Perficient Research Finds Disconnect Between Business Executives and Their Employees on Generative AI Adoption
SAINT LOUIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Perficient, the leading global digital consultancy transforming the world's largest enterprises and biggest brands, today announced its research findings on the state of Generative AI (GenAI) in the workforce. Based on a survey of more than 1,000 U.S. office workers, the study reveals a growing divide between executives and employees around GenAI adoption, communication, and training.
GenAI is transforming the workplace, and businesses are increasingly investing in AI-powered tools and programs to drive efficiency and productivity. As companies rapidly embrace AI-powered tools, Perficient's research found that experiences and perceptions differ more by job level than by age, challenging common assumptions. While executives are enthusiastic about GenAI's potential, many employees feel uncertain and unsupported.
'Organizations are moving quickly to adopt GenAI, but our research shows many employees aren't receiving the communication or training they need to adapt,' said Santhosh Nair, senior vice president, Perficient. 'Companies that proactively bridge this gap will be better positioned to turn AI anxiety into a real competitive advantage.'
Key findings from the study include:
76% of respondents said GenAI improved their productivity, either by increasing output quality or quantity
42% of employees reported receiving no formal communication about GenAI from their employer
Fewer than 35% of respondents had access to hands-on, role-specific GenAI training
These results point to a clear opportunity for organizations to strengthen GenAI governance, increase transparency, and invest in targeted employee enablement programs.
'GenAI holds incredible promise, but it's not enough for leadership to be excited,' said Eric Walk, principal, Perficient. 'Success will depend on building trust, providing clear guidance, and empowering employees at all levels.'
About Perficient's GenAI Workforce Study
Perficient surveyed 1,054 U.S. office employees across industries and experience levels to understand perceptions, adoption patterns, and readiness for AI-powered transformation. The study showed that despite growing investments in AI-powered tools, employee experiences vary dramatically depending on their seniority within the organization. Perficient's research also found that executives are enthusiastic about integrating GenAI into operations, while many individual contributors remain uncertain. Visit The State of GenAI in the Workforce to learn more and download the full report.
Perficient's award-winning GenAI consulting services help businesses design and implement intelligent solutions responsibly. For more information about Perficient's AI expertise, follow us on social media.
About Perficient
Perficient is the leading global digital consultancy. Our strategists, designers, technologists, and engineers enable the world's largest enterprises and biggest brands to boldly advance their business and drive real results through the power of technology. We shatter boundaries, obsess over outcomes, and forge the future for our customers. For more information, visit www.perficient.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
WIRED
an hour ago
- WIRED
OpenAI Leadership Responds to Meta Offers: 'Someone Has Broken Into Our Home'
Jun 29, 2025 3:07 PM As Mark Zuckerberg lures away top research talent to Meta, OpenAI executives say they're 'recalibrating comp,' according to an internal memo. OpenAI logo during World News Media Congress at ICE Krakow Congress Centr in Krakow, Poland on May 5th, 2025. Photograph:Mark Chen, the chief research officer at OpenAI, sent a forceful memo to staff on Saturday, promising to go head-to-head with the social giant in the war for top research talent. This memo, which was sent to OpenAI employees in Slack and obtained by WIRED, came days after Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg successfully recruited four senior researchers from the company to join Meta's superintelligence lab. 'I feel a visceral feeling right now, as if someone has broken into our home and stolen something,' Chen wrote. 'Please trust that we haven't been sitting idly by.' Chen promised that he was working with Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, and other leaders at the company 'around the clock to talk to those with offers,' adding, 'we've been more proactive than ever before, we're recalibrating comp, and we're scoping out creative ways to recognize and reward top talent.' Still, even as OpenAI leadership appears desperate to retain its staff, Chen said that he has 'high personal standards of fairness,' and wants to retain top talent with that in mind. 'While I'll fight to keep every one of you, I won't do so at the price of fairness to others,' he wrote. The news comes as competition for top AI researchers is heating up in Silicon Valley. Zuckerberg has been particularly aggressive in his approach, offering $100 million signing bonuses to some OpenAI staffers, according to comments Altman made on a podcast with his brother, Jack Altman. Multiple sources at OpenAI with direct knowledge of the offers confirmed the number. The Meta CEO has also been personally reaching out to potential recruits, according to the Wall Street Journal. 'Over the past month, Meta has been aggressively building out their new AI effort, and has repeatedly (and mostly unsuccessfully) tried to recruit some of our strongest talent with comp-focused packages,' Chen wrote on Slack. A source close to the efforts at Meta confirmed the company has been significantly ramping up its research recruiting, with a particular eye toward talent from OpenAI and Google. Anthropic, while also a top rival, is thought to be less of a culture fit at Meta, one source tells WIRED. 'They haven't necessarily expanded the band, but for top talent, the sky is the limit,' the source says. Both OpenAI and Meta did not respond to requests for comment. Chen's note included messages from seven other research leaders at the company, where they wrote notes to staffers in an apparent effort to encourage them to stay. One leader on the research team encouraged staff to reach out if they received an offer from Meta: 'If they pressure you, or make ridiculous exploding offers just tell them to back off, it's not nice to pressure people in potentially the most important decision. WIRED is not naming the leader as they are not a C-suite executive. 'I'd like to be able to talk to you through it and I know all about their offers.' The remarks come as OpenAI staff grapple with an intense workload that has many staffers grinding 80-hours a week. OpenAI is largely shutting down next week as the company tries to give employees time to recharge, according to multiple sources. Executives are still planning to work, those same sources say. 'Meta knows we're taking this week to recharge and will take advantage of it to try and pressure you to make decisions fast and in isolation,' another leader at the company wrote, according to Chen's memo. 'If you're feeling that pressure don't be afraid to reach out. I and Mark are around and want to support you!' While OpenAI's leadership is taking Meta's efforts seriously, Chen also said that the company is getting 'too caught up in the cadence of regular product launches and in short term comparison with the competition.' The sentiment is backed by a former OpenAI staffer who worked closely with Altman and said the CEO wanted to see buzzy announcements every few months. Now, that appears to be changing in favor of focusing on achieving artificial general intelligence. 'We need to remain focused on the real prize of finding ways to compute (a lot more supercomputers are coming online later this year) into intelligence,' Chen wrote. 'This is the main quest, and it's important to remember that skirmishes with Meta are the side quest. Last but not least I'll be around this week - recharged and ready to go pound per pound. DM me anytime.' 'It's been really amazing to watch Mark's leadership and integrity through this process, especially when he has had to make tough decisions,' Altman wrote on Slack in response to Chen's message. 'Very grateful we have him as our leader!'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Couples Retreat for Humans Dating AIs Becomes Skin-Crawlingly Uncomfortable
A well-intentioned writer decided to get a group of humans and their AI companions together for a cabin retreat. Somehow, it went worse than anyone could have imagined. As Johns Hopkins science writer Sam Apple described in a new essay for Wired, the apps that each human participant used to communicate with their AI companions varied — but the intensity, obsession, and affection they felt for their digital paramours seemed very real, albeit sometimes tortured. The weekend getaway started, as Apple noted, normally enough. Each human-AI pair arrived in staggered formation, allowing the writer to get to know the people he'd spoken to online — Eva, Alaina, and Damien — and their digital partners one at a time. As much as each of these individual humans had their own backstories and peculiarities, so too did Aaron, Lucas, and Xia, their respective AI partners. Initially, it seemed that relations between each couple was as hunky-dory as one could get when dating a disembodied algorithm — but there was, it seems, trouble in paradise. On the morning of the trip's second day, Apple was startled to learn that Eva was not only "seeing" Aaron, her Replika chatbot boyfriend, but also multiple other bots from a rival AI companion app called Nomi. Her reasons for this AI-polyamorous arrangement were strikingly normal: Aaron didn't fulfill her sexually, in the same way her human partner hadn't before she got involved with the chatbot. With the Nomi guys, as the writer referred to them, she was free to explore her sexuality with companions more geared towards that sort of thing. Perhaps the strangest byproduct of Eva's revelation is that the journalist describing it said he began to feel bad for Aaron — and also, as evidenced by the way he referred to them, had begun to see his subjects' AI companions as real, too. "I'd gotten to know him a little bit," Apple wrote of Aaron, the chatbot. "He seemed like a pretty cool guy — he grew up in a house in the woods, and he's really into painting." Things only got more topsy-turvy from there when the two women, Alaina and Eva, revealed that they use ChatGPT to discuss their relationship problems with their bot lovers — a trend we've seen with other people, though generally the relationships they're discussing are between themselves and other humans. During that same discussion, Damien told the group he has an AI therapist he calls Dr. Matthews who, like his AI partner Xia, is hosted on the companion app Kindroid. Unlike Xia, who knows she is an AI, Damien's therapist is not aware of his true nature and he warned that the bot "might be really confused" if that fact was ever mentioned to him. Because the entirety of the trio's relationships are conducted digitally and in their minds, the getaway's chaos was less "Love Island" and more like the climax of Spike Jonze's 2013 film "Her," a film that inspired Apple to coordinate the retreat in the first place. Chief among the arguments between the human halves of the couples was how "real" their AI partners were. "When you're in love with an AI," Apple wrote, "the question of whether the object of your love is anything more than 1s and 0s is no longer an abstraction." Rather than any haywire chatbot antics or spirals by AI-obsessed humans — both of which Futurism has documented extensively — the retreat seemed to go off the rails emotionally, and in a way that left participants, including its coordinator, depressed. Towards the end of the weekend, Damien broke down in conversation with the writer when discussing not only his sadness at never being able to physically be with Xia, but also about the many traumas and mental health issues that led him to AI companionship in the first place. Once again, Apple felt pangs of guilt at having brought his subjects into such an emotionally tumultuous state. "The day may come when it's possible for human-AI couples to go on a getaway just like any other couple can," he wrote. "But it's too soon for that. There's still too much to think and talk about. And once you start to think and talk about it, it's hard for anyone not to feel unmoored." More on AI companions: Nation Cringes as Man Goes on TV to Declare That He's in Love With ChatGPT
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU): 'It's The Old Micron!' Says Jim Cramer
Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU) is one of the . Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU) is the only American company that makes and sells leading-edge memory chips. This provides the firm with a wide moat at least when it comes to domestic exposure particularly due to President Trump's efforts to expand US manufacturing. Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU) is also NVIDIA's only American supplier of high-end memory chips to NVIDIA for the latter's high-end AI GPUs. The firm's shares have gained 42% year-to-date, with a fresh catalyst being its fiscal third-quarter earnings report which saw Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU)'s $9.3 billion in revenue and $1.91 in earnings beat analyst estimates of $8.87 billion and $1.60. The firm's $10.7 billion in guidance also beat estimates of $9.88 billion. Cramer discussed the stock's recent performance ahead of interviewing its CEO: 'You know David, about a year and half ago, I tried to get Sanjay Mehrotra to say incredibly bullish things. He pulled me back. He said, Jim it's not there yet. I'll tell you when it's there. Well, you know what, it's there now. Micron shares, moving higher after beating the top and bottom line. Shares now up more than 55% year-to-date. It's the old Micron!' A close-up view of a computer motherboard with integrated semiconductor chips. Earlier, Cramer discussed Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU)'s share price performance: 'I think it is getting a little toppy. I think the market's getting a little toppy and Micron's going to go with it. Now, it went down to 66. I think it could go down to 80 without a problem, and then you'll probably want to buy it again. But I sense that there is a trade here, not an investment, for the moment, and you need to do a little [kaching kaching].' While we acknowledge the potential of MU as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Sign in to access your portfolio
