Islamic charity warned over ‘inflammatory' sermon following October 7 attacks
The Charity Commission stated the sermon included the phrase: "the hour will not begin until the Muslims fight the Jews and the Muslims will kill them until a Jew hides behind a rock or a tree."
Attendees were also reportedly encouraged not to "busy yourselves with politics and voting."
This case is one of more than 300 involving charities related to the Middle East conflict that the regulator, operating across England and Wales, has addressed in the past 18 months.
The latest case involved Nottingham Islam Information Point, a charity said to provide support to victims of Islamophobic attacks and address misconceptions about the religion of Islam.
But a sermon, given on October 13 2023 by trustee Harun Abdur Rashid Holmes 'did not further the charity's purposes, including to provide relief to those in need, and was not in the charity's best interests', therefore amounting to misconduct and/or mismanagement, the regulator said.
Mr Holmes, who is not a trained imam, was deemed not to have acted in accordance with his duties as a trustee and was disqualified in July last year.
He is prevented from holding any senior management position in a charity in England and Wales for three years – and noted by the commission to lack the good judgement expected of a trustee.
While the charities watchdog said it recognised some of the sermon's content had come from a specific hadith – a narration of historical events ascribed to the prophet Mohammed – the appropriate context was not given and it therefore was 'inflammatory and divisive'.
The regulator also said 'no consideration' had been given to the timing of the sermon, coming six days after the October 7 Hamas attacks in Israel.
The commission said Mr Holmes had accepted that, with hindsight, the hadith was sensitive, and that he had not given sufficient context to it.
The commission's assistant director of investigations and compliance, Stephen Roake, said: 'In times of conflict, people expect charities to bring people together, not to stoke division. In this case, we found due consideration had not been given to the words and rhetoric used.
'The sermon was inflammatory and divisive, and we acted robustly and disqualified the trustee who gave the sermon. We also issued the charity with a formal warning.
'Following our intervention, the charity's remaining trustees have taken positive steps to improve their governance. This includes the introduction of a more robust events policy. All charities that host events and speakers should take note of this case and ensure they have sufficient due diligence in place.'
Nottingham Islam Information Point has been contacted for comment.
Charity Commission chief executive David Holdsworth said some people are undermining charities' 'potential for good' in an opinion piece for the Sunday Telegraph.
'Over the past few years, and particularly since the escalation of conflict in the Middle East in October 2023, we have seen charities misused to promote the personal views of those linked to the charity, in some cases inciting hate, or condoning violence,' Mr Holdsworth wrote.
'While trustees, like all of us, have personal rights to freedom of speech, there can be no hiding place for those who seek to use charities to promote hate or harm to others.
'This is not only to put a stop to fundamentally uncharitable activity, but also to help protect and promote public trust in the wider charitable sector.
'I will not shy away from using the more robust powers Parliament has granted us when that is necessary, and taking action against those who risk undermining the incredible positive impact of charities at home and abroad,' he added.
Of the 300 cases considered since the end of 2023 in relation to what is happening in the Middle East, about a third have resulted in formal statutory guidance being issued by the commission.
More than 70 referrals to the police have been made where the regulator considered that a criminal offence might have been committed.
In January, a London charity was handed an official warning after fundraising for a soldier in the Israel Defence Forces (IDF).
The Chabad Lubavitch Centres North East London and Essex Ltd, which describes itself as working for the advancement of the Orthodox Jewish religion, raised more than £2,000 after setting up an online page in October 2023 for a soldier stationed in northern Israel.
Some £937 was sent directly to an individual soldier but the commission said the trustees of the charity were unable to account for how the money was spent and the regulator concluded the charity's actions had amounted to misconduct and a breach of trust.
While charities in England and Wales can legally raise funds to support the UK armed forces, they cannot legally provide aid or military supplies to any foreign armed force, the commission said.
It was believed to be the first time the regulator had used its powers to issue an official warning on the issue of fundraising for a foreign military.
The case was not one among those referred to police, as the commission said its unlawfulness related to charity law rather than criminal law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Welfare U-turn makes spending decisions harder, minister says
Spending decisions have been made "harder" by the government's U-turn on welfare changes, the education secretary has said, as she did not commit to scrapping the two-child benefit Phillipson told BBC One's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme that ministers were "looking at every lever" to lift children out of she said removing the cap would "come at a cost" and insisted the government was supporting families with the cost of living in other comes after a rebellion of Labour MPs forced the government to significantly water down a package of welfare reforms that would have saved £5bn a year by 2030. The climbdown means the savings will now be delayed or lost entirely, which puts pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves ahead of the autumn its retreat on benefits, the Labour government was considering lifting the two-child benefit cap, a policy that restricts means-tested benefits to a maximum of two children per family for those born after April asked if the chances of getting rid of the cap had diminished, Phillipson said: "The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make decisions, future decisions harder."But all of that said, we will look at this collectively in terms of all of the ways that we can lift children out of poverty."
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
How Labour is destroying the British village
Duck pond, cricket pitch, a church and chocolate box cottages. The quintessential features of England's villages will, hopefully, endure for centuries. The endearing charm and blissful way of life, however, is edging closer to extinction. Labour's housebuilding drive threatens to 'bulldoze' Britain's villages to create mega-villages, loosening their sense of community and, perhaps, fracturing their soul. In her quest for 1.5 million new homes by 2029, Angela Rayner, the Housing Secretary, has cranked up the pressure on rural communities to build, while relaxing targets for major cities, including London. This could have a devastating effect on the unique nature of our villages. Blake Stephenson, Tory MP, recently told the Commons how villages in his Mid Bedfordshire constituency are at risk from the 'creeping spread of urban sprawl' that threatens to 'merge them into a conglomerate mass of development'. His fears come amid the Government's plan to strip back development protections in the green belt. Villages would no longer be designated as 'historic', which grants them extra safeguards, while a block on 'unrestricted sprawl' around rural settlements will also be removed. In fact, the Government's proposals stipulate the importance of preventing neighbouring towns from merging, but do not offer the same protection for villages. A bid to boost village protections was launched by opposition MPs last month, but the motion was voted down – paving the way for the identity and heritage of England's classic villages to be lost. 'Changing beyond recognition' Two weeks after Stephenson outlined his concerns for Bedfordshire in Parliament, we're standing in the village of Steppingley, a sleepy green belt settlement where you'd half expect to bump into Midsomer Murders' DCI Tom Barnaby. Dog walkers stop to chat with each other, the church bells chime on the hour and the pub will open at midday. The pub, church and village hall are clustered together, while an Indian restaurant lies on the periphery. The average house sold for £470,000 last year. Home to little more than 200 residents and comprised of just a few roads, it is usually far from the news agenda. But with the Government determined to build millions of homes, Steppingley is one of the potential 'conglomerate mass' victims Stephenson fears for. 'It's places like this which are in danger,' he says. 'England is changing beyond all recognition and most villages are getting a lot of housing.' In what was believed to be a record for public engagement, more than 5,000 objection letters were sent to Central Bedfordshire council over plans to build 170 homes on fields between the town of Flitwick and Steppingley. The proposals, which would have shrunk the gap between the town and village to less than half a mile, were refused by the council's planning committee last month. But there is little cause for celebration. 'It will go to the Planning Inspectorate and be overturned,' Stephenson concedes. 'That's another final decision which will be taken out of the hands of the local community. It feels like the strong arm of the Government is going to take over any form of control. 'Once one field becomes housing, it sets a precedent. One is developed, and then the next and the next again. Flitwick is getting closer to Steppingley.' Due to the Government's housebuilding narrative, villagers fear there is a 'sense of inevitability' that they will soon be swallowed up into one mega-village that has lost its identity. 'I feel like I could cry,' one declares. 'It feels wherever you go around here there is a threat of further development.' 'They've just built that monstrosity over there,' says 65-year-old Mark Gale, pointing to a care complex as he surveys the view across fields from Steppingley to Flitwick. 'Then there's a new ugly crematorium there, and they've just built a housing estate down the bottom there called Steppingley Gardens but it's nothing to do with Steppingley. 'I've been here 25 years and it's very nice living in a village, nice and peaceful. I don't want it to become like any other town. 'Without a doubt it would lose its identity. It's a tight-knit community and I don't think anyone here wants that to change.' 'Villages are losing their souls' It is that sense of village community which feels endangered in modern day Britain – one that is becoming critically endangered thanks to an ever-growing population and the continued struggle for rural businesses and services. The prospect of mass housebuilding in the village of Wolvey, Warwickshire, may spell the end for one of its local stores if a supermarket is built at one of three new estates proposed by Rugby Borough Council. 'We have worked hard to grow the shop at a time when many village stores are closing. Clearly we would not be able to compete with a multiple retailer outlet,' its manager Ian Nicholson posted on a village Facebook page. Opponents claim the green belt village will balloon in size by 80pc should it become victim to housebuilding 'desecration' of 710 new homes put forward by the council in its proposed Local Plan. Rugby Borough Council said it is 'following an evidence-based process of site selection... to bring forward a plan that can be sound and ensure development is properly planned'. A spokesman said: 'For years in Rugby borough, most new housing has been built in the town, and rural housing would provide more housing choice in areas that are popular places to live.' The concerns in Wolvey paint a picture for villages across the country. Councils are grappling with huge new housing targets imposed upon them by Westminster. Rural local authorities have been saddled with vast increases to their delivery numbers, while targets for major cities have retreated. Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, told Parliament that 'raising targets by up to 400pc in rural areas while simultaneously reducing them by over 11pc in London, 30pc in Birmingham and Newcastle, and over 50pc in Coventry is unfair and wrong-headed.' It is that added pressure on rural areas which will do little to safeguard the dwindling community feel. Village amenities are sparse and have been in a continual decline for decades. Only a third of the rural population now live within three miles of a bank, while closed shops are being taken 'away from public service provision' and transferred to private use, according to a recent Parliamentary research paper. In his latest season of Clarkson's Farm, new publican Jeremy Clarkson bemoans how 'villages are losing their soul'. 'You don't have a village doctor any more. He's in a health centre 30 miles away and you can't get an appointment. There's no village bobby on the beat. There's no village vicar, there's no village shop, there's no village school. 'If we end up at a point where there's no village pub then what is a village? It's just some houses. Pubs are the hub and it should always be that way.' While Clarkson has breathed new life into his pub in Asthall, others around the country are falling by the wayside. A recent victim is The Crown in the Bedfordshire village of Shillington, a former local for Stephenson. '[Chancellor] Rachel Reeves's Budget didn't help at all, with National Insurance increasing. The cost of doing business just goes through the roof. Just look behind us, the evidence is there.' In what would have been peak lunchtime hours a few weeks ago, the only noise now is the swinging pub sign squeaking in the wind. 'Footfall is a challenge for village pubs, you've now got to be a destination pub. They are the centres of community, so it's such a shame they're closing.' Six pubs closed every week in 2024, according to the British Beer and Pub Association. 'We've got a gun to our heads over housing delivery' In the Kent village of Littlebourne, three miles east of Canterbury, residents are fearful of the future. Housebuilder Gladman had a 115-home project rejected by the previous Tory administration at Canterbury City Council in 2021 amid concerns over the 'urbanisation of the countryside'. Fast-forward to today and the proposed scheme has almost trebled in size, swelling to 300 homes. The council, now led by Labour, conceded that the new homes would 'harm' the village aesthetic, yet an officer's recommendation of approval for the significantly larger scheme was sent to the planning committee in May. At the meeting, one Tory councillor complained that the committee had 'a gun to our head to allow more of these houses' as a result of the nationwide push to build. The council is in a 'state of presumption in favour of development' because of its failure to hit government housing targets in recent years. This means the authority has to look more favourably on housing applications they would otherwise refuse. A decision on the scheme was deferred until a later date as councillors await more mitigation details from the developers. Peter Farrow, of Littlebourne Parish Council, said: 'The village has had a lot of extra housing in recent years and this would be a huge increase. There isn't a reasonable excuse for bearing down on us. 'There is a lot of pressure coming from the people in Westminster who are really pushing. So I suspect this Labour council probably feels under more pressure than the previous council did.' And it's not just the pressure of housebuilding which is worrying England's villages. The ever-increasing spread of solar farms risks surrounding rural settlements. Residents in 23 villages between Long Stratton and Diss in Norfolk are believed to have been sent letters, telling them their land may be 'required' for what would be the country's biggest solar farm. As the plans are deemed a nationally significant infrastructure project the developer, Island Green Power, could have the power to compulsorily purchase land. Carpets of solar panels are poised to be installed across almost 500 square miles of Britain between now and 2035, as Labour ramps up its net zero plans. Figures released by the Government show that central England will be hit hardest by the solar blitz, with the greatest concentration stretching from Lincolnshire to South Wales. 'Labour is going toe-to-toe with communities' Pick almost any village in the country, and you'll likely hear tales of housebuilding woe and how it looks almost unrecognisable from years ago. Concerns over expansion aren't anything new. Yet Stephenson believes the rhetoric from the Government is putting tails up. Law changes proposed in the Planning and Infrastructure Billinclude the introduction of a national scheme of delegation. This will determine which planning applications should be decided by local officers, and which should go to a public committee. The changes are expected to lead to fewer applications being discussed in public to speed up the planning system and the housebuilding process. Meanwhile, ecology surveys to mitigate the impact on Britain's dwindling wildlife will no longer be mandatory. Earlier this year, Reeves told developers that they need not worry about 'bats and newts' in a bid to cut red tape. 'You don't solve issues by having a fight with village communities, but that's exactly what Labour is doing,' Stephenson says. 'They are going toe-to-toe with communities, telling them 'we don't care what you think, we're going to build anyway'. 'They've decided they have the power, they have the majority, they can fight who they want.' And our villages may be the ultimate casualties.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
How ‘net zero stupidity' inspired an NHS spending spree
When Sir Simon Stevens unveiled plans for the NHS to become the first healthcare system in the world to hit net zero, the former NHS chief made 'no apologies' for setting the target during Covid. In his words, putting the health service at the forefront of the fight against climate change was vital in tackling the 'most profound long-term threat to the health of the nation'. The NHS has set an ambition to reach net zero emissions from its own activities by 2040 – 10 years ahead of the national target. However, this 'world-leading' objective is now under increasing scrutiny as the NHS faces the biggest crisis in its 75-year history, with more than 7m people stuck on waiting lists and financial pressures mounting. It is not only hospitals and GP surgeries that have been set stretching targets. Suppliers of medicines and medical equipment will also have to hit net zero by 2045 if they want to keep working with the health service. Crucially, the rules will also force all NHS suppliers to publicly report their emissions by 2027, excluding them from bidding for contracts if they fail to make progress on net zero by the end of the decade. Such bold goals are now becoming a target for politicians on the Right, who fear it is adding unnecessary strain on the beleaguered health service. Zia Yusuf, the former chairman of Reform UK, made the point in a damning social media post last month, as he advanced the party's pledge to scrap a target to hit net zero by 2050. 'Instead of prioritising the record waiting lists or the tens of thousands who wait more than three days in A&E each year, the Westminster elite decided the NHS should achieve net zero by 2040 and for NHS suppliers by 2045,' he said. 'All these insane rules result in taxpayers endlessly forced to put more into the NHS and yet struggle to see a doctor.' Underpinning the argument are concerns that strict net zero targets will increase costs for the 80,000 suppliers that work with the NHS, pushing up a procurement bill already at £27bn a year. The timing of the debate is also key, coming just days after the Labour Government announced its 10-year plan to reform the NHS. Despite growing strain on the public finances, Sir Keir Starmer has demanded that every part of the country must offer access to care six days a week in what he promised was 'one of the most seismic shifts in care in the history of the health service'. Edward Argar, the shadow health secretary, says this planned and costly overhaul makes it even more important to avoid distractions such as net zero. He says: 'The NHS needs to be focusing its energy and its funding first and foremost on what makes a direct difference for patients, what will improve the quality of their care, and what will improve their access to it.' Chris Naylor, a senior fellow at the King's Fund charity, argues that the strict climate targets will help businesses that work with the NHS to plan ahead and prepare for the future. 'What suppliers for the NHS often say is, 'We just want to know what it is we're going to be required to do and to be given some notice of that,'' he says. 'I think this supplier roadmap does that.' Yet even he admits that the impact on smaller suppliers could be disproportionate. 'I do think it's really important that support is available to them around stuff like carbon measurement,' he says. According to a recent report from the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB), only 15pc of small firms have measured their carbon footprint, posing a significant challenge for many suppliers if they want to compete for NHS contracts in future. Of the small businesses that have been asked to measure their emissions by the Government, only 35pc were able to do so. This highlights the growing risks associated with embracing decarbonisation too quickly, even if the NHS argues some of its net zero plans will help save money. A spokesman points to a planned £59m of savings in travel and transport, which they say will be reinvested into patient care. Yet such small savings will do little to help win the argument against net zero sceptics, particularly as more hospitals lose money and battle high waiting lists. Research published earlier this year by the think tank Nuffield Trust found that 55pc of NHS trusts had a deficit in 2023-24, an increase from 48pc in 2022-23. Despite the growing financial constraints, NHS trusts are also pushing their own sustainability drive, with one London hospital trust launching a contract to decarbonise its hospitals. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust has asked energy companies to pitch green power systems for one of its central London hospitals, with the potential to expand the work across other public sector buildings. Richard Tice, the energy spokesman for Reform, claimed to have found examples of unnecessary NHS green spending in his own constituency of Boston and Skegness. He took aim at a new £42m, 19-bed mental health unit in Boston, Lincolnshire, that will be entirely carbon-neutral, arguing its focus on net zero would take away from other resources the NHS needs. 'That means that other facilities are denied, whether it's extra staff, whether it's extra medicines, whether it's another facility, a bigger A&E,' Tice said. The Pilgrim hospital in Boston has been awarded £23m to upgrade its energy infrastructure, including making its heating system net zero-compliant. Tice said the NHS was wasting millions on 'net zero stupidity' in Boston, adding: 'It's the patients who suffer because the money spent on this means it can't be spent on patient care.' Mark Platts, chief finance officer at Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, said: 'In line with all new NHS buildings, the unit will meet high national standards of sustainability and the NHS commitment to net zero. Doing so will also help reduce our energy costs in the future, which can be reinvested in clinical care.' Tice isn't the only person concerned about unnecessary costs. Last month, Sir Jim Mackey, the head of the NHS, said the health service was too often 'deaf' to criticism and 'wasted a lot of money'. In recent years the NHS has become increasingly reliant on the costly services of US tech giants such as Palantir and Larry Ellison's Oracle. Mackey's comments came as he warned that failing to listen to public frustration could mean the end of a publicly funded state health service. Indeed, while Reform has said that the NHS should remain free at the point of use, Nigel Farage has previously called on its funding model to be re-examined. 'Everyone knows we are not getting value, let's re-examine the whole funding model and find a way that's more efficient,' he told the BBC in March. Meanwhile, questions remain over how achievable the NHS's net zero ambitions really are. Nick Watts, the founding chief sustainability officer of the NHS, told the New Statesman last year that there was a '50-50' chance that it would reach the 2040 target. Lord Mackinlay, former chairman of the net zero scrutiny group, says net zero spending adds to growing scrutiny of just how much cash is being sucked up by the health services. 'The NHS one is very serious because it's an institution that absorbs money like it's going out of fashion,' he says. 'It is a very, very hungry beast and it's not doing the stuff which is customer-focused.' A Government spokesman said: 'We are helping hospitals across the country save hundreds of millions on their energy bills so they can reinvest those savings into frontline services. 'Thanks to this Government's investments, money that is currently being wasted in high energy bills will be redirected to patients and services - we are providing over £1bn of funding over three years to fund hundreds of local energy schemes to decarbonise public buildings and help them access clean, affordable power.'
