logo
'Pierre's riding to lose': candidates in Alberta byelection get together for debate

'Pierre's riding to lose': candidates in Alberta byelection get together for debate

Yahoo2 days ago
CAMROSE — Pierre Poilievre was greeted with cheers and applause by the hundreds of Albertans who showed up to watch a two-and-a-half-hour political debate on a sunny Tuesday evening in July.
The Camrose and District Chamber of Commerce hosted a candidates' forum featuring 10 of the people who are vying to represent Battle River—Crowfoot in the Aug. 18 byelection.
"My mission here is to give national leadership to the issues that are of local importance," Poilievre told the sold-out crowd.
The Conservative leader is widely expected to win the sprawling eastern Alberta riding, which is considered one of the safest Tory seats in the country.
Damien Kurek won more than 82 per cent of the vote in the April election. He resigned to allow Poilievre, who lost his own seat in the Ottawa riding of Carleton, the chance to return to the House of Commons in the fall.
A crowd of Poilievre's supporters was outside the venue before things got underway, many carrying signs with his name. Inside, the signs had to be put away.
The moderator kept a tight schedule, cutting off the microphones of anyone who ran over their allotted time as the candidates answered a range of questions submitted by the public about the economy, health care privatization, electoral reform and immigration.
The candidates seated at a long table on a stage occasionally took aim at Poilievre, particularly for the fact that he does not live in the riding.
Liberal candidate Darcy Spady introduced himself by saying, "I'm from Three Hills, and I don't want to be prime minister" — a line that elicited chuckles from the crowd and from Poilievre when he repeated it.
Spady said he wanted to bring local issues to the government caucus.
Poilievre argued that electing the leader of a political party is a trade-off — leaders are on the road much of the time, he said. "The other side, though, is that leader can bring a very powerful megaphone to the local issues of the community," he added.
Independent candidate Bonnie Critchley pointed out in her closing statement that several candidates, including Poilievre, won't be able to vote in the byelection because they don't live in the riding.
"I firmly believe that Mr. Poilievre is too busy with his personal ambitions to give a rat's backside about us," Critchley said in her closing statement.
She got loud cheers from the crowd earlier in the evening as she argued for local representation.
"If you want to run for an area, you need to live here. This longest ballot crap, that's got to stop," she said.
More than 200 candidates were signed up to run in the byelection as of Tuesday, most of whom were sponsored by the Longest Ballot Committee protest group.
The group says it's trying to get attention for electoral reform, arguing that Canada needs to end the first-past-the-post system.
As a result of the protest, Elections Canada has decided that voters will write in the name of their selected candidate on a modified ballot in the byelection, rather than selecting from a list of 200.
The longest ballot group signed up 85 people to run in Carleton during the April election, and ran dozens of candidates in byelections last summer.
Poilievre called the Longest Ballot Committee "a total scam that must be stopped," and pledged that if he's elected, he will put forward legislative changes to ensure it doesn't happen again.
In opening and closing statements, a number of candidates said Ottawa takes advantage of Alberta and pledged to try to end equalization. Several expressed sympathy for the growing Alberta separatist movement.
There was broad agreement from candidates that Canada needs to pull back on immigration and "take care of our own."
"We must have more people leaving than coming over the next several years as we bring down our population," Poilievre said.
Green Party candidate Ashley MacDonald and the NDP's Katherine Swampy disagreed, calling immigration one of the country's strengths.
Critchley and fellow Independent candidate Sarah Spanier made pitches to voters that they would hold a powerful position as Independent MPs in a minority government, and would leverage that to help the riding.
The forum also featured candidates from the People's Party of Canada, the Libertarian Party, the Christian Heritage Party and the United Party of Canada.
"I think we all know this is Pierre's riding to lose here; he's definitely going to win," MacDonald said in his closing statement. "So please, take a chance."
— by Fakiha Baig in Camrose, Alta., and Sarah Ritchie in Ottawa
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 29, 2025.
The Canadian Press
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Many voters cast ballot in last federal election without feeling fully informed: poll
Many voters cast ballot in last federal election without feeling fully informed: poll

Hamilton Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Many voters cast ballot in last federal election without feeling fully informed: poll

TORONTO - A new survey suggests more than half of Canadians believe they didn't have enough information or needed more to cast their ballot in the last federal election. The Ipsos poll says 57 per cent of respondents either believed they didn't have enough local news or could have used more to assess candidates back in April. Many respondents pointed to social media as among their most influential news sources, with 14 per cent specifically citing Facebook even though the social media site banned news content in Canada. The online survey of 1,000 Canadian residents was conducted July 11 to 21 and is part of a study by the Public Policy Forum on access to local news. The think tank concludes that a steady erosion of local news outlets leaves many Canadians 'wading through the toxic waters of social media.' Report authors include former Toronto Star columnist Tim Harper and former Maclean's editor-in-chief Alison Uncles, who suggest a permanent non-partisan election fund could help media outlets better cover political races. 'There was scant coverage at the local level, with candidates using their own social media channels rather than have their information filtered through local reporters,' says the report, also co-authored by Sara-Christine Gemson, executive director of the Public Policy Forum Academy and a past Radio-Canada journalist. 'It is no hyperbole to argue that given the collapse of local news and the Facebook ban on news on its site, the federal election of 2025 was most likely the most poorly covered election in modern Canadian history.' Meta stopped Canadian access to news on Facebook and Instagram in 2023 after the federal government required the social media giant to pay Canadian news outlets for posting their journalism. Sean Simpson, senior VP at Ipsos, says the poll suggests 'people are craving more information' about their local candidates and local issues. The poll found 70 per cent of respondents said greater availability of local news would have made them better informed voters. There was some overlap when respondents were asked which sources of information had the biggest impact on their ballot, with national media most often cited at 46 per cent, followed by word-of-mouth at 35 per cent. While 14 per cent pointed to Facebook, 15 per cent cited other social media, such as TikTok, Reddit and Instagram. Simpson notes that national concerns dominated the campaign as concerns over the economic policies of U.S. President Donald Trump shaped a two-party race between Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre and winning Liberal leader Mark Carney. 'It was very much an election fought on national leaders,' says Simpson, reached in Kitchener, Ont. 'It was: who's best to deal with Trump?' 'Uncovered: How to build back election coverage for a better democracy' is set for release Thursday. The PPF report was written in partnership with the Rideau Hall Foundation and the Michener Awards Foundation. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 30, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Politicians attend funeral of ‘inspiring leader' Norman Tebbit
Politicians attend funeral of ‘inspiring leader' Norman Tebbit

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Politicians attend funeral of ‘inspiring leader' Norman Tebbit

Tory former Cabinet minister Lord Norman Tebbit will be remembered as a 'giant' and an 'inspiring leader', the friend who gave the eulogy at his funeral said. The service, at St Edmundsbury Cathedral in Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk where Lord Tebbit had lived, was attended by a cast of politicians including former Conservative MP and novelist Jeffrey Archer and his wife Mary. Former Tory MP Neil Hamilton and his wife Christine, former leader of the House of Commons Jacob Rees-Mogg and former deputy prime minister Therese Coffey were also present. Conservative grandee Lord Tebbit, who was one of Margaret Thatcher's closest political allies, died on July 7 aged 94. Tory peer and author Lord Michael Dobbs, who gave the eulogy at Thursday's service, described Lord Tebbit as 'a giant, an inspiring leader'. Former leader of the Conservative Party Iain Duncan Smith, who gave a reading from William Shakespeare's Hamlet, said afterwards that the service was 'glorious'. 'It was a glorious service and rather befitting for Norman, Norman Tebbit, who quite often was understated but never missed an argument,' said Sir Iain. He said the reading he was asked to read, from act one, scene three of Hamlet, 'could not have been more certainly Norman in every respect'. 'He was clear, he was himself from the word go, he didn't change his values throughout the whole of his time,' he said. 'He was a tough competitor but the beauty of it that came out was he had a real soft heart and was kind and had many friends on all sides of the house. 'He was my mentor throughout the early part of my political career.' Lord Archer said afterwards that the service was 'beautiful' and that Lord Tebbit 'was above all loyal, loyalty was his passion'. Lord Tebbit was injured in an IRA bombing during the Conservative Party conference in Brighton in 1984, which left his wife, Margaret, paralysed from the neck down. He served as employment secretary, taking on the trade unions, and as chairman of the Conservative Party from 1985 to 1987 he helped Mrs Thatcher secure her third general election victory. He also served as trade secretary and had a reputation as a political bruiser. After the 1987 election success he left his post as Tory chairman to help care for Margaret, who died in 2020. He left the Commons in 1992 and became a member of the House of Lords. His son William said his father died 'peacefully at home'. Lord Tebbit's coffin arrived at the cathedral in a black hearse driven at walking pace, with family members following behind on foot. Church bells rang as air cadets formed a guard of honour at the cathedral door and the coffin, covered with flowers, was carried inside. Lord Tebbit's children William, Alison and John each took turns to share reflections of their father, who Alison described as 'uncompromising' and 'loyal', also possessing humour and a 'sense of fun'. The service, also attended by Sir Graham Brady, Tory MP Mark Francois, Lord Deben and Labour MP for Bury St Edmunds Peter Prinsley, ended with the RAF March as the recessional music as people filed out.

Ontario Green Party leader drumming up support for foodbelt bill over the summer
Ontario Green Party leader drumming up support for foodbelt bill over the summer

Hamilton Spectator

time4 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Ontario Green Party leader drumming up support for foodbelt bill over the summer

The summer BBQ circuit finds Guelph MPP and Green Party of Ontario Leader Mike Schreiner out drumming up support for a bill that would protect farmland. Schreiner and MPP Bobbi Ann Brady, the independent MPP for Haldimand-Norfolk, introduced a private member's bill at Queen's Park in May. The bill looks to establish a committee led by members of the industry to develop a 'foodbelt' to protect farmland in Ontario. The committee would consist of farmers, farm organizations, and experts in soil, land planning and agriculture. Schreiner told The Observer that the 319 acres of farmland that are lost in the province every day were a major 'motivation behind this bill.' 'That's the equivalent of nine family farms every week. When we think of the threats to our economy and our sovereignty currently, I think it's just essential to protect the land that feeds us in terms of maintaining our food sovereignty and security – the land that is the foundation of the $50-billion food and farming economy that employs over 875,000 people in Ontario, which is the largest employer in the province.' While Ontario is large, covering more than 892,000 square kilometres, just five per cent of it is usable farmland, and only 0.1 per cent is prime farmland, he noted. 'I think it's just essential that we have a plan to protect it, especially because the rate of farmland loss is been going up so rapidly in recent years.' This bill comes on the heels of the controversial Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act (Bill 5), which gave Premier Doug Ford and his cabinet members the ability to assign special economic zones. This would essentially allow developers and their organization on this site the ability to bypass other provincial and municipal rules. Though Schreiner said that he and Brady have been working on this type of farm protection well before the controversial Bill 5, the introduction of the bill, 'accelerated our desire to get this bill introduced and through first reading.' 'I think farmland protection needs to be a part of the conversation around Bill five, because there's nothing in Bill 5 that would prevent the premier's cabinet from declaring substantial acreage of farmland a special economic zone,' added Schreiner. Since its initial proposal, the bill has received support from all parties and all different parts of the political spectrum, he said He has also spoken to Minister of Agriculture Trevor Jones and Rob Flack, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, as well. 'I've had certain members of the Conservative caucus reach out to me, especially those who represent ridings where farming is a big part of the local economy.' With the legislature on summer break, Schreiner will be travelling around Ontario talking about this bill and other issues. He has met many people who have expressed support for this new bill and also seen support from environmental groups and the province's agriculture organizations. All of this support and discourse about the Protect Our Food Act might come from the fact that this bill touches on many different political perspectives all at once. Schreiner noted that it specifically comes from three different perspectives. The first of those is the economy, which he notes is the agri-food sector, the largest employer in the province. 'I think people recognize the economic implications,' added Schreiner. The second perspective is environmental, and it plays a very important role in protecting the environment. The third important perspective that the bill follows is social justice and food sovereignty. 'There are issues around food security and hunger, social justice, where people are saying, 'We want people in Ontario to be able to have access to local food,'' noted Schreiner. 'Ontario's 49,000 plus farmers produce over 200 different crops and livestock, which is one of the most diverse availabilities of food anywhere in the world.' Given the major weather incidents and conflicts around the globe, protecting the places that produce food is particularly important just now, he stressed. 'That has real economic and financial implications for people's lives and their ability to be able to afford to feed themselves and their families. So protecting agricultural land in Ontario ensures that we have secure access to affordable, healthy, local food,' he added. 'I think it is critically important because it touches a lot of people's lives in different ways. And I think that's one of the reasons you've seen support for the bill.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store