South African ministers spend over R200 million on travel in a time of crisis
"A DISTURBING pattern of unchecked luxury", is what ActionSA accused the ministers in the Government of National Unity for having spent over R200 million on travel since stepping into office a year ago.
The party was reacting to supposed spurge of the government officials in question, having considered data provided by the party's GNU Performance Tracker, based on replies to parliamentary questions.
The questions were posed to all ministers - including President Cyril Ramaphosa, Deputy President Paul Mashatile, and the Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture, Gayton McKenzie, who emerged as the big hitters.
"This paints a damning picture of executive indulgence at a time of deep economic crisis,' ActionSA said in a statement, calling the trend 'a disturbing pattern of unchecked luxury and weak oversight.'
At the centre of the controversy is Mashatile, whose office confirmed spending over R2 million on transport and accommodation for official duties. Four international trips undertaken on behalf of Ramaphosa have cost the state more than R7.9 million, including visits to Ireland, the UK, Botswana, Zimbabwe, and Japan.
One trip, a four-night visit to Tokyo in March 2025, drew particular criticism after it was revealed that accommodation alone cost more than R900,000 - approximately R225 000 a day.
McKenzie and his department have spent around R6.6 million on international travel, including a R164,556 payment for a cancelled trip to Burkina Faso, raising questions about financial oversight.
Amid ongoing public debate, IOL News compiled a detailed breakdown of luxury hotel costs in Tokyo.
While the R900,000 figure raised eyebrows, analysis suggests such expenses are possible in one of the world's most expensive cities, especially when top-tier hotels and executive suites are involved.
However, the costs have fuelled public concern over whether officials are appropriately balancing international representation with fiscal responsibility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
President Ramaphosa's National Dialogue is out of touch with African grassroots
President Cyril Ramaphosa's announcement of a National Dialogue, intended to forge consensus around a new 30-year National Development Plan (NDP), is yet another reminder of how disconnected our leadership has become from the realities South Africans face daily. While our communities grapple with gender-based violence, crime, corruption, inequality and social fragmentation, what we are being offered is not the opportunity to confront these urgent crises head-on, but rather a carefully curated event, far removed from the daily struggles of ordinary citizens. This disconnect becomes even more glaring when we consider the lessons of the past. Back in 2009, when the original NDP process began, the National Planning Commission, chaired by then Minister Trevor Manuel, was clear about the distinction between lofty ideals and actionable plans. 'Visions are visions. They are broad, frequently general. They are aspirations,' Manuel warned. 'But plans have to be detailed, supported by numbers.' Ramaphosa's proposed dialogue feels like yet another broad, aspirational exercise disconnected from practical, measurable action. The missing first step: returning to our roots of authentic dialogue Growing up in an African community, Ramaphosa would have been shaped by traditions that prioritised meaningful, grassroots engagement. Justice under the tree, gathering around the fire and community problem-solving were never abstract ideals; they were lived, practical realities that anchored decision-making in language, culture and shared understanding. Our Constitutional Court itself reflects these principles, embodying restorative justice rooted in African traditions. We saw the same values during the Mont Fleur Scenarios of 1991, where South African leaders, activists, economists, ANC officials, academics and business leaders came together to confront the harsh realities of apartheid and imagine a different future. Importantly, they engaged with humility, urgency and a willingness to hear uncomfortable truths – not in corporate boardrooms, but through inclusive dialogue grounded in real experiences. Somewhere along the way, Ramaphosa seems to have lost sight of these foundational principles. The fundamental flaw in Ramaphosa's National Dialogue is that it skips the most crucial first step: genuine engagement with the communities most affected by South Africa's challenges. This is not merely a matter of consultation; it is about ensuring any national conversation is grounded in real data, authentic voices, and the uncomfortable truths that emerge from township streets, rural villages and community halls. Without this foundation, dialogue among elites becomes premature, uninformed and, ultimately, disconnected from the problems it claims to address. The reality on the ground: excluded frontline voices In my recent experience of engaging with three police stations on their approach to gender-based violence (GBV), it became clear that the very people tasked with delivering justice are underprepared, unsupported and excluded from meaningful conversations about solutions. Officers openly expressed frustration at their lack of training and resources, especially when dealing with GBV cases. Some even asked, 'How do we begin to report and deal with GBV cases?' It was deeply concerning to hear officers say that they don't know how to deal with one of the biggest issues the country is facing. If Ramaphosa spent time listening to those on the front lines – police officers, community workers, survivors – his policies would be shaped by reality, not disconnected visions. But right now, these critical voices are excluded from shaping national solutions. This concern reflects a broader problem: the people working on the front lines are systematically excluded from meaningful conversations about solutions. Many operate within broken systems, with little institutional support, resulting in failed justice for survivors and growing public distrust. These are the voices and experiences that should inform any national dialogue. Building an informed foundation: the path forward Before any national dialogue proceeds, we need to start where the real South African story is being lived – around fires, in community halls, on street corners – speaking directly to those affected by these challenges. Language, culture and context matter. Social consensus cannot be built in luxury venues when trust, understanding and practical solutions have yet to be built at the grassroots level. This means conducting proper research, gathering credible data and creating space for diverse communities across South Africa to share their lived experiences. We don't need to reinvent solutions – South Africans already know what works: authentic, community-driven engagement, leadership grounded in reality, and a willingness to hear hard truths. Return to roots Ramaphosa must return to the spaces where he once witnessed genuine, grassroots dialogue. We need honest, uncomfortable, face-to-face conversations with those carrying the daily weight of South Africa's hardships. The president would do well to take cues from his own comrades, notably Trevor Manuel, whose original NDP process recognised that vision alone is meaningless without measurable action rooted in lived experience. Likewise, the lessons of Mont Fleur show that during times of deep division, bold, inclusive conversations driven by ordinary people, not staged events, can help reshape South Africa's future. The president faces a clear choice: continue with another sanitised, media-friendly gathering that delivers little beyond soundbites, or embrace the messy, uncomfortable, yet potentially transformative work of authentic, community-based engagement. Until that first critical step is taken, this so-called dialogue remains premature, disconnected and destined to miss the very voices it claims to elevate. Anything less is performative politics – a detached exercise in optics, wasting state resources that should be directed towards solving the very crises this dialogue claims to address. DM
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
There are just and compassionate alternative solutions to corporal punishment in prisons
Minister for Correctional Services Pieter Groenewald has thrown a hornet's nest at us. Last week he suggested we reintroduce whipping and beating for some offenders, or even alleged offenders, to spare sending them to our overcrowded and often dangerous prisons (corporal punishment). Minister Groenewald seemed to have in mind inmates convicted or suspected of minor offences who cannot afford low amounts of bail. They may often spend long periods in prison awaiting trial and then serving their sentences. For the last nearly six years, I've headed the Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional Services (Jics), South Africa's Mandela-era prisons' oversight body. The minister's concerns are real. Our prisons are grossly overcrowded. With bedspace for only 107,000, we jam into them almost 164,000 inmates, – a staggering 53% overcrowding rate. This has devastating consequences for those in detention, for their safety and security, and for running effective rehabilitation programmes. Remand detainees (those not yet convicted) make up a bigger and bigger chunk of the prison population. Over 59,000 people are awaiting trial inside prison. More than 4,000 have been awaiting trial for longer than two years. And, more disturbingly even, some 2,500 are in prison simply because they cannot afford bail amounts of less than R1,000. So the minister is right to jolt us into controversy. His call for alternatives to prison, for both awaiting trial and sentenced inmates, is timely. He cited the example of a man arrested for stealing bread. Often on prisons inspections, I meet inmates imprisoned for petty offences, or for non-violent crimes, like shoplifting, or for possessing small amounts of drugs for personal use. These inmates are not a danger to society. They do not have to be confined and isolated. Crushing them into our overcrowded and often unsanitary prisons, rather than confronting the factors that drove them to crime in the first place, or effectively rehabilitating them, risks exposing them to drugs, gangs and violence. Many of our remand centres function as training sites to recruit youngsters into gangs – or to turn them into practised criminals. So we badly need effective alternatives. But is corporal punishment the answer? The Constitutional Court answered this in 1995. Before it was the startling practice of 'juvenile whipping'. In S v Williams, Justice Pius Langa, a deeply humane man and diffident lawyer, later Chief Justice, led the Court in finding that corporal punishment violates human dignity – and is cruel, inhuman and degrading. 'Corporal punishment involves the intentional infliction of physical pain on a human being by another human being at the instigation of the State… The objective must be to penetrate the levels of tolerance to pain; the result must be a cringing fear, a terror of expectation before the whipping and acute distress which often draws involuntary screams during the infliction. There is no dignity in the act itself; the recipient might struggle against himself to maintain a semblance of dignified suffering or even unconcern; there is no dignity even in the person delivering the punishment.' He concluded powerfully, ' It is a practice which debases everyone involved in it'. Expert evidence convinced the Court that corporal punishment is not an effective deterrent: 'its effect is likely to be coarsening and degrading rather than rehabilitative.' And even deterrence could not justify so humiliating and painful a punishment. The Court dismissed the State's argument that corporal punishment is a necessary alternative because of resource and infrastructure constraints. The Court pointed to other creative, more humane, alternatives to imprisonment – like community service, linked to suspended or postponed sentences, and victim-offender mediation. Counsel for the accused in the Williams case, then-advocate Lee Bozalek, pointed the Court to disturbing class and race implications. Given the huge inequality in our country, most of those likely to experience the State-sanctioned brutality of whipping would be poor black men. So the question whether corporal punishment can be consistent with the society we aspire for – based on human dignity, equality and freedom – has been conclusively answered. It is not. But this does not address the minister's legitimate concerns. Don't long periods in overcrowded, unsanitary prison cells also violate inmates' dignity and endanger them? Yes. They do. Of course. So what is the alternative? Long pre-trial detention is the product of overburdened police, prosecutors, Legal Aid attorneys and courts, all services hollowed out by austerity, inefficiency and corruption. These are systemic problems that corporal punishment will not fix. Instead, we must invest in energising every element of our criminal justice system, so that crime is swiftly and effectively investigated and tried. There is no quick way, no shortcut, no 'magic bullet' to do this. But we can do it. With energy and leadership and determination. We have the talented people. We need to energise and lead them. And there are alternatives to unaffordable cash bail. Jics is setting up a bail fund for low-risk inmates granted small bail amounts they cannot afford. At the same time, Jics supports the SA Law Reform Commission's review of the entire bail system, which we hope will lead to much-needed systemic improvements. And there is more we can do. Some crimes – like sex work, drug use and possession, and many petty offences – should not be crimes at all. For other minor offences, our law already enables non-custodial sentences. These include correctional supervision, community service, fines and restorative justice programmes. Our overworked courts and prosecutors should embrace these alternatives. S v Williams warned that when the State administers violence, it fosters violence and indignity. Quoting a US judge, the Court noted that, 'Our Government is the potent, the omni-present teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example.' Our country's history warns us away from more violence, more state-sanctioned brutality. What powerful lessons the State could teach us when, rather than violence or incarceration, it prioritises quick, effective, and – yes – compassionate justice. DM
The Citizen
9 hours ago
- The Citizen
Top 10 stories of the day: Ramaphosa disputes 30% tariff claim
Here's your daily news update for Tuesday, 8 July 2025: An easy-to-read selection of our top stories. News today includes President Cyril Ramaphosa has contested the United States' justification for imposing a 30% trade tariff on South African goods, describing the percentage as inaccurate and based on a flawed interpretation of trade data. Meanwhile, the City of Cape Town has paid its condolences to its former mayor Theresa Solomon. Furthermore, while luxury cars linked to her name are being auctioned off by the South African Revenue Service (Sars) and her once-prized football club, Royal AM, slips from her grasp, Shauwn 'MaMkhize' Mkhize continues to live life in unapologetic opulence. Weather tomorrow: 9 July 2025 Damaging winds are expected along the north coast of KwaZulu-Natal while extremely high fire danger conditions are forecast over parts of the Northern Cape. Most provinces can expect fine, cold to cool weather, with some wind and isolated rain in parts of the Western Cape. Full weather forecast here. Stay up to date with The Citizen – More News, Your Way. Ramaphosa disputes Trump's 30% tariff claim as 'not accurate' President Cyril Ramaphosa has contested the United States' justification for imposing a 30% trade tariff on South African goods, describing the percentage as inaccurate and based on a flawed interpretation of trade data. The dispute emerged after President Donald Trump announced the unilateral tariff imposition in correspondence received by South Africa on Monday. US President Donald Trump meets with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 21 May 2025. Picture: AFP South Africa was among several countries to receive similar communications from the US administration, signalling a broader shift in American trade policy. CONTINUE READING: Ramaphosa disputes Trump's 30% tariff claim as 'not accurate' Inmates busted using smuggled cellphones to run scams from prison Prisoners at Baviaanspoort Correctional Centre were recently busted for using snuck in mobile phones to actively scam members of the public from within their cells. The scams came to light after National Commissioner Makgothi Samuel Thobakgale led a specialised raid that revealed the criminal network operating in daytime. Inmates cellphone raid. Picture: Department of Correctional Services. The scamming operation relied on a system of hidden mobile phones that inmates had successfully smuggled into the facility. CONTINUE READING: Inmates busted using smuggled cellphones to run scams from prison Former Cape Town mayor dies The City of Cape Town has paid its condolences to its former mayor Theresa Solomon. Solomon died on Monday. Cape Town shoreline. Picture:She was the mayor of Cape Town from 1996 to 1998. CONTINUE READING: Former Cape Town mayor dies Health minister weaponising racial bias report to push NHI, says IRR The Institute of Race Relations (IRR) has accused Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi of using a report into the racial bias of medical aid compliance standards to further his National Health Insurance (NHI) agenda. The report, compiled by a panel chaired by Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, concluded that medical aid schemes were unfairly discriminating against black practitioners when investigating fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA) claims. Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi. Picture: GCIS To reach this conclusion, the independent panel relied on an equation devised by a mathematician with a PhD from the University of Cape Town. CONTINUE READING: Health minister weaponising racial bias report to push NHI, says IRR While luxury cars linked to her name are being auctioned off by the South African Revenue Service (Sars) and her once-prized football club, Royal AM, slips from her grasp, Shauwn 'MaMkhize' Mkhize continues to live life in unapologetic opulence. From fur coats courtside at an NBA game to glam game-reserve getaways, the flamboyant businesswoman remains silent, despite growing scrutiny and public questions around her ties to figures named in a weekend briefing by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Shauwn Mkhize. Picture Instagram The fall of Royal AM, once a rising force in South African football owned by MaMkhize, has sent shockwaves through the PSL. CONTINUE READING: Fur, football and forfeits: MaMkhize lives it up as netizens link her to the Mkhwanazi saga Here are five more stories of the day: Yesterday's News recap READ HERE: Mkhwanazi vs Mchunu | Magaqa's killer sentenced | Travis Scott tickets still available
