Lavrov says NATO spending increase won't significantly affect Russia's security
'As for the impact of this 5% goal on our security, I don't think it will be significant,' Lavrov told a press conference.
NATO allies on Wednesday agreed to raise their collective spending goal to 5% of gross domestic product over the next decade, citing what they called the long-term threat posed by Russia and the need to strengthen civil and military resilience.
MOSCOW (Reuters) -NATO's decision to increase defence spending will not significantly affect Russia's security, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Thursday.
'We know what goals we are pursuing, we don't hide them, we openly announce them, they are absolutely legal from the point of view of any interpretation of the principles of the U.N. Charter and international law, and we know by what means we will always ensure these goals.'
NATO adopted the higher spending target in response to pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump for European members to pull their weight, and also to European fears that Russia poses a growing threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Russia, which is spending more than 40% of this year's budget on defence and security, denies any intention to attack a NATO state.
The Kremlin accused the alliance this week of portraying Russia as a 'fiend of hell' in order to justify its 'rampant militarisation'.
(Reporting by Vladimir Soldatkin; Writing by Gleb Stolyarov and Mark Trevelyan; Editing by Hugh Lawson)
Disclaimer: This report is auto generated from the Reuters news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
36 minutes ago
- First Post
Supreme Court ruling sparks confusion over US birthright citizenship
On Friday, the court's conservative majority approved President Donald Trump's request to limit the authority of federal judges but did not rule on the legality of his attempt to restrict birthright citizenship read more The U.S. Supreme Court's decision related to birthright citizenship led to confusion and calls to attorneys as individuals potentially impacted worked to understand a complex legal ruling with significant humanitarian consequences. On Friday, the court's conservative majority approved President Donald Trump's request to limit the authority of federal judges but did not rule on the legality of his attempt to restrict birthright citizenship. This outcome has created more uncertainty than clarity around a right long interpreted as protected by the U.S. Constitution: that anyone born in the United States is a citizen at birth, regardless of their parents' citizenship or immigration status. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lorena, a 24-year-old Colombian asylum seeker who lives in Houston and is due to give birth in September, pored over media reports on Friday morning. She was looking for details about how her baby might be affected, but said she was left confused and worried. 'There are not many specifics,' said Lorena, who like others interviewed by Reuters asked to be identified by her first name out of fear for her safety. 'I don't understand it well.' She is concerned that her baby could end up with no nationality. 'I don't know if I can give her mine,' she said. 'I also don't know how it would work, if I can add her to my asylum case. I don't want her to be adrift with no nationality.' Trump, a Republican, issued an order after taking office in January that directed U.S. agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the U.S. who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident. The order was blocked by three separate U.S. district court judges, sending the case on a path to the Supreme Court. The resulting decision said Trump's policy could go into effect in 30 days but appeared to leave open the possibility of further proceedings in the lower courts that could keep the policy blocked. On Friday afternoon, plaintiffs filed an amended lawsuit in federal court in Maryland seeking to establish a nationwide class of people whose children could be denied citizenship. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If they are not blocked nationwide, the restrictions could be applied in the 28 states that did not contest them in court, creating 'an extremely confusing patchwork' across the country, according to Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a policy analyst for the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute. 'Would individual doctors, individual hospitals be having to try to figure out how to determine the citizenship of babies and their parents?' she said. The drive to restrict birthright citizenship is part of Trump's broader immigration crackdown, and he has framed automatic citizenship as a magnet for people to come to give birth. 'Hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into our country under birthright citizenship, and it wasn't meant for that reason,' he said during a White House press briefing on Friday. Worried calls Immigration advocates and lawyers in some Republican-led states said they received calls from a wide range of pregnant immigrants and their partners following the ruling. They were grappling with how to explain it to clients who could be dramatically affected, given all the unknowns of how future litigation would play out or how the executive order would be implemented state by state. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lynn Tramonte, director of the Ohio Immigrant Alliance said she got a call on Friday from an East Asian temporary visa holder with a pregnant wife. He was anxious because Ohio is not one of the plaintiff states and wanted to know how he could protect his child's rights. 'He kept stressing that he was very interested in the rights included in the Constitution,' she said. Advocates underscored the gravity of Trump's restrictions, which would block an estimated 150,000 children born in the U.S. annually from receiving automatic citizenship. 'It really creates different classes of people in the country with different types of rights,' said Juliana Macedo do Nascimento, a spokesperson for the immigrant rights organization United We Dream. 'That is really chaotic.' Adding uncertainty, the Supreme Court ruled that members of two plaintiff groups in the litigation - CASA, an immigrant advocacy service in Maryland, and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project - would still be covered by lower court blocks on the policy. Whether someone in a state where Trump's policy could go into effect could join one of the organizations to avoid the restrictions or how state or federal officials would check for membership remained unclear. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Betsy, a U.S. citizen who recently graduated from high school in Virginia and a CASA member, said both of her parents came to the U.S. from El Salvador two decades ago and lacked legal status when she was born. 'I feel like it targets these innocent kids who haven't even been born,' she said, declining to give her last name for concerns over her family's safety. Nivida, a Honduran asylum seeker in Louisiana, is a member of the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project and recently gave birth. She heard on Friday from a friend without legal status who is pregnant and wonders about the situation under Louisiana's Republican governor, since the state is not one of those fighting Trump's order. 'She called me very worried and asked what's going to happen,' she said. 'If her child is born in Louisiana … is the baby going to be a citizen?'
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
RTL buys Sky Deutschland in deal to take on US streaming giants
European broadcaster RTL Group said on Friday it would buy Sky Deutschland , in a deal that combines Sky 's sports and streaming offerings with RTL's news and entertainment brands to create a business with 11.5 million paying subscribers. Shares in RTL surged 12% following announcement of the deal, rising to the top of Germany's mid-cap index. The merger brings together two of Europe's strongest media offerings in sport and entertainment in a battle to catch up with U.S. heavyweights in Germany. RTL and Sky's combined streaming services boast an audience larger than that of Disney but far behind market leaders Netflix and Amazon Prime. The deal includes a 150 million euro ($176 million) upfront payment plus a variable component of up to 377 million euros depending on RTL's share price which Sky parent Comcast can trigger any time within five years. The purchase gives RTL, which is majority-owned by German media group Bertelsmann , local access to Sky's premium sports rights including Bundesliga and Premier League soccer, and Formula 1 motor racing, as well as Sky's WOW streaming service. A person familiar with the situation said RTL had approached Sky for the deal, and that Sky was not looking to sell any other part of its business. RTL Chief Executive Thomas Rabe described the deal as "transformational" for the group and said it would create cost savings of around 250 million euros per year within three years of the deal closing. In the past, Rabe had considered a bid for German competitor ProSiebenSat.1 but doubted whether competition regulators would give that the green light. He told Reuters in a separate interview that RTL would not be involved in any further consolidation in the German market. "The issue of a merger with ProSiebenSat.1 is now definitely off the table," he said. ProSieben, for its part, is trying to fend off a takeover from MFE, the TV broadcaster controlled by Italy's Berlusconi family, which wants to build on its commercial TV operations in Italy and Spain to create a pan-European broadcaster. Sky Deutschland, which operates in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, was on track to break even on an earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) basis, Sky Group Chief Executive Dana Strong said. The business reported around 2 billion euros in annual revenue. The variable component of the deal with Sky depends on RTL's share price, which was 35.40 euros at 0721 GMT in Frankfurt trade following a jump in value after announcement of the deal. Comcast can trigger it at any time within five years of the deal being finalised provided the share price exceeds 41 euros. At a share price of 70 euros, the additional payment for Comcast would be capped at 377 million euros. RTL can pay in cash, shares or a combination of both.
The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
At Least 13 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Suicide Attack
New Delhi: At least 13 Pakistani soldiers were killed in a suicide attack in Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province today (June 28). While Reuters has reported a toll of 13, other outlets have reported a higher number – 16. A local government official told the news agency AFP that a suicide bomber drove an explosive-laden vehicle into a military convoy. The attack took place in the province's North Waziristan district. As many as 29 people – 10 army personnel and 19 civilians – are reportedly injured. Six children are among those injured. Some outlets have reported that the Pakistani Taliban has taken responsibility for the attack. The Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP), also known as the Pakistan Taliban, is an alliance of formerly disparate militant groups that came together in 2007 following Pakistan military operations against Al-Qaida-related militants. The group operates along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. This comes days after Pakistan was appointed chair of the UN Security Council's 1988 Sanctions Committee, which monitors sanctions targeting the Taliban, and vice-chair of the 1373 Counter-Terrorism Committee.
