Government accused of watering down environment rules in housebuilding proposals
Ministers are seeking to give a boost to smaller housing developments with faster planning decisions and financial backing to speed up building new homes.
Under the proposals, Labour would cut red tape and shift planning decisions away from councillors and towards expert officers - all as part of efforts to meet Sir Keir Starmer 's pledge to build 1.5 million homes by 2029-30.
Politics latest: Farage says 'yes' he can be PM
The consultation will also consider easing biodiversity net gain requirements for minor developments. At the moment, these mean builders must pay to boost nature habitats if they are impacted by the development process.
But the government hopes to create a new category for medium-sized developments - those with between 10 and 49 homes - with fewer costs, simplified biodiversity net gain rules and an exemption from the building safety levy.
An 89-strong coalition of environment groups has warned that these reduced biodiversity rules would mean the vast majority of housing developments would no longer need to compensate for nature loss.
The Wildlife and Countryside Link also suggested that developers could be allowed to break up large projects into smaller ones to avoid the rules.
Richard Banwell, the group's chief executive, has urged the government not to "turn back the clock to the days of damaging development" with changes to this system.
He said: "Exempting small sites would mean almost three-quarters of developments face no requirement to compensate for nature loss - let alone enhance it.
"These changes could leave the biodiversity net gain system dead in the water and, with it, the government's main guarantee of nature-positive planning."
However, the government has described the simplified biodiversity net gain rules for medium-sized developments as a "win-win for nature and development".
Ministers are also seeking to support smaller firms by offering £100m in accelerator loans.
A new National Housing Delivery Fund to be confirmed at the spending review will support long-term finance options - such as revolving credit - for small and medium-sized enterprises.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said it was time to "level the playing field" for smaller housebuilders.
"Smaller housebuilders must be the bedrock of our Plan for Change to build 1.5 million homes and fix the housing crisis we've inherited - and get working people on the housing ladder," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ministers condemn 'flawed and unworkable' UN court ruling amid fears Britain will be forced to pay massive reparations over climate change
Ministers have condemned a 'flawed and unworkable' UN court ruling amid fears Britain could be forced to pay massive reparations for climate change. The International Court of Justice said nations are obliged to comply with climate treaties and failure to do so was a breach of international law. While the ruling is non-binding, it is likely to influence legislation globally and may open the floodgates to a series of court cases against countries such as the UK. The Tories have warned Attorney General Lord Hermer's 'ideological obsession' with international law means the government could follow the edict. But touring broadcast studios this morning, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds insisted the UK should not 'apologise or pay reparations' for leading the industrial revolution. He told Times Radio: 'I think that's completely unreasonable and unworkable from a legal point of view. 'Whilst we should obviously take seriously our legacy, our history, the contribution that UK has made to the world on a number of areas, I think the industrial revolution was not a bad thing. 'The fact that we have a modern industrial society is a good thing. We led on that innovation that then has been transferred around the world. But I don't think it's anything to apologise for or pay reparations for.' Challenged that the UK had obeyed a similar advisory ruling on the status of the Chagos Islands, Mr Reynolds said that 'essential national security functions' had been at stake in that case. 'I think any argument that there should be reparations paid for British history and that should fall on the British people today... I think it's a flawed judgment in my view,' he added. Campaigners have hailed the ruling as a victory for small nations affected by climate change over big polluters such as the US and China. Judge Yuji Iwasawa, the court president, said: 'Failure of a state to take appropriate action to protect the climate... may constitute an internationally wrongful act.' Environmental lawyers said the judgment would lead to a rise in court cases over climate change. Danilo Garrido, legal counsel for Greenpeace, said: 'This is the start of a new era of climate accountability at a global level.' Sebastien Duyck, at the Centre for International Environmental Law, laid out the possibility of nations being sued. 'If states have legal duties to prevent climate harm, then victims of that harm have a right to redress,' he said. And Joana Setzer, climate litigation expert at the London School of Economics, told Sky News that the ruling 'adds decisive weight to calls for fair and effective climate reparations'. Harj Narulla, a barrister specialising in climate litigation and counsel for Solomon Islands in the case, said the ICJ laid out the possibility of big emitters being successfully sued. 'These reparations involve restitution — such as rebuilding destroyed infrastructure and restoring ecosystems — and also monetary compensation,' he said. It is the largest case heard by the ICJ in the Hague, and involved 96 countries, 10,000 pages of documents, 15 judges and two weeks of hearings in December. In its ruling, the United Nations' highest court said countries that breach their climate obligations set out in treaties could be sued by states which can prove they have suffered damage as a result. Mr Iwasawa said. 'States must cooperate to achieve concrete emission reduction targets. The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment is essential for the enjoyment of other human rights.' The case, brought by law students from Pacific islands affected by climate change, addressed two questions – what obligations were on countries under international law to protect the climate, and what legal consequences should those that have broken them face. Wealthier countries, including the UK, argued existing treaties such as the 2015 Paris Agreement should be used to decide their responsibilities. But developing nations and island states such as Vanuatu in the Pacific argued there should be stronger legally-binding measures in place and called for reparations. The court ruled developing nations have a right to seek damages for the impacts of climate change, such as destroyed buildings and infrastructure, or could claim compensation. However, the court said it was not concerned with setting out when these responsibilities would date from, leaving questions about countries being sued over historical emissions going back to the Industrial Revolution. Government sources stressed the UK would be under no obligation to pay reparations, a stance likely to be tested by lawyers. A Foreign Office spokesman said: 'It will take time to look at this detailed, non-binding, advisory opinion before commenting in detail. We will continue to collaborate closely to create the conditions for greater ambition and action, including with Brazil as it prepares to host COP30.' Despite being non-binding, previous ICJ decisions have been implemented by governments including the UK, such as agreeing to hand back the Chagos Islands to Mauritius last year. Shadow Foreign Secretary Priti Patel described the court's climate ruling as 'mad', adding: 'The ICJ has lost its core purpose and is now joining political campaigns and bandwagons based upon ideological obsessions... and destroying the sovereign rights of national governments. 'We challenge Labour to put Britain's interest first and make clear they do not intend to act on this ridiculous advisory ruling.'
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Epping hotel anti-migrant protests were organised by members of Neo-Nazi groups
Members of one of the UK's biggest Neo-Nazi groups have been involved in organising anti-migrant protests outside a hotel in Essex, which has led to 10 people being arrested. Two members of the far-right group Homeland can be seen as the administrators of Facebook page Epping Says No, a Facebook page with 1,500 members where the protests outside the Bell Hotel in Epping have been organised. The Homeland Party was formed as a splinter group to the neo-Nazi Patriotic Alternative in April 2023, and has been described as the largest fascist group in the UK by Hope Not Hate. Two members of the party have since called on their social media pages for a 'national call to action', as the government fears another summer of unrest similar to last year when nationwide disorder broke out after three girls were stabbed to death in Southport. Essex Police has issued a dispersal order in Epping which will be in place from 2pm on Thursday until 8am on Friday, and covers an area including the town centre, transport hubs and networks such as the Tube station. The order gives officers the power to direct anyone suspected of committing anti-social behaviour, or planning to do so, to leave the area or face arrest. Dozens of anti-immigration protesters also descended on the Britannia hotel in Canary Wharf on Wednesday, after reports circulated on social media that it had been earmarked to house migrants. It has not yet received any asylum seekers, while it has been reported that the Home Office has reserved more than 400 beds at the four-star hotel. Counter-protesters from Stand Up to Racism have attended both Epping and Canary Wharf, with Essex Police forced to deny claims they had 'bussed' them to the demonstration on Sunday evening. Protests were first sparked outside the Bell Hotel nearly two weeks ago, after 38-year-old Ethiopian asylum seeker Hadush Kebatu was accused of sexually assaulting a schoolgirl within days of arriving in the UK on a small boat. He denies the charges. Chairperson of the Police Federation, Tiff Lynch, wrote in The Telegraph that the disorder was 'not just a troubling one-off', adding: 'It was a signal flare. A reminder of how little it takes for tensions to erupt and how ill-prepared we remain to deal with it.' She said that local commanders across the country are forced to choose between 'keeping the peace at home or plugging national gaps'. Ms Lynch said: 'A summer of further unrest is not inevitable. But it becomes far more likely if we once again fail to prepare.'
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Liverpool 'table improved contract offer' to first-team star amid interest from Real Madrid - as he enters the final year of his Anfield deal
Liverpool have tabled an improved contract offer to a first-team star in the hope of fending off interest from Real Madrid, according to a report. The Reds have been extremely busy this summer, splashing out over £290million on the likes of Florian Wirtz, Hugo Ekitike, Jeremie Frimpong and Milos Kerkez ahead of their Premier League title defence. Anfield's chiefs have now reportedly turned their attention towards renewing Ibrahima Konate 's contract, with the centre-back now having entered the final year of his five-year deal. Konate, so far, has turned down Liverpool's contract extension offers - attracting the attention of Real Madrid who are in the market for a defender. Eager not to allow Konate to run his contract down and leave on a free transfer next summer, Liverpool have tabled a new and improved bid in the hope of tying him down at Anfield, according to Foot Mercato. On Wednesday, the Reds confirmed the £79m summer signing of Eintracht Frankfurt striker Ekitike, who is expected to join up with the squad in Hong Kong in the next 48 hours for training sessions. The package is a £69m base fee plus £10m in add-ons which are based on team and player performance. Liverpool have also been heavily active in terms of organising departures from the club, with several familiar faces leaving Anfield. Trent Alexander-Arnold joined Real Madrid, while Jarell Quansah signed for Bayer Leverkusen and Caoimhin Kelleher made the switch to Brentford. Sporting director Richard Hughes has remained in the UK for now to finalise the Ekitike move and conduct all other transfer business, after Arne Slot's squad departed for the Far East on Sunday night. Prior to flying out, the Reds beat Stoke 5-0 in a behind-closed-doors game at the AXA Training Base in Kirkby. The champions played two different starting line-ups before and after half-time - and Wirtz got his first competitive action for the club following his £116million move from Bayer Leverkusen. The likes of Frimpong, Kerkez and Giorgi Mamardashvili also featured, having joined for £29.5m, £40m and £29m respectively. Konate, meanwhile, came on as a substitute, with Joe Gomez partnering captain Virgil van Dijk from the start. Arne Slot's side are gearing up for their next pre-season test against AC Milan on Saturday Darwin Nunez showed Ekitike the competition he will be up against at No 9 with a 14-minute hat-trick against the Potters, with Rio Ngumoha and Federico Chiesa also getting on the scoresheet. Liverpool will take on AC Milan in their next preseason friendly on Saturday.
