logo
Apples and oranges get SST exemption after public complaints

Apples and oranges get SST exemption after public complaints

The Stara day ago

PUTRAJAYA: The government has decided to exempt apples and oranges from the Sales and Services Tax (SST) but Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim still feels it is better for people to eat a local banana a day instead of apples.
However, since many people, including the B40, eat imported apples and oranges, which are usually cheaper than other imported fruits, these fruits will get an exemption.
The Prime Minister said that although it was better to eat local fruits like papayas and bananas, the Cabinet decided yesterday to exempt these popular foods.
'There's really no need to eat imported foods. I noticed that avocados are even being grown in Sabah. However, after many request from the public, we decided to compromise with apples and oranges,' he told the media after launching the Kota Madani project in Precinct 19 here.
'However, there will be no exemptions for other imported fruits as we have many local fruits (to choose from).
'The (sales value) threshold will now be increased from RM500,000 to RM1mil. There will be further announcements and clarification on this,' said Anwar.
In his speech, he said there were people who complained that villagers still want apples.
'They say, 'It's a saying from the past – an apple a day keeps the doctor away.' 'That's not true. Actually, a banana a day is better – because bananas are high in potassium,' said Anwar.
On June 9, the government announced a targeted review of the SST rate, from July 1, 2025. The sales tax rate would remain the same for essential goods, while a rate of five or 10% will be imposed on non-essential or discretionary goods.
On June 19, the government stated that it will review the implementation of the revision and expansion of the SST on several selected imported goods, including fruits such as apples and mandarin oranges.
Earlier this week, the Kuala Lumpur Fruit Wholesalers' Association stated that consumers may have to pay much more for imported fruits from July 1.
Importers said they faced a double whammy with the 5% SST on fruits and 30% increase in freight charges at Port Klang.
Currently, many imported fruits are already subject to duties ranging from 5% to 30%, depending on their countries of origin and type.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can Xi, Trump, Khamenei, and Anwar get along? Yes — If the world rediscovers strategic civility — Phar Kim Beng
Can Xi, Trump, Khamenei, and Anwar get along? Yes — If the world rediscovers strategic civility — Phar Kim Beng

Malay Mail

timean hour ago

  • Malay Mail

Can Xi, Trump, Khamenei, and Anwar get along? Yes — If the world rediscovers strategic civility — Phar Kim Beng

JUNE 28 — In a world marked by sanctions, suspicion, and soundbites, the idea that Xi Jinping, Donald Trump, Ayatollah Khamenei, and Anwar Ibrahim could ever get along may seem far-fetched. But it is not impossible. The world has long misunderstood the difference between ideological differences and strategic necessity. In an era of multipolar competition and post-normal crises, the ability to disagree without destabilizing the global order is no longer a luxury—it is a prerequisite. The answer to whether these four leaders can find common ground is 'yes'—but only if the world learns to value strategic civility over ideological conformity. And only if we recognize the role of strategic convenor powers—like Malaysia under Anwar Ibrahim—in brokering spaces where dialogue, not dogma, prevails. Four leaders, four civilizational trajectories Xi Jinping leads a China determined to reclaim its historical stature through the revival of Confucian governance principles, Party supremacy, and economic statecraft. China's global posture is one of confidence—sometimes defiant, but often methodical. Donald Trump, back in office, rules through disruption. His foreign policy may seem erratic, but there is a pattern: transactionalism, spectacle, and a preference for leverage over long-term entanglements. While he loathes multilateralism, he is not instinctively drawn to war either. He wants deals—big, visible, and beneficial to domestic constituencies. Ayatollah Khamenei, presiding over a beleaguered but resilient Islamic Republic, blends revolutionary theology with geopolitical pragmatism. Despite decades of sanctions and confrontation, Tehran has always kept a channel open for diplomacy—when treated with dignity. And Anwar Ibrahim—a Muslim democrat, intellectual, and reformer—brings moral clarity without moral posturing. He is not just the Prime Minister of Malaysia; he is Asean's most articulate proponent of civilizational dialogue, advocating for coexistence between Islam, the West, and the Confucian East. His track record shows a consistent commitment to rule-based order, justice, and multilateralism anchored in ethics. When strategic interests overlap, so can leaders What connects these four leaders is not their personal affinity but their converging interests. All four, for different reasons, now operate in a world where overreach brings blowback, and where the line between strategic deterrence and economic disaster grows thinner by the day. Trump wants trade wins and less global policing. He remains open to deals that avoid new wars, especially if they burnish his legacy and strengthen U.S. industry. Xi seeks global stability to ensure China's continued rise. Tensions with the U.S. must be managed, not escalated. A rare earth agreement with Washington was recently signed—proof that economic logic can prevail over decoupling rhetoric. Khamenei, behind the veil of defiance, sees value in a stable regional order. Iran's pivot eastward, especially toward China and Asean, reflects a desire to diversify diplomacy and find breathing room from Western isolation. Anwar, more than any other, recognizes that leadership today means navigating contradictions, not escaping them. Under his stewardship, Malaysia is stepping up as a strategic convenor power—offering a rare neutral space for diplomacy between conflicting blocs. The post-normal world needs convenors, not commanders In this post-normal world—characterized by chaos, contradiction, and complexity—what is urgently missing is not hard power, but bridging power. Countries that can bring opposing sides together without being seen as biased are crucial. This is where Malaysia's role as a strategic convenor power becomes indispensable. Malaysia does not lecture. It listens. It does not impose. It hosts. Its voice resonates across the Islamic world, the Global South, and East Asia—not because it is large, but because it is trusted. The Asean Regional Forum, the East Asia Summit, and now growing Asean-GCC-China trilateral dialogues all reflect Malaysia's convening capacity. Anwar's proposal to address global problems through neutral ASEAN mediation, or to build a global moral coalition against Islamophobia and Sinophobia, are not fringe ideas—they are blueprints for how strategic convenors should behave in the 21st century. Lessons from Asean's quiet success The Asean model, for all its imperfections, thrives on strategic civility—a concept the West often mistakes for weakness. ASEAN has shown how ten countries with vastly different systems can pursue consensus, non-interference, and cooperative security without military blocs or coercion. This 'Asean way,' when applied globally, indeed, turned into Asean Will, could moderate the extremes of U.S. unilateralism, Chinese assertiveness, and Iranian resistance. But for that to happen, countries like Malaysia must be given the diplomatic space to facilitate, not just participate. Ayatollah Khamenei, presiding over a beleaguered but resilient Islamic Republic, blends revolutionary theology with geopolitical pragmatism. — AFP pic Toward a new diplomatic quadrilateral Can Xi, Trump, Khamenei, and Anwar sit at the same table—perhaps not literally, but diplomatically? If the terms are mutual respect, economic stability, and non-imposition of political systems, the answer is yes. China wants a stable periphery and global markets. The U.S. wants reduced costs and visible wins. Iran wants security guarantees and economic inclusion. Asean—led by Malaysia—wants a world where small states are not trampled by the rivalry of giants. It is not only possible, but necessary, for this emerging diplomatic quadrilateral to form. Conclusion: Replacing clash with convening The time of zero-sum diplomacy is over. No single power—American, Chinese, or Islamic—can impose its version of order without backlash. What the world needs are strategic convenor powers that can host the moral imagination of all civilizations, offering an architecture of dialogue when architecture of dominance is crumbling. Anwar, by not siding with any ideological camp, but standing for values rooted in justice and dignity, is uniquely placed to midwife this new order. Yes, Xi, Trump, Khamenei, and Anwar can get along—if the rest of us choose convening over coercion, civility over confrontation, and realism rooted in respect. * Phar Kim Beng is Professor of Asean Studies at the International Islamic University Malaysia and a former Head Teaching Fellow at Harvard University. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.

Register early for SST to avoid extra costs, tax expert tells businesses
Register early for SST to avoid extra costs, tax expert tells businesses

New Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Register early for SST to avoid extra costs, tax expert tells businesses

KUALA LUMPUR: Businesses that fall under the scope of the expanded Sales and Service Tax (SST) should register early to avoid extra costs during the transition period. Customs Department announced that businesses could voluntarily register for SST from today and be registered from July 1. The mandatory registration deadline is Aug 31. The expanded SST kicks in on Sept 1. Henesh Kannaa, executive director of TRATAX Sdn Bhd, a tax consulting firm based in Kuala Lumpur, said it would be financially beneficial for businesses to register before the Aug 31 deadline. "Due to technical reasons, some businesses are better off registering sooner than later," he said in a LinkedIn post. Citing the example of a manufacturer that exports all its finished goods, Henesh said previously, if the finished goods were exempt, this manufacturer could remain unregistered under SST but still benefit from the B4 exemption, a provision that allows for import or purchase of taxable materials without paying sales tax. However, with the inclusion of more goods under the taxable category beginning September, these businesses would now be required to register for SST, he said. Under the new rules, registered manufacturers might qualify for the C1 exemption, which similarly allows for tax-free acquisition of raw materials, he said. "But here's the catch for any imports or purchases made in July and August, it appears that the manufacturer may be ineligible for both B4 and C1 exemptions if it has not registered early. "This could lead to higher input costs during these two months solely due to the technicalities of the SST law," Henesh said. To avoid extra costs, he advised manufacturers to register for SST by June 30 so that they could get the C1 exemption from July 1. He said service providers could benefit from early registration, especially those involved in business-to-business (B2B) transactions. "Some service businesses may want to register early to avoid breaking the chain of B2B exemptions. "A careful assessment is needed to weigh the pros and cons of registering by June 30 versus waiting until the Aug 31 deadline. "The right choice really depends on each business's circumstances." Henesh said early registration is only available to businesses that are not currently SST-registered. For those already registered, the expanded scope will automatically take effect on July 1, with no option to delay compliance to September, he said.

Government reviews 13MP after thorough discussions, says Fahmi
Government reviews 13MP after thorough discussions, says Fahmi

The Sun

time5 hours ago

  • The Sun

Government reviews 13MP after thorough discussions, says Fahmi

KUALA LUMPUR: The government's decision to review the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) was not made hastily but followed detailed discussions over the past two weeks, according to Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil. He explained that the process began with a draft presented by the Economy Ministry secretary-general to the Cabinet. 'We've actually discussed this. In my press conference a few weeks ago, I mentioned that the Prime Minister (Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim) had issued a directive to review the draft presented by the Economy Ministry secretary-general,' Fahmi said during a press conference after launching the Nadi Aspirasi Nasional Bersama Anak Muda (NANBA) programme. He emphasised that all policies and decisions must first undergo Cabinet scrutiny. Last Friday, ministries were instructed to study the draft and submit feedback. A special Cabinet meeting was then held to consolidate these inputs, leading to further refinements. Fahmi, who also serves as the MADANI government spokesman, noted that the review process revealed several areas requiring adjustments, prompting the Cabinet to assign Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri Amir Hamzah to oversee the Economy Ministry's functions. The decision comes after former Economy Minister Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli questioned the review, calling it a rushed response to social media criticism. However, Fahmi reiterated that the move was procedural and aimed at ensuring the 13MP aligns with national priorities. The 13MP is set to be tabled in Parliament on July 31.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store