
The Sun, a pinhole, and a hefty price tag
Image: Ian Griffin Very keen-eyed visitors to the recent Cleveland National Art Awards show in Dunedin might have noticed a small, unassuming 4-by-5-inch photograph tucked away on a gallery wall — entry number 71. A smudgy image showing a figure-eight shape hovering above some blurry trees. Nothing much to look at, really. But perhaps curious, they flipped through the catalogue and promptly fell over when they saw the outrageous price. Let me explain. The image in question is an analemma, a picture showing the sun's position at the same time each day for a year. Due to Earth's tilted axis and its not-so-circular orbit, the sun doesn't return to the same spot in the sky each day — unless you count weekends, when it's always directly behind clouds. Instead, it traces a lovely elongated figure eight. To capture this celestial doodle, I mounted a pinhole camera in my office window. Every day at 12.30 in winter and 1.30 in summer (it's daylight saving's fault), a tiny dot of sunlight etched itself onto a glass photographic plate. For a whole year. No lens. No electronics. Just physics and patience. After 12 months, having carefully developed the precious image, I proudly entered what I believe to be the first ever complete southern hemisphere photographic analemma into a prestigious astronomy photography competition. It didn't even get selected for consideration — though a bloke who caught the Moon rising behind a lighthouse won third prize. Fair enough, it was a lovely lighthouse. So, I entered it in the Cleveland Art Awards. To my utter astonishment, it got in. Art judges apparently have better taste than astrophotography ones. Over several darkroom sessions (involving much muttering and chemical spills), I produced the final print. But there was a catch: just before entering, I realised that all entries had to be for sale. And I didn't want to sell it. Did I mention this image took an entire year of my life to create? Hence the outrageous price. Is this science or art? As Einstein said, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious". I say it's both. Though my camera was nudged before the year was up — so I'll have to start over. Such is the life of a pinhole perfectionist.