logo
Treaty 8 First Nations call for 2% resource revenues from projects on their land

Treaty 8 First Nations call for 2% resource revenues from projects on their land

CBC2 days ago

Treaty 8 First Nations chiefs in Alberta are calling for a two-per-cent share of royalties from projects that develop resources from their land.
The chiefs met with Premier Danielle Smith in Calgary on Thursday to raise various concerns, including revenue sharing. Trevor Mercredi, grand Chief of the Treaty 8 First Nations of Alberta, said the meeting was urgently needed due to speed with which legislation is moving that could lead to major projects affecting Treaty 8 communities.
"There has to be some sort of a relationship developed between Alberta and the nations, so we can move forward with some of these projects in a good way for our people," said Mercredi.
"We're not looking for a handout, we're not looking for the province to come take care of our people, we don't need the province to take care of our people. We need our own people to serve and take care of our people"
The meeting came on the same day that Bill C-5, Prime Minister Mark Carney's 'nation-building' projects bill, was passed by the Senate unamended. The legislation allows the prime minister's cabinet to streamline approvals for some projects that have the potential to boost the Canadian economy.
But the bill has received criticism from some, including Mercredi, for the possibility it could lead to insufficient consultation with Indigenous peoples.
Mercredi said resource revenue sharing is how his community can better support itself through funding education and health services, especially due to how profitable drawing resources from within Treaty 8 land, in northern Alberta, has been for the province.
"You hear Premier Smith and all of the others talk about the millions and billions and trillions coming out of Alberta. That's from our backyards," Mercredi said.
"Every day, we have industry and the province coming into our nations with hat in hand, looking for projects. It's not the other way around."
Smith said the provincial government is looking for ways to ensure all First Nations in Alberta receive revenue from natural resources within the province. But instead of royalties, Smith said she believes this should be accomplished through equity.
She pointed to the Alberta Indigenous Opportunities Corporation as an example. It's set up to facilitate investment by Indigenous groups in natural resource, agriculture, telecommunication and transportation projects.
"Those are the kinds of things that will deliver the long-term revenue streams that I think that they're looking for," Smith said.
"We share the aspiration, we just have a different way of supporting it."
A seat at the table on emergency management
Treaty 8 First Nations of Alberta rejected Alberta's attempts to "assert jurisdiction through legislation like the Sovereignty Act," according to a statement the organization issued Thursday. It called for a formal recognition of Treaty 8 governance as a government-to-Nation partner.
Thursday's meeting also saw First Nations chiefs raise emergency management as an issue to the province, Mercredi said. He specifically pointed to a need to reinforce fire-suppression services, as Alberta contends with destructive wildfire seasons each summer.
More broadly, Mercredi said the group wants more input with the province about responding to crises, to find long-term solutions to problems First Nations groups in Alberta face each year.
"It's a new world we live in. Alberta's on fire, and Alberta's been on fire for the last five or six years," he said.
"Our people are really traumatized, our people are being removed, our nations are always looking at the smoke, the lightning. It's very concerning and Alberta has to pick up on their services when it comes to fire."
He added that he believes Smith was receptive to the issues his group raised Thursday, but for too long, First Nations groups haven't had a sufficient seat at the table in these negotiations.
Smith will meet with the group again in August in Treaty 8 territory.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alberta's proposed care-first auto insurance could add $136 in annual premiums: report
Alberta's proposed care-first auto insurance could add $136 in annual premiums: report

Calgary Herald

timean hour ago

  • Calgary Herald

Alberta's proposed care-first auto insurance could add $136 in annual premiums: report

A new analysis by MNP consulting firm found Alberta's proposed care-first auto insurance system may not deliver on the $400 savings as promised. Article content Premier Danielle Smith in November of last year announced the province will overhaul the auto insurance system in 2027 to a no-fault system boasting lower premiums, the country's most generous benefits package while maintaining a right-to-sue. Article content Article content Article content The estimated cost of tort-access as proposed in the model could add up to $218 annually to premiums, while limiting the ability to sue to a select set of Criminal Code and Traffic Safety Act provisions as well as economic losses higher than the coverage limits could still cost drivers an extra $136 in annual premiums. Article content 'And when you add in the increased cost of tariffs, other inflationary pressures which can't be accounted for today due to the rate cap, it's becoming increasingly unlikely that drivers are going to see savings when the care-first model is adopted,' Aaron Sutherland, IBC's vice-president for Western and Pacific Canada said. Article content Article content Under the new model, car accident victims would be paid by their own insurers at compensation rates set by the government, instead of suing parties responsible for injury. Article content Article content In November, Smith said the changes would minimize costs and time lost in legal claims and prioritize care for accident victims. Article content The province has modelled its system on those seen in B.C, Saskatchewan and Manitoba — but those systems have 'eliminated the right to sue,' Sutherland said. 'Having pulled those costs out, they've used those to expand the benefits people get to recover and improve the price they're paying.' Article content The report stated the province based its savings estimates on adopting Manitoba's model, wherein drivers can only sue for property damage. 'Alberta, it sounds like, isn't going to be pulling out the ability to sue to the same degree and that means that those cost savings simply won't be there,' Sutherland said. Allowing for tort access to recoup any losses income that exceed coverage limits would result in a four-to-nine per cent increase in driver premiums, the report stated. For traffic and criminal code violations, the more flexible the tort access, the higher the premiums. Until the new system is launched, insurers will be able to raise the rates for good drivers up to 7.5 per cent each year, which includes a 2.5 per cent rider to cover costs for natural disasters like hail storms and wildfires. IBC: Rate-cap stifling competition The rate cap, according to Sutherland, impedes an insurer's ability to compensate for rising costs, innovate and remain in healthy market competition. 'It's driving competition away,' he said. 'It's not improving affordability. For many drivers, if they've got to find a new insurer, they're actually seeing their price grow quite dramatically.' The province, he added, is yet to reveal any details of what the system is set to look like when it comes to fruition, which makes analyzing any actual outcomes difficult and uncertain. 'There's still much that remains to be seen,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store