
Govt dreaming of building concrete cities and urban jungles over fertile land: KMM
Addressing the media, KMM coordinator Sarwan Singh Pandher said, 'Following the central government's model, the state government is trying to benefit corporate interests by dreaming of building concrete cities and urban jungles over Punjab's fertile land, a move that will be firmly resisted.'
Questioning the government's 'intention,' Pandher said, 'There is no data on demand for housing colonies, yet Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann-led state government, under pressure from Delhi-based lobbies, is aggressively pursuing a policy that threatens to displace entire villages.'
'Government representatives cite examples from Dubai and other countries, but those nations built structures on barren land, and not on fertile lands that produce three to four crops a year,' Pandher said.
Pandher emphasised that the policy 'isn't just harmful to farmers, but it would also affect farm labourers, small shopkeepers, commission agents (arhtiyas), and middle-class traders'.
Terming the government's claim that 'land won't be forcibly acquired false, Pandher read out a clause in the policy, purportedly reading 'if landowners on both sides of a plot agree to pooling, the landowner in between could lose his land even without consent under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act'.
Criticising the 'cost-sharing clause' in the land pooling policy, Pandher said, 'The policy mandates landowners to bear 60 per cent of the development cost, while the development authority pays 40 per cent.'
Referring to Cabinet Minister for Revenue, Rehabilitation and Disaster Management, Water Supply & Sanitation and Housing and Urban Development Hardeep Mundian's remarks that 'land with bank loans will have the debt transferred to the allotted plots,' Pandher questioned, 'If the farmer no longer owns cultivable land, how will they repay those loans?'
The KMM coordinator accused the government of 'trying to grab land under the guise of generous offers like Rs 1 lakh annual lease payments', calling it 'unrealistic'.
'How will a government struggling financially afford Rs 650 crore annually for 65,000 acres?' he asked.
Referring to the statements of the Punjab CM and other Cabinet ministers that the Opposition was 'misleading farmers,' Pandher said, 'We are not illiterates…the time has changed now and everyone can read the policy and understand its pros and cons… farmers know what is good or bad for them. Rather, the government is misleading the public.'
Pandher also questioned the August 4 deadline provided to landowners to file objections, and warned, 'There is no clear recourse whether the farmers' objections will be rejected during the hearings.'
Calling upon the farmer and labourer organisations in Punjab to set aside differences and fight the land pooling policy unitedly, Pandher announced full support for the Samyukta Kisan Morcha's (SKM) tractor march on July 30, and appealed to the public to actively support all such united efforts.
BKU (Krantikari) president Surjit Singh Phool said, 'The promise of 'affordable housing' is hollow. At the current government rate, a five marla plot will cost Rs 45 to Rs 50 lakh, making it unaffordable even for the middle class. So, who will buy plots in these government-developed colonies? The real motive behind the policy is to seize land and lease it to corporate houses for large-scale corporate farming on the pretext of urban development. That's why the policy targets highly fertile land close to highways.'
BKU (Azad) president Jaswinder Singh Longowal said, 'Thousands of colonies already exist around New Chandigarh, Ludhiana, Jalandhar, Amritsar, Mohali and Phagwara. Why don't the government regularise those colonies first instead of setting up new colonies?'
Leaders who submitted the memorandums at various locations are Sukhwinder Singh Sabhra (Kisan Mazdoor Sangharsh Committee), Omkar Singh Bhangala (Kisan Mazdoor Hitkari Sabha), Malkeet Singh Gulamiwala (Kisan Mazdoor Morcha, Punjab), Dilbag Singh Gill (Bhartiya Kisan Mazdoor Union), Manjeet Singh Rai (BKU, Doaba), Jang Singh Bhateri (BKU, Bhateri), Balwant Singh Behramke and Guramneet Singh Mangat (BKU, Behramke), and several others.
The major demands in the memorandums included, among others, compensation for property and items lost during the forced dismantling of protest sites at the Shambhu and Khanauri borders; complete waiver of farmers' and labourers' loans; the passage of a Minimum Support Price (MSP) Guarantee Act in the Punjab Assembly and pressing the central government to implement it and few other demands.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Deesa fire tragedy: Kin move SC, seek Rs 2 crore compensation per victim, probe outside Gujarat
The family members of the April 1 Deesa fire tragedy — during which at least 21 workers, including seven children, were killed and six others were injured after a blast, involving a massive blaze, destroyed a firecracker warehouse — have moved the Supreme Court seeking a compensation of Rs 2 crore per victim and also directions to transfer the case probe to police officers from outside Gujarat. While moving the top court, the victims' kin mentioned the infringement of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees 'protection of life and personal liberty'. The Supreme Court has issued notice to the respondents, including the Chief Secretary of Gujarat, returnable on September 26. The Supreme Court Division Bench of Justice Surya Kant, Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh issued the notice to the respondents on July 31, after admitting the petition filed by Chandar Singh Nayak, from Madhya Pradesh's Devas village, who works as a labourer in Ahmedabad, and has lost six family members in the tragedy. The State of Gujarat, through the Chief Secretary as well as the Home Secretary as well as the Regional Fire Officer of Gandhinagar, District Collector of Banaskantha and the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Deesa are respondents to Nayak's petition before the SC. On April 1, when a fire broke out in the illegal firecracker manufacturing facility, comprising six warehouses in Deesa, Nayak lost his daughter, son-in-law, siblings of son-in-law, and mother-in-law of his deceased daughter in the incident. In his petition, filed through Advocate Utkarsh Dave, Nayak has informed the court that the firecracker warehouse ran without proper licensing, sale permissions, fire safety equipment and regulatory insights. 'A majority of the deceased migrant workers, who were brought by the warehouse owners from the neighbouring state of Madhya Pradesh, worked in the firecracker factory without any formal contract, with no or minimal safety measures and equipment,' the petition states, enlisting four similar incidents that have occurred in Gujarat since 2023, including the April 20, 2023 blaze in a firecracker factory in Aravalli, in which four labourers were killed as well as a fire in Bapunagar godown storing firecrackers without permission in Ahmedabad on May 10, 2023, that caused injuries to some persons. The petition also lists the death of two persons in a blast in a firecracker factory in Ahmedabad's Vanch on April 21, 2024 that killed two as well as the May 25, 2024 Rajkot TRP gaming zone fire. 'Several persons lost their lives and many others suffered serious injuries to their person and property in these incidents due to the repeated failure of the State authorities who failed to keep a check on these illegal activities and, therefore, are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation to the kin of the victims and injured persons… In such cases, the state must see that the victims do not remain in the constant state of suffering and despair…' the petition states. Seeking a higher compensation of Rs 2 crore each for the families of the deceased victims and Rs 50 lakh to the injured victims, the petition states, 'It is submitted that the Central Government and the State Governments of Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh announced paltry compensation amounts of Rs 2 lakh, Rs 4 lakh, and Rs 2 lakh respectively to the next of kin of the deceased persons and Rs 50,000/- each for the injured by overlooking the fact that a majority of the victims were the sole bread earners of their respective families…' The petition seeks 'directions' for the state government to 'immediately locate and carry out an inspection of all the firecracker manufacturing units in the State of Gujarat in respect of compliance with applicable fire safety norms' under prevailing laws.' Advocate Dave said that the petition seeks investigation into the role of the state officials, who have 'shown extreme administrative lethargy and even complicity despite judicial interventions'. Dave said, 'Gujarat has seen several tragedies in the past that have caused loss of lives due to negligence of authorities and repeated failure of the officials working in state government. Our petition is seeking that the amount of compensation should be enhanced, which can bring a life of dignity to the kin of the victims, if not closure in the matter… In the specific case of Deesa, we have sought that the investigation should be conducted by officers from outside the state of Gujarat so that the state government officers responsible for the tragedy are not given scope to escape the law. A total of 21 people had lost their lives in the tragedy. The warehouse owners were illegally manufacturing fireworks in the said premises. An FIR was lodged in the case in Deesa Rural police station.


United News of India
22 minutes ago
- United News of India
SC issues notice on challenge to section 9 of Citizenship Act over automatic termination of Indian citizenship
New Delhi, Aug 4 (UNI) The Supreme Court today issued notice on a plea challenging the constitutional validity of Section 9 of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which provides for the automatic termination of Indian citizenship upon the voluntary acquisition of foreign citizenship. A Bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi tagged the matter with a pending case, Dr Radhika Thappeta v. Union of India, which raises a similar issue concerning revocation of Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) status. The Court also issued notice on an interim application filed by the petitioner seeking protection from being required to renounce Indian citizenship in order to acquire foreign citizenship, while the constitutional challenge to Section 9 is under consideration. The petition was filed by Sanjay Gundlagutta Reddy, a US-based Economics professor of Indian origin, who, despite living in New York for several years, continues to identify as an Indian citizen. He argues that Section 9(1) is arbitrary, disproportionate, and violates fundamental constitutional rights, particularly the right to equality and personal liberty. During the hearing, Justice Surya Kant initially questioned the petitioner's counsel Advocate Warisha Farasat, asking, 'You are an eminent person. But what grievance is there…if you are so keen for Indian citizenship, you surrender the foreign citizenship and get the Indian one?' However, after hearing her submissions including reference to a previous case where the Supreme Court had granted interim relief on similar grounds the Bench agreed to issue notice and listed the matter for hearing after two weeks. Key arguments in the Petition are that Section 9 imposes a 'Hobson's choice' on Indians abroad, either acquire foreign citizenship and lose Indian nationality or retain Indian citizenship at great personal and professional cost. It fails to consider the global mobility and dual loyalty of Indian-origin individuals who maintain cultural and emotional ties with India The provision does not offer any discretionary or adjudicatory mechanism, resulting in automatic cessation of citizenship. The petitioner highlights that non-citizens globally face precarious legal status, with risks of deportation and limited access to rights. The petition, filed through Advocate-on-Record Yashwant Singh, seeks a reconsideration of India's citizenship framework to better align with contemporary realities of global Indian diaspora. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for Indian-origin individuals across the world, particularly in how India defines and regulates its citizenship laws in a globalized era. UNI SNG RN


Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Tree Funeral March: AAP protests irregularities in tree cutting in Pune
In a unique show of protest, the Adam Aadmi Party (AAP) organised a symbolic 'Tree Funeral March' on Monday to raise concerns about alleged illegal tree cutting and the lack of transparency in the tree permission process in Pune. The march, featuring participants carrying cut tree branches and saplings wrapped in white cloth, akin to dead bodies, began from JM Road and concluded at the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) headquarters. AAP leaders and volunteers accused PMC and other authorities of turning a blind eye to rampant tree felling across the city. 'Between April 2022 and December 2023 alone, official data accessed through the RTI Act shows that permissions were granted to cut 10,502 trees and transplant 11,860 trees,' the party stated in its press release. While agencies were mandated to plant 3.4 lakh compensatory trees and deposited a total of Rs 22.5 crore for the same, AAP alleged that there is no credible or publicly accessible record to confirm whether these plantations have actually taken place. 'The Tree Authority is functioning in a non-transparent manner. Citizens are left in the dark about how decisions are made, where compensatory plantations happen, or if they survive,' said one of the party volunteers during the protest. The party has demanded an immediate halt to illegal tree cutting, a complete audit of past permissions, and the creation of a publicly monitored dashboard to track compensatory plantations.