S. Asia faces prospect of ‘water war'?
World Economic Forum has water challenges under its focus. A paper presented at this forum, way back in October 2018, by Paul Ratner — titled: 'Where will the 'water wars' of the future be fought?' highlighted the five most vulnerable hotspots as the Nile, Ganges-Brahmaputra, Indus, Tigris-Euphrates, and Colorado rivers. The paper paints a disturbing picture of a nearby future where people are fighting over access to water.
Now South Asia is witnessing a 'water war' era where hydro-political issues have flared up between China, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh with China, India, and Pakistan begin constructing dams at unprecedented pace as water sources becoming scarce.
Water scarcity with growing population, climate change, glacier melt, and monsoon unpredictability are intensifying regional dependence on rivers.
China's recent announcement to construct the world's largest hydroelectric power project on the Yarlung Tsangpo (Brahmaputra River's upstream segment in Tibet), estimated to cost USD 170 billion, has attracted reactions from India and Bangladesh, both rely heavily on the Brahmaputra's waters. This megaproject ignites strategic tensions in an already volatile region.
India's concerns are loss of water control, strategic vulnerability and seismic sensitivity. India fears upstream diversion could dry up the Brahmaputra during critical agricultural seasons. India fears that China's strategic control of the headwaters could be a pressure tactic in any future Sino-Indian military standoff.
The Brahmaputra is a trans-boundary river that flows from Tibet into Arunachal Pradesh and Assam (India), then into Bangladesh. The dam in question is to be built at the 'Great Bend,' where the river curves sharply before entering India. This is the most hydrologically and seismic sensitive part.
Bangladesh receives around 70 percent of its freshwater inflow from India; a reduction in Brahmaputra flows due to upstream Chinese control could lead to saline intrusion, crop failure, and food insecurity. Furthermore, Bangladesh and India have unresolved disputes over Teesta River sharing.
China describes the planned dam as a clean energy triumph and considers the concerns of India and Bangladesh as unfounded. It claims the project is for hydropower (not irrigation or large-scale diversion).
India's suspension of Indus Water Treaty (IWT) and its unilateral water control on western rivers belonging to Pakistan (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab) can lead to conflicts if not wars.
China's Brahmaputra Dam could work as a leverage. With China as an upper riparian power on another major South Asian river system, Pakistan can work to diplomatically highlight India's double standards — protesting Chinese upstream control while exercising it over Pakistan downstream.
If India escalates its water weaponization, Pakistan could align more closely with China and even propose regional water negotiations including all key stakeholders — possibly under the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).
China's action serves Pakistan's interest in regionalizing the water discourse, challenging India's long-standing resistance to multilateral water negotiations
At the heart of the matter is water sovereignty and regional power dynamics. With India unilaterally suspending parts of the Indus Waters Treaty after the Pulwama incident and subsequent tensions with Pakistan, the emergence of China as an upper riparian power is now rebalancing the equation — particularly for Pakistan, which may see an unexpected leverage.
War over water? Not yet. But the seeds are sown.
While a literal 'water war' may still be far away, the politicization of rivers is undeniably underway. Asia's great rivers are no longer just lifelines — they are becoming lines of control, lines of contention, and lines of influence.
Unless water is treated as a shared climate asset, not a sovereignty token, this region, which is home to a fifth of the world's population, may soon face a crisis deeper than politics: the crisis of thirst.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
20 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Govt bans land travel for Arbaeen pilgrims
Listen to article The federal government banned the overland travel for pilgrims heading to Iraq for the Arbaeen, citing security concerns in the restive Balochistan province, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi confirmed on Sunday. Naqvi said that the decision had been taken after consultations with the Foreign Ministry, the Balochistan government, and the security agencies, adding that the pilgrims would be allowed to travel to Iraq only by air. Arbaeen, marking the 40th day of mourning after Ashura, sees millions of pilgrims, including thousands from Pakistan, travel to Karbala, Iraq, annually. Traditionally, many Pakistani pilgrims journey by road through Balochistan and Iran. However, due to the deteriorating law and order situation in the province — including increased terrorist attacks by Indian proxy outfits — the government deemed the move necessary for public safety and national security. "After extensive consultations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Balochistan Government, and security agencies, it has been decided that Zaireen will not be allowed to travel to Iraq and Iran by road for Arbaeen this year," Naqvi posted on X. "Zaireen will, however, be able to travel by air. Prime Minister Mian Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif has directed authorities to arrange maximum flights to facilitate their pilgrimage in the coming days," he added. "This difficult decision was taken in the interest of public safety and national security." On the direction of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif for arranging flights to facilitate the pilgrims, the Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) announced four special flights from Karachi between August 8 and 11, with return flights from Najaf scheduled from August 18 to 21. According to a PIA spokesperson the fare has been set at Rs212,000 per person, and the ticket sales had started. He added that more flights could be scheduled if necessary. Officials said passengers traveling by air individually will have to be sponsored by local people, otherwise they cannot enter Iraq. Meanwhile, private airlines have sharply increased fares, with tickets now ranging between Rs300,000 to Rs350,000. Tour operators estimate group travel expenses at $1,400 per pilgrim, compared to just $550 for land travel. This has raised fears that tens of thousands of low-income pilgrims might be unable to afford the journey. Salars — pilgrim group leaders — argue that the ban that has been announced just 15 days before Arbaeen has caused significant financial losses. They said that many people had already made advance payments for visas, vehicle certifications, and hotel bookings. They demanded that the government allowed supervised bus convoys under security agencies' protection or provide alternative transport arrangements. "This loss isn't borne by the rich but by the poor," a pilgrimage organiser told The Express Tribune on condition of anonymously. He questioned why the ban wasn't announced earlier during a recent trilateral meeting between Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq, where travel restrictions were discussed. During a meeting with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Naqvi briefed him on Balochistan's security situation and the new pilgrim policy. The prime minister directed for the initiation of the Gwadar Safe City project to enhance security in the region. Naqvi emphasised the need for better pilgrim management. Starting next year, he said, the pilgrims will only be allowed to travel under officially registered group organisers, with special embassy-issued visas required for independent travel. This system aims to curb illegal travel and overstaying issues. Meanwhile, Naqvi also visited Quetta and Azad Kashmir. In Quetta, he paid tribute to martyred soldiers at the Frontier Corps headquarters, praising their sacrifices in maintaining peace. Later, in Muzaffarabad, he met the family of Major Rab Nawaz, a martyred officer, and offered condolences.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Saif-led KP team arrives in Beijing
PESHAWAR: A 12-member Pakistani delegation led by Advisor to KP CM on Information, Barrister Dr. Muhammad Ali Saif, arrived in Beijing on Sunday following visits to Urumqi and Kashgar. The delegation comprises prominent religious scholars, academics, and political figures. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs received the group with a warm welcome. During their stay in Beijing, the delegation visited China's first official mosque and held a detailed meeting with the leadership of the Islamic Association of China, including the Chairman and Vice Chairman. The delegation was briefed on the current state of Islamic affairs in China. Officials shared that there are approximately 35,000 mosques, 55,000 imams, and more than a dozen active Islamic centers across the country. Beijing alone hosts 72 mosques. Additionally, the Islamic Association operates eight sub-divisions nationwide and organizes various national-level religious competitions. The briefing also highlighted the availability of Quran and Hadith translations in the Chinese language. It was noted that 10,000 Chinese Muslims performed Hajj this year, and several students are currently pursuing religious education at Al-Azhar University in Egypt. Barrister Dr. Saif expressed gratitude on behalf of Pakistan and termed the visits to Urumqi, Kashgar, and Beijing highly productive. Other delegation members included Mufti Zubair Ashraf Usmani (Vice President, Darul Uloom Karachi), Maulana Abdul Qudoos Muhammadi (Spokesperson, Wifaq-ul-Madaris), Mufti Anwar Shah (Head, Jamia Ahsanul Uloom, Karachi), Haji Muhammad Ibrar (Tablighi Jamaat), Maulana Muhammad Ahmad (Darul Uloom Haqqania) and Syed Shah Faisal (Sadat Movement). The delegation invited Chinese Islamic leaders to visit Pakistan and offered free education, accommodation, and essential facilities for Chinese students in Pakistani religious institutions. They emphasized the importance of strengthening bilateral religious and academic ties and acknowledged the efforts of Israr Madani and the International Research Council for Religious Affairs in facilitating this initiative. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's Minister for Religious Affairs Sahibzada Adnan Qadri and Minister for Social Welfare Syed Qasim Ali Shah praised the visit as a significant step in Pakistan-China relations. Syed Usama Ajmal (Chairman, Pakistan Peace Council) and Syed Shah Faisal also expressed their appreciation to the Chinese government and Islamic Association. Dr. Zia-ul-Haq presented copies of the 'Paigham-e-Pakistan' document to Chinese counterparts, highlighting its message of peace and unity. The Chinese hosts also arranged visits for the delegation to the Great Wall of China, the Forbidden City, and other key historical and cultural sites. The visit concluded with an exchange of souvenirs, marking a meaningful step towards enhanced religious, educational, and cultural cooperation between Pakistan and China. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Working in silos will not do
EDITORIAL: The energy sector's complex web is becoming increasingly difficult to manage as authorities continue to attempt to solve issues in silos, an approach that only complicates the problems. Currently, the Energy Task Force (ETF) and the Power and Petroleum Divisions are developing their own solutions without considering their interconnectivity and interdependence. With the power sector's push, backed by the IMF, captive power plants are being subjected to hefty levies on gas consumption. The objective is to transition industrial consumers to the grid, which is being partially achieved. The logical consequence should have been a higher off-take of RLNG by the power sector, but that is not happening, leaving expensive gas unused, which contributes to the circular debt of gas, excessive pressure on the pipelines, and lower off-take of cheap domestic gas. Reportedly, when the Petroleum Division urged the Power Division to increase its intake of RLNG, the minister replied that it would not commit a grave sin (gunnah-e-kabeera) by violating the economic merit order (EMO). The minister was behaving like a principled man, but such discipline was regrettably found lacking when the levy imposed (at peak rates for the entire day) was even higher than what the IMF had prescribed. The Discos (working under the Power Division) are being blamed for Rs 240 billion of overbilling to poor consumers, who are already paying for the inefficiencies of the government. The minister is silent on this issue that is beginning to become increasingly conspicuous. This selective amnesia does not stop here. The power minister is pushing his petroleum counterpart to review RLNG buying contracts with Qatar, asking to emulate what the Power Division has done with the IPPs. How naïve is it to even suggest this remedy. First, it would be tantamount to openly disregarding the sanctity of sovereign contracts. Second, it tends to advocate and normalise coercive actions that were employed against local IPP owners, a stance that has severely undermined investor confidence. Third, it demands breaking contractual commitments with international investors, despite the Power Division and ETF's own failures — even they could not persuade Chinese IPPs to waive the late payment interest (LPI) on outstanding dues, casting uncertainty over the Rs 1.3 trillion circular debt reduction plan. And the cherry on the top is that EMO that is being termed 'holy' while others are being advised to violate (or revise) sovereign contracts. Not only is buying RLNG from Qatar a necessity, but running RLNG plants to a specific limit is also necessary. It is a problem of double standards and a lack of understanding of the core issues. What the government is required to focus on is why the power demand is falling, as the off-take from the grid is still 11 percent shy of its peak in FY22. The need is to address the issue of solar net metering — where rates should be revised by adjusting solar pricing for new net metering contracts (with no change in existing rates) — has been identified, yet the necessary action has not been taken. The power ministry fears a public backlash over solar net metering, while the public is being cheated by entities under its domain by engaging in overbilling at the same time. Suffice it to say that the direly needed clarity of thought and objectivity in the solutions being proposed are simply missing. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
