logo
A farmer protested policy at a Danielle Smith town hall. 5 days later, it was paused

A farmer protested policy at a Danielle Smith town hall. 5 days later, it was paused

CBC13-07-2025
Chad Anderson had travelled 90 minutes from his farm near Cremona, Alta., to bend the premier's ear, but it was starting to look futile.
He'd come to a town hall with Danielle Smith and Agriculture Minister RJ Sigurdson in Okotoks, an apparent rehearsal of sorts for the Alberta Next panels that kick off next week, with Smith presiding as chair.
Last week's Okotoks event was approaching its end, and a too-long lineup of attendees separated Anderson from the question microphone, all of them hoping to plant a seed in the premier's mind.
Believing he'd miss his chance, Anderson told others what he wanted to ask about — changes to a farm program that would rein in his farm's licensed but uninspected slaughtering business. They let him jump ahead in line, he recalls.
"Last year we sold 30 [head of] beef ... we've done it safely and of the highest quality," Anderson told the July 2 town hall south of Calgary.
"Last week I got an email from Alberta Ag effectively cancelling the program," he added, to scattered boos in the crowd.
Anderson listened to Sigurdson defend the government's policy change and emphasis on meat safety. But the rancher was struck by the premier sitting quietly next to her minister, glancing over with what Anderson described as a "what's going on?" look.
Five days later, on July 7, Alberta Agriculture announced that after hearing farmers' concerns, it would indefinitely pause the limits to on-farm slaughter licenses that it had just brought in.
Anderson believes he has the premier to thank for halting the change, even if he can't prove it.
"I think it was probably critical to it," he told CBC News in an interview this week.
" She cares about small business. She cares about the entrepreneurial spirit."
More than three decades after Ralph Klein won his first election as premier on the slogan "He listens. He cares," another Alberta premier has carved out a reputation for hearing Albertans' pleas and then acting on them.
The five-day turnaround from town hall complaint to policy bulletin may be a pronounced example of Smith's responsiveness, but she has repeatedly demonstrated this approach to supporters, especially those in the United Conservative base.
The premier whose government has banned vote tabulating machines, restricted health care treatments for transgender youth and — just this week — banned books with sexual content in school libraries is also the leader whose party has passed convention resolutions requesting those changes.
At last year's UCP annual gathering, Smith even held an "accountability session" to go over every policy resolution the party had made since her leadership, and excitedly shouted "done!" for each of the many requests she had enacted.
Tuned in
Many Albertans have come to understand or expect this tendency from the premier. During her bi-weekly Your Province, Your Premier radio call-in show, Smith will often ask a caller with a unique pitch to discuss it further off-air with an aide.
At a Smith-hosted town hall in Three Hills in June, one woman travelled from 150 kilometres south along with a German doctor friend in tow who'd come to offer theories about the harms of renewable energy installations. The premier urged them to arrange a meeting with her scheduler to hear more.
That woman showed up again weeks later at the Okotoks event, to raise alarm about solar and battery projects in the region. Smith recognized her, and recalled that her doctor associate had discussed safety issues.
"I've talked with my utilities and affordability minister on that, but I didn't have contact information for you," the premier said, urging the resident to connect with a premier's aide in a white jacket.
Not everybody's protests or questions get embraced with the same warmth.
Several attendees at the Okotoks meeting came to criticize the Smith government's lifting of the moratorium on new coal mining. Each time, she defended the provincial policy on mining for metallurgical (steel-making) coal.
"We need steel. We need solar panels. We need all of the things that get produced from those [mines]," Smith told one questioner. "So we just have to figure out the way to do it that has the minimal impact on the environment."
It seemed that night like Anderson's criticism about the on-farm slaughtering policy might also amount to tilting at windmills.
Anderson is one of several dozen Alberta farmers who have held an on-farm slaughter operator (OFSO) licence since 2020. It's a pandemic-era program that expanded the ability of small livestock producers to sell live animals to customers and process them on site for the buyers' own consumption — instead of going through a provincially or federally inspected slaughterhouse.
There are strict limits that this meat cannot go to any store, restaurant or other business, but the government did not cap the number of cattle, farm, chickens or other livestock a farmer could kill and sell in a year.
A new licensing policy that took effect July 2 — the day of that town hall in Okotoks — capped farmers at selling 5,000 pounds of live-weight animal per year. That amounts to around three or four cattle.
Farmers slaughtering 30 to 40 bovines without inspection was pushing them toward the scale of small provincial abattoirs, Sigurdson replied to Anderson, the Cremona rancher.
"We saw a huge proliferation of offices across the province growing at a rate and processing levels that didn't provide a lot of faith that we're going to be able to maintain that food safety across the entire network," the minister said.
He suggested Anderson speak to ministerial aides about getting an abattoir license. Anderson said later he had no interest in the high costs of erecting a specialized building and getting the municipal rezoning and permits, instead of his existing outdoor slaughtering process.
He worried the rule would decimate his farm business and others like it around Alberta.
"We've done nothing wrong, and then the government effectively cancels the program and sterilizes and strands our investment," Anderson said in an interview. "So I think those are all things that would deeply concern the premier."
After his town hall appearance, Anderson worked with other OFSO licensees to arrange a letter-writing and social media campaign. Conservative activists joined in, including separatist movement leader Jeffrey Rath: "Please have everybody tell @ABDanielleSmith and [Smith's chief of staff] what they think about the socialist bureaucrats that they refuse to rein in or fire," he posted online.
Anderson first spoke to Smith and Sigurdson on the eve of Thursday's kickoff of the Calgary Stampede, a calendar-busting period for a premier and agriculture minister. But by Monday, Sigurdson announced the OFSO license changes were immediately paused for further consultation, after learning of "unintended consequences" to the viability of some 88 farm businesses.
Feedback from several farmers, not just Anderson, prompted the government to reconsider its policy, Sigurdson spokeswoman Darby Crouch said in an email. She did not directly answer when asked if the premier or her office had any input in halting the new slaughter limits.
But the premier has made it known that she's got an open mind, especially when it comes to fellow conservatives' concerns or protests.
Albertans will get more chances this summer to line up at microphones to offer Smith their ideas.
The Alberta Next panel hearings on federal-provincial relations kick off Tuesday in Red Deer — a series of three-hour town halls, chaired by Smith herself.
Agriculture issues may be off-topic, but Albertans will find out soon how wide-ranging the policy pitches are, and how persuaded she is by them.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prime Minister Mark Carney scheduled to visit Kelowna, B.C., Tuesday
Prime Minister Mark Carney scheduled to visit Kelowna, B.C., Tuesday

CTV News

time16 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Prime Minister Mark Carney scheduled to visit Kelowna, B.C., Tuesday

Prime Minister Mark Carney listens while touring the Royal Canadian Navy torpedo recovery vessel Sikanni at the Canadian Forces Maritime Experimental and Test Ranges (CFMETR), in Nanoose Bay, B.C., on Monday, August 4, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck KELOWNA — Prime Minister Mark Carney is scheduled to be in Kelowna, B.C., for an announcement at a lumber facility on Tuesday after attending the Vancouver Pride parade on the weekend before he toured a Canadian Forces facility on Vancouver Island on Monday. Carney toured the Canadian Forces Maritime Experimental and Test Ranges facility near Nanoose Bay outside Nanaimo with officials from the Canadian Navy. He toured the Royal Canadian Navy vessel Sikanni accompanied by Navy Commander Vice-Admiral Angus Topshee and Commanding Officer Craig Piccolo from the testing facility. Carney on Sunday met with B.C. Premier David Eby and officials from the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, but the meeting with the premier was closed to reporters. Carney also made a surprise appearance at the Pride parade in downtown Vancouver, where he was greeted with cheers from crowds that lined the parade route. The Prime Minister's visit to the province comes amid renewed tensions in the softwood lumber dispute with the U.S., which has placed anti-dumping duties on softwood lumber products that the B.C. Council of Forest Industries has condemned as 'unjustified and punitive trade actions.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 5, 2025.

After unionized Canada Post workers reject ‘final offers,' what happens next?
After unionized Canada Post workers reject ‘final offers,' what happens next?

CTV News

time28 minutes ago

  • CTV News

After unionized Canada Post workers reject ‘final offers,' what happens next?

A Canada Post employee prepares to check a street letter box while delivering mail, in White Rock, B.C., on Monday, July 28, 2025. Unionized workers at Canada Post rejected the Crown corporatin's latest offers in a forced ratification vote. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck OTTAWA — Labour experts say another postal service strike is unlikely after unionized Canada Post workers rejected their employer's latest round of offers in a forced vote and the parties mull their next steps. The Canadian Union of Postal Workers said Friday that the roughly 55,000 members represented by the union shot down the Canada Post's latest proposal, which would've seen wage hikes of about 13 per cent over four years and restructuring to add part-time workers to the deal. Some 68.5 per cent of urban mail carriers who voted were against the deal, while their rural and suburban colleagues were 69.4 per cent against. Adam King, assistant professor in the labour studies program at the University of Manitoba, said the forced ratification vote ordered by the federal government and administered by the Canada Industrial Relations Board was a 'distraction.' 'Hopefully, at the end of the day, we see an agreement reached at the table — where it should have been in the beginning,' he said in an interview. 'Canada Post management is really going to have to put something on the table that the union actually thinks members will accept.' Negotiations for a new collective agreement have been ongoing for more than a year and a half. The federal government asked CIRB to step in and scuttle a holiday season postal strike late last year, but the parties remain at an impasse. The Crown corporation requested Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu send its most recent proposals from late May — calling them the 'final offers' — to a forced vote from workers. Canada Post said in a statement Friday that it was 'disappointed' in the vote results and that it was weighing its next steps. CUPW said in a bulletin to members last week that its negotiators are ready to head back to the bargaining table. A national ban on overtime work, in place since CUPW entered a strike position in late May, will continue in the meantime. King acknowledged that while the vote didn't go in Canada Post's favour, it wasn't a 'resounding' rejection, with more than 30 per cent of voters coming out in favour of the deals as presented. Larry Savage, professor in the department of labour studies at Brock University, said that apparent division in the ranks of CUPW would make it difficult to get members on a picket line. 'Even if you could effectively organize a strike, it's not obvious to me that it would produce the results the union's looking for,' Savage said in an interview. Before Hajdu sent Canada Post's offers to a vote, she had asked the parties to come to terms for binding arbitration to put an end to the dispute. CUPW was broadly in favour of sending talks to arbitration but Canada Post pushed back, arguing it would tie negotiations up in a lengthy process. Canada Post has warned that uncertainty around the fate of contract talks continues to cost the struggling postal service millions of dollars in business each day as customers shift to competitors. The Crown corporation's financial woes have been well-documented throughout the talks. An Industrial Inquiry Commission report from Commissioner William Kaplan earlier this year found the postal service was effectively bankrupt and needed substantial reforms to remain afloat. But King said arbitrators tend to be 'conservative' in bringing parties to a middle ground and are unlikely to make the kinds of sweeping, structural changes Canada Post is looking for in a new deal. Savage agreed that 'binding arbitration is not actually a long-term solution to the problems at Canada Post.' 'I think that management's forced final vote was a gamble and it blew up in their faces, but they still hold cards,' he said. Canada Post could unilaterally impose new contract terms and 'dare the union to strike,' Savage said, or could start laying off workers as its business falters. 'Both of those strategies would put tremendous pressure on the union to reach an agreement,' he said. 'The danger, of course, for Canada Post is that its aggressive tactics thus far have seemingly only driven the parties further apart.' Hajdu said in a statement Friday that the federal government expects the parties to get back to the negotiating table and find a resolution 'as soon as possible.' Given the financial struggles mentioned in the report, Savage said he expects the federal government will look to restructure Canada Post's mandate after the current labour dispute wraps up. That could see, as suggested in Kaplan's report, a further expansion of community mailboxes or an end to daily door-to-door delivery. In that context, Savage said the negotiations are less about which side wins the day and more about 'who will survive long-term.' 'There is a storm brewing for both Canada Post's management and the union. And I think that getting over this hump is important, but I think that it pales in comparison to what's coming,' he said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 5, 2025. Craig Lord, The Canadian Press

Ryan Painter: How bureaucrats almost stopped B.C. from saving a child's life
Ryan Painter: How bureaucrats almost stopped B.C. from saving a child's life

National Post

time35 minutes ago

  • National Post

Ryan Painter: How bureaucrats almost stopped B.C. from saving a child's life

In British Columbia, at least 10 members of the province's expensive drugs for rare diseases (EDRD) committee have resigned, not because the government failed a dying child, but because it finally helped her. Article content This is the kind of sentence that shouldn't exist in a functioning democracy. Article content Article content Charleigh Pollock is a 10-year-old girl living with terminal Batten disease. Until recently, she was receiving Brineura, a drug that doesn't cure the condition but slows its progression and improves quality of life. For Charleigh, it did just that. Her seizures stopped. Her condition stabilized. She went back to school. She played. She laughed. She lived in the way every child should. Article content Article content Then, in June, B.C.'s NDP government ended her treatment. Article content Article content Health Minister Josie Osborne pointed to recommendations from the EDRD committee and Canada's Drug Agency, which, she said, claimed there was 'no clinical evidence (the drug) would provide further benefits.' That term, clinical, bureaucratic and cold, ignored what was visible. Charleigh's family and doctors saw stabilization. Experts in Batten disease, both here and abroad, affirmed the drug was helping her. Article content Still, the province refused to budge. Funding was denied. Appeals were dismissed. Charleigh's parents turned to crowdfunding, launching a GoFundMe campaign to fund her continued care. Article content It was ultimately British Columbians, outraged by what they saw and by the painful pleas for help made by Charleigh's mother Jori Fales, who turned the tide against the government. The public rose up: advocates, physicians, editorial boards and thousands of citizens. Petitions circulated. Columns demanded action. People made clear what the government would not: that compassion should never depend on political expedience or private fundraising. Article content Article content On July 17, after weeks of silence and mounting political pressure, Osborne reversed the decision. Funding resumed. Charleigh's treatment was back on track. Her family could breathe again. Article content Then came the backlash. Article content Ten members of the EDRD committee resigned, claiming the minister's reversal amounted to political interference. To them, it wasn't the denial of a child's care that crossed a line. It was restoring it. Article content Let that settle in. Article content An unelected committee withdrew a terminally ill child's treatment behind closed doors. A minister intervened only when the political cost of inaction became too high. And when she finally did, the loudest protest came from within the system itself. Article content This wasn't just a policy failure. It was a collapse of moral leadership. A failure made worse by how long elected officials remained silent. Article content Osborne only acted under pressure. Premier David Eby, consistent in his absence, waited until the public outcry made it impossible not to respond.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store