
Lawson may serve as president of both the state Senate and teachers union, R.I. Ethics Commission says
Advertisement
'Mere recusal may not be sufficient,' Ricci said. 'She is in a class of one. She is not a general member of the Senate. She is the president of the Senate, and with that comes vast powers.'
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Ricci noted that former Senate President Dominick J. Ruggerio,
He said Ruggerio represents the only precedent for this specific situation, and he sought to ask Lawson, who attended the meeting, whether she agreed with what Ruggerio did.
But other commission members cut off that line of questioning, saying Tuesday's meeting was not an investigatory hearing.
Ricci also asked what others states do regarding situations of this type. But the commission chairman, Lauren E. Jones, said the Ethics Commission can only apply Rhode Island statutes and regulations. 'What other states do in this context is really irrelevant to our situation,' he said.
Advertisement
After the meeting, reporters asked what Lawson thought of Ruggerio's decision to leave his union post, 'I can't speak to the legality of a precedent, whether that applies or not,' Lawson said, adding that she's not sure why Ruggerio did not hold both positions simultaneously.
Lawson said she has recused herself from certain votes during her tenure in the Senate, including two recent votes on labor-related bills. And, she said, 'I'll continue to be thoughtful and mindful in the process and use the standards outlined by the commission.'
In a written statement, Lawson said, 'I am pleased that the Ethics Commission has affirmed that the standard I had been using as a senator, as whip, and as majority leader remains applicable in my role as president of the Senate.
She said the Ethics Commission decision 'helps to distinguish between a vague notion of a perceived, general conflict and an actual, specific conflict requiring recusal under the Code of Ethics.'
Also, Lawson said, 'It ensures that one does not have to be retired or independently wealthy to serve in this role. This decision supports the operation of our legislative body as the framers intended: a part-time, citizen legislature comprised of a diverse membership from all walks of life, who can draw from their varied experiences to best serve the public.'
Lawson, who is 58, earns
After the meeting, Common Cause Rhode Island executive director John M. Marion said the advisory opinion analysis is 'a little naive' about what the office of Senate president involves.
Advertisement
While it mentions the Senate president sets the 'consent calendar,' it doesn't mention her influence over the calendar of bills voted on the Senate floor, he said. And while it mentions she no longer sits on particular committee, it doesn't mention that the Senate president has ex officio power to sit on any committee, he said.
Marion said he is glad that Lawson sought guidance from the Ethics Commission, but he said it's unusual for an opinion to address a potential conflict without reference to specific legislation. And he said he expects Lawson will be back before the Ethics Commission to address whether she may vote on particular bills.
Marion noted that two of the four Senate presidents in state history stepped away from their day jobs to lead the chamber, and the two Senate president who kept their other jobs — William V. Irons and Joseph A. Montalbano — " were pursued by the Ethics Commission."
In 2019, the state Ethics Commission
And in 2024, the Ethics Commission
But the circumstances are different now that Lawson is president of both the Senate and NEARI, Marion has said.
Advertisement
'Lawson is no longer a classroom teacher or vice president of NEARI,' he said. 'She's president of NEARI, responsible for a very large organization with lots of business before the state Senate. Her duty to lead NEARI at the same time as exercising the vast powers of Senate president create a unique challenge.'
Marion said other legislators might be able to sidestep conflicts of interest by recusing themselves from certain votes and stepping out of the room during any debate. 'But as Senate president, you can't really step out of the room when the final decision needs to be made,' he said, noting the Senate president plays a pivotal role in deciding which bills make it to floor votes and in negotiating with the House and the governor.
Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Emanuel: Dems will be ‘fools' if they don't put midterm focus on Trump megabill
Former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel in a recent interview weighed in on the passage of the 'big, beautiful bill,' suggesting it will be a major sticking point in next year's midterm elections. Asked by CNN's David Chalian if the bill will become 'the centerpiece' of Democrats' messaging, Emanuel replied, 'If it doesn't, we're fools.' 'As I've argued before, the bills should be just captured [as] 'tax cuts for the wealthy, health care cuts for the many,' he told the host of the outlet's 'Political Briefing' podcast, which aired before President Trump signed the legislation, full of his domestic priorities, into law Friday. 'People get that.' 'It's already underwater,' Emanuel added. 'There's nothing about reducing health care benefits for working people that is going to make it more popular.' The pundit also criticized the bill for being sympathetic to billionaires, giving the example of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who held an extravagant wedding as lawmakers scrambled to unite over the megabill. The House passed the final bill Thursday afternoon after hours of tense debate and with help from President Trump, who spoke to several GOP holdouts ahead of the crucial vote. The Senate a day earlier pushed through their own bill, after adjusting the language to satisfy the parliamentarian's Byrd Rule. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) had voiced optimism throughout the process that they would have the legislation to Trump's desk by July 4. While they ultimately made good on the promise, it did not come without hiccups. From internal skepticism among the GOP over cuts to Medicaid and food stamps to how it would impact the national debt to Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries' (D-N.Y.) record-breaking 'magic minute' speech that delayed the vote, the bill faced an uphill battle. Trump took a victory lap over the bill during a speech in Iowa, calling it a 'declaration of independence from a really national decline.' On Friday, during a signing ceremony, the president echoed the sentiment. 'This is a triumph of democracy on the birthday of democracy,' he said. 'And I have to say, the people are happy.' Democrats in both chambers have made it clear that they will use the legislation — which they dubbed the 'big, ugly bill' or the 'big, beautiful betrayal' — as fodder against the GOP in the upcoming midterms, zeroing in on the health care and food assistance cuts and the rollback of green energy tax credits. Emanuel's critique comes as the former mayor, who also previously served as the U.S. ambassador to Japan, has stoked speculation in recent weeks over whether he could launch a presidential bid in 2028. 'I have something I think I can offer,' he told CNN's Kaitlan Collins last month. 'But I haven't made that decision.'


Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Trump signs his tax and spending cut bill at the White House July 4 picnic
'America's winning, winning, winning like never before,' Trump said, noting last month's bombing campaign against Iran's nuclear program, which he said the flyover was meant to honor. 'Promises made, promises kept and we've kept them.' The White House was hung with red, white and blue bunting for the regular Fourth of July festivities. The United States Marine Band played patriotic marches — and, in a typical Trumpian touch, tunes by 1980s pop icons Chaka Khan and Huey Lewis. The two separate flyovers bookended Trump's appearance and the band playing the national anthem. Democrats assailed the package as a giveaway to the rich that will rob millions more lower-income people of their health insurance, food assistance and financial stability. 'I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this is a crime scene,' Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York said during a record-breaking speech that delayed the bill's passage by eight-plus hours. 'It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and the well-being of the American people.' The legislation extends Trump's 2017 multitrillion-dollar tax cuts and cuts Medicaid and food stamps by $1.2 trillion. It provides for a massive increase in immigration enforcement. Congress' nonpartisan scorekeeper projects that nearly 12 million more people will lose health insurance under the law. The legislation passed the House on a largely party-line vote Thursday, culminating a monthslong push by the GOP to cram most of its legislative priorities into a single budget bill that could be enacted without Senate Democrats being able to block it indefinitely by filibustering. It passed by a single vote in the Senate, where North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis announced he would not run for reelection after incurring Trump's wrath in opposing it. Vice President JD Vance had to cast the tie-breaking vote. In the House, where two Republicans voted against it, one, conservative maverick Tom Massie of Kentucky, has also become a target of Trump's well-funded political operation. The legislation amounts to a repudiation of the agendas of the past two Democratic presidents, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, in rolling back Obama's Medicaid expansion under his signature health law and Biden's tax credits for renewable energy. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage.


The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
NC governor vetoes anti-DEI, transgender rights bills
North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein (D) on Thursday vetoed three bills targeting diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives within the state government, as well as a measure that takes aim at transgender rights. With the anti-DEI bills — Senate Bill 227, Senate Bill 558 and House Bill 171 — the GOP-led state legislature sought to eliminate what it called 'discriminatory practices' in public education with threats to cut funding and to prevent local and state government agencies from promoting or maintaining DEI programs or policies. Stein, in his veto messages, said the bills were 'riddled with vague definitions.' 'Our diversity is our strength. We should not whitewash history, ban books, or treat our teachers with distrust and disdain,' he wrote in one veto. 'Rather than fearing differing viewpoints and cracking down on free speech, we should ensure our students can learn from diverse perspectives and form their own opinions.' In another, the first-term governor suggested the legislation would 'make it harder' for the state to provide high quality services to its residents. 'My administration is focused on building the strongest team possible by hiring and supporting the best employees. We cannot recruit and retain them without creating a welcoming work environment,' Stein wrote. 'We make our most effective decisions when there is a diverse set of perspectives around the table.' The fourth bill, House Bill 805, included a provision to prevent state-funded gender affirming surgeries or hormone therapy for prisoners. It also includes language recognizing only two genders and would require the state to keep a transgender person's original birth certificate attached to any updated one. The effort follows similar moves in conservative states and at the federal level. President Trump, upon his return to office, issued several executive orders that targeted federal DEI programs and diversity initiatives in public education as well as sweeping actions against transgender athletes and service members — though his moves have faced legal action. The bills now head back to the North Carolina General Assembly, where Republicans need support from 60 percent of both chambers to override Stein's veto. The state House is one seat short of a veto-proof majority, and no Democrats voted for the anti-DEI bills, The Associated Press reported. State Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger (R) vowed to continue fighting for the legislation in a post online, suggesting the governor 'chose to bow down to a radical ideology that harms women.' 'He's choosing to ignore the clear will of the people who are tired of politically correct nonsense,' Berger wrote on social platform X. 'I'm prepared to lead the Senate in overriding Gov. Stein's vetoes and stand up for the North Carolinians he claims to represent.' State House Speaker Destin Hall (R) echoed the remarks, claiming he 'vetoed this bill and sided with radical activists over the overwhelming majority of North Carolinians.' 'We will keep fighting,' he posted on X. The Associated Press contributed.