What's the difference between earned wage access and a loan? How to know which is right for you
When you're hit with a surprise cost like a car repair or medical bill, waiting for payday can be challenging. But sometimes, you don't have to.
Enter earned wage access (EWA), which goes by numerous nicknames - on-demand pay, daily pay, instant pay, same-day pay, instant payroll, and accrued wage access among them - and allows you to snag the money you've earned early. Some companies offer EWA as a company perk, but there are also third-party services that bring it directly to consumers.
With roughly a quarter of households living paycheck-to-paycheck according to a Bank of America report published last year, it's no surprise that some people are flocking to EWA services that can help them cover the cost of groceries, utilities and more. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) found that the market for earned wage products is growing, with the share of workers using the products at least once a month jumping from 41% in 2021 to nearly 50% in 2022.
But it's important to fully understand how these services work before you take the leap. Consumer banking platform Current explains.
What is earned wage access?
Earned wage access programs allow workers to pocket a portion or all of their paycheck outside their typical payroll cycle. The exact process will vary by program, but here's an example: Say you are usually paid out for your work weekly or bi-weekly. Instead of having to wait until the next day for your money to hit your bank account, you can request to have some of the money come through now (or within a few days, depending on the service) and see the remainder of the paycheck on payday.
Employer-sponsored services require that your employer offer EWA as a benefit, and will use your payroll records to track your earnings and pay out the remainder of your payment on time. Companies that offer EWA - including Uber, Walmart, and McDonald's - often have hourly workers. Direct-to-consumer products determine your EWA limit by analyzing your earnings history.
How is earned wage access different from a loan?
While loans are a way to borrow money and pay it back with interest over a set period of time - from a few months to years - EWA is early access to money you have already earned without having to pay interest. When you use an EWA you're tapping money that is yours, but just doing so before payday. The funds you get early are then excluded from your paycheck.
If you're looking for extra funds to help cover a big expense, like a car repair, "it's probably best to go the loan route," says Ben Loughery, a certified financial planner and founder of Lock Wealth Management. EWA will typically have maximums for how much you can access at once, like $500.
When you borrow money via a personal loan, you'll owe the lender an annual percentage rate (APR) - and those can take a chunk out of your wallet. As of June 11, the average personal loan interest rate was 12.65%, according to Bankrate. The rates can be especially steep for payday loans: Typical two-week payday loans with a $15 fee for every $100 borrowed come out to an APR of almost 400%, the CFPB points out. Plus, if you don't pay back the loan as promised, your credit score can take a hit. That's not a concern with EWA.
Should you choose earned wage access or a loan?
In an ideal world, you have an emergency fund available for when surprise costs arise, and you're managing your cash flow in such a way that you don't need to turn to a loan or EWA, explains Catherine Valega, financial advisor and founder of Green Bee Advisory. But that's not always the case.
"If you have access to earned wage access, it is much better than a payday loan," Valega says. She adds that because many people are more familiar with payday loans, they tend to seek those out first and "shoot themselves in the foot" because they then face high interest rates that take a huge chunk out of the money that should hit their accounts. "With earned interest rates, there's a fee, not an interest rate, and you've completed the work so you have earned that money … I would absolutely start there first."
Loughery says to take caution, especially if you're not good with managing your cash flow. You shouldn't rely on EWA as a long-term fix.
"But if you are in a bind, it could be a great solution," he adds.
How to find an earned wage access product
If your employer offers EWA, there's likely already a service for you to select. But if you're going the third-party route, assess the following features:
Fees. Some services charge subscription fees, fees for accessing your money and/or a fee for accessing your money instantly. Some even ask for an optional tip. Ideally, you'll want to go with a service that provides low or no fees for accessing your money early - it's money you've already earned, after all.
Fund timing: How long will you have to wait for your money? In most cases, you'll see the money hit your account within a few business days. But if you need the money instantly and there's a high fee for receiving the money at a moment's notice, you may want to look elsewhere.
Deposit limit: The amount of your paycheck you can tap early will vary by service. One may allow you to gain access to half your paycheck early, while another could offer to send you just a portion of your daily earnings or set a daily dollar amount limit. Before you choose to go with a EWA service, make sure you will actually be able to get what you need if you're in a tight spot.
This story was produced by Current and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
© Stacker Media, LLC.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
CFPB drops $95M overdraft case against Navy Federal
This story was originally published on Banking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Banking Dive newsletter. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said Tuesday it has terminated its overdraft fee-related consent order against Navy Federal Credit Union and waived any alleged non-compliance. The CFPB, under former director Rohit Chopra, had ordered the Vienna, Virginia-based Navy Federal to pay more than $95 million for 'illegal surprise overdraft fees' – the largest penalty ever against a credit union for such activity. The credit union was required to pay a civil penalty of $15 million and refund $80 million in illegally paid overdraft fees. The two-page order termination, signed by the CFPB's Acting Director Russell Vought, did not state any specific reason. Navy Federal had earlier said it 'fully cooperated' with the agency's investigation. 'Navy Federal's commitment to prioritize and protect our members is core to who we are. Our overdraft program allows our members to make necessary, everyday purchases without going into long-term debt or turning to payday lenders,' a credit union spokesperson said in a statement seen by Banking Dive. 'Navy Federal complied with all applicable laws and regulations at the time and continues to do so. We firmly believe the CFPB's decision to terminate the order was appropriate.' In a separate move, the CFPB on Tuesday terminated its order against Fay Servicing, noting that the mortgage servicer had fulfilled several obligations, including paying a civil penalty of $2 million and $3 million to the CFPB for bureau-administered consumer restitution. The CFPB will distribute the amount to consumers 'consistent with the terms of the order.' Between 2017 and 2022, the credit union charged customers overdraft fees on certain ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases, even when their accounts showed sufficient funds at the time of the transactions, the CFPB under Chopra said. The CFPB, under Chopra, noted the bureau's efforts to tackle 'junk fees' saved American families billions. But Vought's CFPB has taken a different perspective. 'The more we uncover at CFPB, the more we see how this agency was weaponized against targeted Americans,' Vought said in a statement, while seeking to vacate a redlining order against mortgage lender Townstone Financial. However, the CFPB's attempt to undo the Biden-era redlining settlement against Townstone Financial backfired after a federal judge denied the motion to dismiss the case, noting it would 'erode public confidence in the finality of judgments.' The CFPB's latest terminations follow other efforts to overturn Biden-era consent orders. Last month, the CFPB vacated Bank of America's mortgage-related consent order three years early. The lender allegedly failed to collect the required demographic data from mortgage applicants but blamed the applicants for the lack of data, stating that they chose not to respond. Bank of America paid $12 million in 2023 to settle the allegations without admitting any wrongdoing. In a similar move, the bureau also terminated a consent order against Mississippi-based Trustmark Bank, 17 months earlier than planned, over allegations of redlining. The CFPB also amended an earlier consent order against fintech Wise regarding its remittance practices and reduced the nearly $2.025 million penalty to $45,000. The agency itself has grabbed attention over significant workforce reduction plans and efforts to cut off funding. Vought has attempted to reduce CFPB staff by approximately 90%. A provision in President Donald Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill that would have eliminated the CFPB's budget was recently blocked. Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled the provision violated the Byrd Rule. The Senate Bankig Committee came up with an updated version of the bill that would cap the CFPB's access to funding at 6.5% of the Federal Reserve operating budget - down from its current limit of 12%. Recommended Reading UBS, Barclays diverge on whether to chase US wealth Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Biggest US Banks Boost Dividends After Fed Stress Tests
JPMorgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Bank of America Corp. were among firms raising quarterly payouts following the Federal Reserve's annual review last week showed that all banks examined would maintain enough capital to withstand a hypothetical economic downturn. Tom Metcalf reports on Bloomberg Television. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Top US banks boost dividends
This story was originally published on Banking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Banking Dive newsletter. The biggest U.S. banks are increasing quarterly dividends following the Federal Reserve's Friday release of stress test results. Dividend increases come as the 22 stress-tested banks demonstrated they have sufficient capital to withstand a severe recession and continue lending while remaining above minimum capital requirements. This year's scenario wasn't as harsh as last year's, but given the results, large banks were expected to have room to hike dividends or share repurchases. Since large bank capital levels remain robust, 'investors should continue to expect that any excess capital that cannot be redeployed into growing the companies' core businesses either organically or through acquisition will eventually be returned to shareholders,' RBC Capital Markets analyst Gerard Cassidy wrote Tuesday. More 'aggressive' use of buyback plans should follow once a Basel III capital requirements proposal is finalized, he added. Dividend increases came out to a median of 7.1%, analysts noted. Among the top five biggest U.S. banks, JPMorgan Chase is boosting its dividend to $1.50 per share, from $1.40, for the third quarter. Bank of America said its dividend is increasing by 8%, to $0.28 per share. Citi is hiking its dividend to $0.60 per share, from $0.56. Wells Fargo is boosting its dividend to $0.45, from $0.40. U.S. Bank's dividend will tick up to $0.52 per share, from $0.50. Goldman Sachs logged a 33% increase, with its dividend jumping to $4 per share. PNC is hiking its dividend 6%, to $1.70 per share. Truist said its current dividend of $0.52 per share will remain. Preliminary stress capital buffers telegraphed Tuesday 'confirmed broad improvement in capital requirements, clearing the way for large banks to lower CET-1 targets,' Truist Securities analyst John McDonald wrote. JPMorgan, for example, said its required common equity tier 1 capital ratio dropped to 11.5%, from 12.3%. Most of the banks' stress capital buffers will be at the 2.5% regulatory minimum based on test results; Citi's is highest, at 3.6%. However, most were based on current methodology. 'The big question is whether the Fed proceeds with its proposal to average stress test results over two years, which would reduce the magnitude of improvement in capital requirements by ~half for the group,' McDonald wrote. The Fed will inform banks of their final 2025 stress capital buffer requirements by Aug. 31. The Fed also trimmed Wells Fargo's 2024 stress capital buffer, from 3.8% to 3.7%, and cut Goldman Sachs' 2024 stress capital buffer from 6.2% to 6.1%. Goldman's was reduced last year from 6.4%, after the bank contested the Fed's stress capital buffer requirement. On Tuesday, CEO David Solomon reiterated the desire for stress test changes. 'The Federal Reserve has expressed its intention to institute a more transparent and fair approach to these tests, as it looks to uphold the safety and soundness of our financial system,' Goldman CEO David Solomon said in a news release. 'A more balanced approach to the tests would allow Goldman Sachs to continue to serve our clients' needs, invest in our world-class businesses, and support economic growth. We look forward to continued progress.' At JPMorgan – where the board of directors also approved a new $50 billion share repurchase program – CEO Jamie Dimon expressed similar sentiments. 'We look forward to future proposals from the Federal Reserve on stress test models and scenarios that will increase transparency and address longstanding issues with the current SCB framework,' Dimon said in a news release. The amount and timing of JPMorgan's common share repurchases under the new authorization 'will be subject to various factors,' the bank said. Morgan Stanley, which said it was increasing its dividend to $1 per share, from $0.925, also announced its board re-authorized a $20 billion share repurchase program. 'Given how much de-regulation has picked up steam as a topic between reporting seasons, we expect management teams to field questions on buyback cadence specifically and plans for excess capital deployment generally,' UBS analyst Erika Najarian wrote Tuesday. Recommended Reading Largest banks sail through Fed's stress test Sign in to access your portfolio