Cartel leader Rafael Caro Quintero pleads not guilty in NYC after being expelled from Mexico
Caro Quintero is accused in the 1985 kidnapping, torture and murder of U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agent Enrique "Kiki" Camarena. He was expelled from Mexico on Thursday, along with 28 other cartel figures.
"[Camarena's] killer is finally facing justice in the United States," said U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York John Durham. "Carl Quintero, known as 'The Narco of Narcos,' was one of the founding members of the Guadalajara cartel, a large-scale Mexican drug trafficking organization."
Former leader of the Juarez cartel, Vicente Carillo Fuentes, also pleaded not guilty Friday afternoon in Brooklyn Federal Court.
"Two extremely powerful, dangerous cartel kingpins, responsible for decades of flooding drugs and violence throughout multiple countries, including the United States, including here in the Eastern District of New York, they will face the consequences of their action," Durham said.
Others were sent from prisons across Mexico and then taken to eight U.S. cities. Among them are five of the six Mexican organized crime groups that President Trump's administration has designated as foreign terrorist organizations.
Prosecutors in both countries say they are facing charges related to drug trafficking and, in some cases, homicide.
"As President Trump has made clear, cartels are terrorist groups, and this Department of Justice is devoted to destroying cartels and transnational gangs," Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement Thursday.
The international transfer came as Mr. Trump called on Mexico to crack down on drugs and illegal immigration in exchange for delaying his threat of tariffs.
Who is Rafael Caro Quintero?
Caro Quintero is the former leader of the Guadalajara cartel. He spent four decades on the DEA and FBI's Most Wanted list, and the case was documented in the Netflix drama "Narcos Mexico."
After 28 years in prison, Caro Quintero was released in 2013 when a court overturned his sentence. He then returned to drug trafficking until he was arrested again in 2022.
"Carl Quintero and his partners pioneered drug trafficking routes through Colombia, Mexico and into the United States and built one of the largest drug organizations in the world," Durham said.
The U.S. sought to extradite Caro Quintero shortly after his re-arrest, but the request was stuck at Mexico's foreign ministry as the country's then-president curtailed its cooperation with the DEA in protest over U.S. law enforcement operations targeting senior political and military officials.
In January, a nonprofit group representing the Camarena family sent a letter urging the White House to renew the request, according to a copy of the letter provided to The Associated Press.
DEA Acting Administrator Derek S. Maltz described Caro Quintero as "a cartel kingpin who unleashed violence, destruction, and death across the United States and Mexico," calling his transfer "extremely personal for the men and women of DEA."
What happened to Enrique "Kiki" Camarena?
Camarena was living in Guadalajara, Mexico and working as an undercover DEA agent when he was kidnapped, his son told CBS News in a 2017 interview. He had been stationed there for four years, on the trail of the country's biggest marijuana and cocaine traffickers.
At the time, Caro Quintero was one of the primary suppliers of heroin, cocaine and marijuana to the U.S. in the late 1970s. He blamed Camarena for a 1984 raid by Mexican authorities on a marijuana plantation, Rancho Bufalo, that upset his business. The DEA said at the time it was the largest drug seizure ever.
In retaliation, it is believed Camarena was kidnapped in Guadalajara, allegedly on orders from Caro Quintero.
Camarena had been headed to a luncheon with his wife on Feb. 7, 1985 when he was surrounded by five armed men who threw him into a car and sped away, according to the DEA. About a month later, his body was found on a ranch about 60 miles away, the DEA said. He had been tortured.
The attack marked a low point in U.S.-Mexico relations.
Camarena was born in Mexicali, Mexico and moved to the U.S. when he was nine years old. He married his high-school sweetheart, Mika, and they moved their three sons to Mexico in 1981.
Camarena had been with the DEA for 11 years and was due to transfer back to the U.S. just three weeks after his disappearance, said the DEA.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A paid-for trip to talk immigration with Dr. Phil sparks questions about NYPD's John Chell
NEW YORK — John Chell, the NYPD's top uniformed cop, had at least $1,000 in travel expenses covered by Dr. Phil last year to participate in an interview with the conservative TV personality — an example of how the powerful police official has become a mainstay of right-wing media, according to records reviewed by the Daily News. Chell, a key ally to Mayor Eric Adams who was at the time the department's chief of patrol, took the trip to Texas in March 2024 to do an interview with Dr. Phil about New York's 'migrant crime wave.' The intersection of migrants and crime is a key talking point of President Trump's administration as it pursues an aggressive deportation agenda, and Chell's comped Texas trip came at a time he was emerging as a regular on Trump-boosting news shows, raising concerns about him mixing policing with partisan politics. In addition to Dr. Phil's shows, Chell has regularly appeared on Newsmax, a pro-Trump outlet, and Fox News. Wearing full uniform, Chell appeared on Newsmax from inside Madison Square Garden during Trump's October 2024 campaign outlet at the arena. Last year, The News reported that Chell — before being promoted to become the NYPD's chief of department — was even considering quitting public service to join Newsmax as a paid political commentator. Since then, Chell has bolstered ties with Trump, including golfing with the president at his New Jersey club last month, while also attracting scrutiny from city oversight agencies over some of his political activities. Chell, a registered independent voter, didn't violate rules or laws by having his Texas tab picked up by Dr. Phil. Chell also regularly appears on media outlets seen as less partisan, including local and national TV stations. Still, Manhattan Councilwoman Gale Brewer, a Democrat who's the chairwoman of the Council's Oversight Committee, argued Chell appearing on overtly pro-Trump outlets takes on a potentially problematic political overtone. 'It could be a problem to go on quasi news channels that are very conservative and Trump-oriented because it doesn't look great for the police department,' said Brewer, whose committee has oversight to probe the NYPD. 'But it is not illegal as far as I can tell.' Ken Frydman, a longtime New York media consultant who has worked for several of the NYPD's labor unions, agreed with Brewer, calling Chell's Dr. Phil appearance 'not only bad optics' but also 'inappropriate.' Senior police officials like Chell, Frydman added, shouldn't engage in activities that could be construed as 'public political positions' as that could send a signal that the NYPD as a whole is partisan. Details about Chell's Texas trip were included in his 2024 financial disclosure, provided to The News this month by the city Conflicts of Interest Board. The document shows Dr. Phil, a vocal Trump supporter whose real name is Phil McGraw, paid between $1,000 and $5,000 on 'travel & lodging' for the chief. The disclosure, which only offers a range as opposed to an exact dollar figure, says the trip had a 'city-related' purpose, meaning Chell's travel was considered an official government activity. Adams' office has routinely said the city pays for expenditures related to official activities municipal employees engage in. But an NYPD spokesperson noted the City Charter allows for officials to accept travel costs as a gift when 'the trip is for a City purpose and therefore could properly be paid for with City funds.' 'The purpose of the trip was to exchange views regarding policing in America, including discussion regarding the challenges facing New York City amid the migrant crisis,' said the spokesperson, who didn't provide the exact cost of Chell's accommodations and airfare. Earlier this year, the Department of Investigation determined that Chell violated NYPD guidelines by using his official social media accounts to go after political critics online, a finding that came after Chell had planned to deliver remarks at a Republican club meeting in Queens. Then, earlier this month, it emerged the Department of Investigation has separately started looking into a complaint alleging Chell misused police resources by bringing his security detail along with him as he traveled to his Trump golf outing last month. That complaint was filed by Rev. Kevin McCall, a Brooklyn civil rights activist and pastor. In response to Dr. Phil paying for Chell's Texas trip, McCall said NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch should 'get a hold of this media monger.' 'This is an insult to every New Yorker who expects NYPD to be a public institution not a personal brand platform,' McCall said. 'John Chell is being allowed to run rogue.' Since Chell's Texas trip, Dr. Phil has grown increasingly close with Adams and his administration. Last month, the New York Times reported Dr. Phil introduced Adams to Tom Homan, Trump's 'border czar,' who then proceeded to coordinate with administration officials on deportation raids that were called off by Tisch amid concerns they would have violated local sanctuary laws. Recently, Dr. Phil's TV network also signed a deal with Adams' office to do a documentary called 'Behind the Badge,' which is expected to highlight the work of the NYPD, specifically focusing on Chell and Kaz Daughtry, Adams' deputy mayor for public safety. Adams spokeswoman Kayla Mamelak declined this month to share a copy of the Dr. Phil contract. _____
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs order aimed at removing homeless from streets
President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order aimed at removing homeless people from streets. The measure, titled by the White House as 'Ending Crime and Disorder on America's Streets,' calls on Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek to overturn legal rulings the Trump administration says make it difficult for cities and states to force homeless people into shelters and substance-abuse centers, USA Today first reported. It will also redirect federal funding for homeless programs, many of which aim to provide housing to those in need, to addiction programs and mental health resources, although it was not immediately clear how much money would be involved. 'By removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs, the Trump administration will ensure that Americans feel safe in their own communities and that individuals suffering from addiction or mental health struggles are able to get the help they need,' White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said. The order also seeks to prioritize federal grants to cities and states that 'enforce prohibitions on open illicit drug use, urban camping and loitering, and urban squatting, and track the location of sex offenders.' Official figures say America's homeless population is more than 700,000 and rising. But advocates say the number is actually much higher. New York City is one of a few jurisdictions with a 'right to shelter,' meaning in theory that any homeless person has the right to a spot in a shelter. Trump has made fighting big city crime and disorder a major plank of his second White House term, although most measures show crime is declining. Instead of working with Congress or big city mayors, most of whom are Democrats, he has preferred to enact executive orders, some of which have faced critical scrutiny from courts. The edict is touted as forming part of Trump's commitment to ending homelessness, according to a White House fact sheet. It comes after an executive order in March directed the National Park Service to clear homeless encampments and graffiti on federal lands. The Supreme Court ruled in June that that authorities can fine or arrest homeless people for sleeping in public spaces. The ruling, which was approved by a 6-3 margin along ideological lines, overturned a lower court's ruling that it is cruel and unusual punishment to enforce camping bans when shelter is lacking. ________
Boston Globe
4 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Swallowing reservations, Democrats go on offense on Epstein files
'Instead of standing up for kids, for families, instead of standing on the side of transparency and accountability, Republicans are running away — all to avoid the release of the Epstein client list, all to cover up for pedophiles,' Clark said Wednesday. Shut out of power in Washington, Democrats have been searching all year for ways to throw a wrench in the works of Congress and gain the upper hand against a Republican majority that routinely bulldozes over them. They have focused relentlessly on making the economic case against President Trump's agenda, bashing Republicans for backing policies they argue will hurt ordinary Americans. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But the deep GOP fissure over the Trump administration's refusal to release files on Jeffrey Epstein despite promises to do so has shaken that focus, giving Democrats an opening they have eagerly seized to gum up the works at the Capitol and stoke public anger about how Republicans are governing. Advertisement Over the past two weeks, Democrats have effectively paralyzed the House floor by insisting at nearly every turn on forcing votes Republicans do not want to cast on whether to insist on the release of files related to Epstein, the financier who died by suicide while in federal custody on sex-trafficking charges. Advertisement Faced with a choice between alienating MAGA constituents, who are clamoring for the release of the files, or angering Trump, who has urged them to move on, Republicans in control of the House have decided to do neither. The dilemma prompted House Speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday to send lawmakers home early for the summer, even as several rank-and-file Republicans continued to urge a vote calling on the Trump administration to release the material. 'The ghost of the disgraced Jeffrey Epstein is haunting our Republican colleagues,' Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, the minority leader, said on the Senate floor Wednesday. He suggested that Democrats would hammer at the issue during Congress's August break, calling it the 'Epstein recess.' He added: 'This issue is going to grow and grow and grow the longer House Republicans dodge.' Online, Democrats have hardly been able to contain their apparent glee over the Republican infighting, posting a steady stream of memes jabbing at Trump's ties to Epstein and accusing Republicans of protecting pedophiles. It might once have seemed an unlikely line of attack for Democrats, who have spent much of the past decade accusing Republicans of irresponsibly propagating misinformation and trafficking in conspiracy theories that distracted the American public from more pressing concerns. Now, Democrats have come to realize that those theories, many of them fueled by Trump and his right-wing allies, might have a political upside for them too. 'I was not obsessed with the Jeffrey Epstein case,' said Representative Jim McGovern of Worcester. 'I mean, I just assumed all the stuff Trump was saying, that there was no merit to it. But the way he has handled this makes you wonder.' Advertisement The newfound emphasis on Epstein has required an abrupt shift. In preparation for their August recess, Democrats had been drilling their talking points on what they expect to be their most potent political weapon in the midterm elections: the Republican megabill that cut Medicaid and food aid to pay for large tax cuts that mostly benefit the wealthy. Some Democrats initially resisted the sudden pivot to the Epstein affair. Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the former speaker, argued last week that the case was diverting focus from the Trump administration's cuts to government programs. 'This is a distraction,' she said in an MSNBC interview last week. 'We have major issues right here, with things we're voting on today.' Yet by Tuesday, with the Epstein furor in full effect, Pelosi had announced her support for a bipartisan effort to try to force a vote on releasing the Epstein files, saying in a statement that releasing the government's files was a 'vital step toward truth and accountability in the face of unspeakable abuse.' Democratic leaders reject the idea that their recent preoccupation with the Epstein case might divert them from issues like health care that they have long said are of greater concern to American voters. McGovern, the top Democrat on the influential Rules Committee, said his party would have to 'walk and chew gum at the same time.' And at his news conference, Jeffries tried to draw a direct line from the Epstein case to Republicans' policy agenda, arguing that both reflected how Trump and his allies in Congress were favoring the rich and powerful over vulnerable Americans. 'It's reasonable to conclude that Republicans are continuing to protect the lifestyles of the rich and shameless, even if that includes pedophiles,' Jeffries said. Advertisement It was a statement that might have seemed inconceivable just a few years ago, when Democrats were batting down right-wing conspiracy theories that sought to link high-profile members of their party to child sexual abuse and blasting Trump and some Republicans for amplifying them. As they work to exploit the Republican divisions over Epstein, Democrats have found themselves embracing staunch right-wing Republicans they once dismissed as wing nuts, who are their most vocal critics and who are closely aligned with Trump's MAGA movement. In calling for the release of the Epstein material, members like Pelosi now find themselves aligned with Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a hard-right Republican from Georgia and frequent Pelosi critic. Several Democrats have also drawn on Epstein-related talking points that have been fodder in right-wing circles for years. Clark was one of several lawmakers to reference a 'client list,' a document that supposedly details the names of people for whom Epstein procured women and that has been at the heart of theories surrounding the Epstein case. There has never been a reference to any such list in any of the civil litigation brought by Epstein's victims, and many involved in the criminal case insist one never existed. Trump's Justice Department recently concluded that there was no list after deploying hundreds of FBI agents and prosecutors to scour materials in the case. Republicans have accused Democrats of being hypocritical, arguing that they could have called for the release of the Epstein files at any time while former president Biden was in office. 'Where were their voices?' Representative Ralph Norman, a South Carolina Republican who has urged his party's leaders to bring the Epstein matter up for a vote, said on Wednesday. Advertisement This article originally appeared in
