logo
What we know about the UK's parental leave review

What we know about the UK's parental leave review

Yahoo5 hours ago
The UK's parental leave system is one of the least generous compared to other developed countries. Both statutory maternity pay, aimed at employed women, and maternity allowance – for those who are self-employed – are now worth less than half of the weekly national living wage. British fathers get the worst deal in Europe, with just two weeks off at pay that amounts to less than half the minimum wage.
In a bid to address the long-standing problem, the government has launched a "landmark" review of parental leave and pay – a move welcomed by families and campaigners alike. But what exactly will ministers be reviewing, and what could happen at the end of the 18-month review?
According to ministers, it will delve into the entire parental leave system, including maternity leave, paternity leave, adoption leave and shared parental leave. It will also look at kinship care, when a child lives with relatives or friends if the parents are unable to care for them.
'They'll be examining both the length of leave and pay rates, as well as eligibility – particularly looking at what entitlement self-employed people should get,' says Alex Lloyd, co-founder of campaign group The Dad Shift.
Read more: How to cope with pregnancy sickness at work
'Currently, self-employed people get absolutely no paternity leave or shared parental leave, and drastically reduced entitlement to maternity pay compared to employees.'
A source of financial anxiety for many new mums, statutory maternity and adoption leave are paid at 90% of a mother's average weekly earnings for the first six weeks. Then for the next 33 weeks, they receive whichever is the lower of that 90% figure or £187.18 a week.
For self-employed women – or those who don't meet the strict eligibility criteria – the situation is equally poor. Those who are self-employed are eligible for maternity allowance, which is currently between £27 and £187.18 a week for 39 weeks.
'Both maternity, paternity and adoption pay are 43% less than the national living wage, causing many families to experience financial hardship as a result of taking time out of work when they have given birth,' says Rachel Grocott, CEO of Pregnant Then Screwed.
'Dads and non-birthing partners are forced to suck up the same benefits for their two weeks. This has long-lasting negative implications for babies and parents.'
Clearly, one of the key issues is pay. Currently, new parents are struggling to afford basic necessities like food. A survey by Maternity Action and Unison found that a significant number of new mothers are skipping meals to afford essentials, or are eating smaller meals to cut back on food bills. For many single parents or low earners, low maternity pay and high living costs mean they have no choice but to return to work quickly — putting their physical and mental health at risk.
Meanwhile, new fathers and partners miss out on crucial bonding time with their children. They're forced to make an impossible choice between keeping their family afloat financially or being present for them, while women shoulder most of the care burden after childbirth.
'Campaigners are calling for a minimum of six weeks paternity leave paid at 90% of salary,' says Lloyd. 'That would be a significant step forwards but would still be below the European average of eight weeks at full pay, so we would also like to see concrete provisions to further increase the length and pay in the near future.'
Read more: How to apply for jobs when you're pregnant
Experts have emphasised that securing better paternity pay would also benefit all parents, not just fathers. In fact, a recent report from the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Bath found that extending paternity leave to six weeks, paid at 90% of average earnings and available from day one of employment, could deliver net social benefits of up to £12.8 billion annually.
'Fathers want to be more involved and mothers want to stay connected to work,' says Dr Joanna Clifton-Sprigg, an economics lecturer at the University of Bath. 'The current system lets everyone down. We're calling for a policy that matches what modern parents want. Six weeks of well-paid leave is a simple and cost-effective place to start.'
Campaigners are also calling for the complex parental leave system to be made less complicated. At the moment, it effectively excludes a lot of self-employed people, fathers and co-parents – and there are many caveats that lead to hidden inequalities.
For example, there are strict eligibility criteria for statutory maternity pay. To qualify, a new mother must have worked for the same employer for at least 26 weeks by the 15th week before her due date — and still be employed at that time.
'We would also like to see the government remedy the injustices in maternity allowance,' says Rhian Beynon, senior public affairs and communications officer at Maternity Action.
'If a maternity allowance recipient is claiming universal credit, universal credit will treat the maternity allowance as unearned income and claw it back pound-for-pound, so effectively the claimant is no better off. By contrast, universal credit treats statutory maternity allowance as earned income.'
In the UK, single parents, kinship carers and students often fall through the cracks of the current parental leave and pay system. While single parents can access statutory leave and pay if they meet employment criteria, they face greater financial pressure and lack the option to share leave. In reality, single parents often face greater challenges due to lower household income, limited flexibility, and less practical support — all made worse by a system that assumes a two-parent household.
Kinship carers, like grandparents or relatives raising children, are usually excluded unless they have legal parental status. Students, unless employed, don't qualify for statutory maternity or paternity pay and often rely on benefits instead. Campaigners argue that these groups are overlooked and are calling for more inclusive and flexible parental leave policies.
The review will take 18 months to complete, but campaigners say pregnant women and new parents can't wait until 2027 for legislative action on the poor state of parental pay.
The UK's parental leave system is widely seen as outdated, underfunded, and unfair — especially for those who don't fit the traditional two-parent, full-time employed model. With some of the lowest rates of pay and shortest periods of leave in the developed world, it places huge financial strain on new parents, and forces many back to work too soon.
'Before the end of the review, the government needs to increase maternity pay significantly beyond the rate of inflation unless more new parents are to be pushed into poverty and debt for having a child,' says Beynon.
Read more:
Why neurodivergent workers pay the price for poor communication
Why the pressure to be liked at work is holding women back
Five soft skills that can help you get hired or promoted at work
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stocks to watch this week: Shell, TSMC, Levi Strauss, Vistry and Jet2
Stocks to watch this week: Shell, TSMC, Levi Strauss, Vistry and Jet2

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stocks to watch this week: Shell, TSMC, Levi Strauss, Vistry and Jet2

Tariffs are set to be the focus for investors in the next week, with US president Donald Trump's deadline for the resumption of sweeping duties coming up on 9 July, but there are also a number of major companies due to report. Shell (SHEL.L) will kick off the week's company reporting, with the oil major due to update on second quarter performance on Monday. Investors will be looking at TSMC's ( TSM) latest monthly sales figures, given the company is the world's largest contract chipmaker, helping to give a sense of demand in the sector. In the world of retail, investors will be keeping an eye on results from Levi Strauss (LEVI) to see how the jeans brand is navigating tariff uncertainty. Back in the UK, Vistry (VTY.L) will be in the spotlight, with investors hoping the housebuilder's troubles are behind it after issuing three profit warnings towards the end of last year. Given Jet2 (JET2.L) has already provided some guidance on performance for the year in a trading update, the focus will be on the travel company's outlook for the year ahead. Here's more on what to look out for: The share prices of FTSE 100-listed (^FTSE) companies Shell (SHEL.L) and BP (BP.L) have fluctuated in the past month thanks to big swings in oil prices, as conflict between Iran and Israel sparked concerns about disruption to supply through the Strait of Hormuz. While a ceasefire between the two countries appears to be holding, traders continue to watch developments around the issue of Iran's nuclear programme, in terms of how this impacts tensions in the Middle East. However, oil prices have steadied in the wake of the truce, with investors now focused on an expected decision to increase supply when major producers meet this weekend. The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, known as OPEC+, are widely expected to agree on a production increase of 411,000 barrels per day. Prior to the June spike in oil prices, fears that tariff-fuelled economic downturn could dampen demand for fuel weighed on the commodity. This has contributed to longer-term concerns about slowing demand putting pressure on companies' refining margins, which reflect the profits made from processing oil. Read more: Global economy to slow amid 'most severe trade war since 1930s', says Fitch In the first quarter, Shell (SHEL.L) posted a global indicative refining margin of $6.20 a barrel, which was up from $5.50 in the fourth quarter, but down from $12 for the same quarter last year. The Anglo-Dutch energy major reported adjusted earnings of $5.58bn (£4.09bn) for the three months to March, down 28% from $7.73bn a year earlier but ahead of the $5.09bn forecast by analysts polled by London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG.L). Despite the fall in profits, Shell (SHEL.L) announced another $3.5bn in share buybacks with the release of the results in May, which marked its 14th consecutive quarter of repurchases of at least $3bn. Meanwhile, BP (BP.L) reported a significant drop in first-quarter profit. The company reported an underlying replacement cost profit — a key metric used as a proxy for net profit — of $1.38bn (£1bn), falling short of the $1.53bn forecast by analysts polled by LSEG (LSEG.L). BP's (BP.L) weaker performance has led to speculation that the oil major has become a takeover target, with reports that Shell (SHEL.L) was in talks to make a bid on its rival. However, Shell put paid to the rumours in a statement to markets at the end of June, saying it had "no intention of making an offer for BP". Attention will now turn to Shell's (SHEL.L) second quarter update release on Monday, which should give investors an idea as to how the oil major has been performing ahead of it publishing the full results on 31 July. TSMC's ( TSM) June sales data will also give a sense of how the chipmaker has performed in the first half of the year. For May, TSMC ( TSM) posted net revenue of TWD320.52bn (£8.11bn), which was down 8.3% on the previous month but up nearly 40% on the same month last year. The chipmaker has guided to net revenue of $28.4bn to $29.2bn for the second quarter, which would be up from $25.5bn for the first quarter. TSMC ( TSM) is due to release its full second quarter results on 17 July. In a note on Thursday, Barclays (BARC.L) analysts, who have an "overweight" rating on the stock, said that they continued to see the stock as a "core holding". Read more: Whatever happened to NFTs? "Monthly sales data so far this quarter shows continued strong revenues meaning over 2/3s of quarterly guidance has already been achieved," they said. "Thus we think TMSC ( TSM) can beat its guidance for revenues and we see scope for an upgrade to FY (full year). The analysts added: "The debate we think is on 2H and whether TSMC ( TSM) is able to deliver further sequential growth or if what we believe have been pull-in benefits limit quarterly growth from here. We increase our USD revenues for 2025 and now model +33% growth yoy, and if pull in activity has been limited then we think our estimates could be conservative." Year-to-date TSMC's ( TSM) Taipei-listed shares are less than 1% in the green, as tariff-related volatility has weighed on chip stocks more broadly. Despite beating expectations in the first quarter, shares in Levi Strauss & Co (LEVI) fell after it posted its results in April, which were released just days after Trump announced sweeping tariffs on "Liberation Day". Levi Strauss (LEVI) maintained its top and bottom line guidance for the year but said this excluded the impact from the tariff announcements but added that it anticipated minimal impact to its margins for the second quarter. Read more: Stocks that are trending today Speaking to Yahoo Finance at the time, Levi Strauss (LEVI) chief financial officer Harmit Singh said the company debated lifting its full-year guidance but felt it was "prudent" to maintain its outlook, given it was early in the year and in light of the tariff announcement. Levi Strauss (LEVI) posted net revenues of $1.5bn in the first quarter, which was up 9% on an organic basis on the same period last year. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $0.38, compared with $0.25 for the first quarter of 2024. For the year, the jeans maker has guided to 3.5% to 4.5% growth in organic net revenues, while earnings per share are expected to be between $1.20 and $1.25. Shares in Vistry Group (VTY.L) are up 8% year-to-date but have failed to recover from a sharp drop towards the end of last year on the back of profit warnings by the housebuilder. While revenue for the year rose 7% to £17.2bn ($23.5bn), final profit before tax was down 35% to £263.5m. Vistry (VTY.L) is due to share a trading update on Thursday, giving investors a glimpse into what to expect from its actual half-year results in September. AJ Bell's (AJB.L) investment experts Danni Hewson and Coatsworth said: "Analysts will look to chief executive Greg Fitzgerald for reassurance that last year's problems were limited to just two of the four regional operations in the south and that they are now in hand, after a major reorganisation of management there." Read more: The most popular stocks and funds investors bought in June While they said the update is unlikely to be too detailed, areas to watch include any commentary on the housebuilder's forward order book, which stood at £4.4bn at the last count. The company's sales rate per site per week would be another area to keep an eye on, which came in at 0.59 in the first quarter. The outlook for the second half and how that is expected to contribute to full-year profits will also be in focus. Hewson and Coatsworth said current analyst consensus is looking for adjusted pre-tax profit of £270m this year. "Any sign of improved momentum in the order book and sales per outlet, as well as debt reduction, could be taken well, providing 2024's problems are indeed behind Vistry (VTY.L), and there are no more additional charges for cladding remediation, either," they said. "At least the shares are bumping around one times tangible net asset value (NAV), so value hunters have something to ponder there, given the huge derating from two times and more." Shares in Jet2 (JET2.L) surged after its full-year trading update at the end of April and have continued to climb since then, hitting an all-time high in June. For the year, Jet2 (JET2.L) said it expected profit before foreign exchange revaluation and tax to come in between £565m and £570m for the year. That excluded a £10m profit on disposal of assets primarily from our retired Boeing 757- 200 aircraft fleet. The travel company said that this would represent approximately 9% growth on profits for the previous year. Stocks: Create your watchlist and portfolio At the time, Jet2 (JET2.L) said its sale capacity for this summer was 8.3% than the previous year at 18.3 million seats, with new bases at Bournemouth and London Luton airports contributing approximately 4% of this growth. Steve Heapy, CEO of Jet2 (JET2.L), said that the 2025 financial year "ended with another year of healthy profit growth, which underlines the resilience, flexibility and popularity of our product offering". "Although still very early in FY26, we are satisfied with progress for summer 2025 so far," he said. Jet2 (JET2.L) also announced plans to launch a £250m share buyback programme, in more welcome news for investors. Monday 7 July Sinovac Biotech (SVA) Tuesday 8 July Unite Group (UTG.L) Quantum Corporation (QMCO) Wednesday 9 July ZigUp (ZIG.L) Thursday 10 July DCC (DCC.L) PageGroup (PAGE.L) Delta Air Lines (DAL) You can read Yahoo Finance's full calendar here. Read more: Key investing trends in June, from defence stocks to Tesla's sales slump What are premium bonds and what are the odds of winning? How the government's benefits changes could affect your taxes

Trending tickers: Shell, Tesla, Jio Financial Services, FWD Group and Glencore
Trending tickers: Shell, Tesla, Jio Financial Services, FWD Group and Glencore

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trending tickers: Shell, Tesla, Jio Financial Services, FWD Group and Glencore

Shares in oil major Shell (SHEL.L) fell 3.2% on Monday, after the company warned that it expected to report lower trading and production results for its gas division in the second quarter. Shell lowered the top end of its production guidance for the integrated natural gas division to 900,000 to 940,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d) for the quarter, compared with a range of 890,000 to 950,000 previously given. The upper end of its outlook for its liquefied natural gas (LNG) production was also lowered, to 6.4 to 6.8 million metric tons compared with a previous range of 6.3 to 6.9 million tons. Read more: FTSE 100 falls as Trump threatens extra 10% Brics tariff Dan Coatsworth, an investment analyst at AJ Bell (AJB.L), said: "Shell's latest quarterly results teaser has created trepidation that the numbers will be a dud. "Shell will be announcing its upcoming earnings amid considerable volatility in the energy market and the wider global economy. "Shell may face further questions when it unveils its results in full later this month about its intentions with regards to BP. Despite widespread speculation, Shell has denied it has any intention of merging with its stricken counterpart, but the story refuses to go away as BP's struggles continue." Shares in Tesla (TSLA) slid more than 6% in pre-market trading on Monday after CEO Elon Musk said he was launching a new political party. Musk asked X users in a poll on the Independence Day holiday on Friday whether the "America Party" should be created. In another post on Saturday, Musk said: "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." Read more: Stocks to watch this week: Shell, TSMC, Levi Strauss, Vistry and Jet2 Musk had said during his public feud with US president Donald Trump that he would look to form a new party. His latest comments came after Trump signed his "big, beautiful bill" into law on Friday, to which Musk was strongly opposed. In response to Musk's plans, Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Sunday that the Tesla CEO had gone "off the rails". "He even wants to start a Third Political Party, despite the fact that they have never succeeded in the United States - The System seems not designed for them," Trump said. Veteran tech analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush said on X on Sunday that Musk diving deeper into politics "is exactly the opposite direction that most Tesla investors want him to take during this crucial period" for the company, adding that it was causing "exhaustion" for many investors. Shares in India's Jio Financial Services ( originally a subsidiary of Indian billionaire Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries, rose 1.3% on Monday. The rise came after Jio BlackRock Asset Management, a joint venture between Jio Financial Services and BlackRock (BLK), had raised more than $2.1bn (£1.5bn) across three cash or debt mutual fund schemes, according to a Reuters report. The investment adviser reportedly said in a statement that its first three-day offer received investments from more than 90 institutional investors and more than 67,000 retail investors. On the Hong Kong market, shares in FWD Group Holdings ( rose in their trading debut on Monday. Shares in the insurer, which was founded by billionaire Richard Li, rose as much as 2.1% in Monday's session, according to Bloomberg, before closing just above the flatline. The company's initial public offering (IPO) reportedly raised HK$3.5bn (£328m). In a statement on Monday, Li said: "FWD Group is an international team of financial professionals focused on the fastest-growing insurance market in the world – Asia. Today's listing is an important milestone for our customers, our partners and our teams across Asia, and highlights Hong Kong's continued strength as a good listing destination." Back on the UK market, miner Glencore (GLEN.L) was one of the biggest fallers on the FTSE 100 (^FTSE), with shares down 1.6% on Monday morning. Shares were under pressure as trade uncertainty weighed on the UK blue-chip index more broadly, after Trump threatened to impose a new 10% tariff on any country that aligns itself with the Brics group of nations – which includes China, Russia and India. Glencore was down despite the miner announcing the start of a share buyback programme worth up to $1bn. The company said in a statement on Monday that it planned to complete the buybacks by the release of its 2025 full-year results in February 2026. Read more: Key investing trends in June, from defence stocks to Tesla's sales slump What are premium bonds and what are the odds of winning? How the government's benefits changes could affect your taxesError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Privacy is blockchain's missing link—and America's opportunity to lead
Privacy is blockchain's missing link—and America's opportunity to lead

Fast Company

time33 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Privacy is blockchain's missing link—and America's opportunity to lead

In my last job, I was fortunate to join Circle as one of the earliest employees. And as blockchain technologies evolved over recent years, edging closer to mainstream adoption, I noticed a deep contradiction has emerged. The transparency that defines public blockchains—the very feature designed to build trust—has become their Achilles' heel. Every transaction on-chain is etched into a public ledger for all to see. This means that user addresses, financial behavior, and asset holdings are exposed permanently and immutably. In traditional financial systems, such data is closely guarded. In crypto, it's open by default. This is not just a theoretical concern. The lack of privacy on public blockchains is exposing individuals to real-world risks: profiling, extortion, digital surveillance, and even physical threats. Anyone with a blockchain wallet is a potential target—whether they are a Ukrainian citizen receiving aid, a whistleblower relying on digital assets for safety, or a consumer simply transacting online. The stakes are escalating. According to Chainalysis, nearly $46 billion worth of crypto was transferred through illicit channels in 2023, with many transactions linked to sanctioned entities. Blockchain's radical transparency makes tracing those funds technically feasible, but it also means innocent users may be swept up in guilt-by-association logic, flagged by automated compliance systems, or monitored by adversarial nation-states exploiting open ledgers for intelligence purposes. Subscribe to the Daily newsletter. Fast Company's trending stories delivered to you every day Privacy Policy | Fast Company Newsletters We are at an inflection point. On one hand, blockchain has evolved from an experimental idea into a foundational layer for decentralized finance (DeFi), gaming, cross-border payments, and digital identity. On the other, the absence of privacy threatens to stall its momentum. Without privacy guarantees, Web3 won't scale into a secure, inclusive internet economy—it will remain a risky, self-surveilling shadow of its potential. It's not just user safety at stake. Institutional adoption, long seen as the tipping point for crypto's maturation, is lagging in part because privacy solutions are underdeveloped. Financial institutions and enterprises cannot embrace systems that force them to reveal business-sensitive transactions to competitors and regulators alike. Privacy is not the enemy of compliance; it's a prerequisite for serious engagement. The road ahead The good news? A path forward exists. Recent regulatory tailwinds—particularly in the United States—point to a growing willingness to integrate blockchain into the regulated financial system. Lawmakers are increasingly exploring frameworks for stablecoins, digital asset custody, and decentralized finance. And with the emergence of advanced cryptographic tools such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), we now have the technical foundation to reconcile transparency with confidentiality. Zero-knowledge cryptography allows users to prove the validity of information—such as identity or solvency—without revealing the underlying data. In practical terms, this means users can comply with regulations (e.g., AML, KYC) without exposing every transaction to the world. ZKPs are already being piloted by privacy-forward networks and could become the industry standard if policy and investment align. And alignment is possible. In 2024, the European Union began implementing its Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation, while Hong Kong and the UAE continue developing regulated environments for digital assets. Yet the U.S. retains a unique advantage: its history of open innovation, its global financial leadership, and its robust civil liberties tradition. If it embraces blockchain privacy not just as a feature but as infrastructure—akin to encryption on the internet—it can set a global standard. advertisement The stakes for leadership are high. In a world defined by rising geopolitical tension, blockchain privacy is becoming a matter of national security. Adversarial governments are already using blockchain analytics to trace and target users, conduct financial espionage, and undermine dissident movements. Without privacy, blockchains risk becoming tools of surveillance rather than instruments of freedom. At the same time, user demand for private, secure financial tools is surging. A recent survey by the Electric Coin Company found that 84% of crypto users consider privacy to be a critical feature of digital finance. And among developers, privacy-preserving technology is one of the fastest-growing areas of investment, according to Electric Capital's 2023 developer report. A host of solutions So what can be done? First, policymakers must move past the false binary of privacy versus compliance. These are not mutually exclusive goals. Clear guidelines that embrace advanced cryptography, establish safe harbors for privacy-preserving innovation, and differentiate between consumer protection and surveillance will enable the next generation of secure digital finance. Second, industry leaders need to elevate privacy to the level of consensus mechanisms, scalability, and user experience. Just as we wouldn't launch a blockchain without validating transactions or securing the network, we shouldn't deploy them without protecting users. Privacy must be a baseline, not a bonus. Finally, public-private collaboration is essential. The early internet thrived because of cooperation between universities, startups, civil society, and government. Blockchain deserves the same collaborative energy. By fostering research, funding privacy innovation, and supporting interoperability standards, the U.S. can lead the world in building a safer, more trustworthy digital economy. In the end, privacy is not a fringe concern. It is the cornerstone of user trust, the foundation of financial inclusion, and the safeguard of democratic values in the digital age. Blockchain has the potential to reshape the global financial system—but only if we build it securely. The time to act is now.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store