logo
YouTube isn't fighting AI slop. It's betting on it

YouTube isn't fighting AI slop. It's betting on it

Straits Times28-07-2025
Find out what's new on ST website and app.
Sloppification looks set to help the video-sharing site become the world's largest media company.
The video platform's overall approach is that AI-generated content is fine, so long as it's original, provides value to viewers and includes some human input.
There's a prevailing wisdom that content generated by artificial intelligence (AI), or slop as it's colloquially known, should make our skin crawl. AI models tend to generate uncanny faces, mangled hands and fantastical scenarios.
Take the YouTube Short video of a baby that finds itself being shimmied up a baggage loader onto a jumbo jet, before donning an aviation headset and flying the plane. It has racked up more than 103 million views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GenAI helps students think fast. It's time universities teach them to think slow
GenAI helps students think fast. It's time universities teach them to think slow

Straits Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

GenAI helps students think fast. It's time universities teach them to think slow

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The real opportunity with AI in education isn't automation. It's building the habits of deeper thinking. Before AI use becomes autopilot, students have to be trained to engage with it deliberately. Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman proposes that we think using two systems: one fast and intuitive, the other slow and deliberate. System 1 handles familiar tasks automatically – like solving 2 × 2 or sensing a friend's mood. System 2 kicks in for effortful mental work – like evaluating the logic of an argument or finding the right words to comfort someone.

Stella Rimington, Britain's first female spy chief, dies aged 90
Stella Rimington, Britain's first female spy chief, dies aged 90

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Stella Rimington, Britain's first female spy chief, dies aged 90

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox LONDON - Stella Rimington, the first female director general of Britain's MI5 security and counter-intelligence service who ushered in an era of greater transparency at the agency, has died aged 90. Rimington, who ran the domestic security agency between 1992 and 1996, was its first head to be publicly named and later wrote a memoir "Open Secret" about her career at the formerly secretive organisation. She went on to write a series of espionage novels and is also widely thought to have inspired actor Judy Dench's tough but playful characterisation of the fictional spymaster 'M' in several James Bond movies. "She died surrounded by her beloved family and dogs and determinedly held on to the life she loved until her last breath," a family statement quoted by local media said. Rimington was given one of the British state's highest honours when she was made a dame in 1996. She joined MI5 in 1969 and worked in roles including counter-subversion and counter-terrorism. Under her leadership MI5 took a more prominent role in Britain's fight against Irish republican militants, according to a profile on the MI5 website. "As the first avowed female head of any intelligence agency in the world, Dame Stella broke through long-standing barriers and was a visible example of the importance of diversity in leadership," current MI5 Director General Ken McCallum said in a statement. She committed the agency to a more transparent approach to its work, softening its post-Cold War image. "We are, of course, obliged to keep information secret in order to be effective, this is not to say that we should necessarily be a wholly secret organisation," she said in a publicly broadcast 1994 lecture. "Secrecy is not imposed for its own sake. It is not an end in itself." Foreshadowing her later literary career, Rimington opened that same speech with a nod to the British spy novel tradition and the fascination with the security services it had inspired among the general public. "It is exciting stuff and has led to the creation of many myths - and some lurid speculation - about our work. I must admit that it is with some hesitation that I set out tonight to shed some daylight," she said. "I have a sneaking feeling that the fiction may turn out to be more fun than the reality." REUTERS

Tesla board awards ‘good faith' shares worth $37 billion to CEO Elon Musk
Tesla board awards ‘good faith' shares worth $37 billion to CEO Elon Musk

Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Tesla board awards ‘good faith' shares worth $37 billion to CEO Elon Musk

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Tesla has granted CEO Elon Musk shares worth about US$29 billion (S$37 billion) in a new pay deal aimed at keeping the billionaire entrepreneur at the helm during a crucial pivot from its struggling core auto business to robotaxis and humanoid robots. The company described the 'interim award' of the 96 million new shares as a first step, 'good faith' payment to honour Mr Musk's more than US$50 billion pay package from 2018 that was struck down by a Delaware court in 2024. Mr Musk can claim the new award if he remains in a top executive role for another two years and a court does not reinstate the 2018 package currently on appeal. He has to hold the shares for five years and can buy them for US$23.34 per share, the same as the exercise price of the 2018 award. Tesla will also put to vote a longer-term CEO compensation plan at its annual investor meeting on Nov 6. The move is meant to keep Mr Musk, the public face of Tesla and architect of its robotaxi strategy, focused on the electric-vehicle maker as it navigates a shift to cybercabs and robotics from its mainstay auto business. It also seems to quell any speculation that the board's patience with Mr Musk could be wearing thin because of the recent tumultuous months, including the CEO's foray into politics. The move to give Mr Musk greater control of the company suggests that directors still see him as best-suited to tackle Tesla's growing list of challenges in the years ahead. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy World Trump says he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases Singapore Strong S'pore-Australia ties underpinned by bonds that are continually renewed: President Tharman Singapore All recruits at BMTC will be trained to fly drones and counter them: Chan Chun Sing Sport Singaporean swimmer Gan Ching Hwee at 'crossroads' after World Aquatics C'ships display Singapore Ong Beng Seng to be sentenced on Aug 15, prosecution does not object to fine due to his poor health Singapore Pritam Singh had hoped WP would 'tip one or two more constituencies' at GE2025 Sales have been falling at the company due to its ageing vehicle line-up, tough competition and Mr Musk's right-wing political stances that have tarnished its brand. S&P Global Mobility data shared exclusively with Reuters showed on Aug 4 that Tesla's brand loyalty had plunged since Mr Musk endorsed US President Donald Trump last summer. Mr Musk's involvement in politics and his wider business empire, including AI startup xAI, have also sparked concerns about his devotion to Tesla, the main source of his wealth. Mr Musk has threatened to leave unless he gets more control over Tesla. The new stock award will take his Tesla stake, already the largest, to more than 15 per cent from the 12.7 per cent currently, according to Reuters calculations based on data compiled by LSEG. Before Aug 4's grant, Mr Musk had no active compensation plan and Tesla said he had not received meaningful pay since 2017. With the legal fight over his 2018 package expected to continue, the board said it moved to retain Mr Musk's 'extraordinary talent.' Talent magnet 'While we recognise Elon's business ventures, interests and other potential demands on his time and attention are extensive and wide-ranging... we are confident this award will incentivize Elon to remain at Tesla,' said a special committee Tesla formed this year to consider Mr Musk's compensation. It consists of chair Robyn Denholm and independent director Kathleen Wilson-Thompson. The company said it would not record compensation expense for the award as it does not currently expect the performance condition to be 'probable of being met.' It will re-evaluate and recognise the expense if it determines the award is likely to be met, including after the two-year vesting period. The new shares will also be forfeited or offset if the Delaware courts fully reinstate the 2018 stock award, ensuring there is no 'double dip,' the special committee said. Investors and analysts welcomed the news, with Tesla shares rising nearly 2 per cent in early trading. The stock has lost a quarter of its value this year, as of last close. 'Under normal circumstances, a compensation package in the billions would raise some eyebrows. (But) clearly investors have benefited from Musk's stewardship of Tesla,' said Camelthorn Investments adviser Shawn Campbell, who owns Tesla shares. 'This stock grant will bind Musk to Tesla for the next two years.' Battle for pay The Delaware ruling on Mr Musk's 2018 pay package, the largest in Corporate America, had cited flaws in the board's approval process and unfairness to investors. Mr Musk kicked off an appeal against the order in March, claiming a lower court judge made multiple legal errors in rescinding the record compensation. He has argued that the package resulted in spectacular growth for Tesla and yet was determined by the lower Court of Chancery to be unfair to shareholders, who voted twice to approve the plan. Tesla shares have risen nearly 2,000 per cent over the past decade, far outperforming the around 200 per cent rise in the benchmark S&P 500 index in the same period. 'This is simply a repackaged version of what was done years ago and was ruled improper by a judge. It renders the Delaware court decision effectively meaningless,' said Mr Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Centre for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. 'You don't have to incentivise him to stay. If he leaves, he throws away 13 per cent of the company, which is still a huge part of his net worth, said Mr Elson, who had filed amicus briefs supporting the court's decision to void Mr Musk's 2018 award. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store