logo
Thousands in Wisconsin protest immigrant treatment, Trump agenda in No Kings protests

Thousands in Wisconsin protest immigrant treatment, Trump agenda in No Kings protests

Yahoo6 days ago
Wisconsinites in more than 50 towns and cities took to the streets on Saturday, June 14, as part of what organizers say was the largest nationwide protest yet against President Donald Trump's second-term agenda.
In downtown Milwaukee, organizers estimated the crowd reached almost 10,000 people, according to Alan Chavoya, a protester with the Milwaukee Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression. Protestors chanted and sang in Cathedral Square Park, before marching a mile loop around part of downtown. The rally was energetic, but peaceful.
"This is what democracy looks like," Chavoya said.
More than 100 groups worked together to organize No Kings protests across the country, with actions taking place in more than 1,500 cities, according to its website. Spearheading the effort was the national organizing group, 50501 — short for "50 protests, 50 states, 1 movement."
The protests take their name from the idea that in the United States, we don't have kings — a reference to Trump's own language about himself and his perception of virtually unchecked power.
The Saturday's protests coincided with Trump's military parade — estimated to cost upwards of $30 million — to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the U.S. Army and his own birthday.
They also took place as word spread of the assassination Saturday morning of a Minnesota state representative and her husband, along with the shootings of a Minnesota state senator and his wife, in what has been described as a politically motivated attack.
Many of the protestors in Cathedral Square Park held up signs supporting immigrants, and decrying U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's recent nationwide crackdown.
Lindsey Amador, 24, and her niece, Jacqueline Garcia-Amador, 19, traveled from Lake Geneva to specifically protest ICE, they said. Both grew up with undocumented family members and have been protesting for immigrants' rights for years.
"It's really sad seeing everything that's happened recently," Garcia-Amador said. "Most of the people coming here just want a better life. All we want is justice, dignity and no more separation of families."
Julia Miranda Ramirez, 56, said she immigrated to Milwaukee from Mexico nearly two decades ago and eventually attained her green-card status. Waving a Mexican flag at the protest, Miranda Ramirez said she wanted to represent and support her local Mexican American community.
"We deserve respect, dignity and inclusion," she said. "It's common sense."
Janey Christoffersen, 49, of West Allis, said she was attending a protest for the first time, motivated by local reports of federal arrests of immigrants.
"It was a no-brainer to be here," Christoffersen said, speaking through tears. "I want to get out of my comfort zone to show people that we love and care about them, that the whole country is not angry."
Along with immigrants' rights, the Cathedral Square Park crowd singled out issues like veterans' benefits, abortion access, union jobs and public education funding — all of which have been targets of the Trump administration or the broader Republican agenda.
Laurie Peifer, a retired member of the Milwaukee Fire Department, said she was protesting to protect women's health care. She dressed in a red robe and white bonnet, inspired by Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale.
"I'm no longer able to have children, and I never wanted to anyway, but I had the right to choose my entire reproductive life," Peifer said. "That being taken away from women today has me disturbed."
New Berlin resident Dick Clarey, 78, said he came out with his wife to protest the Trump administration's shrinking of the Department of Veteran's Affairs. A Vietnam War veteran, Clarey said he had little use for the military parade in Washington, D.C.
"We really don't need to show off our power like that," Clarey said.
Ellen Eckman, 78, and her husband, Fred, 81, have attended multiple protests against the Trump administration in recent months. The Shorewood residents said they came out Saturday to rally for free speech rights after seeing National Guard troops dispatched to protests in Los Angeles, even though California officials neither wanted them nor thought they were at all needed.
"I'm hoping that the attention generated all over the country today will wake up the Republicans to the fact that this is not what we want," Ellen Eckman said.
In addition to downtown Milwaukee, crowds turned out at other area protests in Shorewood, Greenfield, Brookfield and Waukesha.
Dawn Levine, an organizer with Waukesha Resist, said for her, protest was about preserving freedom for future generations.
'I have two daughters. I want them to have the future that I had growing up," she said. 'We had freedom, we had rights, and (Trump) is trying to take that away from us and make us minions, and I'm not going to stand for that.'
New Berlin resident Bill Loos, 71, said he came to the protest with his wife because he wants to support people impacted by Trump's policies. He questioned how people who knew women, people of color and people in the LGBTQ+ community could support someone who 'wants to hurt them with his policies and programs.'
Waukesha resident Vicki Magisano said she attended because she believes in the importance of Medicare and Social Security.
'We haven't had a king since we kicked them out in 1776. We need to not have another one,' she said. 'This country is built on immigrants, hard work and democracy."
Waukesha resident Nancy Bopre said she wants to tell her grandchildren that she did not stay silent about injustice. Bopre said that she believes in protecting the U.S. Constitution and the right to Medicaid.
'I have a disabled son,' she said. 'He's been accepted to longer-term Medicaid as of two-and-a-half years ago.'
In Shorewood, several hundred people showed up to rally Saturday afternoon, exceeding organizers' original registration numbers. Organizer Caryn Melton, a Shorewood resident for 32 years, said Saturday was her first protest.
'I'm inspired to see so many people from so many walks of life have shown up here to express their concern for our country and to protest and exercise our rights as Americans," she said.
Milwaukee resident, Kelli Hook, 47, opted to attend Shorewood's No Kings protest instead of the larger one in Cathedral Square Park. Hook said she believes having boots on the ground is important, especially in a suburb like Shorewood, where activists may have less of the presence.
'It's our responsibility to stand up, show our voice, not wait until the ballot box, spend every day we can fighting for justice for every single person on the planet, whether they're trans, LGBT, immigrants, refugees and other disfranchised people," she said.
Outside of southeast Wisconsin, protests were held all around Wisconsin.
Thousands marched up Madison's State Street, and organizers estimated as many as 17,000 people gathered at the Wisconsin State Capitol, which featured remarks from U.S. Sen. Raphael Warnock, Democrat from Georgia, and a phone message U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, an Independent from Vermont.
Vietnam War veteran Will Gilmore, 78, traveled from his home in Columbus, Wisconsin, to attend the Madison protest. Gilmore said he felt it was important for him to attend because he took an oath to protect the U.S. Constitution, which he believes the Trump administration is failing to follow.
'We're at a cusp right now," Gilmore said. "It's up to us to decide if we want not to just go back to where we were, but to try to revamp government so that it better addresses the needs of the people."
Ahead of the march to the state Capitol, Women's March held a 'Kick Out the Clowns' rally on Library Mall, complete with clowns and musical performances. The women's rights group coordinated the event with No Kings organizers as part of efforts to draw as many protesters to Madison as possible, executive director Rachel O'Leary Carmona told the Journal Sentinel.
O'Leary Carmona emphasized the importance of community and nonviolent action, especially given the Minnesota lawmaker shootings Saturday.
'I think in this moment, when fear has been rising and polarization has been rising, there is an impulse to start to not trust each other and to fracture at the seams," O'Leary Carmona said. "I think that our actions are a tactical intervention against that because it's an effort to blunt the impact of political violence."
Just as in the Milwaukee area, smaller communities around Madison held No Kings rallies of their own. About 200 gathered in Stoughton, for example, and 150 attended in McFarland, local police department officials said. An estimated 600 protested in Green Bay.
Nationally, protests took place from one coast to the other, and even at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's home in Palm Beach, Florida. The themes were consistent: be more accepting of immigrants and refugees, stop cutting programs that help the poor and those on the fringes, have more respect for veterans, and stop taking actions that denigrate people of color. Many signs and speakers at rallies across the country hit on anti-authoritarian themes.
In New York, the actor Mark Ruffalo, a native of Kenosha, Wisconsin, said: "Sadly today, Donald Trump and the administration of billionaires, crackpots and ICE brigades, have taken over. We have a king and his court and his beige henchmen, and they're trampling on our rights and our laws and our freedoms."
This story was updated to add a video.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Dozens of Wisconsin cities holding 'No Kings' protests against Trump
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How latest block of Trump's birthright citizenship order tests legal landscape after Supreme Court ruling
How latest block of Trump's birthright citizenship order tests legal landscape after Supreme Court ruling

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How latest block of Trump's birthright citizenship order tests legal landscape after Supreme Court ruling

A federal judge's decision to temporarily prevent the Trump administration from stripping birthright citizenship for some babies born in the U.S. is an early test of the legal landscape, after the Supreme Court greatly restricted the ability of judges to issue nationwide blocks of presidential policies. On Thursday morning, in New Hampshire, U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante granted class action status to a lawsuit that seeks to protect babies who would be denied birthright citizenship, and granted a temporary block of President Donald Trump's order from going into effect throughout the country. The decision brought hope to pregnant women and groups who were dealt a blow two weeks ago when the Supreme Court largely restricted the ability of federal judges to use one of the strongest tools at their disposal — the use of nationwide injunctions to prevent federal policies from going into effect. The Supreme Court decision would have allowed Trump's executive order to go into effect on July 27 in parts of the U.S. In the aftermath, immigrants and their attorneys pivoted to seeking class action status for immigrant babies and parents in hopes of finding another way to stop the president. 'It was clear that the Supreme Court decision had closed one very important door for challenging policies, but it also in the process opened other doors,' Muzaffar Chishti, a senior fellow with the Migration Policy Institute, told NBC News. The Supreme Court has not yet ruled on whether Trump's executive order is unconstitutional and multiple lawsuits challenging it remain ongoing. But its decision on June 27 left open an important avenue for plaintiffs to try to stop federal government policies nationwide through the use of class action lawsuits. 'This case is an early test for how litigants will adapt to the legal landscape after the Supreme Court's death blow to national injunctions,' Chishti said. 'It normally takes months, if not years, for an altered landscape to be observed. But since this is such an important constitutional issue, we are getting a chance to revisit the landscape within two weeks.' Under Trump's plan, birthright citizenship would be limited to those who have at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen or permanent resident. The order also denies citizenship to children whose mothers are temporarily in the United States, including those visiting under the Visa Waiver Program or as tourists, or who are students and whose fathers are not citizens or lawful permanent residents. In the written order issued Thursday, Laplante wrote that the court certified class action status to the following group in issuing the nationwide block of Trump's order: 'All current and future persons who are born on or after February 20, 2025, where (1) that person's mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the person's father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person's birth, or (2) that person's mother's presence in the United States was lawful but temporary, and the person's father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person's birth.' Laplante, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, had previously denied issuing a nationwide injunction in a similar case earlier this year. Instead, he had issued a narrower order where he only blocked the policy from being enforced on members of groups that would be affected by Trump's order. But his order on Thursday effectively blocked Trump's executive order from being enforced nationwide, at least temporarily. 'This was a ruling that certified a preliminary class of folks across the nation from a judge who was skeptical of nationwide injunctions, and so I think it shows that the class action mechanism is a viable one, that courts are willing to entertain,' said Haiyun Damon-Feng, an immigration and constitutional law professor at Cardozo School of Law. Cody Wofsy, the American Civil Liberties Union's lead attorney in the case, said after Thursday's court hearing that Laplante's order was 'going to protect every single child around the country from this lawless, unconstitutional and cruel executive order.' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement to NBC News that the decision was 'an obvious and unlawful attempt to circumvent the Supreme Court's clear order against universal relief.' 'This judge's decision disregards the rule of law by abusing class action certification procedures. The Trump Administration will be fighting vigorously against the attempts of these rogue district court judges to impede the policies President Trump was elected to implement,' Fields said in the statement. The Trump administration has seven days to appeal Laplante's temporary block to a higher court, and the issue could find itself back at the Supreme Court to determine if the judge's order complies with last month's ruling. 'It's not the end right of the birthright question. We are probably going to see more fights take place over procedure, over the question of class certification, as well as the question of birthright citizenship on the merits,' Damon-Feng said. This article was originally published on

Karoline Leavitt Just Made A Trump Claim So Ridiculous That Even Republicans Are Calling It Out
Karoline Leavitt Just Made A Trump Claim So Ridiculous That Even Republicans Are Calling It Out

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Karoline Leavitt Just Made A Trump Claim So Ridiculous That Even Republicans Are Calling It Out

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt managed to unite many on the left and right alike on Thursday with a claim about President Donald Trump so over-the-top that neither side was buying it. Leavitt shared a link on X to a USA Today column arguing that Trump is deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize. Twitter: @PressSec Related: The text of Leavitt's post on X was also the headline of the story: 'Trump deserves Nobel Peace Prize. He's achieved more than those who've won before.' The column argued that Trump's attack on Iran last month stopped the nation from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Trump himself claimed the strike 'totally obliterated' Iran's facilities. Analysts have been more measured, saying the strikes may have only set Iran's nuclear program back by a few months. The column also credits Trump for a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, and notes that he is trying to broker one between Israel and Hamas as well. Earlier this week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that he had nominated Trump for the honor. The Nobel Peace Prize has been a sore spot for Trump for years. He's complained repeatedly about not getting one, has griped that President Barack Obama has one, and insisted that he should have had 'four or five' of them by now. But critics pointed out that Trump bombed Iran before the ceasefire, and that the United States has been providing Israel with weapons in its various offensives, among other reasons, Trump shouldn't get the prize. They fired back on X: @seanrcallaghan @gamboleer Related: @backavatar @CassandraRules Twitter: @kranbjam @vanranstmarc Related: @thomasstjames3 @evanakilgore @butlerlonney @healthranger @criticerx @voteharrisout Related: @barnes_law @shirokanechoja Twitter: @PatriotJoe13 Twitter: @JonMadison711 Twitter: @DeGeneralDimes This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Trump to use presidential authority to send weapons to Ukraine, sources say
Trump to use presidential authority to send weapons to Ukraine, sources say

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump to use presidential authority to send weapons to Ukraine, sources say

By Mike Stone WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump for the first time since returning to office will send weapons to Kyiv under a presidential power frequently used by his predecessor, two sources familiar with the decision said on Thursday, a move suggesting new interest by the president in defending Ukraine. More than three years after Russia's invasion of its neighbor, Trump's team will identify arms from U.S. stockpiles to send to Ukraine under the Presidential Drawdown Authority, the sources said, with one saying they could be worth around $300 million. Trump on Tuesday said the U.S. would send more weapons to Ukraine to help the country defend itself against intensifying Russian advances. The package could include defensive Patriot missiles and offensive medium-range rockets, but a decision on the exact equipment has not been made, the sources said. One of the people said this would happen at a meeting on Thursday. So far, the Trump administration has only sent weapons authorized by former President Joe Biden, who was a staunch supporter of Kyiv. Presidential Drawdown Authority allows the president to draw from weapons stocks to help allies in an emergency. The Pentagon and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Republican president's stance on defending Ukraine has been inconsistent. At times he has criticized U.S. spending and spoken favorably of Russia but also sometimes has voiced support for Kyiv and disparaged the Kremlin. The U.S. has $3.86 billion worth of Presidential Drawdown Authority for Ukraine remaining. The last drawdown was a $500 million award by Biden on January 9. Ukraine's top priorities are Patriot missile interceptors and GMLRS mobile rocket artillery which may be included in the package. The weapons could be on the front lines within days because stocks are positioned in Europe. The Trump administration this month halted shipments of some critical weapons that were approved by Biden but some of those shipments have resumed. Congress has approved nearly $175 billion of aid and military assistance for Ukraine and allied nations in the nearly 3-1/2 years since Russia's full-scale invasion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store