World's most hated country is China, second place is taken by..., India, Pakistan at...
Most Hated Countries in World: The world has become a global village, but along with this, hatred and distrust towards countries has also increased rapidly. Recently, based on a report by World Population Review, a map has been released by Newsweek, which tells which countries the world hates the most.
Surprisingly, China ranks first in this list, not Pakistan or Iran or Iraq. India too sadly has a place in the list but at 10th.
China ranks first in this list. The reason for this is serious issues like dictatorial rule, censorship, environmental damage and treatment of Uighur Muslims. Apart from this, China's strict policy regarding the independence of Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau has also damaged its image globally.
US and Russia also on list
US is at number two in this list. Globally, its 'superpower' mentality, obsession with weapons and its interfering attitude at times make it an object of hatred. Russia is at number three in this ranking, which has faced severe criticism due to the Ukraine war and sanctions on democratic rights.
This top 10 list also includes countries like North Korea, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel. The reason for hatred against them is dictatorial rule, religious fanaticism, military conflict and human rights violations. Israel has been targeted due to the Palestine dispute, while Pakistan has been targeted for internal instability and fanaticism.
North Korea
With a tightly controlled dictatorship, harsh punishments and an isolated, militarized stance, North Korea continues to inspire fear and rejection around the world.
Israel
The long-running conflict with Palestine and controversial military operations have kept Israel in the headlines for the wrong reasons, prompting protests and opposition from several countries and international organisations.
Pakistan
Islamabad ongoing internal instability, religious extremism, and tense international relations, particularly with India and Afghanistan, contribute to Pakistan's placement on the list.
Iran
Iran's tense relations with Western countries, crackdown on civil liberties and its involvement in proxy wars in the Middle East have put it under harsh global scrutiny.
Iraq
Years after reconstruction, Iraq is still associated with violence, instability and internal conflict, which shapes its international image.
Syria
Years of brutal civil war, government repression and humanitarian crisis have made Syria one of the countries with the worst reputation worldwide.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Starmer says U.K. will recognize Palestinian state unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Tuesday (July 29, 2025) the U.K. will recognize a Palestinian state in September – unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza and takes steps toward long-term peace. Mr. Starmer called ministers together for a rare summertime Cabinet meeting to discuss the situation in Gaza. He told them that Britain will recognize a state of Palestine before the United Nations General Assembly, 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, reaches a ceasefire, makes clear there will be no annexation in the West Bank, and commits to a long-term peace process that delivers a two state solution." Britain has long supported the idea of an independent Palestinian state existing alongside Israel, but has said recognition should come as part of a negotiated two-state solution to the conflict. Pressure to formally recognize Palestinian statehood has mounted since French President Emmanuel Macron announced that his country will become the first major Western power to recognize a Palestinian state in September.
New Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Starmer says UK will recognize Palestinian state unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire
LONDON: Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday the U.K. will recognize a Palestinian state in September – unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza and takes steps toward long-term peace. Starmer called ministers together for a rare summertime Cabinet meeting to discuss the situation in Gaza. He told them that Britain will recognize a state of Palestine before the United Nations General Assembly, 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, reaches a ceasefire, makes clear there will be no annexation in the West Bank, and commits to a long-term peace process that delivers a two state solution." Britain has long supported the idea of an independent Palestinian state existing alongside Israel, but has said recognition should come as part of a negotiated two-state solution to the conflict. Pressure to formally recognize Palestinian statehood has mounted since French President Emmanuel Macron announced that his country will become the first major Western power to recognize a Palestinian state in September.
NDTV
24 minutes ago
- NDTV
Counter View: A Clarification On Iran's Strategic Path And Historical Resolve
The recently published article "Snapback to Reality: On Iran's 45-Year Slog to Nowhere" presents a perspective that, while rhetorically polished, fundamentally misrepresents Iran's history, identity, and strategic choices. The Islamic Republic of Iran welcomes open discussion and diverse opinions. But narratives built on selective memory, historical erasure, and one-sided judgment do not advance peace or understanding-they reinforce entrenched injustice. The author alleges that Iran's so-called misguided policies and what he describes as "Entrenched Animosity" toward the United States and Israel are the root causes of its challenges. He claims that these policies have brought Iran into a state of crisis and isolation. According to the author, Iran must abandon its confrontational policies and transform into a "normal" actor on the international stage; otherwise, he warns, a bleak future awaits the country. He further asserts that the United States and its Western allies are prepared to invest in Iran and facilitate its transformation into a prosperous and developed nation-provided that Iran relinquishes its nuclear capabilities. Accordingly, this Embassy considers it its legitimate right and responsibility, in the interest of enlightening public opinion, to provide the following clarifications: 1. Iran's Revolution: A Demand for Dignity, Not Just Defiance The 1979 Islamic Revolution was not born out of blind hatred or ideological stubbornness. It was the collective awakening of a nation long subjected to foreign domination, coups, imposed monarchies, and the plundering of national wealth. The slogans heard then-and now-reflect a deep historical memory. They are not simply about America or Israel Per Se, but about resisting colonial arrogance, military aggression, and decades of betrayal. Unlike what the article suggests, Iran does not define itself by enmity. It defines itself by independence, sovereignty, and the pursuit of justice in a region scarred by wars, occupations, and externally backed dictatorships. The question is not why Iran resists, but why others feel entitled to demand its submission. 2. On the JCPOA and Western Commitments Iran negotiated and upheld the JCPOA-a deal verified by the International Atomic Energy Agency as fully implemented. It was the United States, under the Trump administration, that unilaterally withdrew and re-imposed sanctions without cause. Suggesting that Iran retaliated by enriching uranium ignores the timeline and the facts. Iran acted within the framework of the deal, and under the mechanisms allowed by it. Today, Iran remains open to balanced, verifiable, and respectful negotiations-but not to intimidation disguised as diplomacy. The "snapback" mechanism, now being brandished as a threat, is an instrument that was only designed to be used in case of non-compliance. Iran's patience and repeated gestures of goodwill, despite being attacked by Israel and economically strangled by illegal sanctions, are evidence of commitment to peaceful resolution. 3. The Real Choice: Not Capitulation, But Balance The article frames Iran's future as a binary between "stubbornness or survival." But realpolitik has never been that simple. Iran is not demanding war. It is demanding fairness. If the West truly wants reconciliation, it must begin by acknowledging its role in the decades of distrust, ending collective punishment through sanctions, and ceasing to judge Iran through the lens of outdated Cold War ideology. 4. Iran's Regional Role: A Stabilising Force, Not a Spoiler While Iran is criticised for supporting allies in the region, few ask why such alliances exist. Iran's support for movements in Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, or Yemen is not imperial ambition-it is resistance against occupation, extremism, and Western-backed militarism. At every turn, Iran has called for dialogue, regional security cooperation, and a nuclear-free Middle East - a call still ignored by those shielding Israel's undeclared arsenal. If Israel strikes Iranian scientists and sovereign facilities with impunity, and then plays the victim when met with pushback, who truly undermines regional peace? In Closing: A Call for Mutual Respect Iran always welcomed negotiation, provided to be fair and equal and its rights to be respected and no nation should be expected to trade sovereignty for survival. Iran holds the wire-not because it seeks to detonate anything-but because it refuses to be silenced. The choice before the US is to treat Iran as what it is: a sovereign, ancient, capable nation seeking its rightful place in the international system-with respect, not with coercion. Iran doesn't need to be something else. It will remain what it has always been: Iran-independent, proud, and unafraid to choose its own path.
