Bank of Canada survey: firms less worried by worst-case tariff scenarios
OTTAWA, July 21 (Reuters) - Canadian businesses see less chance of a worst-case tariffs scenario but remain cautious and are keeping hiring and investment under check, the Bank of Canada said in a regular quarterly survey on Monday.
Firms' short-term inflation expectations have returned to levels observed at the end of last year and the number of businesses planning for recession has declined slightly, the bank's Business Outlook Survey said.
Earlier this year firms had fretted that U.S. tariffs would hit the economy hard, triggering inflation, weak economic growth and joblessness.
But their impact has largely been contained to the steel, aluminum and automobile sectors. Inflation, job numbers and the economy have not deteriorated markedly.
"Tariffs and related uncertainty ... continue to have major impacts on businesses' outlooks. However, the worst-case scenarios that firms envisioned last quarter are now seen as less likely to occur," the survey said.
Around one-third of the firms expect higher tariff-related costs, down from roughly two-thirds in the last quarter, the bank said.
A separate monthly survey of business leaders suggests the outlook amongst companies, especially exporters, improved as few have been directly affected by the tariffs so far.
But there is still widespread uncertainty on how the U.S. measures and their impacts will play out in the economy.
The business outlook indicator - a metric of what business prospects look like under current economic conditions - fell to its lowest level in a year to a negative 2.42.
The quarterly survey said around 35% of the firms reported their indicators of order books, advance bookings and sales inquiries had deteriorated compared with 12 months ago as against 29% who said indicators had improved.
Investment intentions remain muted, the survey said, adding the balance of opinion is well below its long-term average.
Analysts and economists say the business outlook survey gives the central bank more teeth to take a call on rates.
The Bank of Canada has kept its key rate steady at 2.75% since April. Only around 12% of the current money market bets show a likely cut on July 30 when the bank will announce its monetary policy decision.
A separate survey by the central bank into consumer expectations showed 64.5% of Canadians expect a recession within the next 12 months, down from 66.5% in the first quarter.
"The trade conflict is leading consumers to become increasingly cautious about their spending plans and to change their spending behavior," the report said. Many respondents wanted to spend money on Canadian goods and local vacations.
((Reuters Ottawa bureau))
Keywords: CANADA CENBANK/
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Now Elon wants to make an age-old motor sector job redundant: Musk launches bonkers car sale feature
Elon Musk's and his electric vehicle brand Tesla are plotting to put a lot of motor industry workers out of a job by debuting an all new sales feature. Tesla has completed the world's first autonomous car delivery – using its self-driving technology to complete the maiden hands-off delivery to a customer. Tesla has released a video showing a Model Y steering itself from the Gigafactory in Texas to the new owner's home – and of course Musk took to X to post about the AI-engineered development that could make delivery drivers redundant. 'To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully autonomous drive with no people in the car or remotely operating the car on a public highway,' Musk wrote on the social media platform he owns. Boasting that the personless delivery was 'completed a day ahead of schedule', Musk congratulated the 'Tesla AI teams, both software and AI chop design' - seemingly confirming the need for delivery drivers has been entirely removed from the car buying process. We've quickly become accustomed to an era of car buying where everything can be done online, with no need to step into a dealership, and the car is delivered to your door. But this Tesla world first marks a moment of completely faceless new car deliver... A full clip was uploaded to YouTube where the electric crossover used its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software. No human driver or remote operator was involved. Other than Elon Musk confirming that 'there were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point', Tesla hasn't said to what level humans were involved in the process. If staff weren't needed to remove the robotaxi software and replace it with FSD, and it was all done remotely, then the future of car delivery will indeed be very different, as AI and new technology will phased out the need for delivery drivers. There was certainly no driver on the 15-mile journey for this delivery, which included a mix of urban and highway roads. The Model Y successfully drove itself through merging highways, traffic light navigation, side streets and residential parking. The AI-based, camera-only FSD system is part of Tesla's Robotaxi initiative that launched in Austin earlier in June. This autonomous delivery is a step up for Tesla's autonomous driving technology in general, being the clearest marker yet that the US company is accelerating its autonomous roadmap. Tesla CEO Elon Musk took to X to congratulate the 'Tesla AI team' on the first fully autonomous drive to drop a car buyer their new car The new Model Y - what autonomous driving features does it have? The proud Texas owner of the new Model Y will find that his new car is equipped with Tesla's advanced driver-assistance system, Autopilot. As well as Summon, Autopark and Navigate, the Model Y has Full Self-Driving (Supervised) which expands on these features, enabling the vehicle to navigate more complex situations, including intersections and off-ramps, with minimal driver intervention. The driver has to have their hands on the wheel at all times and is responsible for the car's movements while using FSD mode. Available already in the US and Canada, FSD has just undergone its first trials in the UK. Tesla debuted videos of the Model 3 driving around London, navigating the city's dynamic driving situations including around famous landmarks like Pall Mall. Tesla Model Y - how much does the new version cost and what's changed? The new Model Y is the first time the World's Bestselling Car has had a full update. In brief, the latest Tesla Model Y features a redesigned exterior with a new front end inspired by the Cybertruck, including slimmer headlights and a full-width light bar at the rear. The interior also has upgrades including wraparound ambient lighting, more soft-touch materials, and ventilated front seats, and an eight-inch rear touchscreen for passengers in the back. As well as the original Launch Edition there's a Rear-Wheel Drive, a Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive and a Long Range All-Wheel Drive version. The Rear-Wheel Drive does 0 to 60mph in 5.6 seconds and 311 miles on a single charge, while the Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive does 0 to 60 in 5.4 seconds and 387 miles. The Long Range All-Wheel Drive comparatively manages 0 to 60mph in 4.6 seconds and 364 miles. The cheapest is the Rear-Wheel Drive Y which starts at £44,990. The Long Range RWD jumps up to £48,990 and the Long Range AWD price bumps up again to £51,990.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Republicans slam Trump's firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics chief
Senior Republican lawmakers are condemning the decision of their party leader, Donald Trump, to fire the leading US labor market statistician after a report that showed the national economy added just 73,000 jobs – far fewer than expected – in July. The disappointing figures – coupled with a downward revision of the two previous months amounting to 258,000 fewer jobs and data showing that economic output and consumer spending slowed in the first half of the year – point to an overall economic deterioration in the US. Trump defended his decision to fire US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner Erika McEntarfer. Without evidence to back his claims, the president wrote on social media that were numbers were 'RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad' and the US economy was, in fact, 'BOOMING' on his watch. But the firing of McEntarfer, who had been confirmed to her role in January 2024 during Joe Biden's presidency, has alarmed members of Trump's own party. 'If the president is firing the statistician because he doesn't like the numbers but they are accurate, then that's a problem,' said Wyoming Republican senator Cynthia Lummis. 'It's not the statistician's fault if the numbers are accurate and that they're not what the president had hoped for.' Lummis added that if the numbers are unreliable, the public should be told – but firing McEntarfer was 'kind of impetuous'. North Carolina senator Thom Tillis, a Republican, said: 'If she was just fired because the president or whoever decided to fire the director just … because they didn't like the numbers, they ought to grow up.' Kentucky senator Rand Paul, another Republican, questioned whether McEntarfer's firing was an effective way of improving the numbers. 'We have to look somewhere for objective statistics,' he said. 'When the people providing the statistics are fired, it makes it much harder to make judgments that you know, the statistics won't be politicized.' According to NBC News, Paul said his 'first impression' was that 'you can't really make the numbers different or better by firing the people doing the counting'. Tillis and Paul were both opponents of Trump's recent economic legislative package, which the president dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill'. But Alaska senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican who supported the legislation after winning substantial economic support for her state, remarked that the jobs numbers could not be trusted – and 'that's the problem'. 'And when you fire people, then it makes people trust them even less,' she said. William Beach, a former BLS commissioner appointed by Trump in his first presidency, posted on X that McEntarfer's firing was 'totally groundless'. He added that the dismissal set a dangerous precedent and undermined the BLS's statistical mission. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Beach also co-signed a letter by 'the Friends of the Bureau of Labor Statistics' that went further, accusing Trump of seeking to blame someone for bad news and calling the rationale for McEntarfer's firing 'without merit'. The letter asserted that the dismissal 'undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics that are a cornerstone of intelligent economic decision-making by businesses, families and policymakers'. The letter pointed out that the jobs tabulation process 'is decentralized by design to avoid opportunities for interference', adding that US official statistics 'are the gold standard globally'. 'When leaders of other nations have politicized economic data, it has destroyed public trust in all official statistics and in government science,' the letter said. Democrats have also hit out at Trump's decision. Vermont senator Bernie Sanders described it as 'the sign of an authoritarian type', and he said the decision would make it harder for the American people 'to believe the information that comes out of the government'. Paul Schroeder, executive director of the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, described the president's allegation against McEntarfer as 'very damaging and outrageous'. He said: 'Not only does it undermine the integrity of federal economic statistics, but it also politicizes data which need to remain independent and trustworthy. This action is a grave error by the administration and one that will have ramifications for years to come.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
The British public deserves to know what Miliband discussed with Beijing
When the Government signed a deal on net-zero co-operation with Canada, the text of the memorandum was published. So too were the texts of deals with Ireland, Norway, South Korea and Chile. Five months after the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband signed a similar memorandum with the Chinese government, however, we are still in the dark as to precisely what was agreed. Chinese media have asserted that the Energy Secretary agreed to co-operation on power grids, battery storage, offshore wind power and carbon capture, among other areas; it is understood that Chinese investment in the UK was not discussed by Mr Miliband. The role of the Chinese state in Britain's net-zero ambitions may well be an uncomfortable issue for the Labour Government to discuss. While the Defence Secretary is insisting that Britain is 'ready to fight' over the future of Taiwan and the Foreign Secretary is explicitly referring to China as a 'sophisticated and persistent threat' that requires hundreds of millions of pounds in additional funding for the intelligence services, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been courting Chinese investment, and Mr Miliband's drive to meet his net-zero targets is heavily dependent on Chinese industry. Both the switch to electric vehicles and the decarbonisation of the energy grid will make heavy use of Chinese products. One study commissioned by the German defence ministry recently warned that this position at the heart of Western energy systems could result in Beijing enjoying the power to trigger remote shut-downs as 'an instrument of economic warfare'. Such concerns are less hypothetical than we might wish. Earlier this year, undocumented communication devices were located in Chinese-made power inverters exported to the United States, triggering fears that Beijing could use compromised equipment to 'physically destroy the grid'. This would be fully in line with the current approach of the People's Liberation Army to warfare as a clash between systems, and the extensive Volt Typhoon operation carried out by Chinese state-sponsored actors. Even given the understandable desire to avoid a sudden break with China, the delicacy of the balance between trade and reliance is such that the British public deserves to know what Mr Miliband has discussed with Beijing.
