logo
Trump officials vow to intensify immigration raids despite legal challenges, bad polls, public backlash

Trump officials vow to intensify immigration raids despite legal challenges, bad polls, public backlash

Yahoo13 hours ago
The Trump administration immigration sweeps that have roiled Southern California have shown no signs of slowing despite lawsuits, a court order and growing signs the aggressive actions are not popular with the public.
The operations, which began in early June in the Los Angeles area, largely focused on small-scale targets like car washes, strip malls and Home Depot parking lots before authorities hit their biggest target last week — two farms for one of the largest cannabis companies in California. One worker died after falling from a greenhouse roof during the raid, while 361 others were arrested.
Responding to the death, President Trump's chief border policy advisor Tom Homan called the situation "sad."
"It's obviously unfortunate when there's deaths," he told CNN. "No one wants to see people die."
"He wasn't in ICE custody," Homan said. "ICE did not have hands on this person."
Read more: Details emerge about pot-farm immigration raid as worker dies
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said authorities plan to intensify immigration crackdowns thanks to more funding from the recently passed "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" spending plan from Congress.
The budget bill infuses roughly $150 billion into Trump's immigration and border enforcement plans, including funding for ICE and Border Patrol staffing, building and operating immigrant detention facilities, and reimbursing states and local governments for immigration-related costs.
"We're going to come harder and faster, and we're going to take these criminals down with even more strength than we ever have before," Noem said at a news conference over the weekend. Trump, she added, 'has a mandate from the American people to clean up our streets, to help make our communities safer.'
But there are some signs that support might be slipping.
A Gallup poll published this month shows that fewer Americans than in June 2024 back strict border enforcement measures and more now favor offering undocumented immigrants living in the country pathways to citizenship. The percentage of respondents who want immigration reduced dropped from 55% in 2024 to 30% in the current poll, reversing a years-long trend of rising immigration concerns.
While the desire for less immigration has declined among all major political parties, the decrease among Republicans was significant — down 40% from last year. Among independents, the preference for less immigration is down 21%, and among Democrats it's down 12%, according to the poll.
The poll also showed that a record-high 79% of adults consider immigration beneficial to the country and only 17% believe it is a negative, a record-low for the poll.
Meanwhile, a Quinnipac University poll published in June indicate that 38% of voters approve of the way Trump is handling the presidency, while 54% disapprove. On immigration, 54% of those polled disapproved of Trump's handling of the issue and 56% disapprove of deportations.
At the same time, growing legal challenges have threatened to hamper the Trump administration's efforts.
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, an appointee of President Biden, temporarily blocked federal agents in the Southland from using racial profiling to carry out immigration arrests after she found sufficient evidence that agents were using race, a person's job or their location, and their language to form "reasonable suspicion" — the legal standard needed to detain an individual.
But the White House said it would appeal the ruling.
"No federal judge has the authority to dictate immigration policy — that authority rests with Congress and the president," said Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman. "Enforcement operations require careful planning and execution; skills far beyond the purview or jurisdiction of any judge. We expect this gross overstep of judicial authority to be corrected on appeal."
The sweeps have resulted in a wave of other lawsuits challenging the Trump administration. Amid the legal battles, there are also signs of upheaval within the federal government.
Reuters reported on Monday that the Justice Department unit charged with defending legal challenges to the administration's policies, including restricting birthright citizenship, has lost nearly two-thirds of its staff.
The administration has also faced scrutiny from Democrats and activists over its handling of last week's raids at the marijuana cultivation farms, which were part of a legal and highly regulated industry in California.
'It was disproportionate, overkill,' said Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-Santa Barbara) of the operation.
Read more: Central Coast pot operation becomes site of massive immigration spectacle
Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Los Angeles) criticized Trump for targeting immigrant farmworkers as the administration continues to publicly state that their targets are those with criminal records.
"How many MS-13 gang members are waking up at 3 a.m. to pick strawberries? O'yeah, zero! Trump said he'd go after 'bad hombres,' but he's targeting the immigrant farm workers who feed America. Either he lied — or he can't tell the difference," Gomez wrote on X.
The White House clapped back in a post on X: "That ain't produce, holmes. THAT'S PRODUCT."
Over the weekend, Jaime Alanís Garcia, 57, the cannabis farmworker who was gravely injured after he fell off a roof amid the mayhem of the Camarillo raid, was taken off life support, according to his family.
Alanís' family said he was fleeing immigration agents at the Glass House Farms cannabis operation in Camarillo on Thursday when he climbed atop a greenhouse and accidentally fell 30 feet, suffering catastrophic injury. The Department of Homeland Security said Alanís was not among those being pursued.
His niece announced his death Saturday on a GoFundMe page, which described him as a husband and father and the family's sole provider. The page had raised more than $158,000 by Monday morning, well over its initial $50,000 goal.
'They took one of our family members. We need justice,' the niece wrote.
Times staff writers Brittny Mejia, Rachel Uranga, Dakota Smith and Jeanette Marantos contributed to this report.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump plans to dismantle the Education Department after Supreme Court ruling
How Trump plans to dismantle the Education Department after Supreme Court ruling

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How Trump plans to dismantle the Education Department after Supreme Court ruling

WASHINGTON (AP) — Education Secretary Linda McMahon is expected to move quickly now that the Supreme Court has cleared the way for the Trump administration to continue unwinding her department. The justices on Monday paused a lower court order that had halted nearly 1,400 layoffs and had called into question the legality of President Donald Trump's plan to outsource the department's operations to other agencies. Now, Donald Trump and McMahon are free to execute the layoffs and break up the department's work among other federal agencies. Trump had campaigned on closing the department, and McMahon has said the department has one 'final mission' to turn over its power to the states. 'The Federal Government has been running our Education System into the ground, but we are going to turn it all around by giving the Power back to the PEOPLE,' Trump said late Monday in a post on Truth Social. 'Thank you to the United States Supreme Court!' Department lawyers have already previewed McMahon's next steps in court filings. What happens with student loans, civil rights cases Trump and McMahon have acknowledged only Congress has authority to close the Education Department fully, but both have suggested its core functions could be parceled out to different federal agencies. Among the most important decisions is where to put management of federal student loans, a $1.6 trillion portfolio affecting nearly 43 million borrowers. Trump in March suggested the Small Business Administration would take on federal student loans, but a June court filing indicated the Treasury Department is expected to take over the work. The Education Department said it had been negotiating a contract with Treasury but paused discussions when the court intervened. That work is now expected to proceed in coming days. Under a separate arrangement, nine Education Department workers already have been detailed to Treasury, according to a court filing. The department had also recently struck a deal to outsource the management of several grant programs for workforce training and adult education to the Department of Labor. The Education Department agreed to send $2.6 billion to Labor to oversee grants, which are distributed to states to be passed down to schools and colleges. Combining workforce training programs at Education and Labor would 'provide a coordinated federal education and workforce system,' according to the agreement. Additional agreements are expected to follow with other agencies. At her Senate confirmation hearing, McMahon suggested that enforcement of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act could be handled by the Department of Health and Human Services. Civil rights work could be managed by the Justice Department, she said. Democracy Forward, which represents plaintiffs in the lawsuit, said it will pursue 'every legal option' to fight for children. The group's federal court case is proceeding, but the Supreme Court's emergency decision means the Education Department is allowed to downsize in the meantime. 'No court in the nation — not even the Supreme Court — has found that what the administration is doing is lawful,' said Skye Perryman, president and CEO of the group, in a statement. Laying off staff Trump campaigned on a promise to close the agency, and in March ordered it to be wound down 'to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law.' McMahon had already started a dramatic downsizing, laying off about 1,400 workers. Education Department employees targeted by the layoffs have been on paid leave since March, according to a union that represents some of the agency's staff. The lower court order had prevented the department from fully terminating them, though none had been allowed to return to work, according to the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252. Without the lower court order, the workers would have been terminated in early June. The absence of those staffers already had caused problems in the office that handles student loans, said Melanie Storey, president and CEO of the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators. College financial aid staffers reported delays and breakdowns in federal systems — such as an hours-long outage on the day after departmental layoffs. Communication with the Education Department eroded, Storey said. 'It is concerning that the Court is allowing the Trump administration to continue with its planned reduction in force, given what we know about the early impact of those cuts on delivering much-needed financial assistance to students seeking a postsecondary education,' Storey said. Gutting the Education Department will hinder the government's ability to enforce civil rights laws, especially for girls, students with disabilities, LGBTQ+ students and students of color, said Gaylynn Burroughs, vice president at the National Women's Law Center. Laid-off staff in the Office of Civil Rights were handling thousands of cases. 'Without enough staff and resources, students will face more barriers to educational opportunity and have fewer places to turn to when their rights are violated,' Burroughs said in a statement. 'This is part of a coordinated plan by the Trump administration to dismantle the federal government and roll back hard-won civil rights protections.' ___ AP education writers Annie Ma and Cheyanne Mumphrey contributed reporting. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

Nvidia to sell H20 chips to China again after US gives export approval
Nvidia to sell H20 chips to China again after US gives export approval

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nvidia to sell H20 chips to China again after US gives export approval

US tech giant Nvidia will start selling its H20 AI chip in China again after the Trump administration relaxed export restrictions. The White House gave assurances that it would grant licenses for the product in the Chinese market, the firm said on Tuesday in a blog post. The move is a U-turn for the government, which in April banned sales of the chip to China, linked to concerns that the technology could be used for military purposes. At the time, Nvidia said it had been told that the export control would stay in place for the 'indefinite future". Nvidia claimed in May that it had taken a $4.5 billion (€3.8bn) inventory cost hit in the April quarter because of the restrictions and added that it had missed out on an additional $2.5bn (€2.1bn) in sales. The announcement temporarily sent its share price plunging. The H20 chip was specifically designed for the Chinese market, in line with restrictions introduced by former president Joe Biden in 2023. When in office, Trump overhauled the Biden-era curbs but imposed restrictions on Nvidia's H20 AI chip. On Tuesday, Nvidia also announced a new China-specific AI chip it said was 'fully compliant' with export rules. Tuesday's announcement comes after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has spent months lobbying in both the US and China. Related Chipmaker Nvidia hits $4 trillion making it world's most valuable company Volvo Cars CEO: dual tech for China and the West is new trade reality Huang argued that Trump's restrictions were a 'failure' in the sense that they were boosting China's AI capabilities, notably as the market could no longer rely on American products. Exports of the chip do, however, help Chinese AI companies like DeepSeek, that use Nvidia chips to create their products. The breakthrough comes as relations between Washington and Beijing have thawed in recent weeks. Earlier this year, the Trump administration threatened a 145% duty on Chinese goods sent to the US, and Beijing responded with a 125% retaliatory tariff. The two sides decided to lower these taxes in May, and then agreed on a trade framework last month. The trade agreement seeks to ease restrictions on exports of raw materials and other critical technologies. Throughout earlier talks, Donald Trump had nonetheless suggested that curbs on the H20 AI chip wouldn't be relaxed as part of the framework. Both China and the US are seeking to find a permanent solution to replace the temporary trade truce before a 12 August deadline. Nvidia's Huang is currently in Beijing to hold talks with government officials, after meeting with President Trump last week. The CEO also announced plans to create a new graphics processing unit, the RTX PRO, for the Chinese market, which he said is fully compliant with US export controls.

Would Europe Actually Retaliate Against Trump's Tariffs?
Would Europe Actually Retaliate Against Trump's Tariffs?

New York Times

time24 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Would Europe Actually Retaliate Against Trump's Tariffs?

European Union officials have spent the past week finalizing a plan to hit back at the United States in response to President Trump's tariffs, laying the groundwork to hit more than $100 billion worth of American imports with levies if negotiations on a new trade deal fail. But a question looms over that effort. 'If it comes to it, will they?' asked Frances Burwell, a fellow at the Atlantic Council's Europe Center, a research organization. Officials from the 27-nation bloc have spent months preparing to retaliate, only to hold off in favor of more talks. In April, E.U. policymakers approved a plan to impose tariffs on 21 billion euros (nearly $25 billion) of American goods. But they abruptly suspended them in a show of good will when Mr. Trump pivoted at the last minute and paused some painful across-the-board tariffs. The goal was to negotiate. No deal was forthcoming. Instead, Mr. Trump said on social media last week that he planned to impose 30 percent tariffs on the bloc starting on Aug. 1. After that announcement, E.U. officials chose to again delay that first batch of retaliatory tariffs — which had been suspended only through July 14 — to allow room for more talks. But they have also redoubled their vow to respond forcefully if necessary. E.U. trade officials are now finishing up a second list of tariffs that would target an even longer list of American goods, one that amounts to €72 billion ($84 billion) of goods that includes Boeing airplanes and Kentucky bourbon. The final version was sent to member states on Monday, said diplomats who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an internal process. National representatives have not yet voted on the list. That push to be prepared to retaliate is rooted in an uncomfortable reality. The European Union would prefer to come up with a negotiated solution and avoid a painful and protracted trade war, but the talks could still fail. Strength, many politicians and ministers pointed out, seems to be the only negotiating language that Mr. Trump understands. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store