Metro committee moves forward on $9.4-billion budget as Olympics funding remains uncertain
During a public budget hearing on Thursday and in written comments, residents cited safety as a top priority for Metro after a spate of violence against bus operators in recent years, and regular reports of crime in and around Metro stations. The transit agency's proposal includes more than $390 million for public safety — a nearly 2% increase from the last fiscal year.
The bulk of the budget would go to transit operations, with nearly $3 billion marked for rail and bus expansion and more than $2 billion for infrastructure planning for projects, including the Vermont Transit Corridor bus lane project and Sepulveda Corridor rail project, and construction for projects that include the D Line extension to the Westside.
But future funding remains uncertain amid questions over how tariffs and inflation will affect the economy, as well as state and federal investments.
'As we look ahead to major events like the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympics, we know we'll have to make some tough decisions. But we'll always use our core values to guide us,' Metro finance, budget and audit committee chair Tim Sandoval said Thursday.
The budget will be presented to the full Metro board next week.
The agency is facing 'a deficit of $2.3 billion through 2030,' Metro CEO Stephanie Wiggins warned state leaders earlier this year. In a March letter to Senate Pro Tempore Mike McGuire (D-North Coast), Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas (D-Hollister), state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and state Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel (D-Encino), Wiggins said that while the transit agency is at 90% of pre-pandemic ridership numbers after a dip and has exceeded 2019 passenger numbers on Sundays, Metro still faces significant financial challenges. She advocated for the state to include a $2-billion request in its budget for transit operations equitably distributed among state agencies.
Gov. Gavin Newsom's budget revision on Wednesday did not include the request, ignoring transit and safe streets activists who have warned that the absence of those funds could cause service cuts for a number of public transit agencies throughout the state, including Metrolink.
'Public transportation is vital for jobs, for the health of our economy, and our goal is to ensure that everybody is able to get to where they need to go — from work to school to play — and we believe that the state has to play a role in ensuring that,' said Eli Lipmen of Move LA. 'The operations and maintenance of our system are also critical because the No. 1 issue for transit riders is reliability.'
Lipmen's organization was one of several that hung banners from freeway overpasses throughout the state this week calling on Newsom to 'fund transit.'
The state recently sued the Trump administration over its policy to deny billions of dollars in transportation grants if California didn't follow the federal government's plan for immigration enforcement. Lipmen supported the action but said the suit would affect only capital programs and that the state still needs to increase funds for transit operations.
The state budget proposal, which is still subject to change, did make a significant revision from January by pulling $17.6 million from the state's highway fund toward Olympics and Paralympics planning. The funding singled out Metro's Games Route Network, which would designate a series of roads for travel by athletes, media, officials, the International Olympics Committee, spectators and workers.
Critical parts of Metro's Olympics plans are yet to be nailed down. The agency has yet to confirm $2 billion in funds to lease nearly 3,000 buses, which are integral to Los Angeles' transit-first goal for the Games. The financial crisis affecting the city of Los Angeles, which has a separate budget from Metro, could also jeopardize plans ahead of 2028 as several transit and infrastructure agencies face cutbacks and layoffs.
The top leader for the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, for example, warned that cuts would affect support for major rail and bus lane projects ahead of the 2028 Olympics, in addition to parking enforcement, traffic signal updates and goals to improve traffic safety. Streets LA and the Bureau for Engineering — departments responsible for street and bridge repairs — are also facing significant cuts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
Groups express 'deep concern' about 2026 World Cup in US due to Trump's policies
More than 80 civil rights and labor groups sent a letter to FIFA on July 1 expressing "deep concern" over the U.S. government's immigration policies ahead of the 2026 World Cup in men's soccer. In the letter, which was first reported by The Athletic, the groups cited President Donald Trump's executive order banning visitors from 12 countries as well as the ongoing raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in communities across the country, some of which are slated to host World Cup matches next summer. They called on FIFA to "use its influence to encourage the U.S. government to guarantee the fundamental rights of the millions of foreign visitors and fans." "If FIFA continues to stay silent, not only will millions be placed at risk, but the FIFA brand will also be used as a public relations tool to whitewash the reputation of an increasingly authoritarian government," the civil rights and labor groups wrote. Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the American Civil Liberties Union and the NAACP were among the most prominent national organizations to sign the letter, which was also endorsed by eight fan clubs of soccer teams. The United States is currently hosting the FIFA Club World Cup for men's soccer. FIFA did not immediately reply to an e-mail seeking comment on the letter. The organization and its president, Gianni Infantino, have repeatedly said foreign spectators and teams will have no issues entering the country next summer. "The world is welcome in America," Infantino told reporters on May 15. "Of course, the players, of course, everyone involved, all of us, but definitely also all the fans." The Trump administration has echoed that sentiment, albeit with the caveat that fans will not be allowed to overstay their visas or otherwise remain in the country following the tournament. "I know we'll have visitors probably from close to 100 countries," Vice President J.D. Vance said in May. "We want them to come, we want them to celebrate, we want them to watch the game(s). But when the time is up, they'll have to go home, otherwise they will have to talk to (U.S. Homeland Security) Secretary (Kristi) Noem." FIFA also faced questions and criticism from human rights advocacy organizations ahead of the last men's World Cup, in Qatar. The 2026 edition of the event, which will be co-hosted by Canada and Mexico, begins June 11. Contact Tom Schad at tschad@ or on social media @
USA Today
11 hours ago
- USA Today
New Jersey's Phil Murphy: Club World Cup is 'huge success.' World Cup will transform sport
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy believes the FIFA Club World Cup will be remembered as a 'huge success' and will only set the stage for a memorable World Cup in 2026. MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, has hosted five Club World Cup group-stage matches, which averaged about 35,000-40,000 fans with 'incredible energy,' Murphy said. The venue will host a quarterfinal on July 5, semifinal matches on July 8 and 9, and the Club World Cup final on July 13. Next year's FIFA World Cup final will also be played at MetLife Stadium on July 19, 2026 – which Murphy believes will be epic. 'It will be the most watched event in human history,' Murphy told USA TODAY Sports in an interview on July 1. NJ governor thrilled about huge World Cup role Murphy is a big soccer fan. He played as a child – 'not well,' he adds. He was on the board of the U.S. Soccer Federation, and he's a founding owner of Gotham FC in the National Women's Soccer League. He played a crucial role in helping the New York/New Jersey effort in landing Club World Cup and World Cup matches at MetLife Stadium. 'We're huge soccer fans and we love the sport – the beautiful game – and we're thrilled to be playing a meaningful role both this year and next year,' Murphy said. Murphy credited FIFA president Gianni Infantino, MetLife Stadium operators, and the owners of the Jets (Woody Johnson) and Giants (The Mara and Tisch families) for being 'extraordinary supporters' during the Club World Cup. He was tuned into the June 30 match in Orlando, which saw Saudi Arabian club Al-Hilal eliminate English Premier League standouts Manchester City 4-3 in the Round of 16, noting 'the level of soccer and the passion.' 'Anytime you do something for the first time, you're on a learning curve. But I think it's been a terrific idea,' Murphy said of the first Club World Cup to feature 32 teams and hosted in the U.S. this summer. 'I think this is going to be looked at as a huge success.' Murphy has attended the five Club World Cup matches already played at MetLife Stadium and praised the fans from the six different clubs that have played in the venue. The noise made by Brazilian clubs Palmeiras and Fluminense, Egyptian side Al Ahly, Portuguese club Porto, German standouts Borussia Dortmund and South Korean club Ulsan HD FC even eclipsed the noise made by fans attending NFL games featuring the New York Giants and Jets, Murphy said. 'We regularly attend Giants or Jets football games there with 70,000 to 80,000, and the decibel levels from about half that amount (of people) were about 10 times (more). And I'm literally not kidding – 10 times, what they are at a normal game there,' Murphy said with a laugh. 'They were great matches with lots of great spirit.' 'Just incredible passion,' he added. 'And when they're traveling into the region, there's a big economic boom to the region, and most notably, to New Jersey. It's part of the driving reason we wanted to host as many matches as we are. This is a really good few weeks for Jersey and for the region.' Club World Cup success and next summer's World Cup Murphy says he measures successful events at MetLife Stadium in three dimensions: Was it safe? Was your transportation to and from a good experience? And how was the fan experience inside the stadium? 'All three metrics feel really good,' Murphy said. 'The boxes that we care most about, we've been able to check across the board. And I'm confident we'll continue to do so for the balance of this tournament, and obviously, most importantly, for the World Cup next year.' MetLife Stadium will host eight World Cup matches next summer: five in the Group Stage, one in the Round of 32, one in the Round of 16, and the Final. Along with his excitement for next year's event, Murphy believes the Club World Cup and World Cup will play crucial roles for the future of soccer fandom in the United States. Murphy believes both tournaments will leave their own legacies behind, similar to how the 1994 World Cup birthed Major League Soccer's inception in 1996 and increased awareness of the sport over the last 30 years. 'You're going to see a similar quantum leap in the popularity and participation of soccer in America, and certainly in our region,' Murphy said. 'This will take us to another level heretofore not seen. It's what comes, what it leads to, that I think, is as if not more important than the actual event itself.'
New York Times
11 hours ago
- New York Times
U.S. Senate passes policy bill with $625M security funding for 2026 World Cup, awaiting House vote
The 11 U.S. host city committees for next year's FIFA men's World Cup are one step closer to receiving their requested $625 million in funding for security costs at the tournament, after the U.S. Senate passed an amended version of President Donald Trump's domestic policy bill on Tuesday. The bill now heads to a vote in the House of Representatives this week, and then, if passed, to President Trump's desk for a signature. Advertisement The version of the bill passed by the Senate also included an additional $500 million made available for 'state and local capabilities to detect, identify, track or monitor threats from unmanned aircraft systems (otherwise known as drones),' which has also become a key security concern for World Cup stadiums and fan festivals. The bill also includes $1 billion set aside for security, planning and other costs related to the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles. The host cities, as per their contract with FIFA, are expected to carry much of the security costs for the tournament, both at stadiums and in surrounding areas. Many have already dipped into the pockets of city and state taxpayers and funds and sought private support and donations, in addition to the formal request for $625 million to share the burden of security costs for next summer's tournament. The cities hope to get billions in economic impact from the millions of visitors who they want to arrive in the U.S. during the month-long competition. The World Cup funding is just one line of a mega-bill that includes sweeping reforms to domestic policy. The reconciliation bill passed Tuesday has been fiercely contested in the Senate and required a tie-breaking 51-50 vote by Vice President JD Vance. The bill now heads to the House of Representatives, with the aim for it to be at President Trump's desk by July 4, although this timescale depends on House Republicans having adequate support. If passed, the funding would represent a considerable success for U.S. Soccer, which has supported the host cities in their lobbying, as well as for FIFA, whose president, Gianni Infantino, appears to have developed a close relationship with President Trump. Infantino attended a pre-inauguration rally for Trump and the inauguration itself. Infantino has since attended several events at the White House, including one for the establishment of the FIFA World Cup White House Task Force, chaired by President Trump. The U.S. will co-host the World Cup with Canada and Mexico, but American cities will host 75 percent of the 48-team tournament, including all games from the quarter-final stage of the competition onwards. The Athletic reported in March how the U.S. cities had engaged D.C. lobbyists to convince the Trump administration to commit federal cash to a tournament they argued was a national and international event, despite being hosted in local cities. According to filings registered at the U.S. Senate Lobby Disclosure website, the host committees jointly spent six-figure numbers to enlist Hogan Lovells US LLP as part of their persuasion attempts. Advertisement Unlike other parts of the policy bill, the host cities' request has received bipartisan support. On November 26, 2024, Democrat Congressman Josh Gottheimer and Republican Congressman Darin LaHood sent a joint letter to the leaders of the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, asking for the funding to go into end-of-year packages. The letter described the 2026 tournament as 'the largest sporting event in history' and therefore 'a reasonable and necessary investment in our national security, particularly in light of the evolving global threat landscape and the growing risks associated with large public gatherings.' It said the requested funding would support 'critical infrastructure enhancements, cybersecurity measures, and the necessary training for local and state law enforcement.' A further letter was sent to the House Appropriations Committee on December 6, 2024, this time signed by 48 members of Congress, urging support for Fiscal Year 2025 funding for the World Cup. The letter claimed that the 'scale and geographic scope' of the tournament means the security risks are unprecedented, saying that the multi-billion viewing figures projected for the tournament render it a 'uniquely attractive target for malicious actors.' The letter also said that intelligence from the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center 'confirms an increase in threats targeting stadiums and public events.' Previous attempts to secure the funding had been unsuccessful. In March, a 'continuing resolution,' drafted by House Republicans, was passed through the Senate to fund the U.S. government through the rest of the fiscal year until October, but did not include the funding. Now, however, the cities have moved one step closer to securing the federal funding. (Main image:)
