
‘Disgusted': Bryan Kohberger's former friends, peers react to guilty murder plea
'I won't lie, I kind of spiraled yesterday,' Casey Arntz, 32, told the Idaho Statesman in a text Thursday. 'Did he ever have thoughts like that before? Did he ever think that he wanted to kill me or my friends? Were we spared because we were friends with him?'
Arntz and her younger brother, Thomas, grew up together with Kohberger in the Pocono Mountains near the Pennsylvania state line with New Jersey among a small circle of friends. They spent time together playing video games after school, as well as getting outdoors in the heavily forested region.
As Kohberger got into drugs in high school, they said, a distance developed. Kohberger later overcame a heroin addiction. With the sporadic exception, they hadn't spoken in years, which made his arrest at his parents' Pennsylvania home in December 2022 so startling. He had been their awkward, chubby teenage friend, with heightened ability to observe and wit to match, they said.
Now he was accused of killing four students on the other side of the country in a nationally known investigation that unimaginably ended in their hometown. The victims were Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, both 21, and Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin, both 20. Each suffered multiple wounds in the attack at an off-campus home on King Road in Moscow, Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson told the court Wednesday.
The allegations floored them then, and similar emotions rushed back this week after Kohberger, 30, admitted he repeatedly stabbed the four college undergraduates with a large, fixed-blade knife that prosecutors said he bought on Amazon in March 2022 while living in Pennsylvania.
Kohberger brought the knife and Ka-Bar brand leather sheath — which he left behind with his DNA at the crime scene — with him on his move a few months later to Pullman for a Ph.D. program at Washington State University.
On Wednesday, Kohberger pleaded guilty to the four counts of first-degree murder and a count of felony burglary to avoid a possible death sentence at trial. He agreed to maximum sentences for each, which is likely to see him spend the rest of his life in prison. Kohberger will have no chance of parole and he can never file an appeal, according to the terms of the agreement. A sentencing hearing is scheduled for July 23.
Donna Yozwiak, Kohberger's high school guidance counselor, reacted with surprise.
'Actually, I was hoping that he was not the murderer who killed these four students,' she said in an email to the Statesman. 'I hope that his family will survive this horrendous ordeal and be able to get on with their lives. I also hope that the victims' relatives gain much needed closure and heal after this tragedy.
'As a society, we may never know the motivation for the murders or if Bryan Kohberger has any remorse for his violent actions.'
'Let the inside deal with him'
Kohberger's admissions in court finally put any question of his culpability to bed for Jack Baylis, 31, another of their group of friends at the time.
'You wouldn't plead guilty to it unless you did that,' he said in a phone interview Thursday. 'If you were framed, you'd be fighting tooth and nail.'
Kohberger's decision to take people's lives was additionally disheartening, he said, because he had kicked his drug habit and seemingly had a life direction. But the desire to learn about people who commit murder — an area of interest for Kohberger — took hold, and he likely wanted to see whether he could get away with the perfect crime, Baylis said.
'I think he did it to see what it felt like, to experience it. If he wanted to write a paper about what killers feel and why they kill, to be accurate, you have to experience it yourself to truly understand it,' Baylis said. 'To get into the mind of a killer, you have to be a killer, would be my guess.'
Casey Arntz told the Statesman she had conflicting emotions about how, after 2 ½ years of legal proceedings, her former friend acknowledged he was responsible for the early morning quadruple homicide — perhaps the most talked-about crime in Idaho history. She felt for the victims' families, especially those upset that the death penalty was no longer an option with the plea bargain, but welcomed the case nearing its conclusion.
'I'm disgusted that he could actually do something so heinous,' she said. 'I understand why the families are so upset, they were starved for justice, and I would 100% be, too. However, there was never any guarantee that he'd be given the death penalty. So I think him taking the plea deal was better for everyone.
'He's locked up for life. Let the inside deal with him.'
Thomas Arntz, 29, shared his sister's sentiments. The result Wednesday removed any chance his childhood friend could be acquitted and get away with murder, he said.
'I personally feel relieved with the acceptance of the guilty plea,' Arntz told the Statesman, adding he would pray for the four victims' families. 'I am deeply sorry that Bryan's parents have to live with this as well. … I've always thought they were kind people, and they didn't deserve this. And for Bryan, God have mercy on his soul.'
'He was kind of nonexistent'
For Ben Roberts, 33, a former criminology graduate school colleague of Kohberger's at WSU, Wednesday's guilty pleas felt past due.
The U.S. justice system is built upon the belief that a person is innocent until proven guilty, he said, and yet his former classmate's DNA at the crime scene, with no other suspects, strengthened his own suspicions. Still, Kohberger's arrest left him 'horrified,' he recalled.
'What surprises me at this point is that it dragged out so long, as I thought that a plea deal would never be reached,' Roberts told the Statesman by phone Thursday. 'My general impression was he was not going to stop fighting it, and to all of sudden have this about-face was very surprising — but a pleasant surprise.'
Roberts spent several weeks just a few desks away from Kohberger in the days leading up to the close of the fall 2022 semester — just days and weeks after the murders. His graduate school classmate rarely exhibited much in the way of emotion around him, but also did not necessarily set off any red flags, he said.
'I noticed that unless he was deliberately trying to put on an appearance — if he didn't have the mask — he was kind of nonexistent, or hollow, I guess,' Roberts said. 'It's kind of like you're staring into an abyss. There's something human supposed to be there, and it isn't.'
A casual hunter, Roberts said he's felt bad in the past when he's shot and killed a deer. He said he couldn't even fathom stabbing a person to death.
'I just can't even begin to get inside the head of somebody who could do something like that, and then attend class like it's business as usual,' Roberts said. 'That's just completely alien to me.'
Roberts said he did not watch Wednesday's change-of-plea hearing. He didn't want to hear Kohberger's voice or see his face again, even though the latter has been difficult to escape the past two years, he noted. He was glad the high-profile case finally came to an end, and without the need for a monthslong trial.
'The first thing I said was that it was about damned time that the poor thing was put to rest,' Roberts said.
'We will heal'
For now, the court's gag order in the closely watched case, which restricts attorneys and their agents — including members of law enforcement for the state — is still in effect. Thompson asked that it remain so through sentencing, which Kohberger's defense did not oppose.
The University of Idaho released a statement this week after word broke that Kohberger planned to change his plea to guilty in the shocking crime.
'We keep the families of the victims in our hearts as each deals with this outcome in their own way,' the state's namesake university wrote in the statement. 'We will never forget the four incredible lives taken on King Road, they are forever Vandals and each holds a place in our Vandal Family. Since that fateful day in November 2022 our university has become stronger, more intent on its purpose and more supportive of each other. And while we will not forget, we will heal.'
Similarly, Moscow Mayor Art Bettge, in office in 2022 when the murders took place and upended the community, shared optimism that the city's residents might finally be freed from the clutches of the tragic incident.
'I recognize and understand that we all desire justice for the victims and their families,' he said in an emailed statement. 'My heart, and that of our entire community, go out to the families of the victims. It is my hope that this resolution can begin to provide a small measure of closure for the families and our community. What is clear is that no matter what form justice would have taken, nothing will bring back Ethan, Madison, Xana, and Kaylee, and our world will be forever darkened because of it.'
WSU's comment after Kohberger's hearing was more succinct. A Statesman request to speak with professors in its criminal justice and criminology department who knew and taught Kohberger, including the semester he killed the U of I students, was again declined.
'Our hearts go out to the families, friends and colleagues impacted,' WSU's statement read. 'We do not have anything to add at this time.'
After Wednesday's hearing, one main question remains for everyone, including the victims' families: Why? Why did Bryan Kohberger choose to take these four young lives, thereby essentially also ending his own, to some degree?
That question was on the mind of Casey Arntz, Kohberger's Pennsylvania friend thrust into the spotlight and forced to deal with her own form of grief over the past two-plus years.
'I wasn't as close to him as my brother or my other friends, but we still hung out and talked a lot,' she said. 'He was in my parents' house. I was alone with him.
'I guess the one thing I would say to him is what everyone wants to say to him: 'Why would you do this? Why would you take the innocent lives of four beautiful people?' I can't even begin to imagine what he would say. How does someone justify their actions when they're so morbid?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
4 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Legal group urges state Supreme Court to order Florida Bar to investigate Bondi
Snubbed by The Florida Bar last month, about 70 liberal-leaning scholars, attorneys and former judges have asked the state Supreme Court to order the Bar to investigate their complaint claiming U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi violated Florida's ethics rules as the nation's top law enforcement official. The coalition's legal argument in a petition filed on Tuesday may be compelling, but it's a long shot given the fact that the seven justices on Florida's high court were all appointed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and former GOP Gov. Charlie Crist. In June, the group filed an ethics complaint against Bondi with The Florida Bar, but the Bar rejected it on jurisdictional grounds, saying in a formal response that it 'does not investigate or prosecute sitting officers appointed under the U.S. Constitution while they are in office.' READ MORE: Group accuses Bondi of 'misconduct' as Attorney General; Florida Bar rejects complaint However, in their petition to the Florida Supreme Court, the coalition challenged that assertion, noting that in 1998 Congress passed the McDade Amendment, which explicitly rejected The Florida Bar's argument that investigating federal officials would encroach on federal authority. The McDade Amendment states: 'Attorneys for the [U.S.] Government shall be subject to State laws and rules ... to the same extent and in the same manner as other attorneys in that State.' In their petition filed with the Florida Supreme Court, the coalition preemptively confronts the likely criticism that their legal bid to have The Florida Bar investigate Bondi — who has aggressively carried out the Trump administration's crackdown on undocumented immigrants, elite universities and law firms — amounts to political grandstanding. 'Some have criticized ethics complaints against public officials as being 'politics,' or a vehicle for adjudicating policy disputes,' said the petition, which was filed by seasoned South Florida criminal defense attorney Jon May. 'As a review of the complaint will make clear, however, its aim is to assure that lawyers who occupy positions of public trust continue to abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct that they are obliged to follow,' said May, who represented Panamanian strongman Manuel Noriega in his drug-trafficking case in Miami. 'The long list of signatories to the complaint, many of whom are distinguished professors of legal ethics, vindicates that intent.' On Tuesday, The Florida Bar did not respond to a Miami Herald request for comment. 'The Florida Bar has this view that the Attorney General is too busy to be bothered with an ethics complaint,' said Jamie Conrad, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney with Lawyers Defending American Democracy, which helped author the complaint and petition. 'We think it's just the opposite. 'She, of all people, has to set an example for the government and the rest of the country,' Conrad told the Miami Herald. 'But she and her team are being allowed to operate in an ethics-free zone and that's a very dangerous situation for the country.' The coalition, which includes retired Florida Supreme Court justices Barbara J. Pariente and Peggy A. Quince, took aim at Bondi in their complaint filed on June 5 with The Florida Bar. Democratic Gov. Lawton Chiles appointed Pariente to the Court in 1997 while Chiles and Republican Jeb Bush, then governor-elect, jointly appointed Quince. The coalition's complaint accuses Bondi, a Florida Bar member, of violating her ethical duties as U.S. Attorney General, saying she has committed 'serious professional misconduct that threatens the rule of law and the administration of justice.' The complaint claims Bondi 'has sought to compel Department of Justice lawyers to violate their ethical obligations under the guise of 'zealous advocacy' ' that she espoused in a Feb. 5 memo to all agency employees on her first day in office. The complaint further says Bondi threatened agency lawyers with discipline or termination if they failed 'to zealously pursue the President's political objectives,' alleging her conduct violates Florida Bar rules and longstanding norms of the Justice Department. The coalition noted that The Florida Bar rejected two other recent ethics complaints against Bondi filed, respectively, by two California congressmen and a California lawyer. The Bar's lawyers cited a jurisdictional issue in those prior instances, too. At the time, the Department of Justice, speaking on behalf of Bondi, condemned these collective efforts, saying they were trying to 'weaponize' a complaint using The Florida Bar to attack the U.S. Attorney General. 'The Florida Bar has twice rejected performative attempts by these out-of-state lawyers to weaponize the bar complaint process against AG Bondi,' Justice Department chief of staff Chad Mizelle said in a statement provided to the Miami Herald. 'This third vexatious attempt will fail to do anything other than prove that the signatories have less intelligence —and independent thoughts — than sheep.' Bondi's role in firings The coalition's complaint accuses Bondi — the 59-year-old former Florida Attorney General and State Attorney in the Tampa area — of playing a central role in the improper firings and resignations of numerous government lawyers during her four-month span at the helm of the Justice Department. Three examples are cited in the complaint: ▪ In mid-April, Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche fired a seasoned immigration lawyer who the Trump administration accused of sabotaging its legal case over the mistaken deportation of a Maryland man to his native El Salvador. Justice Department lawyer Erez Reuveni argued the government's case in the deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, who was sent to a Salvadoran mega prison in March due to an 'administrative error,' despite an immigration court order that he not be removed from the United States. Reuveni was initially placed on administrative leave days after informing a federal judge: 'Our only arguments are jurisdictional. … He should not have been sent to El Salvador.' In April, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the judge's order directing the Trump administration to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's release. Abrego Garcia, who had not been charged with a crime despite being accused by the Trump administration of belonging to the notorious MS-13 gang, remained in the Salvadoran prison for nearly three months. But in late May, Bondi announced that Abrego Garcia was flown back to United States and charged in a new federal indictment, accusing him of conspiring to transport undocumented migrants within the country who had crossed the southern border illegally. 'Abrego Garcia has landed in the United States to face justice,' Bondi said at a news conference in Washington. 'He was a smuggler of humans and children and women. ... This is what American justice looks like.' After his return, the coalition that filed the ethics complaint that was rejected by The Florida Bar also submitted a similar one with the federal district court in Maryland, where Abrego Garcia's immigration case was reviewed. Reuveni filed a whistle-blower claim with the U.S. Senate in June. 'The Department of Justice is thumbing its nose at the courts, and putting Justice Department attorneys in an impossible position where they have to choose between loyalty to the agenda of the president and their duty to the court,' Reuveni told the New York Times in an interview last week. Bondi denied his account on social media: 'This disgruntled employee is not a whistle-blower — he's a leaker asserting false claims seeking five minutes of fame.' Last Friday, Bondi also fired her personal ethics adviser, removing the Justice Department's top official responsible for counseling the most senior political appointees, according to published reports. Joseph Tirrell, a career attorney who'd spent nearly 20 years at the department, received a termination letter from Bondi. READ MORE: Judge orders Trump administration to bring Venezuelans back from El Salvador prison ▪ In mid-February, a longtime federal prosecutor resigned rather than carry out what she described as orders from Trump-appointed officials to pursue enforcement actions unsupported by evidence, according to a copy of her resignation letter. Denise Cheung, who was the head of the criminal division of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, wrote in her resignation letter to interim U.S. Attorney Ed Martin that she had 'always sought to offer sound and ethical counsel' and that she had been asked to take investigative and law enforcement actions despite what she called the lack of 'sufficient evidence.' Cheung wrote that she was asked to review documentation provided by the Office of the Deputy Attorney General 'to open a criminal investigation into whether a contract had been unlawfully awarded by an executive agency.' The contract was reportedly granted by the Environmental Protection Agency during President Joe Biden's administration. ▪ Earlier in February, several senior federal prosecutors in New York and Washington resigned after they refused to follow a Justice Department order to drop the corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams. They resigned after Emil Bove, the acting U.S. deputy attorney general, issued a Feb. 10 memo ordering federal prosecutors in New York to dismiss the case against Adams, saying it hampered the mayor's ability to tackle 'illegal immigration and violent crime.' Danielle R. Sassoon, the acting U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, resigned one day after appealing to Bondi. Sassoon said she attended a meeting on Jan. 31 with Bove, Adams' attorneys and members of her office. 'Adams's attorneys repeatedly urged what amounted to a quid pro quo, indicating that Adams would be in a position to assist with the Department's enforcement priorities only if the indictment were dismissed,' Sassoon wrote on Feb. 12. 'Zealous advocacy' According to the coalition's 23-page complaint, Bondi's 'principal ethical violation arises from her perversion of the concept of 'zealous advocacy' into an overriding campaign, individually and through Messrs. Blanche, Bove and Martin, to coerce and intimidate the lawyers they supervise into violating their ethical obligations.' In each of the three examples, Bondi and her senior team 'ordered Department lawyers to do things those lawyers were ethically forbidden from doing, under threat of suspension or termination—or fired them for not having done so,' the complaint says. May, who helped write The Florida Bar complaint, said he believes 'zealous advocacy operates within the rules of ethics, not outside them.' Others in the coalition agreed. 'The Florida Bar has a responsibility to hold Bondi — and every lawyer under its purview who is implicated in her conduct — to account for actions that threaten the rule of law and the administration of justice,' said Norm Eisen, executive chair of Democracy Defenders Fund, a nonprofit legal advocacy group in Washington, D.C. Eisen is the former ambassador to the Czech Republic during the Obama administration.


Washington Post
7 hours ago
- Washington Post
A Florida man is set to be the 26th person executed in the US this year, surpassing 2024's total
STARKE, Fla. — A man who fatally shot a man and woman outside a Florida bar as part of an attempted revenge killing is scheduled to be executed on Tuesday, which would be the 26th execution carried out in the U.S. this year. So far, 25 men have been executed in 2025, tying the number of executions in 2024 and 2018. The number of executions has largely trended downward nationally this century after peaking with 98 in 1999. From 1995 to 2006, there were an average of about 67 executions per year.


CNN
16 hours ago
- CNN
Opening statements set for today in trial of Colorado dentist accused of fatally poisoning his wife
Opening statements are set for Tuesday in the trial of an Aurora, Colorado, dentist accused of fatally poisoning his wife's protein shakes, plus plotting to kill four others, including the lead detective investigating her death. Fifteen jurors – 12 primary and three alternates – were seated following about six hours of questioning Monday. James Craig, 47, has pleaded not guilty to charges including first-degree murder, solicitation to commit first-degree murder, solicitation to commit tampering with physical evidence and solicitation to commit perjury. Craig's wife, Angela, died on March 18, 2023, after being admitted to local hospitals three times in 10 days. She was 43 years old; they had six children. Investigators say Craig began to carry out a plan to end his wife's life one week before her first hospitalization. Craig created a new email account on February 27, 2023, from a computer in an exam room at his dental office, a probable cause affidavit states. He used the account that same day to order arsenic on Amazon after conducting searches including 'how many grams of pure arsenic will kill a human,' and 'Top 5 Undetectable Poisons That Show No Signs of Foul Play,' the document says. A delivery confirmation shows the arsenic arrived at the Craig home on March 4. Two days later, Angela was admitted to a hospital complaining of dizziness, an inability to focus her eyes and sluggish physical responses, according to the affidavit. She was discharged the same day. Text messages between the couple, included in the document, show Angela told her husband the only thing she had consumed that morning was her protein shake. She denied feeling nauseated when he asked, and texted him, 'I feel drugged.' 'Given our history I know that must be triggering,' Craig wrote back. 'Just for the record, I didn't drug you.' The message is an apparent reference to an incident years prior when Craig allegedly drugged his wife to prevent her from stopping his attempt to commit suicide, one of Angela Craig's sisters told investigators, according to a probable cause affidavit. Angela was hospitalized again from March 9 until March 14 and appeared to have consumed another protein shake before that hospitalization, text messages from the affidavit indicate. In a text conversation on March 10, James Craig told a family friend, 'Yesterday, the only thing she had was a protein shake in the morning which she threw up,' along with soup for dinner which she also vomited, screenshots from the court document show. On March 13, while Angela was admitted for her second hospital stay, investigators allege an online order of potassium cyanide was delivered to Craig's dental practice. Craig told the company from which he placed an order that he needed it for a complex surgical procedure, but he told an office manager he would be receiving a personal package and not to open it, the affidavit says. The office manager told investigators the package was inadvertently opened by another employee and she saw a packing slip labeled 'potassium cyanide' before resealing the box, according to the document. Investigators also uncovered 'sexually explicit' email exchanges between Craig and a woman named Karin Cain who traveled from Texas to Colorado to visit Craig while his wife was hospitalized, the affidavit says. Cain met Craig at a dental convention that February and he told her he was amid a divorce, she told ABC News in 2023. 'If I had known what was true, I would not have been with this person,' Cain said. Angela was admitted to the hospital for the final time on March 15. About three hours after arriving, she had a seizure and unexplained rapid medical decline, which led to her being placed on life support in the hospital's intensive care unit, the affidavit says. She was pronounced dead three days later. The Arapahoe County coroner ruled Angela's cause of death was acute cyanide and tetrahydrozoline poisoning, with subacute arsenic poisoning listed as a significant condition. While Craig was in jail awaiting trial in his wife's death, prosecutors say he plotted to kill four people, including the lead detective investigating her death. Craig tried to convince a fellow inmate to kill the detective, another unidentified law enforcement officer and two other inmates, prosecutors said during a February preliminary hearing introducing two additional criminal charges. Craig also allegedly wrote letters to the inmate's ex-wife, trying to convince her to 'fabricate evidence,' prosecutors told the court. Law enforcement intercepted two letters to the woman offering her money to manufacture texts, phone records and photographs to back up a story about her being friends with Angela Craig – a story prosecutors say he wanted to sell to both the district attorney's office and Craig's own defense attorney at the time. That attorney, Harvey Steinberg, had abruptly withdrawn from the case last November, the day jury selection was set to begin. At the time of his withdrawal, Steinberg cited two rules of professional conduct, according to prosecutors. The first states, 'The client persists in a course of action involving the lawyer's services that the lawyer reasonably believes is criminal or fraudulent,' and the second says, 'The client insists upon taking action that the lawyer considers repugnant or with which the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement.' Steinberg has not responded to requests for comment. In one of the letters to the inmate's ex-wife, Craig indicated he believed his case hinged on 'being able to find someone to say Angela was suicidal,' an investigator testified, hinting at a possible defense. Craig had told several people Angela was suffering suicidal ideations leading up to her death, according to the affidavit. Craig's dental partner, Ryan Redfearn, told investigators when he brought up the potassium cyanide purchase, Craig initially denied it, then recanted, 'but claimed Angela asked him to order it,' the affidavit says. Craig told Redfearn he 'didn't think (Angela) would actually take it,' according to the affidavit, at which point Redfearn told him to 'stop talking and get a lawyer.' A case worker with child protective services described a similar conversation to investigators, the document says. Craig told her Angela had been suicidal 'for some time,' and he believed she had been 'intentionally overdosing on opioids and another unknown substance,' according to the document. The social worker told investigators the statements were concerning because Craig never reported the incidents nor tried to get medical help, and none of the couple's six children mentioned their mother suffered from depression. Craig's attorneys have not responded to requests for comment.