Why this town's lake is causing a stink
The Pegasus Residents' Group wants answers on the fate of Pegasus Lake, due to ongoing issues with toxic algae.
Environment Canterbury (ECan) issued an abatement notice to the developer, Templeton Pegasus Ltd, last month about the state of the artificial lake in the Canterbury town.
It followed the latest public health warning for toxic algae, which was issued in December.
Residents' group chairperson Matt James said frustration is growing among residents, who continue to face uncertainty.
''We have a good relationship with Templeton Group, which has given us a good insight into the problem.
''For a manufactured lake it is very deep and the water is very stale.
''It is like a garden pond. It is fed by aquifers, but the flows aren't fast enough to flush it out, which has causes the lake to layer.''
The artificial lake was constructed by the original developer, Infinity Group, between 2008 and 2010, with Todd Property Group taking over the development in late 2012.
It is now owned by Templeton Pegasus Ltd, a subsidiary of Templeton Group.
Templeton Pegasus Ltd has been contacted for comment.
Pegasus Lake is a popular spot for recreational activities. Photo: North Canterbury News Mr James said Templeton Pegasus Ltd presented residents with a plan last year, but he believes no progress has been made since.
''The community hasn't heard back from Templeton for sometime and there's a lot of frustration and at times anger.
''My personal suspicion is it will end up with the council (Waimakariri District Council) having to deal with.''
Fellow residents' group committee members Colin Brownlee and Peter Johnston said the lake had been a drawcard in attracting residents to move to Pegasus.
Algal bloom was first reported in February 2015, with the lake closed to recreational use for the first time.
Two months later ECan found the lake weeds had been sprayed with Diquat herbicide.
An infringement notice was issued to Todd Property Group in 2020, with the sub-division subsequently sold to Templeton Group.
An ECan spokesperson said Templeton Pegasus Ltd holds four resource consents and is in breach of conditions in two of those consents.
''The lake is prone to blooms of potentially toxic algae ('blue-green algae') over the summer period.''
Templeton Pegasus Ltd has since issued a registration of interest via its consultancy firm WSP last month to investigate options to remediate the lake.
By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter
■ LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Dogs allowed on Canterbury buses - but is it workable?
A last-minute rule change to allow small dogs on buses has left Environment Canterbury staff scrambling to make it workable. Councillors adopted the Canterbury Regional Transport Plan 2025/35 at a council meeting yesterday after a late amendment from councillor David East to allow passengers to take a small dog on the bus with a lead and a muzzle. Cr East's motion passed by 8-7, and followed an earlier amendment proposed by Cr Joe Davies, which would have allowed small dogs to travel in their owner's lap, which lost 9-6. This was despite staff advice that dogs were not permitted in the Christchurch bus interchange, administered by the Christchurch City Council, unless they are in a secure carrier. It could mean passengers are able to board a bus with their dog, but are unable to get off with their canine at the interchange. Cr Davies has been lobbying for pets on buses for the last two years, following lobbying by resident JJ Smith. The plan was a good example of how policy takes time, he said. ''This is about dogs on buses. When people think about taking a pet on the bus, a dog is different because people take them to the park or to visit people. ''Dogs are companions in ways that cats and guinea pigs aren't.'' But Cr Claire McKay said she felt allowing dogs was a risk to public safety as ''we can never be certain what a dog is going to do''. ECan staff have been working on the regional transport plan since 2021 with the Canterbury Regional Transport Committee, which comprises the region's mayors, the NZ Transport Agency/Waka Kotahi and the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee. The proposed plan had a clause allowing pets to travel on buses, as long as they were in a secure carrier. Cr Grant Edge, who chaired the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee's hearing panel, said he was disappointed to see the amendment pass. ''It is incredibly naive for us not to have simply adopted the plan. ''As staff have told us, leashing and muzzling has issues with the Christchurch City Council's rules and we have no definition of a small dog.'' Chairman Craig Pauling questioned how bus drivers will ''determine what is a small dog?'' There is still work to do before dogs can ride on buses. ECan staff will now engage with the Christchurch City Council, bus drivers and other stakeholders to come up with a revised code of conduct for pets on buses to present to a future council meeting. The Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee comprises the Christchurch, Selwyn and Waimakariri councils, ECan, Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu and government agencies. - By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter • LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
RNZ News
24-07-2025
- RNZ News
Some Air India victims' families in UK were sent wrong remains, lawyer says
By Sana Noor Haq , CNN All but one of 242 passengers and crew members were killed on June 12. Photo: AFP / Middle East Images / Basit Zargar Authorities in India sent the wrong remains to some British families whose loved ones were killed in a plane crash last month , their lawyer has claimed, as relatives reckoned with the human cost of the world's deadliest aviation accident in a decade. At least two UK nationals were discovered to have been misidentified after they were repatriated, according to James Healy-Pratt, an international aviation lawyer who is representing some of the British relatives of victims. In one case, a coroner in London discovered that the DNA of several bodies had been co-mingled in one of the caskets, Healy-Pratt told UK news agency PA Media. Dr Fiona Shaw "picked up DNA anomalies" when the bodies were first repatriated, Healy-Pratt said. "My understanding was that the co-mingling was at the very beginning, which alerted Dr Wilcox to the fact that she had to be 100% assiduous about checking the identification of the incoming remains," the lawyer added. "She was then able to determine that one particular loved one was not at all who the family thought they were," said Healy-Pratt. All but one of 242 passengers and crew members were killed on June 12, after an Air India jet lost momentum and hurtled into a densely populated neighborhood in Ahmedabad, western India. The London-bound aircraft had barely left the runway of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport before it spun out of control and nosedived into the BJ Medical College and Hospital hostel - also killing 19 people on the ground. Authorities have not yet released the definitive cause of the crash, but a preliminary report suggested that the fuel control switches in the cockpit of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner had been flipped , depriving the engines of power. In an audio recording from the black box, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why he flipped the switches, according to the assessment by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau published last week. The other pilot responds that he did not. Moments later, the switches were flipped to turn the fuel supply back on. Both engines relit and one began to "progress to recovery," but it was too late to halt the plane's tumultuous descent. Of those killed on board, at least 169 were Indian nationals, seven were Portuguese and one was from Canada. The only survivor was Vishwash Kumar Ramesh , one of 53 UK passengers that day who told local media that he escaped by clinging onto a small space near the door by his seat. Vishwash Kumar Ramesh was the only survivor of the Air India crash. Photo: Narendra Modi / YouTube / AFP The relatives of three victims said they were "deeply troubled" by the revelations on Wednesday, calling on authorities to act with "care, co-ordination and respect." "Recent developments have only confirmed what many feared: that serious mistakes may have been made, and that the dignity and rights of victims and their families were not safeguarded as they should have been," they said in a statement. The relatives of Akeel Nanabawa, his wife Hannaa Vorajee and their four-year-old daughter Sara Nanabawa added that while they are "confident" they received the "correct bodies" - they were still "deeply troubled by what this means for other families who may still be searching for certainty and closure." "This isn't just a personal tragedy; it is a collective one." India's foreign ministry had been "working closely with the UK side from the moment these concerns and issues" were raised, according to a spokesperson. Authorities conducted identification of victims using "established protocols and technical requirements," foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in a post on X on Wednesday. "All mortal remains were handled with the utmost professionalism and with due regard for the dignity of the deceased," Jaiswal added. "We are continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue." The case came on the heels of a meeting in London between India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his British counterpart, Keir Starmer, as the two nations sign a landmark free trade agreement. Healy-Pratt, who is demanding "financial justice" for the families, said he believes the allegations will be on the agenda for the talks this week. - CNN
Scoop
23-07-2025
- Scoop
Consumer NZ Reveals The Best And Worst Laundry Detergents
Three laundry detergents have scored no better than water in Consumer NZ's laundry detergent test. We put 46 detergents through the wringer. Two detergents ended up with an overall score of 27 out of 100 – the same score given to a wash with only water. Those two products were Shotz Laundry Liquid and EcoLiving Laundry Detergent Sheets with lavender scent. Another laundry sheet product – Re-Stor Laundry Detergent Sheets fresh linen scent – scored even lower. These sheets were rated 'poor' at removing everyday grime and most of the stains we use in our detergent tests, including grass and mud, olive oil and tomato. Our head of testing James le Page said he wasn't surprised laundry sheets once more took out two of the bottom spots in the test. 'They only weigh a couple of grams, so when you put them in your machine, they're just not going to do a good job compared with a capful of laundry liquid or scoop of powder, both of which have the potential to contain more active ingredients,' James said. However, James wouldn't be surprised if laundry sheets one day climbed up the test results. 'They're early in their developmental journey as a product. They're years behind the other options, so they're playing catch-up.' Persil products took out the top three spots in the test results, with Persil Ultimate powder proving to be New Zealand's most effective laundry detergent. Persil Active Clean powder wasn't far behind, followed by Persil 3 in 1 Ultimate capsules. Ten detergents were given 'Consumer Recommended' status, including some New Zealand-made Laundromate and Ecostore products. The cheapest Recommended detergent was Ecostore Ultrapower Citrus Fresh – it costs just 8c per wash. It was particularly good at removing everyday grime as well as grass and tomato stains. We have made our laundry detergent test results available for anyone to view on our website. 'We encourage people to have a look at the results and see how the detergent they're using now scores. You might find something that will do a better job for a better price,' James said. Best powder detergent – Persil Ultimate Best liquid detergent – Ariel Original Best capsule detergent – Persil 3 in 1 Ultimate Note: Consumer NZ test results are usually exclusively available to our members. However, this time, we have made the laundry detergent test results available for all New Zealanders. You can view them at
