Owner of Dominican nightclub where 236 people died in roof collapse appears in court
The collapse killed 236 people. Nearly 200 people were also injured.
As the owners appeared in court for the first time Wednesday, one victim's sister told CBS News New York she doubts they will ever be held accountable.
"Nothing's going to fill that void"
Among those killed was 24-year-old Jennifer Contreras.
"That was my best friend. We were really, really close," her sister Luz Contreras said. "Nothing's going to fill that void. I'm going to forever miss my sister."
An aerial view of the Jet Set nightclub days after its roof collapsed, killing more than 200 people, in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, Friday, April 11, 2025.
Matias Delacroix / AP
The criminal indictment against the Espaillats says the roof collapse was the result of "complete disregard for building and safety laws." It goes on to say they operated the famous club with systematic and gross negligence which put hundreds of lives at risk.
Antonio Espaillat entered the courtroom surrounded by armed officers. He was followed by his sister Maribel. Prosecutors blame the Espaillats, who owned and managed the nightclub, for April's collapse.
Dozens of families showed up at court Wednesday, including the sister of merengue singer Rubby Perez, who was killed while performing the night of the collapse.
Prosecutors say because of the country's outdated legal framework, involuntary homicide was the highest charge they could pursue. The attorney for the Espaillats calls the charge appropriate, saying the family had no ill intent.
If convicted, the Espaillats face 3 months to 2 years in prison, and a small fine.
"OK, two years and a fine? That's not fair, because you changed everybody's life. Hundreds of people's lives you changed. That's what you did," Luz Contreras said. "He'll probably get away with house arrest. You're living in the comfort of your own home. The comfort of my home has changed. My sister lived with us. Her room is empty now."
The Espaillats also face at least 109 lawsuits filed on behalf of victims and their families.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
U.S. holding detainees from Asia, Africa and Europe at Guantanamo Bay immigration facilities
Most people detained by ICE have no criminal record, despite Trump claims The Trump administration recently transferred immigration detainees from countries in Africa, Asia, Europe and the Caribbean to detention facilities at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba, dramatically expanding the nationalities of those held there, internal U.S. government records obtained by CBS News show. As of earlier this week, Guantanamo Bay's immigration detainees — who are detained separately from the terrorism suspects also held at the U.S. military base — included nationals of China, Jamaica, Liberia and the United Kingdom, according to the federal documents. Two U.S. officials said most of those detained at the base are considered to be "high-risk" detainees, who are defined by immigration authorities as individuals with violent or otherwise serious criminal records, histories of disruptive behavior or alleged gang ties. The transfers, which had not been previously reported, signal a significant expansion in the Trump administration's efforts to turn parts of Guantanamo Bay into immigration detention facilities to hold foreigners facing deportation. Since President Trump ordered his administration to detain "high-priority" foreigners with criminal records at the base earlier this year, the facilities there have mainly housed Spanish-speaking Latin American detainees from countries such as Nicaragua and Venezuela before their formal deportation. But the decision to use Guantanamo Bay to hold immigration detainees from more far-flung nations in Africa, Asia and Europe underscores the broad scope of the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. A defense official told CBS News there were 54 immigration detainees at Guantanamo Bay on Tuesday. It's unclear why exactly the administration decided to transfer detainees from Asia, Africa and Europe to Guantanamo Bay. But the immigration detention system in the U.S. is well over its congressionally funded capacity, as ICE has increased efforts throughout the country to arrest immigrants in the U.S. illegally. In early June, Politico reported that officials were vetting thousands of detainees from different countries, including European allies, for a potential transfer to Guantanamo Bay, a report that the White House denied at the time. Representatives for the Departments of Homeland Security and State did not answer a series of questions, including on whether the African, Asian and European detainees are expected to be deported from Guantanamo Bay. The Trump administration's use of Guantanamo Bay to further its mass deportation agenda has garnered strong criticism and legal challenges from civil rights advocates, who argue the government does not have the authority to hold immigration detainees outside of the U.S. The base, which sits on Cuban land, was controversial before it became an immigration holding center, due to the indefinite detention of terrorism suspects, some of whom faced torture and abuse. While top Trump administration officials like Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller have repeatedly highlighted the detention efforts at Guantanamo Bay, they have provided scant public information on operations at the base and who is being sent there. Reporting by CBS News and other news organizations has confirmed that the administration has sent both detainees deemed to be "high-risk" and "low-risk" to Guantanamo Bay, including Venezuelan men whose relatives have denied accusations that they were gang members. Those classified as "high-risk" have been detained at Guantanamo Bay's Camp VI, a part of the post-9/11 prison that still holds roughly a dozen terrorism suspects, though in a separate section of the complex. The "low-risk" detainees — who by definition lack a serious criminal record or any record at all, beyond civil immigration violations — have been housed at the Migrant Operations Center, a barrack-like facility on the base historically used to accommodate asylum-seekers interdicted at sea. CBS News also revealed in May an internal government memo showing that officials created a broad set of criteria for who could be sent to Guantanamo Bay that did not mention criminality, despite the president saying that only individuals who he called "the worst" would be held at the base. The Department of Defense told Congress in May that as of April 8 it had spent $21 million flying immigration detainees to Guantanamo Bay, or more than $26,000 per flight hour. As of Tuesday, the base's Camp 6 prison and Migrant Operations Center were housing 41 and 13 detainees, respectively, a defense official said. The Trump administration has sought to send a message of deterrence by using or proposing controversial detention centers like Guantanamo Bay to hold those accused of violating U.S. immigration law. In March, the administration flew more than 200 Venezuelans it labeled gang members to El Salvador, which imprisoned them at CECOT, its infamous maximum-security prison. More recently, the Trump administration has announced it is working with Florida state officials to set up an immigration detention center in the wetlands of the Everglades. On Tuesday, Mr. Trump visited the facility, which officials have dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz."
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mass. man spent 32 years in prison claiming innocence. His first chance at parole was denied
After attending a party more than 30 years ago, a Massachusetts man was found guilty of the murder of two men who had been killed by more than a dozen gunshots. But Michael Payne, 52, continues to claim his innocence. And earlier this year, for the first time, he saw a possible path to freedom through a new state law allowing him to seek parole. On June 21, 1995, Payne was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder, armed robbery, and unlawfully carrying a firearm in Suffolk Superior Court. He was sentenced to two concurrent life terms without the possibility of parole for his murder convictions. He became eligible for parole after a recent Supreme Judicial Court decision that states emerging adults between the ages of 18-20 cannot be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Due to the decision, Payne, who was 20 at the time of the murders, was able to go in front of the parole board for the first time in February. The board, however, denied him getting parole yesterday stating there were 'concerns' following his statements at the hearing. At about 4 a.m. on March 28, 1993, eyewitnesses said that Kevin Christopher and Lloyd Industrious were killed when Payne and his co-defendants fired several rounds into a vehicle that the two men had been sitting in in Dorchester. One of the people took jewelry from at least one of the men who had been shot, and ran from the scene. Christopher had 11 gunshot wounds and Industrious had 7 gunshot wounds. An eyewitness selected Payne's photo out of 14 other photographs. However, Payne stated that he attended the nearby party but he was not involved in the murders. He claimed that he learned about the murders for the first time on the news. During his February parole board hearing, Payne told the parole board that the programming offered through the state would not be beneficial for him 'and self-improvement is not a need area,' the parole board wrote in its decision. Payne's sister and a friend spoke in support of parole during the hearing, while Suffolk County Assistant District Attorney Montez Haywood testified against parole. His parole request was denied but the board was torn on how long until his next hearing. One board member voted to grant parole after 6 months in another program, while another board member voted to deny parole with a review in one year from the date of the hearing. Ultimately, it was decided that there will be another review in 2 years. Parole denied for Mass. man who raped 14-year-old he met at library After serving time for 1992 Tasty Chicken killing, paroled man detained by ICE Man convicted of fatal shooting at Mattapan ice cream parlor in 1990 gets parole 'Yes, I stabbed him': Woman paroled after fatal Christmas week stabbing amid abuse claims Man who killed Milford police officer granted 'compassionate release' Read the original article on MassLive.
CBS News
5 hours ago
- CBS News
Sean "Diddy" Combs trial jury resumes deliberations with another question for judge
With no verdict reached in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial on the first day of deliberations, the jury of eight men and four women is gathering again Tuesday to continue discussing the charges. Judge Arun Subramanian is expected to begin by addressing a question posed Monday from the jury about one of the alleged racketeering acts — possession with intent to distribute drugs — which relates to the racketeering conspiracy charge Combs is facing. The jury sent a note asking for clarification on the part of the instructions addressing drug distribution. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to federal charges of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution for allegedly arranging to fly sex workers across state lines. The first day of deliberations saw several notes from the jury, as well as Combs and his supporters bowing their heads in prayer in the courtroom. One of the notes came not long after jurors started deliberating and raised concerns from several jurors about another member of the panel. They told the judge they thought "he cannot follow your honor's instructions." After a discussion between the judge, attorneys for Combs and prosecutors, the judge reminded the jurors of their obligation to follow the law and sent them back to resume their deliberations, but said if more issues should arise, the foreperson should send another note. To help them come to a verdict, jurors were provided with a laptop loaded with all of the exhibits shown in court, including text messages, photographs and videos of the sexual encounters at the heart of the case. Five alternate jurors are also on standby in case they're needed to fill in on the main jury. The jury will sift through seven weeks of at times graphic and emotional testimony about the rap, fashion and reality TV impresario's propensity for violence and his sexual predilections, including drug-fueled sex marathons dubbed "freak-offs" or "hotel nights." Defense lawyers argued that there was no conspiracy and that his conduct did not violate federal laws. contributed to this report.
