Increase In Awareness Of Whistleblowing Legislation
Today is World Whistleblowing Day and the Office of the Ombudsman has released an annual poll that shows 36 percent of people know about the Protected Disclosures Act. That's an increase of 11 percent since 2024.
Chief Ombudsman John Allen says his office has also seen a significant rise in protected disclosures since the new Protected Disclosures (Protection of Whistleblowers) Act came into force in 2022.
"This survey reflects what my office is seeing when we are out and about in communities around New Zealand. There is very high interest in the Protected Disclosures Act and how to make a protected disclosure, particularly amongst Māori, Pasifika and Asian communities.
"People are using this Act more and more. My office has seen more than a 300 percent increase in protected disclosures matters since the amended Act came into force. This may be because the revised Act expands the definition of serious wrongdoing and offers more avenues for reporting and protection.
"Other factors could include an increase in news coverage of whistleblowing cases and it may be that changes in society have prompted workers to become more aware of their rights and protections."
Thirty one percent of those surveyed said they had witnessed serious wrongdoing at work, and of those who had witnessed it 50 percent said they reported it. That's an increase of nine percent on the previous year in people reporting serious wrongdoing that they had witnessed.
Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
A solid majority - 84 percent - stated they would report it to their employer if they witnessed serious wrongdoing. However, just under half (48 percent) thought they would be safe to do so. Of those who would not feel safe, an increasing number of people said they were afraid of losing their job (61 percent). Almost half of those who would not feel safe (44 percent) also thought they would face retaliation.
Almost half of those surveyed (49 percent) said they would feel safer reporting serious wrongdoing if they were assured of anonymity and confidentiality. This demonstrates how important it is for workplaces to have effective processes in place to encourage employees to speak out, protect them from retaliation, and keep their identities confidential.
The Office of the Ombudsman has released new guidance aimed at businesses and workplaces that receive protected disclosures: https://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/resources/guidance-receivers
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
32 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Court of Appeal rejects couple's challenge of order confiscating $1.7m in property after cannabis operation busted
It was argued both pieces of real estate were 'tainted' by Heron's illegal activities, which a forensic accountant estimated had netted him $1.28m between 2013 and 2020, and the cash was derived in the same way. Heron acknowledged that the $153,000 was derived from illegal activity but denied that any of his real estate was 'tainted' in terms of the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act. Last year, the High Court made an order under the act to transfer the properties and the cash to the Crown. The couple took their case to the Court of Appeal, which dismissed their challenge. However, the court order allowed Lewis to keep $147,000, which Lewis, who has no criminal charges and no criminal history, had contributed to the mortgage and upkeep of the properties from her legitimate full-time employment. The sum was to be paid to her after the properties had been sold. Heron and Lewis have since taken their case to the Court of Appeal, attempting to have the High Court's decision overturned. The couple's challenge Today, the Court of Appeal released its judgment which detailed Heron argued it was only necessary for the judge to make orders that deprived him of assets to the value of the cash profit he had made illegally from the cannabis operation, which amounted to about $380,000. He submitted that the sale of the Waikuku property alone would recover more than that amount, making forfeiture of the Fernside property unnecessary. It was also argued that forfeiting the Fernside property would cause undue hardship, as Heron had established a new business on that property. Lewis argued that the relief granted to her was inadequate and that the judge failed to fully consider her contributions to the Waikuku property from 2016 to 2020. It was also submitted that Lewis should retain the increase in the capital value of the Fernside property between the date of Heron's arrest and the hearing in the High Court. 'The undue hardship that the forfeiture of both properties will cause for her can only be mitigated by recognising the legitimate financial and non-financial contributions that she made both to her family and to the two properties,' her counsel argued. But the Court of Appeal ruled the judge was correct not to grant Heron relief against forfeiture concerning the Fernside property. The decision stated the Fernside property was bought using a deposit from Heron's tainted investment account, the house was then used as a residence for the family, and the garage was converted into a 'sophisticated cannabis growing facility' using cash derived from criminal activity. 'The garage was then used exclusively to conduct a sophisticated cannabis growing operation that derived further cash profits.' The Court of Appeal also ruled it would not be appropriate to increase the relief Lewis has already received. 'On any view of the evidence, she had some appreciation of what was occurring at both properties. She also plainly knew of the significant quantities of cash her husband's activities were generating over a period spanning several years. She was also prepared to share in the benefits those activities produced.' The senior court dismissed the couple's appeals and did not make an order for costs as their appeal was legally aided. Raid found 331 cannabis plants Heron was convicted on the cannabis charges in 2021 and then turned his skills to start a legitimate business, building up a 'micro-greens' growing facility providing edible vegetable sprouts using similar methods to his former cannabis operation. When he was raided in 2020, officers found 331 cannabis plants in four different stages of cultivation in four grow rooms or tents. The bust came about a month before the 2020 nationwide referendum on whether to legalise recreational cannabis. The referendum was narrowly defeated and a draft Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill did not proceed. When he was first arrested, Heron claimed he had only undertaken one successful grow to supply cannabis oil 'for medicinal purposes' in anticipation of a legislative change to permit this. On the day of the search, Lewis told police that she 'knew something was going on, but not the extent', court documents say. Police said, however, that Heron had been using four times the daily average electricity use for years to power his grow rooms. Since June 2016, he had consumed more than 100kWh (units) per day. Over four months in the spring and summer of 2015, his power bill came to $3483. Police said Heron had fitted out a five-bay garage next to his house to accommodate the commercial-scale hydroponic cannabis-growing operation. Equipment found included heat pumps and air conditioners, water and nutrient supply systems and a carbon dioxide pump. 'Cash and electronic funds derived from Mr Heron's criminal activity were regularly paid into the couple's joint bank account, and used to pay the mortgages,' according to the High Court order. In the walk-in wardrobe of the couple's bedroom, police found $153,860 – in total, 3238 banknotes neatly bundled up into $10,000 packages – in two lock boxes on a shelf.
1News
15-07-2025
- 1News
Queenstown hotel fined $22k for illegal crayfish sale in VIP experience
A Queenstown hotel has been fined $22,000 for illegally selling recreationally caught crayfish as part of a luxury guest experience and failing to keep records. The Rees Management Limited, trading as The Rees Hotel, was sentenced in the Queenstown District Court yesterday following a prosecution by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI). The charges were laid under the Fisheries Act 1996 and the Fisheries (Recordkeeping) Regulations 1990. At the centre of the case was the hotel's luxury package, known as The Rees Ultimate Heli Crayfish Dining Experience. This included a helicopter flight over the Southern Alps to a remote West Coast beach where a driver collected live crayfish, which was then brought back and cooked at the hotel. ADVERTISEMENT Guests were charged between $4650 and $7750 for the total day's experience. Under the Fisheries Act, a commercial fishing licence was required to take any fish for sale. Fisheries New Zealand South regional manager Garreth Jay said the offending persisted despite clear advice being given to the operators that the package did not comply with the Fisheries Act. Any use of seafood as part of a business' commercial activity was considered a sale under the Act, he added. "The rules are there for a reason – to safeguard the resource for current and future generations, protect the integrity of the fisheries management system, and ensure a level playing field for businesses using seafood as part of their commercial activities. "Where we find evidence of people breaking the rules we will investigate and take appropriate action." ADVERTISEMENT The hotel did not keep required records of the crayfish, which Jay said made it difficult to quantify the scale of the offending. "We all have a role to play in ensuring the ongoing sustainability of our fisheries." Another business was being prosecuted by Fisheries NZ in relation to this offending. The matter was before the courts.
Otago Daily Times
09-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Gloriavale school fails second audit
By Jean Edwards of RNZ Gloriavale Christian School's registration could be suspended or cancelled if it does not rectify issues identified in another failed audit, the Ministry of Education says. It has expressed serious concern about an Education Review Office (ERO) report that found the private school has not met three of eight registration criteria and is not a physically and emotionally safe space for students. It is the second time the Christian community's school on the West Coast has failed an audit in as many years. Andrea Williams, the ministry's acting hautū (leader) Te Tai Runga (South), said staff would meet with school leaders next week to discuss the ERO report and the ministry's response to its findings. "The ministry is seriously concerned by the ERO's conclusion that the school continues to fall short of providing a physically and emotionally safe environment for students and has failed its compliance audit for the second consecutive year," she said. "The ministry is currently working on its response to the report which will be communicated to the school next week. We will expect the school to take immediate and meaningful steps to address the issues identified. "If the school does not demonstrate sustained and measurable improvement within the timeframe we require, the ministry will consider all available options under the Act, including suspension or cancellation of registration." Under the Education and Training Act, the ministry could cancel the registration of a private school if it no longer met the criteria, including providing suitable premises, staffing, curriculum or ensuring student safety and well-being. The step was considered only after other avenues had been exhausted and where there was clear and ongoing non-compliance, the ministry said. The ERO report, published on July 2, found Gloriavale Christian School staff were following the New Zealand curriculum and education provision was "slowly improving". A damning 2023 ERO review found the school did not meet six of the eight criteria for private school registration and the provision of education was "inadequate and uncertain". "At that time, court cases citing incidences of physical and sexual abuse of children within the Gloriavale community and findings about young people's employment status and the suitability of some school staffing were significant events impacting schooling," the latest report said. Following a review visit at the end of last year, the ERO said there was a lack of suitable staffing for enrolled students with complex additional needs and they could not attend because of insufficient equipment to support their physical needs. The ERO report also noted the Teaching Council was investigating an allegation of staff misconduct and the school had been instructed to formally monitor the staff member. The report said about 40% of the 224 school-aged children at the Gloriavale community attended the school, while about half were home-schooled and the remainder were enrolled with Te Kura (formerly the Correspondence School). "The school board and staff have worked extensively with board-contracted external support and Ministry of Education advice and guidance to develop capacity to provide high quality learning and teaching," the report said. Suitable policy and procedures were in place, including a child protection policy, but aspects required improvement, it said. "ERO is not yet assured that all learners physical and emotional health and safety is closely, regularly, and sufficiently considered and monitored across all schooling provision." In 2023, the ERO recommended that community leaders urgently develop a long-term strategic plan for educational provision across the community and consider external leadership or support. In its July report the ERO said a plan for all children up to the age of 16 was not yet in place, although the school board and staff had worked extensively with external consultants and the Ministry of Education.
