Police quiz five over preacher's alleged sharing of explicit videos involving his wives
Shah Alam police chief Assistant Commissioner Mohd Iqbal Ibrahim said the 39-year-old suspect remains under investigation, and the case will be referred to the deputy public prosecutor once completed, according to a report published in the New Straits Times today.
'So far, statements from five witnesses have been recorded in connection with this case,' he said when contacted yesterday.
The man was arrested on July 5 following a report by his second wife, who claimed he had shared explicit videos featuring her and his other wives.
Police had earlier confirmed that two mobile phones and a laptop were seized during the arrest.
On Sunday, Selangor Islamic Religious Council chairman Datuk Salehuddin Saidin said the council had revoked the preacher's teaching credentials due to alleged criminal conduct dating back to 2022.
Salehuddin also confirmed that the Selangor Islamic Religious Department had detained the preacher in September 2024 for preaching without valid credentials.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
SRC board, not Najib, responsible for company's funds, says ex-PM's lawyers
SRC International is suing ex-prime minister Najib Razak (left) and former CEO Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil for US$1.18 billion. KUALA LUMPUR : The High Court here was told today that SRC International Sdn Bhd's board and management had exclusive control of the company's operations and loan funds received from Retirement Fund Incorporated (KWAP). Lawyer Farhan Shafee Abdullah – representing former prime minister Najib Razak in SRC International's US$1.18 billion civil suit against him and former SRC CEO Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil – submitted that his client had no control over the company. Farhan said all transactions were carried out by the board, which also bore responsibility for overseeing the company's affairs. 'If any misappropriation occurred, it was the result of the board's own decisions. 'Even taking Najib's alleged instructions at their highest, responsibility ultimately rested with the board to properly manage the funds within those parameters,' he said. Farhan also dismissed SRC International's claim that Najib acted as a shadow director or the de facto controller of the company. He submitted that Najib was not part of the company's governing board and did not assume the fiduciary duties of a director. 'The evidence shows the SRC board exercised independent judgement and was not accustomed to act on Najib's instructions,' he said. Farhan added that SRC International had not produced any instance of Najib issuing a binding directive to the board on operational matters. He said the company's own witness, former BSI Bank wealth management head Kevin Swampillai, had testified that he did not receive, see or become aware of any instruction from Najib directing the transfer or investment of SRC International's funds. 'All instructions for the movement of funds came from Jho Low (Low Taek Jho) and SRC officers, including (former director) Suboh Yasin – not Najib. This is a striking admission from the plaintiff's own witness. 'Despite Najib's position, no directive from him was ever communicated to the bank handling the money,' he said. The hearing before Justice Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin will continue at a later date. SRC International is suing Najib and Nik Faisal – who remains at large – for allegedly misappropriating company property and conspiring to convert it for their own use. Judgment in default of appearance has been entered against Nik Faisal. The suit originally included former SRC International chairman Ismee Ismail and former directors Suboh, Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi, Azhar Osman Khairuddin and Che Abdullah @ Rashidi Che Omar as co-defendants. SRC International later dropped the case against them, but Najib named them as third parties in his defence. Najib is currently serving a jail sentence in Kajang prison for misappropriating RM42 million from SRC International.
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Two Malaysians found hiding in car boot in bid to leave Singapore illegally
Under the Immigration Act 1959, illegal departure is punishable by a fine of up to S$2,000, imprisonment of up to six months, or both. - ST file SINGAPORE: Two Malaysians were arrested on Saturday (July 5) for attempting to illegally leave Singapore by hiding in the boot of a car, according to the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA). In a statement on Tuesday, ICA said the car's driver, a 20-year-old Malaysian, was also arrested. All three men were charged in court on the same day. ICA said that in the incident, its officers had profiled and directed a Malaysia-registered departing vehicle for further checks at Woodlands Checkpoint at around 3am, during which they discovered the two men concealed in the boot. "Both men aged 30 and 31 were not in possession of any travel document,' the agency said. Under the Immigration Act 1959, illegal departure is punishable by a fine of up to S$2,000, imprisonment of up to six months, or both. Offenders who engage in the business of conveying prohibited immigrants out of Singapore face a jail term of between two and five years and a minimum of three strokes of the cane. ICA added that vehicles used in such offences are liable to be forfeited. - Bernama
Malaysian Reserve
5 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Two Malaysians found hiding in car boot in bid to leave Singapore illegally
SINGAPORE — Two Malaysians were arrested on July 5 for attempting to illegally leave Singapore by hiding in the boot of a car, according to the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA). In a statement on Tuesday, ICA said the car's driver, a 20-year-old Malaysian, was also arrested. All three men were charged in court on the same day. ICA said that in the incident, its officers had profiled and directed a Malaysia-registered departing vehicle for further checks at Woodlands Checkpoint at around 3am, during which they discovered the two men concealed in the boot. 'Both men aged 30 and 31 were not in possession of any travel document,' the agency said. Under the Immigration Act 1959, illegal departure is punishable by a fine of up to S$2,000, imprisonment of up to six months, or both. Offenders who engage in the business of conveying prohibited immigrants out of Singapore face a jail term of between two and five years and a minimum of three strokes of the cane. ICA added that vehicles used in such offences are liable to be forfeited. — BERNAMA
