Pakistan prequalifies four investors for PIA, greenlights Roosevelt Hotel joint venture deal
Pakistan has been seeking to sell a 51-100 percent stake in the struggling national airline to raise funds and reform cash-draining, state-owned enterprises as envisaged under a $7 billion International Monetary Fund program. It would be the country's first major privatization in nearly two decades.
Among the bidding groups, one is a consortium of major industrial firms Lucky Cement, Hub Power Holdings, Kohat Cement and Metro Ventures. Another is led by investment firm Arif Habib Corp. and includes fertilizer producer Fatima Fertilizer, private education operator The City School, and real estate firm Lake City Holdings. Additionally, Fauji Fertilizer Company, a military-backed conglomerate, and Pakistani airline Airblue, have been approved to bid for PIA.
'The prequalified parties will now proceed to the buy-side due diligence phase — a critical next step in the transparent and competitive privatization process of PIACL,' the privatization commission's statement said.
PIA, once a respected carrier in Asia, has been propped up by taxpayers for decades due to political interference, corruption and inefficiencies. The airline's privatization has repeatedly collapsed amid union resistance, legal hurdles and low investor appetite.
Pakistani state-owned enterprises post annual losses of more than Rs800 billion ($2.87 billion), and when subsidies, grants and other support are included, the burden swells beyond Rs1 trillion ($3.59 billion), Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb told parliament while presenting the budget for fiscal year 2025–26 earlier this month.
PIA has been one of the government's most costly liabilities, which has accumulated over $2.5 billion in losses in roughly a decade and been surviving on repeated bailouts that have weighed heavily on Pakistan's strained budget.
Last month, five consortiums submitted expressions of interest for a 51–100 percent stake in PIA after the government restructured its balance sheet to make the deal more attractive. It also scrapped the sales tax on leased aircraft and is providing limited protection from legal and tax claims. Around 80 percent of the airline's debt has been transferred to the state.
ROOSEVELT HOTEL
Separately, the CCOP approved the transaction structure for Roosevelt Hotel under a 'Joint Venture model with multiple options.'
'This option is aimed at maximizing long-term value for the country, while ensuring flexibility, multiple exit opportunities, and minimizing future fiscal exposure,' the privatization commission said.
How much money the hotel ultimately brings in, and its overall valuation, depends on the type of transaction structure adopted, Privatization Commission Chairman Muhammad Ali told Arab News in an interview last month. If the government formed a joint venture with a private investor, sharing both the risks and future profits, the hotel could be worth four to five times more than its as-is valuation, he said at the time.
'So, depending on what sort of structure you have, how much risk you take, how much effort the government puts in, we can make a lot of money from this asset,' the privatization chief had said.
The Roosevelt, a 1,015-room historic hotel in Midtown Manhattan, has long been one of Pakistan's most prominent but politically sensitive overseas assets. Acquired by Pakistan International Airlines Investment Limited (PIAIL) in 1979, the hotel occupies a full city block on Madison Avenue and 45th Street. Over the past two decades, successive Pakistani governments have floated plans to sell, lease, or redevelop the property, but no proposal has advanced beyond early-stage planning.
Operations at the Roosevelt were suspended in 2020 following steep financial losses during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2023, Pakistan entered a short-term lease with the City of New York to use the property as a temporary shelter for asylum seekers, generating more than $220 million in projected rental income. That agreement ended in 2024 and no new revenue stream has since been announced.
The Roosevelt Hotel is one of several state assets the government hopes will contribute to its target of raising Rs86 billion ($306 million) in privatization proceeds during the fiscal year starting July 1, alongside the sale of PIA and three electricity distribution companies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Imran Khan's sons to lobby US, march in Pakistan in new protest movement — sister
ISLAMABAD: Former prime minister Imran Khan's sons, Sulaiman Khan and Kasim Khan, will lobby in the United States (US) about Pakistan's human rights record before traveling to the South Asian country to join a protest movement by their father's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, Khan's sister announced on Tuesday. The PTI last week announced it would launch a nationwide protest movement against the government after the Islamic month of Muharram, days after Pakistan's top court denied the party reserved parliamentary seats for minorities and women. Khan's party has frequently held protests in recent years, demanding a probe into Feb. 2024 election results and the release of Khan, who has been jailed for nearly two years. His sons live in the UK and have not visited Pakistan in years, facing criticism by Khan opponents for not joining demonstrations for their father's release, which his party was calling supporters from all over the nation to join. Khan's sister, Aleema Khan, told reporters in Rawalpindi on Tuesday that his sons, Sulaiman and Kasim, had decided to travel from the United Kingdom (UK) to the US and would eventually arrive in Pakistan to play their role in the PTI's protest campaign against the government. 'Firstly, they are going to America and they're telling all their friends, 'And we will go and tell them [US administration] about the human rights [situation] and what injustice is being done to their father [in Pakistan]',' Aleema said. 'Secondly, Sulaiman [and] Qasim have said, 'After that, we will come to Pakistan.' And they want to play their part in the [protest] movement.' This is not the first time Khan's sons have spoken about Pakistan's domestic politics and their father, who has been in jail on corruption and other charges. In a rare interview with business influencer and citizen journalist Mario Nawfal in May, they had urged US President Donald Trump and the 'people of influence' around the world to help free their father from prison, speaking of alleged 'suppression of democracy' in Pakistan and a lack of basic facilities for Khan in his prison cell. Khan's PTI has held frequent protests demanding his release and against the Pakistani government over what it says were rigged general elections in Feb. 2024 and a campaign to subdue PTI and its support base since Khan's ouster from the PM's office in April 2022. Pakistani authorities deny the allegations and accuse the ex-premier and his party of leading violent anti-government protests in the past, particularly in May 2023 and Nov. 2024. Hundreds of PTI supporters were jailed after riots allegedly ordered by the party against the army on May 9, 2023, while the government says four troops were killed in protests in November last year to demand Khan's release. The PTI denies instigating followers to violence. The PTI announced the latest round of protests after the Supreme Court's constitutional bench on June 27 ruled that the party was not entitled to reserved seats in the national and provincial assemblies, upholding an earlier verdict by the Peshawar High Court. The dispute arose after the PTI lost its electoral symbol ahead of the February 8, 2024 national polls and its candidates contested as independents. Despite PTI-backed candidates winning the most general seats, the party was denied reserved seats for women and minorities, which are allocated to political parties based on proportional representation, by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). The government lost its two-thirds majority in parliament in July 2024 when the top court reversed the ECP's decision, terming it unconstitutional and ordering the reserved seats to be allocated to PTI. The ECP and the political parties had filed review petitions, which were accepted by the top court last week.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Chinese air chief hails Pakistan's ‘textbook' response in recent India conflict — ISPR
ISLAMABAD: The Chinese air chief has praised Pakistan's military response during its May conflict with India as a 'textbook example' of modern warfare, the Pakistan army said on Tuesday, quoting remarks that come amid renewed Indian allegations of Chinese support to Islamabad during their latest conflict in May. Lt. Gen. Wang Gang, chief of staff of the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF), made the comments during a high-level visit to Islamabad on Monday, where he met Pakistan's Air Chief Marshal Zaheer Ahmed Baber Sidhu and discussed regional security, airpower cooperation, and bilateral military ties. 'He praised the decisive and measured response delivered by PAF pilots under the resolute leadership of the Air Chief, describing it as a textbook example of precision, discipline and courage in the face of unprovoked aggression,' the Pakistani army said in an official statement, quoting Wang. The Chinese general 'paid rich tribute to the exemplary performance' of the PAF during the conflict with India, which took place from May 7 to 10 and involved drones, missiles, and artillery fire before a US-brokered ceasefire ended hostilities. Wang's remarks follow claims by Indian Army Deputy Chief Lt. Gen. Rahul Singh, who last week alleged China had provided Pakistan with 'live inputs' about Indian military positions during the May fighting. Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir has rejected the claim as 'factually incorrect' and a 'shoddy attempt' to explain India's battlefield failures. While Beijing has not officially responded to the Indian allegations, the Chinese delegation's strong endorsement of PAF's conduct has added diplomatic weight to its deepening military alignment with Islamabad. 'Lt. Gen. Wang Gang expressed deep appreciation for the high state of operational readiness and the cutting-edge capabilities of Pakistan Air Force,' the official statement said, adding that he was 'particularly impressed by PAF's seamless integration of Multi-Domain Operations, terming it a hallmark of modern air warfare.' The visiting delegation was also given a detailed briefing on the PAF's evolving force structure, modernization plans and strategic initiatives. Air Chief Marshal Sidhu 'reiterated that Pakistan and China enjoy historic and time-tested ties rooted in mutual trust, strategic convergence and shared aspirations for regional peace & stability,' the statement added. Pakistan and China have long collaborated on airpower development, including co-producing the JF-17 fighter jet and holding joint training exercises. But their military alignment has grown closer in recent years, particularly amid rising tensions with India, with whom both have longstanding disputes. The latest visit reinforces that trajectory, military observers say. 'The meeting stands as a testament to the shared resolve of Pakistan and China to advance their time-tested strategic partnership through deepened cooperation and innovation-driven collaboration,' the Pakistani military said. In an address this week, Munir said India had failed to achieve its stated military objectives in 'Operation Sindoor,' New Delhi's campaign during the May conflict. Pakistan said it launched 'Operation Bunyan Al Marsoos' in retaliation for Indian attacks on civilian and military sites. India claimed it had only targeted militant infrastructure. Tensions between the neighbors had escalated into a brief war after an April 2025 militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir killed several tourists, an incident New Delhi blamed on Pakistan, which Islamabad denied.
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Indian diplomacy and the Gaza crisis
The last 21 months of military conflicts in large parts of the Middle East have presented complex challenges to the interests of several regional and extraregional states. Not surprisingly, given its historic links with the region and its substantial political and economic ties with regional states, India's responses to various aspects of the conflicts have been closely scrutinized by commentators. It has been noted that, on four occasions, India abstained on UN General Assembly resolutions calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza that were backed by most members of the Global South. Sonia Gandhi, the president of the opposition Congress Party, last month wrote an article criticizing the country's 'muted stance' on the conflicts in Gaza and Iran, describing this as a 'surrender of moral values.' She attacked the free hand enjoyed by Israel in 'an atmosphere of impunity' and insisted on the reaffirmation of India's support for the two-state solution to fulfill Palestinian aspirations. Another writer said that India's diplomatic balancing act now appeared to be 'unravelling (and) revealing inconsistencies' under strong geopolitical challenges. Even India's former National Security Adviser M.K. Narayanan felt that Indian foreign policy was facing an 'existential crisis' amid serious diplomatic challenges, such as those posed by the new US administration and the wars in the Middle East, where India seemed 'out of sync with reality.' These are harsh words for a country whose ties with the Middle East go back at least five millennia — ties that have remained uninterrupted and been nourished over the centuries with fresh inputs so that they meet the changing needs and interests of both sides. So, why these criticisms? India's diplomatic approach to the Middle East has been bilateral and transactional. It has built very substantial relations with all the regional states, but only on a bilateral basis; it has largely avoided taking a collective view of the region and has avoided engagements through regional cooperation platforms. And it has assiduously avoided any active involvement with issues relating to Middle Eastern security and stability. India's diplomacy will need to exhibit a fresh focus on engagement with its immediate and extended neighborhoods. Talmiz Ahmad This approach, ideal in peacetime, has been found inadequate amid the horrendous killings that have defined Israel's response to the Hamas attacks of Oct. 7, 2023, and the wanton spread of its attacks to the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria, and to Iran itself, in which it was joined by the US. No wonder Gandhi said that 'we cannot remain silent in the face of such destruction.' But recent developments have also raised new challenges for India's core interests. India's hands-off approach as far as security issues are concerned has provided opportunities for other nations to play a leading role in addressing matters of regional security by facilitating engagements between hostile neighbors and encouraging rival Palestinian factions to interact with each other. There is more. Last month, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations organized a joint conclave with the Gulf Cooperation Council states and China as part of their effort to expand and diversify economic links with other major partners in the face of challenges posed by the US administration. The tripartite joint declaration contained strong ASEAN criticisms of Israel and backing for the peace efforts of the GCC states. Former Indian diplomat Gurjit Singh noted that the declaration affirmed that the ASEAN has matured and is 'no longer content to remain a bystander in global affairs.' Gandhi wrote in her article that there was still time for India to 'course-correct' and act 'clearly, responsibly and decisively.' The first step in the proposed course correction would be for India to affirm the core principle that will guide Indian diplomacy: a commitment to strategic autonomy and the realization of a multipolar world order in which India will be a robust voice of the Global South, recalling its role in the Non-Aligned Movement during the Cold War. To end the sense of strategic drift that some commentators have noted, India's diplomacy will also need to exhibit a fresh focus on engagement with its immediate and extended neighborhoods — South, West, Central, Southeast and Northeast Asia, and the Indian Ocean. This will call for the replacement of the outdated bilateral approach to important relationships with the shaping of collective regional approaches, with regular interactions on matters of geopolitics and geoeconomics at specially designed regional platforms. India's substantial and abiding links with the Middle East, founded on energy, trade, investments, joint ventures, connectivity projects and technology partnerships — all brought together by the presence of India's 9 million-strong resident community — will ensure that this region will command its principal attention. But India's new approach will also include an important place for dialogue on issues of security and stability with a view to shaping a regional comprehensive security arrangement. This pioneering effort will be propelled by three principles. One, it will be inclusive in that participation in the dialogue process will include all parties with an abiding interest in regional security. Two, the effort will be diplomatic, given the conviction of participants that, for far too long, external military interventions have wreaked havoc upon the region. And, three, the process will be incremental and evolutionary. Given the long-standing differences among regional states, this is the only approach that will work. India's fading global influence and credibility has in fact opened exciting opportunities for new visions and new initiatives in which 'moral responsibility and diplomatic leverage act as a bridge for de-escalation and peace.' • Talmiz Ahmad is a former Indian diplomat.
