Saar Renews Israel's Interest in Ties with Syria, Lebanon
'We have an interest in adding countries such as Syria and Lebanon, our neighbors, to the circle of peace and normalization, while safeguarding Israel's essential and security interests,' Saar said at a press conference in Jerusalem.
'The Golan will remain part of the State of Israel,' he added.
Israel annexed the Golan Heights in 1981 after capturing the territory from Syria during the 1967 Six-Day War.
While most of the international community regards the Golan as occupied Syrian land, US President Donald Trump recognized Israeli sovereignty over it during his first term in office.
A senior Syrian official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters on Monday that Syria would never give up the Golan Heights, describing it as an integral part of Syrian territory.
The official also said that normalization efforts with Israel must be part of the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative, and not carried out through a separate track.
The 2002 initiative proposed Arab normalization with Israel in exchange for its withdrawal from occupied territories including the Golan Heights, the West Bank, and Gaza. It also called for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem, which Israel also captured in 1967, as its capital.
Israel's Saar said it was 'not constructive' for other states to condition normalization on Palestinian statehood.
'Our view is that a Palestinian state will threaten the security of the State of Israel,' he said.
In May, Reuters reported that Israel and Syria's new rulers had established direct contact and held face-to-face meetings aimed at deescalating tensions and preventing renewed conflict along their shared border.
The same month, Trump announced the US would lift sanctions on Syria and met Syria's new president, urging him to normalize ties with Israel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Syria state media says talk of peace deal with Israel ‘premature'
DAMASCUS: Syrian state media reported Wednesday that statements on signing a peace agreement with Israel were 'premature,' days after Israel said it was interested in striking normalization agreements with Syria and neighboring Lebanon. 'Statements concerning signing a peace agreement with the Israeli occupation at this time are considered premature,' state TV reported an unidentified official source as saying. 'It is not possible to talk of the possibility of negotiations over a new agreement unless the occupation fully adheres the 1974 disengagement agreement and withdraws from the areas it has penetrated,' it added.
Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
Hamas Studies Trump's Ceasefire Proposal, Israel Signals Seriousness
The Palestinian movement, Hamas, said on Wednesday it was considering a ceasefire proposal for Gaza, which the US President, Donald Trump, described as 'final,' reported Reuters. Studying Ceasefire Proposal In a statement, Hamas said it was studying a new ceasefire proposal offered by the Egyptian and Qatari mediators. However, the Palestinian group emphasized that its aim is reaching an agreement that would guarantee an end to the war and a complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. Hamas senior official, Taher Al-Nunu, said that the group was 'ready and serious regarding reaching an agreement,' reported the Associated Press (AP). He added that Hamas was 'ready to accept any initiative that clearly leads to the complete end to the war.' Moreover, a delegation from the Palestinian group was expected to meet with Egyptian and Qatari mediators in Cairo on Wednesday to discuss the ceasefire proposal, the AP reported quoting an Egyptian official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Trump's Announcement Earlier on Wednesday, Trump said that Israel had agreed to the conditions required to finalize a 60-day ceasefire, following a 'long and productive' meeting between his representatives and Israeli officials on Gaza. 'Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War. The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring Peace, will deliver this final proposal,' Trump posted on Truth Social. He urged Hamas to accept the ceasefire deal. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE,' he added. No Hamas in Postwar Gaza On his part, the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, reiterated his call for the destruction of Hamas. After Trump's announcement, Netanyahu said: 'There will not be a Hamas. There will not be a Hamastan. We're not going back to that. It's over.' The Israeli Prime Minister is expected to arrive in Washington on Monday, where he will meet with Trump in the White House. This follows the Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer's visit to Washington on Monday, during which he was set to meet with US special envoy, Steve Witkoff, Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, and Vice President, JD Vance, to discuss the situation in Gaza. Israeli Seriousness about Ceasefire Meanwhile, the Israeli Foreign Minister, Gideon Saar, conveyed Israel's seriousness about reaching a ceasefire deal to end the Gaza war and return the hostages. Speaking at a press conference in Estonia's capital, Tallinn, Saar said: 'We are serious in our will to reach a hostage deal and a ceasefire. We said yes to special envoy Witkoff's proposals. 'There are some positive signs. I don't want to say more than that right now. But our goal is to begin proximity talks as soon as possible.' Ramping Up Pressure The Israeli Minister also called for increased international pressure on the Palestinian movement. 'But it must be clear: Hamas is not only responsible for initiating this war on October 7 (2023). It is responsible also for its continuation,' he noted. 'Pressure must be applied on Hamas. The international community must now back the American initiatives. It must shatter any illusions that Hamas may have,' Saar said. Short link : Post Views: 7
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Gulf diplomacy with Iran helped limit conflict with Israel, Middle East experts say
LONDON: Improved relations between Arab Gulf countries and Iran helped contain the recent conflict with Israel, Middle East experts said on Wednesday during a discussion about regional developments. Israel attacked Iran on June 13 with airstrikes targeting its nuclear program and military sites. Iran retaliated during the 12-day conflict by launching salvos of missiles toward Israeli cities. Many feared the war might escalate, dragging in other countries in the region, especially after the US joined the airstrikes on June 22 by dropping bombs on key Iranian nuclear sites. While Iran did retaliate against the US by attacking Al-Udeid airbase in Qatar on June 23, President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire two days later, and Iran has refrained from attacking other US targets in the region. When the war started, Gulf countries condemned Israel's attacks on Iran and called for deescalation. There has been a shift in the region in recent years away from an adversarial relationship with Iran to one of more pragmatic relations, cemented by a Chinese-brokered agreement between Riyadh and Tehran in March 2023. 'That reintegration of Iran into the Gulf security complex has played a really prominent role in preventing this from getting out of hand,' Simon Mabon, a professor of international politics and director of the SEPAD peace and conflict research center at Lancaster University, said during a discussion about developments in the Middle East this year. This approach showed Gulf states building a regional security architecture from the inside that is 'inclusive,' he added. It is viewed as a more 'pragmatic and more sustainable way of building a longer-term form of prosperity,' and the approach speaks to Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 reforms program and the economic pragmatism of Gulf states, he added during the online event organized by SEPAD and the Foreign Policy Centre in London. Eyad Alrefai, a lecturer in political science at King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah and a SEPAD fellow, said the efforts to forge new relationships between Gulf countries and Iran meant that the nations had been able to 'manage their differences diplomatically,' and this included economic issues. There had been less Iranian interference in the domestic affairs of GCC countries, and also in the wider Arab region, he added. This included Iran's decision not to get involved in Syria when President Bashar Assad, an Iranian ally, was removed from power by opposition fighters in December last year. The West's position on the Iran-Israel conflict, largely seen to be one of support of Israel, was symptomatic of the fact that those countries continue to adopt a 'tactical' outlook toward the region rather than a strategic one, Alrefai said. He urged those countries to engage with the Middle East as a socioeconomic, sustainable project moving forward. If the truce between Iran and Israel continues to hold, many see the end of the brief war as a potential opportunity for more stability in the region. Lina Khatib, an associate fellow at Chatham House's Middle East and North Africa Program, said there was 'a real possibility for an integrated economic and security and political partnership' to emerge. She said a weakened Iran also opens up the chance to restart the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had agreed to the terms of a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, where more than 57,000 Palestinians have been killed during a devastating military campaign launched by Israeli authorities in response to the Hamas-led attacks against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, during which 1,200 people were killed and dozens taken hostage. Khatib said a shift in domestic Israeli politics, with pressure from Trump, could reopen a pathway toward a long-term agreement between Israel and Palestine. This would also lead to further normalization of relations between Israel and Arab countries, she added. 'This will in turn encourage the flow of funding to places like Lebanon and Syria for reconstruction, which could only be good news for these countries economically, but also will help with stability,' Khatib said. 'Having a stable region is very much in the interest of countries in the Gulf as well.' Clive Jones, a professor of regional security and director of the Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies at Durham University, said Israel had scored a huge win against Iran but ran the risk of failing to convert it into a diplomatic opportunity. 'The challenge for Israel now is how you actually cash in those military gains for diplomatic advantage,' he said. 'I think Israel is actually missing a huge opportunity, for example by not engaging more proactively with the new regime in Syria.' He said Israel's reliance on its military superiority would not be enough to secure long-term security.
