Great Highway mural vandalized and artists harassed, local leaders say
A mural painted near Ocean Beach was vandalized over the weekend.
Within 24 hours of it being vandalized, the artist gathered a large group of volunteers to help restore the piece.
Artist Emily Fromm hopes the mural will be completed with a new protective sealant in the coming week.
SAN FRANCISCO - A mural on the Great Highway in San Francisco was vandalized late Friday, the same day the area was closed to motorists, according to community members and leaders.
In addition to the vandalism, artists working on the mural and other public art were harassed.
"It's painful to see something meant to uplift the community and celebrate our history be treated with disrespect," Emily Fromm said.
Fromm is a local artist and worked on the mural at the Judah bathroom on the Great Highway.
"Vandalism like this doesn't just damage a mural, it undermines the spirit of community that this project is all about. It's my sincere hope that we can turn down the temperature and show our neighbors and local art the respect they deserve," she said.
Friends of Ocean Beach Park said they filed a report with park rangers to investigate the vandalism.
By Sunday morning, more than a dozen volunteers joined Fromm to help restore the mural that was defaced.
"The mural is intended as a gift for the community, and vandalizing my artwork will have no bearing on this voter-approved measure," Fromm told KTVU on Sunday. "I am so grateful for the outpouring of the community support that has greeted this, and I look forward to getting the project back on track with the help of the kind people who have reached out to help."
Local perspective
Despite disagreeing about the new Oceanfront Park's existence, both its supporters and opponents found common ground, condemning the vandalism.
"Vandalizing a beautiful mural to protest a park is a bit like slashing your own tires to complain about traffic. It just doesn't make sense," said San Francisco's Recreation and Parks Department's general manager Phil Ginsburg.
Among supporters decrying the vandalism was State Sen. Scott Wiener.
"This kind of vandalism and harassment has no place in San Francisco," Wiener said, according to the organization. "Attacking artists and volunteers who are bringing this vision to life is shameful. We need to stand up for public art, civil discourse, and the right of every San Franciscan to help shape a more vibrant and inclusive city."
On social media, Wiener added that while people have the right to oppose the creation of the park, "vandalism — & particularly defacement of public art & harassment of artists — crosses a line."
Prop K opponent Malcom Young also spoke against the defacing of the new mural.
"While I did not support Prop K, San Francisco voters as a whole did," Yeung said.
"In the face of national developments that are dangerously ignoring or intentionally trying to destroy democratic processes, it's important now more than ever that we as San Franciscans uplift these principles," he added.
The backstory
The new park is not without controversy. Opponents of the new park have expressed their disdain, saying closure of the Great Highway to cars will push traffic into their neighborhood.
A lawsuit has been filed by opponents saying the supporters overstepped the State's authority on how roads are used and that the park plans do not address environmental concerns.
Additionally, Supervisor Joel Engardio who represents the district, is facing calls for a recall following his support for the Great Highway closure's to cars.
Prop K passed with 54% of voters in favor with shutting down the Great Highway to vehicles.
The Source
Friends of Ocean Beach Park, State Sen. Scott Wiener, previous KTVU reporting
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
9 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Daniel Lurie's approval rating may be sky high, but new poll reveals vulnerabilities
Despite the resounding approval San Francisco voters gave Mayor Daniel Lurie this month in the Chronicle's first poll of his tenure, the survey also suggested he has some vulnerabilities. Lurie's remarkable 73% overall favorability rating was not matched when the poll dug into specific areas of his job performance. Asked how well the mayor was doing at providing enough reasonably-priced housing, for instance, just 36% of respondents approved of his handling of the issue, versus 47% who disapproved. On providing shelter to homeless people and managing the overdose crisis, Lurie's approval was below 50%. But those ratings still represented pluralities of respondents due to the number who said they didn't know. The mayor performed strongest on his efforts to revive downtown, keep neighborhoods clean and keep residents and businesses safe from crime — all subjects that were central to his campaign and his messaging in his early months in office. Taken together, the poll results show that Lurie is enjoying a robust honeymoon a half-year into his term, even as voters harbor concerns about his ability to solve some of San Francisco's most entrenched problems. 'Mayor Lurie is delivering results on the issues San Franciscans care about,' mayoral spokesperson Charles Lutvak said in a statement to the Chronicle. 'Our administration will continue to deliver on what we've been working on relentlessly since day one: tackling the fentanyl crisis and providing safe and clean streets for everyone in our city.' Still, the mismatch between voters' sentiment about Lurie broadly and their feelings about his work on key issues suggests his rapport with the electorate could deteriorate over time if he is blamed for not making enough progress. 'I would certainly say that the challenge for the mayor and his team is to demonstrate real improvement on housing and the number of visible homeless (people),' said Jonathan Brown, president of Sextant Strategies & Research, which conducted the poll for the Chronicle. The survey respondents did not perfectly align with San Francisco's demographics. Notably, 53% of the respondents were non-Hispanic white, 16 points higher than the city's population. But Brown noted that Asian voters, who were underrepresented in the survey, gave Lurie even higher marks than the broader electorate. Corey Cook, a political scientist at Cal Poly's Solano County campus, said the fact that Lurie's approval is not as strong on the issues as it is overall is 'absolutely expected' at this point in the mayor's tenure. 'People are really anxious about these issues, but they understand the complexity of them, and it's more than just their sense of how the mayor is doing,' Cook said. 'The opportunity is that the support for the mayor can bring those numbers up. The risk is that the concern about those issues can bring the mayor's numbers down.' Over time, voters could begin to blame Lurie if they feel continued discontent around homelessness, housing and drug overdoses, Cook said. 'Or they could start to say, 'Actually, the mayor is fighting for us and doing what we want from him and there are other reasons for this, and that's who I'm mad at,'' Cook said. 'That could be anybody.' Lurie has introduced policies that seek to address the frustration San Francisco residents feel about these core issues. He released a zoning plan that would allow taller and denser buildings along certain transit corridors, seeking to pave the way for tens of thousands of new homes from the Marina to the Richmond and Sunset districts. He also passed a local law that allows him to speed up contract approvals for projects related to homelessness, mental health and drug addiction. And he increased police enforcement along corridors in the South of Market and Mission neighborhoods in response to worsening public drug scenes, while rolling out more street ambassadors to complement the work of law enforcement. Lurie, though, backed off a signature campaign promise to build 1,500 shelter beds during the first six months of his term. His administration framed the move as a decision to focus on more targeted efforts to get help to people struggling with addiction, mental illness and homelessness. Lurie's homelessness proposals have triggered some political resistance from those to the left of the moderate mayor. Progressive Supervisor Shamann Walton blasted Lurie when he pressed ahead with plans to expand a shelter in Walton's district instead of providing safe parking spots for RV dwellers that were originally planned at the site. The mayor also faced opposition from a handful of progressive supervisors when he successfully sought permission to more easily spend up to $19 million in future proceeds from a business tax that funds homeless services. 'Every dictator states that they just want additional authority once — and then they keep pressing,' Walton said of Lurie's homeless tax proposal at a recent supervisors' meeting. 'Our mayor already has a lot of power in this city … without this body allowing more.' Additionally, Lurie has drawn scrutiny over his approach to President Donald Trump, whose name he carefully avoids uttering as he tries to stay focused on local matters — and as he seeks to keep the president from focusing his vengeful politics on San Francisco. While some have questioned the mayor's Trump strategy, the Chronicle poll found that 50% of respondents thought it was the right one. Just 29% agreed with the statement that Lurie should help lead the opposition to Trump. 'Democrats are struggling with that question nationally,' said Cook, the political scientist. 'I think it's fascinating that's where San Francisco voters are right now.' Brown, the pollster, said that due to the severity of San Francisco's problems and voters' 'desire to see them remedied,' they are 'comfortable that Mayor Lurie is prioritizing local issues as opposed to national issues.'
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mayor Lurie enjoying high approval ratings
SAN FRANCISCO - A new poll shows San Francisco's Mayor, Daniel Lurie, is enjoying high approval ratings. More than six months into his term, nearly three in four voters like the job Mayor Lurie is doing. Polling from the San Francisco Chronicle finds 73% of San Francisco voters approve of the job Mayor Daniel Lurie is doing so far. "I am just focused on delivering results for the people of San Francisco. That's why they elected me," said Mayor Lurie. "Our administration is working relentlessly every single day to deliver and I think these numbers show that people want us to continue to do that work and that's what I'm gonna be focused on." More than half of the poll respondents said they want the mayor to focus on local issues like safety and keeping the city clean. Voters said they're seeing a difference in how people view the city. "It's just cool to see you feel like he has us. He has this personal relationship to the city, and he's enthusiastic, and you want everyone else to be," said Fred Ward. San Francisco State University political science Professor Jason McDaniel said voters seem positive about the direction of the city, and that's benefiting the mayor. "I think we've seen a little bit of people feeling better the city," said McDaniel. "Not dramatic, people aren't super optimistic about the future, but I think better than they were a year ago." The poll found most San Franciscans gave the mayor high marks for revitalizing the downtown, and focusing on safety and clean neighborhoods. McDaniel said so far Mayor Lurie has been able to maintain his popularity even as the city faces budget cuts, and he creates more of a record. "So I think that is the number one sort of iceberg in the future is the decision now we have a negative echoing effect going into the future." While most voters say they approve of the job the mayor is doing, half or more of the respondents said they wanted to see more done to handle the city's long-standing epidemic of deadly drug overdoses and homelessness. "But I don't see Mayor Lurie doing all that much better at the moment," said Vance Johnson. "Personally I think that he's pretty much only accountable to the major corporations within downtown." While the mayor has seen high approval ratings, the approval rating for the board of supervisors is up as well. This time last year, 20% of voters approved of the job the supervisors were doing. That number is now up to a 38% approval the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
How's Lurie doing as mayor? Our new poll on the state of S.F. had stunning results
Six months into Mayor Daniel Lurie's tenure, San Franciscans are far happier with his performance than they were with former Mayor London Breed's one year ago, according to a new poll commissioned by the Chronicle. The poll also revealed a turnaround in voters' attitudes about the city overall: A majority now rate the quality of life to be good or excellent, and half of respondents believe that conditions will continue to improve. The poll, which surveyed 961 registered voters between July 9 and 13, found that almost three quarters of San Franciscans approved of the job Lurie had done so far. His sky-high approval rating is almost the exact inverse of how likely voters rated Breed's performance last July: At that time, just over one quarter of respondents said they approved of the mayor's performance. The poll reflects a sampling of San Francisco residents, and was not perfectly representative of the city's demographic breakdown. Notably, even after weighting the results to better reflect the city's demographics, respondents were 53% non-Hispanic white, while the city on the whole is just 37% white. Still, the poll found no major difference between white and non-white respondents in their support of the mayor — although Asian respondents were more supportive than Black and Latino respondents. The positive results for Lurie come just six months into his term. Last July's poll on Breed, on the other hand, came six years into Breed's tenure — and months before the election. The political landscape in which the two polls were conducted has notably shifted as well. Last July, San Francisco was still struggling out of its pandemic-induced slump and grappling with a bruised national reputation. Campaigns for the mayoralty, swirling controversies around the state of the city and the presidential election were in full swing. Now, even as much of the nation's attention has shifted to President Donald Trump, his sweeping cuts to the government, his harsh immigration policies and even his feud with California Gov. Gavin Newsom, San Franciscans seem to prefer that Mayor Lurie stay out of the fray. Half of voters said the mayor should remain focused on local issues, while just 29% said Lurie should help lead the opposition. Not everyone is bullish on the mayor. Men were slightly more supportive than women, and more recent arrivals to San Francisco were more supportive than longtime residents. But the sharpest divide was political: People who identified themselves as progressives were far less likely to approve of Lurie's performance, and to be bearish on the city's future in general. Strikingly, Lurie was less popular on specific issues than he was overall. While most respondents agreed that he was keeping the city clean, keeping residents and businesses safe from crime and revitalizing downtown, he scored less favorably when it came to providing shelter for the homeless, handling the overdose crisis and addressing the cost of housing. The poll also found that San Franciscans still have mixed reviews of the Board of Supervisors: 38% of respondents said they approved of the supervisors' performance, and 46% said they disapproved. Though that's far from the ringing endorsement that Lurie enjoyed, it's much better than a year ago, when just 20% of respondents approved of the board's job, while 70% disapproved. Overall, San Franciscans are more likely now than last year to say that the city is headed in the right direction. Almost 50% of people in the new poll said they believed the quality of life in San Francisco would get better, while 23% said they believed it would get worse. Last July, 40% believed it would get better, while 32% believed it would get worse. In both years, a little over a quarter of people believed that the quality of life would stay the same. Even as a majority agree that things are looking up in the city, it's clear that a certain nostalgia for the past persists. The Chronicle asked whether respondents found the city to be more fun today than it was 10 years ago. Nearly 60% said it was more fun a decade ago. Just 13% found it more fun today.
