Only ‘small minority' exploit Hong Kong's talent schemes: city's No 2 official
Advertisement
Chief Secretary Eric Chan Kwok-ki, who chairs a government committee on education, technology and talent, also warned on Wednesday that anyone who moved to the city through a talent scheme only to give birth, without any intention of gaining employment, would be in violation of the law.
A few recent posts on Chinese social media platform RedNote claimed that mainlanders who want Hong Kong identity cards for their children could move to the city through its talent schemes. They could become pregnant and have children in the city after they settle down, the posts suggested.
The city currently has at least seven talent admission schemes. Over 95 per cent of applicants to one of them, the Top Talent Pass Scheme rolled out in 2022, were from the mainland.
Weighing in on the issue, Chan said any applicant of a talent admission scheme must declare their purpose for coming to Hong Kong.
Advertisement
'If the actual purpose [of these applicants] is to give birth rather than to work, this could constitute a false declaration, which is illegal,' he warned after a closed-door exchange with lawmakers at the legislature's antechamber.
'We expect all talent coming to Hong Kong to strictly follow the purposes stated in their applications. It's not acceptable to apply for one purpose while actually intending to do something else.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
How historical amnesia fuels US-China conflict
This August marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in Asia. Contrary to the narrative often presented by Western commentators, the conflict did not begin in 1941, but in 1937, when Japan invaded China. Advertisement Unfortunately, this has been forgotten. In a breathtaking display of historical ignorance, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly declared during his first visit to Japan: 'We share a warrior ethos that defines our forces. Japan is our indispensable partner in deterring communist Chinese military aggression.' For the record, Japan's aggression against China predated 1937 by decades. The first Japanese attack occurred in 1894-95, resulting in the seizure of Taiwan as spoils of war. In 1904-05, Japan's victory over Russia expanded its reach into Manchuria. Imperial Japanese infantry amid the occupation of Manchuria in 1931 following the Mukden Incident. Photo Getty Images By 1910, Korea had been annexed as a Japanese colony. In 1931, the Japanese Imperial Army manufactured the Mukden Incident as a pretext to carve out Manchukuo from China's northeast: a date still commemorated in China every September 18 . Then, in 1937, came the Lugouqiao, or Marco Polo Bridge, incident – again orchestrated by the Japanese Imperial Army. Only then did full-scale war ensue. At the G7 summit in May 2023 , world leaders gathered at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park, which documents the horrific aftermath of the US' atomic bombing on August 6, 1945. What it does not document is why Hiroshima was bombed. Advertisement Japanese aggression against China led to a US oil embargo in 1941. Rather than withdraw, Japan chose to attack the colonial possessions of Britain and the Netherlands and launched a surprise assault on Pearl Harbour – resulting in America's entry into the war and ultimately leading to the atomic bombings. Unlike Germany, Japan has never fully and honestly confronted its wartime history, especially in relation to China.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong's policy change for children of non-local talent ‘to ensure fairness'
Hong Kong's plans to impose a required residency period for children of non-local talent before they can apply for subsidised tertiary education is part of efforts to ensure fairness and the reasonable use of public funds, a minister has said. Advertisement Secretary for Education Christine Choi Yuk-lin on Saturday defended the coming policy change, noting the number of relevant applications had increased fivefold between 2022 and last year. In a bid to provide a transition period, the policy will initially require such dependants to have lived in Hong Kong for at least one year before they can apply in the 2027-28 academic year as local students and receive reduced fees. The threshold will then be increased to two years for 2028-29 applications. 'Everyone is naturally concerned about a small number of individuals – dependants of talent scheme arrivals who may have never lived in Hong Kong but have completed their secondary education exams in mainland China or elsewhere as private candidates,' she told a radio programme. Advertisement 'They then use their [Diploma of Secondary Education] results and their local resident status to apply for subsidised university places at our government-funded tertiary institutions at local students' fees.'
AllAfrica
4 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Trump takes step back from Philippines in South China Sea
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr's recent visit to the White House promised to set a new tone for US strategy. The contrast with the Biden administration was vivid: President Donald Trump mostly discussed trade with Marcos and seemed eager to downplay any militarized rivalry with China. It's an encouraging pivot from the Biden administration's approach, which escalated the US-China rivalry. Last year, President Joe Biden was focused on the so-called 'latticework' of alliances in the Asia-Pacific, holding a trilateral summit with both Marcos and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba of Japan. The rather clear intention was to balance and even contain China's rise. By contrast, while Trump did briefly praise the ongoing military exercises between the US and the Philippines, there was no mention of the trilateral initiatives with Japan. Instead, Trump seemed eager to tamp down the US-China rivalry, at least in the Philippines context. There was only minimal discussion of tensions in the South China Sea and these came at the behest of Marcos. Trump reportedly 'professed that he didn't mind if the Philippines got along with China.' Such a clear effort to defuse the US-China rivalry could simply reflect Trump's desire to secure a near-term summit with Chinese leader President Xi Jinping. However, it might also reflect the new realism that's taken hold in his administration, one that favors a 'spheres of influence approach' to global affairs over the neoliberal paradigm promoted by the Biden administration. Under Biden, the US was focused on safeguarding freedom of navigation and the law of the sea, a strategy that risked near-term escalation with China over meaningless rocks and reefs and fishing disputes. The Philippines has been increasing its maritime capabilities, but it has little prospect of matching China frigate for frigate or cutter for cutter in those sensitive sea areas. In fact, when Marcos did mention 'international law' and alluded to a country—plainly China—'that has intentions of unilaterally changing the world order,' Trump pointedly refused to respond in kind. Instead, he immediately pivoted to the importance of positive US-China relations, saying, 'we're getting along with China really well.' Trump also emphasized the crucial rare earth magnets exported by China and needed across many US industries, which are 'coming out now… in record numbers.' In this White House, it seems geoeconomics trumps geopolitics. When Marcos again brought up the volatile South China Sea situation while discussing Philippines military modernization, Trump changed the topic to terrorism. 'Don't forget… Philippines were loaded up with ISIS and lots of terrorists,' he said, adding, 'we spent a lot of time and a lot of talent on going into the Philippines and wiping out terrorists.' Trump went so far as to claim that 'During my [first] administration… we got [the terrorists] out, and now you really have a good solid country again.' It's worth pointing out that China also assisted the Philippines in this recent and bloody fight against terrorism, according to Manila. Trump further hinted at the White House's new focus on spheres of influence when he explained, 'And the [Philippines] was maybe tilting toward China, but we un-tilted it very, very quickly.' While realists will welcome the diminishing likelihood of a US-China war developing over rocks and reefs, an even more dangerous conflict still lurks. The situation in the Taiwan Strait—often tense—has become a powder keg waiting to explode, maybe even in the near term. Here Trump seems much more cavalier. When asked by a reporter about 'the ammunitions hub that the US plans to build in Subic and the Luzon corridor' of the Philippines, Trump remarked that 'we'll have more ammunition than any country has ever had.' The Philippines is a mere couple of hundred miles south of Taiwan and many US strategists are fixated on the country as a means of deterring or countering a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. If it comes to war in the Taiwan Strait, losses would be enormous on both sides. An authoritative wargame by the Center for Strategic and International Studies a couple of years ago said the US would likely lose two aircraft carriers in the first week of such a war and that's to say nothing of the real potential for nuclear escalation. Nor is the Philippines likely to make a major difference in such a war, since its armed forces are weak and it would likely be attacked by China if it becomes involved in the conflict. Trump is wise to play down the South China Sea conflict and focus on trade and counterterrorism with the Philippines. Wiser still would be a recognition that a spheres of influence approach should seek to detach the Philippines' future from the fate of Taiwan. Lyle Goldstein is director of Asia engagement at Defense Priorities.
