logo
Climate extremists make our kids despair — and groom them to join the left's crusades

Climate extremists make our kids despair — and groom them to join the left's crusades

New York Post24-05-2025
Extreme privilege and fame have never been a recipe for emotional stability, but today's Hollywood offspring seem especially unequipped to face reality.
Case in point: Ramona Sarsgaard, the 18-year-old daughter of actors Maggie Gyllenhaal and Peter Sarsgaard, who was arrested this month for criminal trespass during a pro-Palestinian protest at Columbia University's Butler Library.
This wasn't her first foray into activism. Sarsgaard has been a committed climate crusader since childhood.
At just 13, she gave a speech at Amnesty International's Ambassador of Conscience award ceremony in honor of Greta Thunberg.
Like Thunberg, Ramona has built her identity around the belief that climate catastrophe is not only inevitable but imminent.
Sarsgaard marched in the Youth Climate Strike in New York and, according to her mother, is among the many children who 'aren't able to push out of their minds the dire situation that we're in.'
She's not alone: An entire generation has been raised to believe they are living through the end of the world — and their mental health reflects it.
Just this week Violet Affleck, 19, daughter of Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck, published an essay in Yale University's 'Global Health Review' describing a heated conflict with her mother earlier this year.
'I spent the January fires in Los Angeles arguing with my mother in a hotel room,' she wrote — in fights triggered by Garner's shock at the devastation.
'As a lifelong Angelena and climate-literate member of Generation Z,' Violet explained, 'my question had not been whether the Palisades would burn but when.'
She went on to call climate change an 'existential and accelerating' crisis.
It's clear she wasn't just debating a hot topic with her mother — she was evangelizing a worldview that sees environmental collapse as a given.
If that mindset sounds extreme, that's because it's being carefully cultivated.
Affleck's worldview was deliberately drilled into her by climate activists, who have groomed an entire generation to join their crusade.
At institutions like Yale, climate anxiety is treated as a developmental inevitability.
An advice column in a Yale newsletter a few years ago instructed parents and caregivers to lead even the youngest children through therapeutic climate exercises, like imagining their favorite animal being impacted by climate change and speaking from its perspective.
Just imagine launching that conversation with your 4-year-old: 'Think of Peter Rabbit. Now imagine Peter has run out of food and dies because he's too thirsty, has no grass to eat, and no shade to take refuge in as temperatures soar.'
You couldn't come up with a more traumatic lesson for a young child to engage in if you tried —yet the 'experts' at Yale recommend it as a therapeutic template to explain to children that the world is ending.
The consequences of this approach are measurable.
A global 2021 study on climate anxiety found that in 31 of 32 countries, distress about climate change was linked to poorer mental health.
In another survey of 10,000 young people across 10 nations, three-quarters said 'the future is frightening,' and more than half believed that 'humanity is doomed.'
And yet the same activists, media outlets and global institutions that amplify climate alarmism are now wringing their hands over the youth mental-health crisis.
A pair of Stanford University psychiatrists, discussing the 2021 anxiety study on the World Economic Forum website, sought to normalize what they called 'climate distress' — defining it as a troubling blend of dread, sadness, powerlessness and anger.
It's 'a normal and appropriate thing to feel,' they claimed, in the face of 'hurricanes, droughts and floods, and clear evidence that our planetary boundaries are being overshot.'
But let's be honest: These experts are reporting on the very fire they helped start.
And they need that fire to keep the recruits engaged and energized to stay in the fight.
Sarsgaard, Thunberg and Affleck are the natural products of a culture that's fed kids a steady diet of existential panic.
Raised in privilege, surrounded by wealth and educated at elite institutions, these young women nonetheless see themselves as doomed.
The first two already boast criminal records — and Affleck, by her own account, has become so unbearable a scold that her family may opt to shelter in place next time disaster threatens, rather than crowd into a cramped hotel room with her truculent presence.
They're fighting an existential battle to save the planet — one they've been convinced is rapidly coming to an end.
And as Sarsgaard demonstrates, they're easy prey for those pushing the next leftist cause du jour.
They represent an entire generation driven off the deep end by their own manufactured anxiety.
We told kids the world was ending. They listened.
Bethany Mandel writes and podcasts at The Mom Wars.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Daughter of holocaust survivors may leave job at Columbia due to university's new antisemitism definition
Daughter of holocaust survivors may leave job at Columbia due to university's new antisemitism definition

New York Post

time17 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Daughter of holocaust survivors may leave job at Columbia due to university's new antisemitism definition

For years, Marianne Hirsch, a prominent genocide scholar at Columbia University, has used Hannah Arendt's book about the trial of a Nazi war criminal, 'Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil,' to spark discussion among her students about the Holocaust and its lingering traumas. But after Columbia's recent adoption of a new definition of antisemitism, which casts certain criticism of Israel as hate speech, Hirsch fears she may face official sanction for even mentioning the landmark text by Arendt, a philosopher who criticized Israel's founding. 8 Marianne Hirsch is a prominent genocide scholar at Columbia University. AP For the first time since she started teaching five decades ago, Hirsch, the daughter of two Holocaust survivors, is now thinking of leaving the classroom altogether. 'A university that treats criticism of Israel as antisemitic and threatens sanctions for those who disobey is no longer a place of open inquiry,' she told The Associated Press. 'I just don't see how I can teach about genocide in that environment.' Hirsch is not alone. At universities across the country, academics have raised alarm about growing efforts to define antisemitism on terms pushed by the Trump administration, often under the threat of federal funding cuts. 8 After Columbia's recent adoption of a new definition of antisemitism, Hirsch is thinking of leaving the classroom. AFP via Getty Images Promoted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, the definition lists 11 examples of antisemitic conduct, such as applying 'double standards' to Israel, comparing the country's policies to Nazism or describing its existence as 'a racist endeavor.' Ahead of a $220 million settlement with the Trump administration announced Wednesday, Columbia agreed to incorporate the IHRA definition and its examples into its disciplinary process. It has been endorsed in some form by Harvard, Yale and dozens of other universities. While supporters say the semantic shift is necessary to combat evolving forms of Jewish hate, civil liberties groups warn it will further suppress pro-Palestinian speech already under attack by President Donald Trump. 8 'A university that treats criticism of Israel as antisemitic and threatens sanctions for those who disobey is no longer a place of open inquiry,' she said. AP For Hirsch, the restrictions on drawing comparisons to the Holocaust and questioning Israel's founding amount to 'clear censorship,' which she fears will chill discussions in the classroom and open her and other faculty up to spurious lawsuits. 'We learn by making analogies,' Hirsch said. 'Now the university is saying that's off-limits. How can you have a university course where ideas are not up for discussion or interpretation?' A spokesperson for Columbia didn't respond to an emailed request for comment. The 'weaponization' of an educational framework 8 In addition to Columbia, academics in other universities around the country have raised alarm about growing efforts to define antisemitism on terms pushed by the Trump administration, often under the threat of federal funding cuts. AFP via Getty Images When he first drafted the IHRA definition of antisemitism two decades ago, Kenneth Stern said he 'never imagined it would one day serve as a hate speech code.' At the time, Stern was working as the lead antisemitism expert at the American Jewish Committee. The definition and its examples were meant to serve as a broad framework to help European countries track bias against Jews, he said. In recent years, Stern has spoken forcefully against what he sees as its 'weaponization' against pro-Palestinian activists, including anti-Zionist Jews. 'People who believe they're combating hate are seduced by simple solutions to complicated issues,' he said. 'But when used in this context, it's really actually harming our ability to think about antisemitism.' 8 For Hirsch, the restrictions on drawing comparisons to the Holocaust and questioning Israel's founding amount to 'clear censorship.' GHI/Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images Stern said he delivered that warning to Columbia's leaders last fall after being invited to address them by Claire Shipman, then a co-chair of the board of trustees and the university's current interim president. The conversation seemed productive, Stern said. But in March, shortly after the Trump administration said it would withhold $400 million in federal funding to Columbia over concerns about antisemitism, the university announced it would adopt the IHRA definition for 'training and educational' purposes. Then last week, days before announcing a deal with the Trump administration to restore that funding, Shipman said the university would extend the IHRA definition for disciplinary purposes, deploying its examples when assessing 'discriminatory intent.' 'The formal incorporation of this definition will strengthen our response to and our community's understanding of modern antisemitism,' Shipman wrote. 8 Stern has spoken forcefully against what he sees as its 'weaponization' against pro-Palestinian activists. AP Stern, who now serves as director of the Bard Center for the Study of Hate, called the move 'appalling,' predicting it would spur a new wave of litigation against the university while further curtailing pro-Palestinian speech. Already, the university's disciplinary body has faced backlash for investigating students who criticized Israel in op-eds and other venues, often at the behest of pro-Israel groups. 'With this new edict on IHRA, you're going to have more outside groups looking at what professors are teaching, what's in the syllabus, filing complaints and applying public pressure to get people fired,' he said. 'That will undoubtedly harm the university.' Calls to 'self-terminate' 8 The university's disciplinary body has faced backlash for investigating students who criticized Israel in op-eds and other venues. Derek French/SOPA Images/Shutterstock Beyond adopting the IHRA definition, Columbia has also agreed to place its Middle East studies department under new supervision, overhaul its rules for protests and coordinate antisemitism trainings with groups like the Anti-Defamation League. Earlier this week, the university suspended or expelled nearly 80 students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. Kenneth Marcus, chair of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, said Columbia's actions were an overdue step to protect Jewish students from harassment. 8 Earlier this week, the university suspended or expelled nearly 80 students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. AP He dismissed faculty concerns about the IHRA definition, which he said would 'provide clarity, transparency and standardization' to the university's effort to root out antisemitism. 'There are undoubtedly some Columbia professors who will feel they cannot continue teaching under the new regime,' Marcus said. 'To the extent that they self-terminate, it may be sad for them personally, but it may not be so bad for the students at Columbia University.' But Hirsch, the Columbia professor, said she was committed to continuing her long-standing study of genocides and their aftermath. Part of that work, she said, will involve talking to students about Israel's 'ongoing ethnic cleansing and genocide' in Gaza, where more than 58,000 Palestinians have died, over half of them women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. 'With this capitulation to Trump, it may now be impossible to do that inside Columbia,' Hirsch said. 'If that's the case, I'll continue my work outside the university's gates.'

Israel, U.S. Slam France's Recognition of Palestinian State
Israel, U.S. Slam France's Recognition of Palestinian State

Time​ Magazine

time18 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Israel, U.S. Slam France's Recognition of Palestinian State

Israeli and U.S. leaders have denounced President Emmanuel Macron's announcement that his country will recognize Palestinian statehood, becoming the first major Western power to do so. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 'strongly condemned' the move, saying that it 'rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became.' 'What he says doesn't matter,' President Donald Trump said in reaction to Macron's decision while speaking to reporters at the White House on Friday. "He's a very good guy. I like him, but that statement doesn't carry weight." The United States 'strongly rejects' Macron's plan, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said. 'This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace,' he wrote. 'It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th.' France will officially recognize Palestine as an independent state at a meeting of the United Nations General Assembly in September, Macron announced on Thursday. 'It is essential to build the State of Palestine, ensure its viability, and enable it, by accepting its demilitarization and fully recognizing Israel, to contribute to the security of all in the Middle East. There is no alternative,' the French President said in a post on X. The decision could add momentum to a push for Palestinian statehood that has so far largely been driven by smaller nations. While meeting with criticism from Israel and the U.S., Macron's announcement was celebrated by other countries that have already made similar moves, as well as by Hamas and Palestinian leadership. Hamas called it 'a positive step in the right direction to achieve justice for our oppressed Palestinian people and support their legitimate right to self-determination.' Palestinian Liberation Organization Vice President Hussein Al Sheikh thanked Macron, saying that his announcement 'reflects France's commitment to international law and its support for the Palestinian people's rights to self-determination.' What does Macron's decision mean for a Palestinian state? France will be the biggest Western power and first member of the group of economic superpowers known as the Group of 7 (G7) to recognize Palestine as an independent state. Nearly 150 out of the 190 U.N. member states now do so, including several other European countries—Spain, Ireland and Norway—that have formally recognized Palestine since the start of the war between Israel and Hamas in October 2023. France has signaled it is hopeful other major powers will follow suit. 'I've had other colleagues on the phone and I'm sure that we won't be the only ones recognizing Palestine in September,' a senior official with the French presidency told CNN. Macron has not specified what territory France would recognize as being part of a Palestinian state. Palestinians seek a state including parts of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza, all of which are considered occupied territories by the United Nations. The French President did say that he wishes to ensure the demilitarization of Hamas and rebuild Gaza. Macron will hold calls with British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Friday to discuss the situation in Gaza. On Thursday, Starmer said that 'statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people. A cease-fire will put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state and a two-state solution which guarantees peace and security for Palestinians and Israelis.' A divided response Macron's announcement comes amid international outcry over what humanitarian organizations warn is a deepening humanitarian crisis in Gaza, as the enclave's health ministry reports that more than 100 people have died of hunger since the war began. The starkly divergent responses to France's decision from world leaders reflect deeper divisions over the conflict. 'The audacity of the French president to create, with mere words, a permanent order in our land is absurd and unserious,' Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said on Thursday. He added that 'a Palestinian state would be a Hamas state,' in a statement on social media. Israeli far right politician and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich said that Macron's recognition of Palestine provides a reason to 'finally implement Israeli sovereignty' over the West Bank. 'This will be our legitimate Zionist response to the unilateral pressures and coercive maneuvers of Macron and his allies,' he continued on X. On Wednesday, the Israeli Parliament voted in favor of a non-binding motion for Israel to annex the West Bank. Smotrich, as well as fellow far-right politician Itamar Ben Gvir, were both recently sanctioned by the U.K., Canada, New Zealand, Australia and Norway for inciting 'extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights,' particularly in the West Bank. Other countries that have recognized Palestine met the announcement with a very different tone. 'I warmly welcome President Macron's intervention, this is very significant, the first G7 nation to recognize the state of Palestine,' Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Micheál Martin told reporters on Friday. He added that it was significant for peace efforts to 'create a future landscape for a two-state solution.' Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has 'celebrated' France's decision to recognize Palestine. 'Together, we must protect what Netanyahu is trying to destroy. The two-state solution is the only solution.' China has offered a more nuanced response. When asked on Friday about Macron's decision to recognize Palestine, China's Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun said: 'The Palestinian question is at the heart of the Middle East situation. The only viable way to resolve it lies in the two-State solution,' adding that China will continue working towards the 'just and lasting settlement of the Palestinian question.'

U.K., French and German leaders press Israel over Gaza aid after Macron backs a Palestinian state
U.K., French and German leaders press Israel over Gaza aid after Macron backs a Palestinian state

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

U.K., French and German leaders press Israel over Gaza aid after Macron backs a Palestinian state

LONDON — The leaders of Britain, France and Germany demanded Israel allow unrestricted aid into Gaza to end a 'humanitarian catastrophe,' after French President Emmanuel Macron announced that his country will become the first major Western power to recognize a Palestinian state. The joint statement, issued after a call between Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, called for an an immediate ceasefire and said that 'withholding essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable,' though it broke no new diplomatic ground. The leaders said they 'stand ready to take further action to support an immediate ceasefire and a political process that leads to lasting security and peace for Israelis, Palestinians and the entire region,' but did not say what that action might be. Macron's surprise announcement exposed differences among the European allies, known as the E3, over how to ease the worsening humanitarian crisis and end the Israel-Hamas war. All three support a Palestinian state in principle, but Germany said it has no immediate plans to follow France's step, which Macron plans to formalize at the United Nations General Assembly in September. Britain has not followed suit either, but Starmer is under mounting pressure to formally recognize Palestinian statehood, both from opposition lawmakers and from members of his own Labour Party government. Health Secretary Wes Streeting on Tuesday called for an announcement 'while there's still a state of Palestine left to recognize.' On Friday, 221 of the 650 lawmakers in the House of Commons signed a letter urging Starmer to recognize a Palestinian state. 'Since 1980 we have backed a two-state solution. Such a recognition would give that position substance,' said the letter, signed by legislators from several government and opposition parties. After the E3 call on Friday, Starmer condemned 'the continued captivity of hostages, the starvation and denial of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people, the increasing violence from extremist settler groups, and Israel's disproportionate military escalation in Gaza.' He said that 'recognition of a Palestinian state' must be one of the steps on a pathway to peace. 'I am unequivocal about that. But it must be part of a wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution and lasting security for Palestinians and Israelis,' he said. More than 140 countries recognize a Palestinian state, including a dozen in Europe. But France is the first Group of Seven country and the largest European nation to take that step. Israel and the United States both denounced France's decision. Britain has long supported the idea of an independent Palestinian state existing alongside Israel, but has said recognition should come as part of a negotiated two-state solution to the conflict. Any such solution appears far off. There had been no substantive Israel-Palestinian negotiations for years even before the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel that killed 1,200 people and sparked the current war. The worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where hunger is spreading and children have starved to death, has caused alarm even among Israel's closest allies. Germany has traditionally been a particularly staunch ally of Israel in Europe, with relations rooted in the history of the Holocaust. It says recognizing a Palestinian state should be 'one of the concluding steps' in negotiating a two-state solution and it 'does not plan to recognize a Palestinian state in the short term.' But Berlin, too, has sharpened its tone recently, describing the Israeli military's actions in Gaza as unacceptable and pushing for greater humanitarian aid, but still appears to favor trying to influence Israeli officials by direct contact. The German government said in a statement on Friday that it is in a 'constant exchange' with the Israeli government and other partners on issues that include a ceasefire in Gaza and the need to drastically improve humanitarian aid. It said it is 'prepared to increase the pressure' if there is no progress, but didn't elaborate on how. Britain has halted some arms sales to Israel, suspended free trade talks and sanctioned far-right government ministers and extremist settlers, but Starmer is under intense pressure to do more. Also weighing on Starmer is his desire to maintain good relations with the U.S. administration, which has strongly criticized France's decision. The British leader is due to meet President Donald Trump in the next few days while the president is in Scotland visiting two golf courses he owns there. Yossi Mekelberg, a Middle East expert at the international affairs think-tank Chatham House, said Macron's decision to defer finalizing recognition until September 'creates some space' for other countries to get on board. 'We know that the U.K. is close, but not there,' he said. 'This might encourage Starmer, who we know is not one to rush such a decision. … This might create some momentum, some dynamic, for the U.K.' Lawless writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Geir Moulson in Berlin contributed to this story.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store