logo
The wild west of beauty: why Ireland's cosmetic treatment craze needs taming

The wild west of beauty: why Ireland's cosmetic treatment craze needs taming

Irish Examiner21-06-2025
Type 'botox party' into your search engine and watch as almost two million results pop up. Among the items there to grab your attention are card designs for invites to such a party, videos on how to 'experience the excitement of botox parties', tips on how to run such an event, and a 'what you need to know' guide for those just starting out on such an adventure.
Botox, fillers, and other cosmetic procedures are now as normal as booking in for a hair appointment, a chin wax, or a dental scale and polish. More traditionally associated with a select number of providers, the offering open to people now who are looking for cosmetic improvements is wide, with people also considering travelling abroad for procedures, or simply getting together with 'the girls' for a laugh, a drink, and a shot of botulinum toxin (botox) in the comfort of their own home.
This week's Irish Examiner Women's Health Report shows that a growing number of women, particularly in the under 34 age profile, feel positive towards cosmetic treatments and plastic surgery procedures including brow lifts, 'nose jobs', and breast augmentation. For example, 44% of those in the 25 to 34 age bracket felt positively about cosmetic treatments compared with just 17% of the over 65 category.
While there is slightly more reticence about plastic surgery procedures among all age cohorts, the age differential remains. Over a third, 35%, of those in the 25-34 age category felt positively about plastic surgery compared with just 10% in the over 65 category.
Overall, 12% of the 1,078 women interviewed for the Ipsos B&A survey conducted over a two-week period had undergone a procedure involving botox or fillers. For the vast majority of respondents, the experience was positive.
Of those who had undergone botox or anti-wrinkle injections, 82% would consider doing it again.
Why do people do it?
So why do people do it? Almost half of women who opted for cosmetic treatments such as botox or anti-wrinkle injections did it to boost their confidence.
The desire to roll back the years was also evident in the responses with 50% saying they had undergone lip fillers/injections for anti-ageing purposes, compared with 66% who said they had done botox or anti-wrinkle injections for anti-ageing reasons.
In recent years, dental practices across the country began offering cosmetic procedures including botox and dermal fillers, with the Dental Council having its own code of conduct for the area, which was updated in 2023. The Irish Examiner survey shows that while one in seven of the surveyed women were aware of dentists offering cosmetic procedures, just one in 10 knew GPs also offered such services.
Dublin-based aesthetic medicine practitioner Eithne Brenner has been a doctor for 36 years, including 25 years as a GP. She diverted her focus to aesthetic medicine in 2007 and says that her clients are mainly women in the over 45 category, who are looking for cosmetic work to tackle signs of ageing.
'I do work with lasers improving people's ruddy complexions, doing work that can be very subtle and very effective,' said Dr Brenner.
'The filler side of it is one of the areas where there is still a lot of bad work out there.
I don't see the younger girls at all because they are looking for a bargain in somebody's kitchen.
"I tend to see people 45 or 50 plus who want subtle changes and they are terrified of looking different but they want something. My work is more restorative. The younger girls are going to beauticians and people who are cheaper. They take more risks.
'I have colleagues who do amazing breast reconstruction for somebody who has very heavy, very droopy boobs and pain. In the right hands, surgery can be transformative. But it is about doing research. These are very serious medical procedures.'
Dr Brenner accepts that there is more awareness now of the dangers of unscrupulous people carrying out cosmetic procedures but said: 'There is still a drive for plastic surgery and there is an issue of how do we raise our younger generation to be really careful and know they don't need these things.'
Currently, botox is supposed to be only available through prescription, under the administration of qualified doctors and dentists.
However, as seizures conducted by the Health Products Regulatory Authority show, there is a thriving market for counterfeit and illegal versions in Ireland. Last year, 1,709 units of fake or illegal products claiming to contain botulinum toxin were seized, compared with just 26 in 2020.
Unlike botox, dermal filler is not yet subjected to stringent regulations, meaning that it can be administered in unsafe settings and environments.
Legislation delayed
Legislation mooted in 2016 still has not been enacted for governing the area of cosmetic procedures. The Patient Safety (Licensing) Bill was approved by the then government in 2017 and subsequently underwent pre-legislative scrutiny. It was then referred to the Office of the Attorney General for drafting.
In March, in answer to a parliamentary question, health minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill said the legislation remained with the AG's office and that her department continues to work on it. She said it will, for the first time, 'introduce a licensing requirement for all hospitals, public and private, and certain designated high-risk activities in the community'.
The general scheme of the bill outlines that 'designated activities are likely to initially relate to cosmetic surgery services but other services may be added over time as the licensing system becomes embedded in the health system'.
Social Democrats health spokesman Pádraig Rice called the delay in progressing the bill unacceptable.
'It's almost eight years since the draft legislation received government approval, and yet there is no sign of the final bill,' said Mr Rice. 'In that time, there has been an exponential increase in demand for unregulated cosmetic procedures. Until Hiqa has the necessary accreditation, inspection, and enforcement powers, patients will continue to fall into the hands of unqualified practitioners.'
Almost half of women who opted for cosmetic treatments such as botox or anti-wrinkle injections did it to boost their confidence, and the desire to roll back the years was also evident in the responses, the IPsos B&A survey found.
Last week in the UK, the Health Security Agency (UKHSA) revealed that 14 people from Co Durham and Darlington had experienced 'adverse reactions' including eye drooping and double vision following a procedure involving 'botulinum toxin' injections.
Of those, 10 people required treatment as a result.
The County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust said that investigations were ongoing 'but evidence so far does not suggest that the product used has been contaminated' and that 'symptoms are being reported a few weeks after injection'.
It added: 'UKHSA has issued advice to clinicians to ensure that they look out for botulism in people who may have had a recent aesthetic procedure in order to provide them appropriate treatment which includes giving anti-toxin.'
Meanwhile, a public health notice was issued in the past 10 days by the UKHSA asking clients of an aesthetics company in Wolverhampton who received 'vampire facials' to contact it to arrange free blood tests, due to concerns about the risk of bloodborne viruses including hepatitis. The notice said that 'inadequate cleaning of equipment used for this treatment at the clinic' had been identified as 'a risk to health'.
Dr Brenner is adamant that progress needs to be made on the planned Irish legislation and cites the recent UK cases as examples of why there needs to be regulation of the sector.
'Botox is a prescription-only medicine so you have to see a doctor or dentist for a consultation to make sure you are suitable,' she said. 'But there is absolute widespread fraud and illegal use among non-medical staff and we do know there is illegal product coming into the country.
When we get into fillers, it is even more Wild West. They are not counted as a medicine at all, they are counted as a medical device, a bit like a bandage.
"So you could legally go onto any website, buy filler, and inject one of your friends and you are technically not breaking the law. There are good quality products but there is also a tonne of cheap stuff.'
She said that people opting to buy bargain filler products online have no concept of 'cleanliness, hygiene, safety, anatomy'.
Unscrupulous use of filler products can lead to strokes or other health implications such as scarring and loss of tissue, she added.
'It has been really trivialised. It has become like a commodity like getting your hair done. I do think in the 40 plus age group, they are more cautious and more nervous of looking overdone and they are the people who come to a medical person.
"But the younger ones are very bargain-led, which you can understand, but that is where there is a safety issue. And you have people doing what are major surgical procedures and all that kinds of crazy things in filthy conditions.
'There was a death last year of a mum of five in the UK who died from having a litre of filler injected into each buttock.'
Dr Brenner said that botox parties are not the right location for such a procedure.
People could be on medications that they might not disclose in a public setting at a party. It is not conducive to cleanliness or confidentiality.'
A spokesperson for the Department of Health told the Irish Examiner: 'The general scheme of the Patient Safety (Licensing) Bill was approved by government on December 12, 2017. It underwent pre-legislative scrutiny at the Oireachtas joint committee of health on June 13, 2018, was subsequently referred to the Attorney General's Office for drafting.
'Legislative priority was given to the Patient Safety (Notifiable Incidents and Open Disclosure) Act 2023 which was commenced in September 2024.
'A decision is now being sought from the Government to recommence drafting of the Patient Safety (Licensing) Bill. A memo for Government will be considered at Cabinet shortly.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court hears nurse raised concerns that flow of oxygen at low level for first 11 minutes of baby's life
Court hears nurse raised concerns that flow of oxygen at low level for first 11 minutes of baby's life

Irish Times

time8 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Court hears nurse raised concerns that flow of oxygen at low level for first 11 minutes of baby's life

A nurse who was involved in the resuscitation of a baby who died five days later has said she was 'extremely concerned' after finding that oxygen flow through respiratory equipment used was initially at a low level. A sitting of Dublin District Coroner's Court heard on Wednesday that nurse Elaine Sheehy raised concerns that the flow of oxygen was at a low level for the first 11 minutes of Aaron Cullen's life. Ms Sheehy, who resigned from her post at the Midland Regional Hospital Portlaoise in October 2016 and took up a post elsewhere, was on duty at the Special Care Baby Unit when she was asked to urgently attend resuscitation efforts. Aaron had been born by emergency Caesarean section on May 4th, 2016, at 35 weeks gestation. The inquest heard he was 'extraordinarily' unwell after his birth and was 'gasping' for breath, witnesses said. READ MORE He suffered from severe persistent pulmonary hypertension, a condition in which a baby fails to transition from antenatal circulation. Two attempts to intubate him after birth by a paediatric registrar were unsuccessful. Between attempts, a Neopuff resuscitator was used in an effort to pump his lungs. Aaron was 11 minutes old by the time Ms Sheehy arrived, she said, recalling the mask being used to ventilate him being too large, as it was for full-term babies. It was then switched to a preterm mask, which was readily available in the room, to ensure an airtight seal so no gas could escape. Ms Sheehy further recalled being 'extremely upset and concerned' at the fact that she had to increase the oxygen flow of the Neopuff used during resuscitation. Although she could not be certain, she said she either had to turn on the flow of gas providing oxygen entirely or she at least needed to it turn up to recommended levels. Ms Sheehy, who became visibly upset while giving evidence, said she found the fact that she had to adjust the flow 'very upsetting'. While Prof Colm O'Donnell, a consultant neonatologist and expert witness who reviewed the case for the coroner, said he could not definitively say whether or not the Neopuff gas flow was turned on, it was his opinion that it was. He cited several staff being in attendance before Ms Sheehy arrived, saying they reported checking the equipment before Aaron's delivery. He also noted that although Aaron did not breathe spontaneously, his heart rate increased from less than 60bpm to over 100bpm, which indicated the machine had some effect. Prof O'Donnell said Aaron's lungs were 'very poorly compliant', adding that it would have been 'extremely difficult' to aerate his lungs during mask ventilation as opposed to intubation, which the inquest heard was not achieved until 21 minutes after his birth. While sooner intubation would have allowed for an immediate and better supply of oxygen, he did not believe this, or a proper fitting mask from the beginning, would have changed the outcome. Ms Sheehy disclosed concerns to the hospital's interim director of midwifery, Maureen Revilles, after learning of Aaron's death, which took place at the Coombe hospital on May 9th. Ms Revilles, who said she expected Ms Sheehy to be a witness at Aaron's initial inquest due to the disclosure, insisted that she said she had to turn on the machine. This was later 'revised' to her having to turn up the flow, she said. Evidence concerning Ms Sheehy's concerns was not made available to coroner Dr Myra Cullinane at the time of the original inquest, which returned a narrative verdict. The evidence was secured by his mother, Claire Cullen, through Freedom of Information requests, prompting a fresh inquiry. An inquest verdict is due to be returned on Thursday.

Public warned to avoid e-cigarettes from two brands after EU health alert
Public warned to avoid e-cigarettes from two brands after EU health alert

Irish Times

time12 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Public warned to avoid e-cigarettes from two brands after EU health alert

The HSE's National Environmental Health Service (NEHS) is warning the public to stop using e-cigarettes from two differentbrands as they are wrongly labelled as containing no nicotine. The products, for which European Safety Alerts have been issued, were found to contain nicotine at concentrations up to 30 mg/ml, following analysis by the State Laboratory. The products involved are: McKesse MK Bar 700, blueberry, blackcurrant mango and blueberry pear flavours; and Bank Box 18000 Puffs, watermelon ice, strawberry watermelon and blueberry ice flavours. People can return them to the shop where they were bought and retailers have been asked to stop selling them. READ MORE HSE principal environmental health officer Margaret Ruddy said: 'In response to finding non-compliant and unsafe products on the Irish market, the HSE National Environmental Health Service will continue to exercise its full legal powers to protect public health, this includes product seizure, product destruction and prosecutions. 'Retailers should be checking both the products themselves and their suppliers' details before selling them on to consumers.' Retailers who sold or distributed the products have been told to display a recall notice on their premises or on social media.

HSE chief tells Oireachtas group that ‘we took our eye off the ball'
HSE chief tells Oireachtas group that ‘we took our eye off the ball'

Irish Times

time15 hours ago

  • Irish Times

HSE chief tells Oireachtas group that ‘we took our eye off the ball'

'We took our eye off the ball', the head of the HSE Bernard Gloster acknowledged as he sought to explain how the practice known as third-party insourcing had expanded into a multimillion euro industry living inside the public hospital system. A report he had drawn up for Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill revealed that in 27 months to the end of March this year, close to €100 million had been paid out on engaging external companies that use HSE-owned facilities and equipment after normal working hours – in many cases employing existing health service staff – to reduce public waiting lists. The report reveals 83 serving or former health staff are acting as directors in 148 companies providing what are known as insourcing and outsourcing – another system which involves buying care in outside private facilities – arrangements to reduce waiting lists. It says 23 of these company directors are employed by the HSE. READ MORE Gloster told the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Health that over two decades insourcing arrangements had grown from 'a small localised thing' to a level where the health system was now overly dependent on it. 'People saw opportunities, entrepreneurially,' he said, although he stressed there was nothing unlawful about being a company director. He defined insourcing as the practice of engaging external companies or third-party providers to deliver services, often outside of normal working hours, using HSE-owned facilities and equipment. 'In many cases, these providers may employ or subcontract staff who are already directly employed by the HSE, effectively re-engaging internal staff through a separate commercial arrangement, typically at premium rates.' The availability of such premium payments for working for insourcing companies, the HSE chief acknowledged, also made regular overtime less attractive. Gloster told Fianna Fáil TD Martin Daly that the focus of hospitals in embracing insourcing had been a rush to do the right thing and reduce waiting lists. However, he argued that the effective governance of insourcing arrangements became 'quite questionable'. Over recent weeks, there have been significant controversies surrounding insourcing arrangements at Children's Health Ireland, Beaumont Hospital and – the public was told for the first time on Wednesday – at Naas General Hospital . Internal auditors have been sent into Naas to look at concerns over the use of National Treatment Purchase Fund financing. Gloster concluded, following his analysis of the scale of insourcing, that it was now time to wind down the whole process. He has recommended to the Minister that insourcing should end by June 30th, 2026. It cannot be shelved immediately as this would leave patients relying on such services in the lurch. But in the meantime, new controls and safeguards will be introduced. Gloster's plan is for the regular health service to carry out the work previously carried out by insourcing, using new, more flexible rosters now agreed with hospital consultants and other healthcare staff. But he warned that if a gap remains, it will have to be filled by sending more public patients to be treated in private hospitals. Ultimately, Carroll MacNeill is expected to decide on whether to call a halt to the insourcing train – which would appear to generate close to €50 million per year for those on board – by the end of July. However, the investigations into allegations of concern at Children's Health Ireland , Beaumont and now Naas arising from insourcing arrangements will likely run a lot longer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store